Categories
- Global News Feed
- Uncategorized
- Alabama Stem Cells
- Alaska Stem Cells
- Arkansas Stem Cells
- Arizona Stem Cells
- California Stem Cells
- Colorado Stem Cells
- Connecticut Stem Cells
- Delaware Stem Cells
- Florida Stem Cells
- Georgia Stem Cells
- Hawaii Stem Cells
- Idaho Stem Cells
- Illinois Stem Cells
- Indiana Stem Cells
- Iowa Stem Cells
- Kansas Stem Cells
- Kentucky Stem Cells
- Louisiana Stem Cells
- Maine Stem Cells
- Maryland Stem Cells
- Massachusetts Stem Cells
- Michigan Stem Cells
- Minnesota Stem Cells
- Mississippi Stem Cells
- Missouri Stem Cells
- Montana Stem Cells
- Nebraska Stem Cells
- New Hampshire Stem Cells
- New Jersey Stem Cells
- New Mexico Stem Cells
- New York Stem Cells
- Nevada Stem Cells
- North Carolina Stem Cells
- North Dakota Stem Cells
- Oklahoma Stem Cells
- Ohio Stem Cells
- Oregon Stem Cells
- Pennsylvania Stem Cells
- Rhode Island Stem Cells
- South Carolina Stem Cells
- South Dakota Stem Cells
- Tennessee Stem Cells
- Texas Stem Cells
- Utah Stem Cells
- Vermont Stem Cells
- Virginia Stem Cells
- Washington Stem Cells
- West Virginia Stem Cells
- Wisconsin Stem Cells
- Wyoming Stem Cells
- Biotechnology
- Cell Medicine
- Cell Therapy
- Diabetes
- Epigenetics
- Gene therapy
- Genetics
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetic medicine
- HCG Diet
- Hormone Replacement Therapy
- Human Genetics
- Integrative Medicine
- Molecular Genetics
- Molecular Medicine
- Nano medicine
- Preventative Medicine
- Regenerative Medicine
- Stem Cells
- Stell Cell Genetics
- Stem Cell Research
- Stem Cell Treatments
- Stem Cell Therapy
- Stem Cell Videos
- Testosterone Replacement Therapy
- Testosterone Shots
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
Archives
Recommended Sites
Category Archives: Stem Cell Therapy
StemCells, Inc., Discloses How it Will Generate $40 Million in Matching Funds
Posted: September 16, 2012 at 3:55 pm
StemCells, Inc., said yesterday that it
will come up with the $40 million needed to match loans from the California
stem cell agency through “existing infrastructure and overhead”
and will not be issuing stocks or warrants to the agency.
In a statement to shareholders, Martin
McGlynn, CEO of the publicly traded firm, discussed the $40 million in loans awarded by agency this summer, including $20 million last
week. The stem cell agency's governing board, after it emerged from
an executive session on the matter, last Wednesday night adopted a
motion requiring the company to demonstrate that it has the matching
funds.
McGlynn, CEO of the publicly traded firm, discussed the $40 million in loans awarded by agency this summer, including $20 million last
week. The stem cell agency's governing board, after it emerged from
an executive session on the matter, last Wednesday night adopted a
motion requiring the company to demonstrate that it has the matching
funds.
CIRM Chairman J.T. Thomas, a Los Angeles bond financier, said that
concerns were expressed during the executive session that the agency
“would account for such a large part of the assets of the company.”
At his suggestion, the board approved the loan on the condition that
“it show it has access” to the $20 million in matching funds that
company offered during the application process. StemCells, Inc., also
offered a $20 million match on another loan approved in July by CIRM.
concerns were expressed during the executive session that the agency
“would account for such a large part of the assets of the company.”
At his suggestion, the board approved the loan on the condition that
“it show it has access” to the $20 million in matching funds that
company offered during the application process. StemCells, Inc., also
offered a $20 million match on another loan approved in July by CIRM.
The latest financial reports from
StemCells, Inc., which is based in Newark, Ca., show that it had
assets of $17 million as of June 30 and liabilities of $11.6 million.
The company reported net income for the second quarter of $833,522
compared to a loss of $4 million for the same period a year ago.
StemCells, Inc., which is based in Newark, Ca., show that it had
assets of $17 million as of June 30 and liabilities of $11.6 million.
The company reported net income for the second quarter of $833,522
compared to a loss of $4 million for the same period a year ago.
In its filing with the SEC, the company
said,
said,
“We have incurred significant
operating losses since inception. We expect to incur additional
operating losses over the foreseeable future. We have very limited
liquidity and capital resources and must obtain significant
additional capital and other resources in order to provide funding
for our product development efforts....”
In his statement yesterday, McGlynn
said the California stem cell agency had “doubled down” on
StemCells, Inc., in approving the two loans. He said the company is
not concerned about meeting the matching requirements. McGlynn said,
said the California stem cell agency had “doubled down” on
StemCells, Inc., in approving the two loans. He said the company is
not concerned about meeting the matching requirements. McGlynn said,
Martin McGlynn StemCells, Inc., Photo |
“To be clear, we do not interpret the
diligence requirement as an obligation to raise a specific amount of
money in a particular period of time, and we wish to correct the
misstatements made by some uninformed third parties that the ICOC is
requiring us to raise $20 million in matching funds. In
point of fact, we expect that a substantial amount of our
contribution towards these projects will come from existing
infrastructure and overhead, salaries for our existing personnel, and
other contributions in kind. Furthermore, we will soon be
reviewing the budgets for both projects in detail with CIRM
staff. Because each disease team budget was prepared on a
stand-alone basis, we expect to see significant economies and
efficiencies now that the company has in fact been awarded funding
for both.”
McGlynn also said,
"Under this particular CIRM
program (RFA 10-05), funding for companies will be in the form of
unsecured, non-recourse, interest-bearing, term loans, which will be
forgivable in the event the funded research fails to result in a
commercialized product. On the other hand, should the product be
successfully commercialized, CIRM would earn milestone payments
depending on how successful the product becomes. Because CIRM
shares the downside risk, and could participate handsomely on the
upside, the structure makes the loan about as close to 'equity' as one could, without having to dilute existing shareholders in order
to gain access to significant amounts of capital. The company
will not issue stock, warrants or other equity to CIRM in connection
with these awards.
"Of course, we realize that CIRM
prefers that applicants from industry provide evidence of their
ability to secure whatever additional funds may be needed to complete
any CIRM-funded project, in this case the filing of an IND for each
indication. This is stated in the text of RFA 10-05 itself and
was repeated in various comments by CIRM staff during the application
process. When making the second award on September 5, the
ICOC naturally recognized the sizeable commitment it was making
to StemCells, so it instructed CIRM staff to satisfy themselves
of the company's ability to access the capital needed to fund the
project, namely the Alzheimer's program through to the filing of the
IND.”
McGlynn also said firm's bid for
another $10 million from CIRM could come in the form of a grant
instead of a loan. He said,
another $10 million from CIRM could come in the form of a grant
instead of a loan. He said,
"Finally, I can confirm that in
June of this year the Company applied for up to $10
million under CIRM's Strategic Partnership I program
(RFA 12-05). Unlike the disease team awards under RFA
10-05, if companies are approved for funding under RFA 12-05, they
may elect to take such funding in the form of a grant, not a
loan. Our application under RFA 12-05 is for a controlled Phase
II clinical trial of HuCNS-SC cells in Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease
(PMD), a rare myelination disorder. StemCells completed a Phase
I study in PMD in February 2012 and in April announced that
all of the patients from that study showed evidence of cell-derived
myelination and three of the four patients in the study showed
measurable gains in motor and/or cognitive function.”
According to CIRM, the awards in the strategic partner round will be approved either next month or in December.
StemCells, Inc. stock was trading at
$1.85 at the time of this writing. Last week, it rose to $2.43.
During the last 12 months, its high was $2.67 and its low was 59
cents.
$1.85 at the time of this writing. Last week, it rose to $2.43.
During the last 12 months, its high was $2.67 and its low was 59
cents.
Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy
Comments Off on StemCells, Inc., Discloses How it Will Generate $40 Million in Matching Funds
California Stem Cell Firsts: From Emotional Appeals to $40 Million Awards
Posted: September 16, 2012 at 3:55 pm
During the last few months, the $3 billion California stem cell
agency, which is approaching its eight-year anniversary, has chalked up a
number of important firsts.
Most of them came during the July and
September meetings of its 29-member governing board and were related to strenuous efforts by researchers to win approval of awards of up to
$20 million each. Several firsts involved the agency's former
chairman, Robert Klein, who could be considered the father of the
state's stem cell research effort.
September meetings of its 29-member governing board and were related to strenuous efforts by researchers to win approval of awards of up to
$20 million each. Several firsts involved the agency's former
chairman, Robert Klein, who could be considered the father of the
state's stem cell research effort.
So here is the California Stem Cell
Report's list of firsts at the California Institute of Regenerative
Medicine (as CIRM, the stem cell agency, is formally known) for the
summer of 2012.
Report's list of firsts at the California Institute of Regenerative
Medicine (as CIRM, the stem cell agency, is formally known) for the
summer of 2012.
It was the first time that a single
company – in this case, StemCells, Inc. , of Newark, Ca. –
received two awards in the same round.
company – in this case, StemCells, Inc. , of Newark, Ca. –
received two awards in the same round.
It was the first time any company has
been awarded as much as $40 million. Again, StemCells, Inc.
been awarded as much as $40 million. Again, StemCells, Inc.
It was the first time that Klein has lobbied his former board (see here and here) on
behalf of a particular grant application. That occurred in both July
and September with one of StemCells, Inc.'s application.
behalf of a particular grant application. That occurred in both July
and September with one of StemCells, Inc.'s application.
It was the first time that the board
has approved an application that has been rejected twice by
reviewers, again the StemCells, Inc., proposal backed by Klein.
has approved an application that has been rejected twice by
reviewers, again the StemCells, Inc., proposal backed by Klein.
It was the first time that board has
received such a large outpouring of appeals by rejected applicants.
received such a large outpouring of appeals by rejected applicants.
It was the first time that the board
has received such lengthy presentations of emotional appeals by
patient advocates on behalf of rejected applicants.
has received such lengthy presentations of emotional appeals by
patient advocates on behalf of rejected applicants.
It was the first time that action on a
grant round has been extended over three months(see here and here). The disease team
round began in July. Action will not be completed until the end of
October.
grant round has been extended over three months(see here and here). The disease team
round began in July. Action will not be completed until the end of
October.
It was the first time that the
governing board has sent so many applications back for re-review –
five, six if the one to be acted on in October is included.
governing board has sent so many applications back for re-review –
five, six if the one to be acted on in October is included.
It was also the first time that the
board has ordered a full-blown review of its grant appeal process
with an eye to making making major changes in it.
board has ordered a full-blown review of its grant appeal process
with an eye to making making major changes in it.
Several reasons exist for the number of
firsts racked up by CIRM. One is the high stakes involved in the
disease team round that began in July and the low number approved by reviewers – six compared to the 12 approved by the board, as of
today, out of 21 applications. Another reason involves the
increasing understanding on the part of many scientists that they can
appeal directly to the board when reviewers reject their
applications. However, it is also clear that not all applicants
grasp the full range of appeal possibilities. A third reason involves
the agency's muddled appeal process, which has been a problem for
years. And a fourth reason involves the board's push to drive research into
the clinic and commercialization, which applicants are quickly
learning how to exploit.
firsts racked up by CIRM. One is the high stakes involved in the
disease team round that began in July and the low number approved by reviewers – six compared to the 12 approved by the board, as of
today, out of 21 applications. Another reason involves the
increasing understanding on the part of many scientists that they can
appeal directly to the board when reviewers reject their
applications. However, it is also clear that not all applicants
grasp the full range of appeal possibilities. A third reason involves
the agency's muddled appeal process, which has been a problem for
years. And a fourth reason involves the board's push to drive research into
the clinic and commercialization, which applicants are quickly
learning how to exploit.
Readers should feel free to add their
own firsts to this list. They can do so – even, anonymously – by
clicking on the word “comments” at the end of this item.
own firsts to this list. They can do so – even, anonymously – by
clicking on the word “comments” at the end of this item.
Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy
Comments Off on California Stem Cell Firsts: From Emotional Appeals to $40 Million Awards
StemCells, Inc., Gunning for Another $10 Million from California Stem Cell Agency
Posted: September 9, 2012 at 3:58 pm
Fresh from winning $40 million from the
California stem cell agency, StemCells, Inc., is shooting for
another, $10 million award from the state research effort.
The latest proposal comes as the
publicly traded firm also faces the task of raising $40 million that it
has promised the agency to match the earlier awards. That figure
could well rise to $50 million given the new application.
publicly traded firm also faces the task of raising $40 million that it
has promised the agency to match the earlier awards. That figure
could well rise to $50 million given the new application.
Martin McGlynn, CEO of the
well-connected Newark, Ca., firm, disclosed StemCells, Inc.'s,
latest proposal in an article by Catherine Shaffer in BioWorld. She
wrote,
well-connected Newark, Ca., firm, disclosed StemCells, Inc.'s,
latest proposal in an article by Catherine Shaffer in BioWorld. She
wrote,
“Already looking ahead, StemCells has
set its sights on one more CIRM initiative designed to fund early
stage clinical trials over a four-year period. StemCells has applied
for that grant, worth up to $10 million, to fund a Phase II trial in
PMD(Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease).”
The article did not disclose the timing on the new application.
StemCells, Inc.'s lobbying efforts with the stem cell agency were vigorously aided by the former chairman of the $3 billion
California stem cell agency, Robert Klein (see here and here). And Wednesday evening, the company convinced
the state agency's board to overturn two successive reviewer rejections of a
$20 million proposal for Alzheimer's research. The vote was 7-5.
California stem cell agency, Robert Klein (see here and here). And Wednesday evening, the company convinced
the state agency's board to overturn two successive reviewer rejections of a
$20 million proposal for Alzheimer's research. The vote was 7-5.
Klein's efforts came in a record-breaking round of appeals and emotional presentations by patient advocates, which triggered complaints from the board this week about "arm-twisting" and politicking.
StemCells, Inc., was founded by the
eminent Stanford stem cell researcher Irv Weissman, who helped to
raise millions for the ballot initiative that created the stem cell
agency. He additionally appeared in in the campaign's TV advertising.
The campaign was headed by Klein, who ultimately raised $35 million
to convince voters to create the agency. Weissman is currently on the board
of the StemCells, Inc. His wife is executive vice president.
eminent Stanford stem cell researcher Irv Weissman, who helped to
raise millions for the ballot initiative that created the stem cell
agency. He additionally appeared in in the campaign's TV advertising.
The campaign was headed by Klein, who ultimately raised $35 million
to convince voters to create the agency. Weissman is currently on the board
of the StemCells, Inc. His wife is executive vice president.
In July, the stem cell agency board
approved the first $20 million award to the firm for research involving spinal injury.
approved the first $20 million award to the firm for research involving spinal injury.
McGlynn told BioWorld,
"We're the only company that has
programs going on in all three regions of the central nervous system:
the brain, the spinal cord and the eye."
Not discussed in the BioWorld article
was a requirement, imposed by the CIRM board, that StemCells, Inc.,
show it can deliver $20 million in matching funds on the Alzheimer's
award before receiving any state funds. CIRM said no such board
requirement existed on the spinal award, but the firm has promised to
match the $20 million on that award as well.
was a requirement, imposed by the CIRM board, that StemCells, Inc.,
show it can deliver $20 million in matching funds on the Alzheimer's
award before receiving any state funds. CIRM said no such board
requirement existed on the spinal award, but the firm has promised to
match the $20 million on that award as well.
BioWorld described the awards as
grants. In fact, they are loans. But under the terms of the loans, if
the research is not successfully commercialized, it will be
forgiven.
grants. In fact, they are loans. But under the terms of the loans, if
the research is not successfully commercialized, it will be
forgiven.
Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy
Comments Off on StemCells, Inc., Gunning for Another $10 Million from California Stem Cell Agency
Arm-twisting and Emotion: Stem Cell Directors Move to Reform Appeals on Multimillon Dollar Grants
Posted: September 9, 2012 at 3:58 pm
Frustrated with politicking,
“arm-twisting,” lobbying and “emotionally charged
presentations,” the governing board of the $3 billion California
stem cell agency today approved short-term changes in its grant
appeal process and ordered up a study to prepare long-term reforms.
The moves followed a prolonged series of appeals on grant applications that began in July and continued through today,
setting records for the number of appeals and generating hours of
sometimes tearful and emotion-laden presentations from members of the
public.
setting records for the number of appeals and generating hours of
sometimes tearful and emotion-laden presentations from members of the
public.
The board adopted changes in the appeal process for its next few meetings that are aimed at curbing its
free-wheeling nature and making it more understandable to the public
and applicants. The board also directed creation of a panel to make
recommendations by the end of the year for more wide-ranging reforms.
free-wheeling nature and making it more understandable to the public
and applicants. The board also directed creation of a panel to make
recommendations by the end of the year for more wide-ranging reforms.
Directors of the agency were clearly
not happy with the appeal process this summer. However, it has been a
problem since 2008 when Bert Lubin, now a director of the stem cell
agency and CEO of Childrens Hospital of Oakland, Ca., was the first applicant to make a public pitch before the board to overturn
reviewer rejection of his application.
not happy with the appeal process this summer. However, it has been a
problem since 2008 when Bert Lubin, now a director of the stem cell
agency and CEO of Childrens Hospital of Oakland, Ca., was the first applicant to make a public pitch before the board to overturn
reviewer rejection of his application.
One director, UCLA medical school dean,
Gerald Levey, said at the time,
Gerald Levey, said at the time,
"I don't think we can run a board
this way. If we do, it would be chaos."
Today, CIRM Director Carmen Puliafito,
dean of the USC School of Medicine, said that “lots of lobbying”
was going over the last couple of months. He predicted there will
more lobbying and “more politicking.” Puliafito said,
dean of the USC School of Medicine, said that “lots of lobbying”
was going over the last couple of months. He predicted there will
more lobbying and “more politicking.” Puliafito said,
“On big money grants, people will be
calling their friends.”
The name of former board chairman,
Robert Klein, was not mentioned during this afternoon's discussion.
But Klein vigorously and successfully backed an appeal (see here,
here and here) by StemCells, Inc., of Newark, Ca., for a $20 million
application that had been rejected twice by reviewers. Last night the
board approved the award on a 7-5 vote. It was the first time the
board has approved an award that was rejected twice by its reviewers.
Robert Klein, was not mentioned during this afternoon's discussion.
But Klein vigorously and successfully backed an appeal (see here,
here and here) by StemCells, Inc., of Newark, Ca., for a $20 million
application that had been rejected twice by reviewers. Last night the
board approved the award on a 7-5 vote. It was the first time the
board has approved an award that was rejected twice by its reviewers.
Director Jeff Sheehy, co-vice chairman
of the review group and a communications manager at UC San Francisco,
said the agency is dealing with “big money grants” that are
“incredibly complex.” He also referred to “certain arm-twisting
by certain individuals.”
of the review group and a communications manager at UC San Francisco,
said the agency is dealing with “big money grants” that are
“incredibly complex.” He also referred to “certain arm-twisting
by certain individuals.”
Several board members made references
to appearances by persons who have diseases or conditions that might
be affected by CIRM-financed research. Director Duane Roth, head of
CONNECT, a San Diego business development organization, said the
board is making decisions in “an emotionally charged setting.”
to appearances by persons who have diseases or conditions that might
be affected by CIRM-financed research. Director Duane Roth, head of
CONNECT, a San Diego business development organization, said the
board is making decisions in “an emotionally charged setting.”
Other issues cited by directors include
the integrity of review process, fairness, consistency, shifting
appeals procedures, transparency and board discipline on appeals.
the integrity of review process, fairness, consistency, shifting
appeals procedures, transparency and board discipline on appeals.
James Harrison, outside counsel to the board, said the board's action today includes "eliminating the reference to unpublished data in the discussion of 'material new information," imposing a 3-page limit on other correspondence, explaining that applicants should have seven business days from the time the (grants review group) recommendation is made available to them to file an (extraordinary petition), and posting all of the information regarding these policies in one place on CIRM’s website."
For a list of articles and CIRM
documents dealing with the appeal process, see here.
documents dealing with the appeal process, see here.
Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy
Comments Off on Arm-twisting and Emotion: Stem Cell Directors Move to Reform Appeals on Multimillon Dollar Grants
Florida Researcher Wins $6.7 Million Grant to Come to Golden State
Posted: September 9, 2012 at 3:58 pm
Dennis Steindler UF Photo |
The governing board of the California stem cell agency this morning approved a $6.7 million grant to recruit Dennis Steindler of the University of Florida to the Parkinson's Institute in Sunnyvale, Ca.
The grant was approved immediately following a 45-minute executive session with no further debate. (For more on this, see here, here and here.)
Steindler later told the California Stem Cell Report he would begin work in California as soon as possible.
Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy
Comments Off on Florida Researcher Wins $6.7 Million Grant to Come to Golden State
California Stem Cell Agency Okays $38 Million for Basic Research
Posted: September 9, 2012 at 3:58 pm
Directors of the California stem cell agency today approved about $38 million for research into basic biology, including two appeals by researchers on applications initially rejected by reviewers.
The governing board turned down five appeals in the round, which attracted 357 applications in its "pre-app" process, 64 of which were invited to apply. Reviewers approved 25 applications.
The following appeals in the biology round were approved:
- $1.3 million, Deborah Lieu of UC Davis. (Review summary here, appeal here.) 764
- $1.4 million, Yanhong Shi of the City of Hope. (See review summary here and appeal here.)
The board also approved another application that was rejected by reviewers based on a recommendation by CIRM President Alan Trounson. It is very unusual for the board to approve rejected applications based on staff recommendations following a review. Trounson described the grant addressed a major bottleneck in stem cell science.
The California stem cell agency is expected to post a press release shortly with the names of all recipients. The agency usually withholds names of applicants until the the board formally acts.
(An earlier version of this item reported that the board approved $37 million in grants.)
Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy
Comments Off on California Stem Cell Agency Okays $38 Million for Basic Research
Board Concludes Private Session on Recruitment Grant
Posted: September 9, 2012 at 3:58 pm
The governing board of the California stem cell agency has just concluded a 45 minute executive session on a $6.7 million grant to recruit a Florida scientist to the Parkinson's Institute in Sunnyvale, Ca.
It was the longest executive session ever on a recruitment grant, which are usually approved routinely with little serious discussion.
The board is now resuming discussion of the matter(see here and here.)
Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy
Comments Off on Board Concludes Private Session on Recruitment Grant
Dennis Steindler Application: Excerpt from Review Summary
Posted: September 9, 2012 at 3:58 pm
The CIRM summary of the review on the
$6.7 million grant to recruit Florida scientist Dennis Steindler to
the Parkinson's Institute in California carried a strong minority report. However, the review itself drew fire this morning from some CIRM board members.
$6.7 million grant to recruit Florida scientist Dennis Steindler to
the Parkinson's Institute in California carried a strong minority report. However, the review itself drew fire this morning from some CIRM board members.
They included patient advocate Jeff Sheehy, co-vice chair of the grant review group, who supported approval of the grant. He noted that the low score reflected two extreme opinions. He said some of the reviewers were doing their research on the Parkinson's Institute on the Internet during the actual review. Sheehy said that was not a "good way" to perform a review and reflected a "major short-coming."
Here is an excerpt from the review.
"In summary, this is an
application from an established leader in NSC biology to pursue
research focused on disease mechanisms in PD. Strengths of the
proposal include the quality of the PI, the focus of the project on
an interesting hypothesis, and the leadership in basic science that
the candidate would bring to the applicant institution. Weaknesses
included deficiencies in the research plan, the limited track-record
of the PI in PD research and an institutional environment lacking
adequate support for basic science investigations."
The summary continued,
"During programmatic discussion some GWG (grant review group) members cited a need to broaden stem cell leadership not only at the
large universities but also at the smaller institutions as well. They
felt that the candidate's recruitment would strengthen the applicant
institution and provide leadership and strength in basic research.
The need for increased research focused on Parkinson's Disease was
also cited by some reviewers. A motion to recommend the application
for funding carried with a majority vote. Because more than 35% of
GWG members opposed the motion, opponents have exercised their right
to have that position reported to the ICOC. The consensus statement
from this group is as follows: 'Despite the facts that the
applicant has many excellent attributes, that Parkinson's disease is
a key area of interest, and that the applicant institution may
deserve additional consideration, our opinion is that the application
clearly falls short in several critical scientific areas that
outweigh the programmatic concerns and do not justify a
recommendation for funding. We believe that the people of California
depend upon us to make recommendations based on our scientific
expertise, for outcomes that are most likely to impact medicine and
the health and treatment of their citizens. We believe that their
money can be better spent.'"
Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy
Comments Off on Dennis Steindler Application: Excerpt from Review Summary
CIRM Board Eyes Florida Researcher for $6.7 Million Grant
Posted: September 9, 2012 at 3:58 pm
The board of the California stem cell agency is discussing a proposal to award $6.7 million to recruit a Florida scientist to the Parkinson's Institute in Sunnyvale, Ca.
The scientist is Dennis Steindler of the University of Florida. The recruitment award received a score of 57, although the scores ranged from 30 to 75. Jeff Sheehy, a member of the grant review group and CIRM board member, said the score reflected two extremely divergent positions by two reviewers.
The board has awarded four grants in its recruitment round over the past couple of years, but this is the first extended discussion of an award recommended by reviewers. It is also the first to have a representative of the applicant institution speaking publicly for the grant.
CIRM directors have now moved into executive session to discuss matters they prefer to air in private.
Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy
Comments Off on CIRM Board Eyes Florida Researcher for $6.7 Million Grant
Two Additional Appeals Rejected in Disease Team Round
Posted: September 9, 2012 at 3:58 pm
The governing board of the California stem cell agency last night rejected appeals by two applicants -- OncoMed Pharmaceuticals of Redwood City and Albert Wong of Stanford -- in the $200 million disease team round.
Both petitions generated little discussion. You can find more on their petitions here and here.
The board also approved changes in its intellectual property and grant administration rules. Both proposals will now enter the state's official administrative law process for more comment and possible change.
Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy
Comments Off on Two Additional Appeals Rejected in Disease Team Round