Categories
- Global News Feed
- Uncategorized
- Alabama Stem Cells
- Alaska Stem Cells
- Arkansas Stem Cells
- Arizona Stem Cells
- California Stem Cells
- Colorado Stem Cells
- Connecticut Stem Cells
- Delaware Stem Cells
- Florida Stem Cells
- Georgia Stem Cells
- Hawaii Stem Cells
- Idaho Stem Cells
- Illinois Stem Cells
- Indiana Stem Cells
- Iowa Stem Cells
- Kansas Stem Cells
- Kentucky Stem Cells
- Louisiana Stem Cells
- Maine Stem Cells
- Maryland Stem Cells
- Massachusetts Stem Cells
- Michigan Stem Cells
- Minnesota Stem Cells
- Mississippi Stem Cells
- Missouri Stem Cells
- Montana Stem Cells
- Nebraska Stem Cells
- New Hampshire Stem Cells
- New Jersey Stem Cells
- New Mexico Stem Cells
- New York Stem Cells
- Nevada Stem Cells
- North Carolina Stem Cells
- North Dakota Stem Cells
- Oklahoma Stem Cells
- Ohio Stem Cells
- Oregon Stem Cells
- Pennsylvania Stem Cells
- Rhode Island Stem Cells
- South Carolina Stem Cells
- South Dakota Stem Cells
- Tennessee Stem Cells
- Texas Stem Cells
- Utah Stem Cells
- Vermont Stem Cells
- Virginia Stem Cells
- Washington Stem Cells
- West Virginia Stem Cells
- Wisconsin Stem Cells
- Wyoming Stem Cells
- Biotechnology
- Cell Medicine
- Cell Therapy
- Diabetes
- Epigenetics
- Gene therapy
- Genetics
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetic medicine
- HCG Diet
- Hormone Replacement Therapy
- Human Genetics
- Integrative Medicine
- Molecular Genetics
- Molecular Medicine
- Nano medicine
- Preventative Medicine
- Regenerative Medicine
- Stem Cells
- Stell Cell Genetics
- Stem Cell Research
- Stem Cell Treatments
- Stem Cell Therapy
- Stem Cell Videos
- Testosterone Replacement Therapy
- Testosterone Shots
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
Archives
Recommended Sites
Category Archives: Stem Cell Videos
Stem-cell | Define Stem-cell at Dictionary.com
Posted: July 17, 2016 at 6:40 am
Contemporary Examples
Now, Rich writes, when Barack Obama ended the Bush stem-cell policy last week, there were no such overheated theatrics.
It launches curricular reviews and stem-cell initiatives; it raises money, and buys up property (or at least, it used to).
Many women who undergo IVF either discard their leftover embryos or donate them for stem-cell research.
Maybe they would, but this has played absolutely no part in the stem-cell debate.
I am often criticized for previously voting for John Kerry and my support of stem-cell research.
The stem-cell controversy is really about abortion, of course.
Whatever, the result is that the promise of stem-cell research is delayed or unrealized.
British Dictionary definitions for stem-cell Expand
(histology) an undifferentiated cell that gives rise to specialized cells, such as blood cells
stem-cell in Medicine Expand
stem cell n. An unspecialized cell that gives rise to a specific specialized cell, such as a blood cell.
stem-cell in Science Expand
stem-cell in Culture Expand
A cell from which a variety of other cells can develop through the process of cellular differentiation. Stem cells can produce only a certain group of cells (as with skin stem cells) or any cell in the body (as with embryonic stem cells).
Posted in Stem Cell Videos
Comments Off on Stem-cell | Define Stem-cell at Dictionary.com
Academia.edu | Documents in Stem Cells – Academia.edu
Posted: July 17, 2016 at 6:40 am
Cellular immortality happens upon impairment of cell-cycle checkpoint pathways (p53/p16/pRb), reactivation or up-regulation of telomerase enzyme, or upregulation of some oncogenes or oncoproteins leading to a higher rate of cell division.... more
Cellular immortality happens upon impairment of cell-cycle checkpoint pathways (p53/p16/pRb), reactivation or up-regulation of telomerase enzyme, or upregulation of some oncogenes or oncoproteins leading to a higher rate of cell division. There are also some other factors and mechanisms involved in immortalization, which need to be discovered. Immortalization of cells derived from different sources and establishment of immortal cell lines has proven useful in understanding the molecular pathways governing cell developmental cascades in eukaryotic, especially human cells. After the breakthrough of achieving the immortal cells and understanding their critical importance in the field of molecular biology, intense efforts have been dedicated to establish cell lines useful for elucidating the functions of telomerase, developmental lineage of progenitors, self renewal potency, cellular transformation, differentiation patterns and some bioprocesses, like odontogenesis. Meanwhile, discovering the exact mechanisms of immortality, a major challenge for science yet, is believed to open new gateways toward understanding and treatment of cancer in long shot. This review summarizes the methods involved in establishing immortality, its advantages, and the challenges still being faced in this field.
Read more here:
Academia.edu | Documents in Stem Cells - Academia.edu
Posted in Stem Cell Videos
Comments Off on Academia.edu | Documents in Stem Cells – Academia.edu
How Umbilical Cord Stem Cells Work | ViaCord
Posted: July 17, 2016 at 6:40 am
Stem cells are the basic building blocks of life. They are found in the bodys organs, tissues, blood, and immune system and have the ability to regenerate into additional stem cells or differentiate into specialized cells, such as nerve or blood cells. This remarkable ability makes them invaluable in medical treatments. When transplanted into a patients body, stem cells can repair or replace the patients damaged or diseased cells, improving the patients health and, in many cases, saving the patients life.
Throughout pregnancy, the umbilical cord functions as the lifeline between mom and baby, carrying nutrient-rich, oxygenated blood from the placenta to the developing baby via the umbilical vein. The baby, in turn, pumps nutrient-depleted, deoxygenated blood back to the placenta through the umbilical arteries. The cord tissue surrounding the umbilical vein and arteries acts like a cushion, preventing twisting and compression to ensure the cord blood flow remains steady and constant.
The umbilical cord is a rich source of two main types of stem cells:cord blood stem cellsandcord tissue stem cells. Through the science of cord banking, both cord blood and cord tissue stem cells can help nurture life, long after a babys birth.
Umbilical cord stem cells share a special property that sets them apart from adult bone marrow stem cells: flexibility. This special property enables them to more easily adapt to a patients body during transplant. As a result, a patients body is less likely to reject the cells, increasing the chances for a successful outcome.
Another benefit of cord stem cells is their easy accessibility. Collecting umbilical cord stem cells is a straightforward, quick, and painless procedure for both mom and baby. Collecting bone marrow stem cells, on the other hand, involves a more complex surgical procedure that can put the bone marrow donor at risk for medical complications.
Read more here:
How Umbilical Cord Stem Cells Work | ViaCord
Posted in Stem Cell Videos
Comments Off on How Umbilical Cord Stem Cells Work | ViaCord
Stem Cells – RCN
Posted: July 17, 2016 at 6:40 am
Stem cells are cells that divide by mitosis to form either
How the choice is made is still unknown. However, several genes have been found whose activity prevents a daughter cell from differentiating.
The only totipotent cells are the fertilized egg and the first 4 or so cells produced by its cleavage (as shown by the ability of mammals to produce identical twins, triplets, etc.).
In mammals, the expression totipotent stem cells is a misnomer totipotent cells cannot make more of themselves.
Three types of pluripotent stem cells occur naturally:
All three of these types of pluripotent stem cells
In mice and rats, embryonic stem cells can also:
Using genetic manipulation in the laboratory, pluripotent stem cells can now be generated from differentiated cells. These induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are described below.
Multipotent stem cells are found in adult animals; perhaps most organs in the body (e.g., brain, liver, lungs) contain them where they can replace dead or damaged cells. These adult stem cells may also be the cells that when one accumulates sufficient mutations produce a clone of cancer cells.
Examples:
While progress has been slow, some procedures already show promise.
Using multipotent "adult" stem cells.
One way to avoid the problem of rejection is to use stem cells that are genetically identical to the host.
This is already possible in the rare situations when the patient has healthy stem cells in an undamaged part of the body (like the stem cells being used to replace damaged corneas).
In this technique,
Using this procedure it possible to not only grow blastocysts but even have these go on to develop into adult animals cloning with a nuclear genome identical to that of the donor of the nucleus. The first successful cloning by SCNT was with amphibians [View procedure]. Later, mammals such as sheep (Dolly), cows, mice and others were successfully cloned. And in the 11 November 2007 issue of Science, researchers in Oregon reported success with steps 14 in rhesus monkeys (primates like us).
Their procedure:
This should reassure people who view with alarm the report in May 2013 by the same workers that they have finally succeeded in producing embryonic stem cells (ESCs) using SCNT from differentiated human tissue. The workers assure us that they will not attempt to implant these blastocysts in a surrogate mother to produce a cloned human. And their failure with monkeys suggests that they would fail even if they did try.
While cloning humans still seems impossible, patient-specific ESCs
Whether they will be more efficient and more useful than induced pluripotent stem cells [below] remains to be seen.
Sperm and eggs each contain certain genes that carry an "imprint" identifying them later in the fertilized egg as being derived from the father or mother respectively.
Creating an egg with a nucleus taken from an adult cell may not allow a proper pattern of imprinting to be established.
When the diploid adult nucleus is inserted into the enucleated egg (at least those of sheep and mice), the new nucleus becomes "reprogrammed". What reprogramming actually means still must be learned, but perhaps it involves the proper methylation and demethylation of imprinted genes. For example, the inactive X chromosome in adult female cells must be reactivated in the egg, and this actually seems to happen.
In primates (in contrast to sheep, cattle, and mice), the process of removing the resident nucleus causes molecules associated with the centrosome to be lost as well. Although injecting a donor nucleus allows mitosis to begin, spindle formation may be disrupted, and the resulting cells fail to get the correct complement of chromosomes (aneuploidy).
In other words, mutations that might be well-tolerated in a single somatic cell of the adult (used to provide the nucleus) might well turn out to be quite harmful when they become replicated in a clone of cells injected later into the patient.
The goal of this procedure (which is often called therapeutic cloning even though no new individual is produced) is to culture a blastocyst that can serve as a source of ES cells.
And in fact, Dolly and other animals are now routinely cloned this way. Link to a description.
The spectre of this is so abhorrent to many that they would like to see the procedure banned despite its promise for helping humans.
In fact, many are so strongly opposed to using human blastocysts even when produced by nuclear transfer that they would like to limit stem cell research to adult stem cells (even though these are only multipotent).
A promising alternative to the use of embryonic stem cells in human therapy are recently-developed methods of genetically reprogramming the nuclei of differentiated adult cells so that they regain the pluripotency of embryonic stem (ES) cells.
In June 2007, three laboratories reported that introducing extra copies of only 4 genes into adult mouse skin cells (fibroblasts) enables them to regain the properties of ES cells. When these cells, named induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs for short), were placed in mouse blastocysts, they participated in building all the tissues of the chimeric mice that resulted. (When placed in tetraploid (4n) blastocysts unable by themselves to develop normally embryos were formed that thus were clones of the skin cell donor.) The four genes: c-Myc, Sox2, Oct3/4, Klf4.
Reprogramming works in humans, too! Using the same four genes, the Yamanaka lab in Japan reported on 20 November 2007, that they now had reprogrammed human skin cells to become induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). And the Thomson lab in Wisconsin accomplished the same thing using SOX2, OCT4, NANOG, and LIN28.
These achievements open the possibility of
Therapy with iPSCs has already been demonstrated in mice. Three examples:
The result: all the signs of sickle-cell disease (e.g., anemia) in the treated animals showed marked improvement.
The result: the implanted buds developed a blood supply and the mice began to secrete human albumin, human alpha-1-antitrypsin, and to to detoxify injected chemicals just as human livers do.
Let us hope that what works in mice can someday be developed into a safe therapy that will work in humans. (In the case of Type 1 diabetes mellitus, however, even patient-derived beta cells will still be at risk of the same autoimmune rejection that caused the disease in the first place.)
Despite these successes, iPSCs may not be able to completely replace the need for embryonic stem cells and may even be dangerous to use in human therapy. Several groups have found that human iPSCs contain mutations as well as epigenetic patterns (e.g., methylation of their DNA) that are not found in embryonic stem cells. Some of the mutations are also commonly found in cancer cells.
Applied to humans, none of the above procedures would involve the destruction of a potential human life.
Excerpt from:
Stem Cells - RCN
Posted in Stem Cell Videos
Comments Off on Stem Cells – RCN
Microscope Imaging Station. Stem Cells: Cells with Potential.
Posted: July 17, 2016 at 6:40 am
What are stem cells?
Your body contains over 200 types of cells, each with a specific job: blood cells carry oxygen; muscle cells contract so that you can move; nerve cells transmit chemical signals. The job of a stem cell is to make new cells. It does this by undergoing an amazing processdifferentiating, or changing into another type of cell. Each time a stem cell divides, one of the new cells might remain a stem cell while the other turns into a heart, blood, brain, or other type of cell. In fact, stem cells are able to divide to replenish themselves and other cells without any apparent limit.
Stem cells are the source, or stem, for all of the specialized cells that form our organs and tissues. There are many kinds of stem cells, but two types have made frequent appearances in the news: embryonic stem are present in very earlyand very tinyembryos, and produce the first cells of the heart, brain, and other organs. They have the potential to form just about any other cell in the body. Adult stem cells are found in many tissues of developed organisms, and even in embryos after theyve begun to grow (A newborn babys body contains adult stem cells). Theyre also found in the placenta and umbilical cord. Adult stem cells can replenish some tissues lost through normal wear and tear or injury. However, adult stem cells are only able to generate a few specific cell types. Adult stem cells in bone marrow, for example, make new blood cells, and adult stem cells in the skin make the cells that replenish layers of the skin.
Next: Why invest so much in studying stem cells?
Read more from the original source:
Microscope Imaging Station. Stem Cells: Cells with Potential.
Posted in Stem Cell Videos
Comments Off on Microscope Imaging Station. Stem Cells: Cells with Potential.
Stem Cell Therapy – Prolotherapy Institute Los Angeles
Posted: July 17, 2016 at 6:40 am
Dr. Marc Darrow Stem Cell Therapy
In this article Marc Darrow, M.D., explains Stem Cell Therapy for Bone on Bone Knee
In recent research, doctors followed patients for five years and found that five years after treatment stem cell treated knees were still better than before treatment.1 In a second study doctors in China announced that in their animal studies,stem cells injected into the site of a bone fracture, promoted rapid and accelerated bone healing.
The implications of the above researchcan help revolutionize the way standardized medicine addresses problems of bone degeneration and necrosis (bone death). When the doctor says you have bone-on-bone, it can be used as an umbrella term to describe various levels of knee degeneration. In the knee joint, cartilage protects the shinbone, the thighbone, and the back of the knee cap the patella. In addition to this cushion is the thick meniscus the padding between the bones. A healthy knee has all its surfaces glide smoothly atop these cartilages for pain free, efficient, and in the case of athletics explosive movement.
Bone-on-bone means one, some, or all the cartilage and/or the meniscus has defects or holes in them.
Frequentlythese holes go all the way down to the bone and thus painful, debilitating bone-on-bone osteoarthritis develops.
Many times a patient will assume that bone-on-bone means extreme or advanced deterioration, many times that is not the case at all.
When a patient asks us this question we respond by saying that following a physical examination we discuss our non-surgical treatment methods including Prolotherapy, Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy, and Stem Cell Therapy. In minor deterioration, sometimes we start with simple dextrose. In advanced deterioration we may employ both PRP and stem cells.
When stem cells are recommended, we draw stem cells from you. Stem cells have the ability to morph into a variety of cell types including: osteoblasts (bone cells) and chondrocytes (cartilage cells). So it is understandable why so much research and effort are being put into this alternative to knee surgery.
Rebuilding cartilage in severe osteoarthritis is considered one of the great challenges in orthropedic medicine. A recent medical paper sums it up:
Drug interventions and surgical treatments have been widely attempted for cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis. However, the results were largely unsatisfactory. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) or matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) offers potential for the regeneration of cartilage over the long-term.
However, due to the limitations and disadvantages of ACI, alternative therapies for cartilage regeneration are in need.
The availability of large quantities of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and the multilineage differentiation (the morphing ability), especially their chondrogenic (for cartilage) differentiation property, have made MSCs the most promising cell source for cartilage regeneration. 2
MSCs can modulate the immune response of individuals and positively influence the microenvironment of the stem cells already present in the diseased tissue. 3
In other words, spark a new healing cascade for advanced osteoarthric cases.
Researchers are looking at the osteoblasts, specialized mesenchyme-derived (stem) cellsaccountable for bone synthesis, remodelling and healing. What they are finding is that these cells rebuild bones through various mechanisms including cell homing or cell signalling. This is where stem cells communicate with the surrounding tissue to help them navigate to the site of the wound and differentiate themselves into the material to build bone.4Other research suggests positive results even in cases ofAvascular necrosis. 5 Researchers in China announced that in their animal studies, stem cell injections accelerated bone healing and the further research should investigate stem cell injections for fractures of the bone.6
Should you consider stem cell therapy for your bone-on-bone?The Darrow Wellness Institute has long been recognized for utilizing advanced, non-surgical options for degenerative joint disease including Stem Cell Therapy. Stem Cell Therapy, like Prolotherapy and Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy are designed to stimulate the immune system to heal and rebuild damaged joints without the significant risks that surgeries, joint replacement, or other invasive procedures come with.
1. Davatchi F, Sadeghi Abdollahi B, Mohyeddin M, Nikbin B. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis: 5 years follow-up of three patients. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015 May 20. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12670. [Epub ahead of print]
2. Qi Y, Yan W. Mesenchymal stem cell sheet encapsulated cartilage debris provides great potential for cartilage defects repair in osteoarthritis. Med Hypotheses. 2012 Sep;79(3):420-1. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
3. Qi Y, Feng G, Yan W. Mesenchymal stem cell-based treatment for cartilage defects in osteoarthritis. Mol Biol Rep. 2012 May;39(5):5683-9. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
4. Titorencu I, Pruna V, Jinga VV, Simionescu M. Osteoblast ontogeny and implications for bone pathology: an overview. Cell Tissue Res. 2014 Jan;355(1):23-33. doi: 10.1007/s00441-013-1750-3. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
5.Calori GM, Mazza E, Colombo M, Mazzola S, Mineo GV, Giannoudis PV. Treatment of AVN using the induction chamber technique and a biological-based approach: Indications and clinical results. Injury. 2013 Sep 19. pii: S0020-1383(13)00423-3. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.014. [Epub ahead of print
6.Huang S, Xu L, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Li G. Systemic and local administration of allogeneic bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells promotes fracture healing in rats. Cell Transplant. 2015 Feb 2. [Epub ahead of print]
See more here:
Stem Cell Therapy - Prolotherapy Institute Los Angeles
Posted in Stem Cell Videos
Comments Off on Stem Cell Therapy – Prolotherapy Institute Los Angeles
Stem cell – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Posted: July 17, 2016 at 6:40 am
Stem cells are cells of the body (somatic cells) which can divide and become differentiated.[1]
When an organism grows, stem cells specialize, and take specific functions. For instance, mature tissues like skin, muscle, blood, bone, liver, nerves, all have different types of cells. Because stem cells are not yet differentiated, they can change to become some kind of specialized cells. Organisms also use stem cells to replace damaged cells.
Stem cells are found in most, if not all, plants and animals. They divide and differentiate into a range of cell types. Research in the stem cell field grew out of findings in the 1960s.[2][3]
The two broad types of mammalian stem cells are: embryonic stem cells, and adult stem cells, which are found in adult tissues. In a developing embryo, stem cells can differentiate into all of the specialised embryonic tissues. In adult organisms, stem cells act as a repair system for the body, replenishing specialized cells, but also maintain the normal turnover of blood, skin, and intestinal tissues.
Stem cells can be grown in tissue culture. In culture, they can be transformed into specialised cells, such as those of muscles or nerves. Highly plastic adult stem cells can be taken from a variety of sources, including umbilical cord blood and bone marrow. They are now used in medical therapies, and researchers expect that stem cells will be used in many future therapies.[4]
Embryonic stem cells (ES cells) are stem cells taken from the inner cell mass of the early stage embryo known as a blastocyst. Human embryos reach the blastocyst stage 4-5 days after fertilization. At that time, they are made up of between 50 and 150 cells.
The stem cells' state, and what the daughter cells turn into, is influenced by signals from other cells in the embryo.
Read more:
Stem cell - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Posted in Stem Cell Videos
Comments Off on Stem cell – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Immunology and Therapeutic …
Posted: July 17, 2016 at 6:40 am
1. Introduction
Bone marrow is a complex tissue containing hematopoietic cell progenitors and their progeny integrated within a connective-tissue network of mesenchymal-derived cells known as the stroma (1). The stroma cells, or Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), are multi-potent progenitor cells that constitute a minute proportion of the bone marrow, represented as a rare population of cells that makes up 0.001 to 0.01% of the total nucleated cells. They represent 10-fold less abundance than the haematopoietic stem cells (2), which contributes to the organization of the microenvironment supporting the differentiation of hematopoietic cells (3). MSC are present in tissues of young, as well as, adult individuals (4, 5), including the adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid and even peripheral blood (1, 6-8). MSCs were characterized over thirty years ago as fibroblast-like cells with adhesive properties in culture (9, 10). The term MSC has become the predominant term in the literature since the early 90s (11), after which their research field has grown rapidly due to the promising therapeutic potential, resulting in an increased frequency of clinical trials in the new millennium at an explosive rate.
As data accumulated, there was a need to establish a consensus on the proper definition of the MSCs. The International Society for Cellular Therapy has recommended the minimum criteria for defining multi-potent human MSCs (12, 13). The criteria included: (i) cells being adherent to plastic under standard culture conditions; (ii) MSC being positive for the expression of CD105, CD73 and CD90 and negative for expression of the haematopoietic cell surface markers CD34, CD45, CD11a, CD19 or CD79a, CD14 or CD11b and histocompatibility locus antigen (HLA)-DR; (iii) under a specific stimulus, MSC differentiate into osteocytes, adipocytes and chondrocytes in vitro. These criteria presented properties to purify MSC and to enable their expansion by several-fold in-vitro, without losing their differentiation capacity. When plated at low density, MSCs form small colonies, called colony-forming units of fibroblasts (CFU-f), and which correspond to the progenitors that can differentiate into one of the mesenchymal cell lineages (14, 15). It has been reported lately that MSCs are able to differentiate into both mesenchymal, as well as, non-mesenchymal cell lineages, such as adipocytes, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, tenocytes, skeletal myocytes, neurones and cells of the visceral mesoderm, both in vitro and in vivo (16, 17).
All cells have half-lives and their natural expiration must be matched by their replacement; MSCs, by proliferating and differentiating, can be the proposed source of these new replacement cells as characterized in their differentiation capacity. This replacement hypothesis mimics the known sequence of events involved in the turnover and maintenance of blood cells that are formed from haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) (18). Unlike HSCs, MSCs can be culture-expanded ex vivo in up to 40 or 50 cell doublings without differentiation (19). A dramatic decrease in MSC per nucleated marrow cell can be observed when the results are grouped by decade, thus showing a 100-fold decrease from birth to old age. Being pericytes present in all vascularized tissues, the local availability of MSC decreases substantially as the vascular density decreases by one or two orders of magnitude with age (20). In recent years, the discovery of MSCs with properties similar, but not identical, to BM-MSCs has been demonstrated in the stromal fraction of the connective tissue from several organs, including adipose tissue, trabecular bone, derma, liver and muscle (21-24). It is important to note that the origin of MSCs might determine their fate and functional characteristics (25). Studies of human bone marrow have revealed that about one-third of the MSC clones are able to acquire phenotypes of pre-adipocytes, osteocytes and chondrocytes (16). This is in concordance with data showing that 30% of the clones from bone marrow have been found to exhibit a trilineage differentiation potential, whereas the remainder display a bi-lineage (osteo-chondro) or uni-lineage (osteo) potential (26). Moreover, MSC populations derived from adipose tissue and derma present a heterogeneous differentiation potential; indeed, only 1.4% of single cells obtained from adipose-derived adult stem cell (ADAS) populations were tri-potent, the others being bi-potent or unipotent (27).
Mesenchymal Stem Cells have been shown to possess immunomodulatory characteristics, as described through the inhibition of T-cell proliferation in vitro (28-30). These observations have triggered a huge interest in the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs. The in vitro studies have been complemented in vivo, where both confirmed the immunosuppressive effect of MSC. MSC activating stimuli in vitro, appears to include the secretion of cytokines and the interaction with other immune cells in the presence of proinflammatory cytokines (Fig 1) (31). Primarily, the in vivo effect has been originally shown in a baboon model, in which infusion of ex vivoexpanded matched donor or third-party MSCs delayed the time to rejection of histo-incompatible skin grafts (29). The delay indicated a potential role for MSC in the prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in ASCT, in organ transplantation to prevent rejection, and in autoimmune disorders. Recently, MSCs were used to successfully treat a 9-year-old boy with severe treatment-resistant acute GVHD, further confirming the potent immunosuppressive effect in humans (32). The immunosuppressive potential has no immunologic restriction, whether the MSCs are autologous with the stimulatory or the responder lymphocytes or the MSCs are derived from a third party. The degree of MSC suppression is dose dependent, where high doses of MSC are inhibitory, whereas low doses enhance lymphocyte proliferation in MLCs (33). Broadly, MSC modulate cytokine production by the dendritic and T cell subsets DC/Th1 and DC/Th2 (34), block the antigen presenting cell (APC) maturation and activation (35), and increase the proportion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells in a mixed lymphocyte reaction (36).
Potential mechanisms of the MSC interactions with immune cells. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can inhibit both the proliferation and cytotoxicity of resting natural killer (NK) cells, as well as, their cytokine production by releasing prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and soluble HLA-G5 (sHLA-G5). Killing of MSCs by cytokine-activated NK cells involves the engagement of cell-surface receptors (Thick blue line) expressed by NK cells with its ligands expressed on MSCs. MSCs inhibit the differentiation of monocytes to immature myeloid dendritic cells (DCs), bias mature DCs to an immature DC state, inhibit tumour-necrosis factor (TNF) production by DCs and increase interleukin-10 (IL-10) production by plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). MSC-derived PGE2 is involved in all of these effects. Immature DCs are susceptible to activated NK cell-mediated lysis. MSC Direct inhibition of CD4+ T-cell function depends on their release of several soluble molecules, including PGE2, IDO, transforming growth factor-1 (TGF1), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) and haem-oxygenase-1 (HO1). MSC inhibition of CD8+ T-cell cytotoxicity and the differentiation of regulatory T cells mediated directly by MSCs are related to the release of sHLA-G5 by MSCs. In addition, the upregulation of IL-10 production by pDCs results in the increased generation of regulatory T cells through an indirect mechanism. MSC-driven inhibition of B-cell function seems to depend on soluble factors and cellcell contact. Finally, MSCs dampen the respiratory burst and delay the spontaneous apoptosis of neutrophils by constitutively releasing IL-6.
Dendritic cells have the elementary role of antigen presentation to nave T cells upon maturation, which in turn induce the proinflammatory cytokines. Immature DCs acquire the expression of co-stimulatory molecules and upregulate expression of MHC-I and II, as well as, other cell-surface markers (CD11c and CD83). Mesenchymal stem cells have profound effect on the development of DC, where in the presence of MSC, the percentage of DC with conventional phenotype is reduced, while that of plasmacytoid DC is increased, therefore biasing the immune system toward Th2 and away from Th1 responses in a PGE-2 dependent mechanism (37). Furthermore, MSCs inhibit the up-regulation of CD1a, CD40, CD80, CD86, and HLA-DR during DC differentiation and prevent an increase of CD40, CD86, and CD83 expression during DC maturation (38). When mature DCs are incubated with MSCs they have a decreased cell-surface expression of MHC class II molecules, CD11c, CD83 and co-stimulatory molecules, as well as, decreased interleukin-12 (Il-12) production, thereby impairing the antigen-presenting function of the DCs (Fig 1) (39, 40). MSCs can also decrease the pro-inflammatory potential of DCs by inhibiting their production of tumour-necrosis factor (TNF-) (40). Furthermore, plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), which are specialized cells for the production of high levels of type-I IFN in response to microbial stimuli, upregulate production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 after incubation with MSCs (34). These observations indicate a potent anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effect for MSC in vitro and potentially in vivo.
Natural killer (NK) cells are key effector cells of the innate immunity in anti-viral and anti-tumor immune responses through their Granzyme B mediated cytotoxicity and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (41). NK-mediated target cell lysis results from an antigen-ligand interaction realized by activating NK-cell receptors, and associated with reduced or absent MHC-I expression by the target cell (42). MSCs can inhibit the cytotoxic activity of resting NK cells by down-regulating expression of NKp30 and natural-killer group 2, member D (NKG2D), which are activating receptors involved in NK-cell activation and target-cell killing (Fig 1) (43). Resting NK cells proliferate and acquire strong cytotoxic activity when cultured with IL-2 or IL-15, but when incubated with MSC in the presence of these cytokines, resting NK-cell, as well as, pre-activated NK cell proliferation and IFN- production are almost completely abrogated (44, 45). It is worth noting that although the susceptibility of NK cells to MSC mediated inhibition is potent, the pre-activated NK cells showed more resistance to the immunosuppressive effect of MSC compared to resting NK cells (43). The susceptibility of human MSCs to NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity depends on the low level of cell-surface expression of MHC class I molecules by MSCs and the expression of several ligands, that are recognized by activating NK-cell receptors. Autologous and allogeneic MSC were susceptible to lysis by NK cells (43), where NK cell-mediated lysis was inversely correlated with the expression of HLA class I on MSC (46). Incubation of MSCs with IFN- partially protected them from NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity, through the up-regulation of expression of MHC-I molecules on MSCs (43). Taken together, a possible dynamic interaction between NK cells and MSC in vivo exists, where the latter partially inhibit activated MSC, without compromising their ability to kill MSC, reflecting on an interaction tightly regulated by IFN- concentration.
Neutrophils play a major role in innate immunity during the course of bacterial infections, where they are activated to kill foreign infectious agents and accordingly undergo a respiratory burst. MSCs have been shown to dampen the respiratory burst and to delay the spontaneous apoptosis of resting and activated neutrophils through an IL-6-dependent mechanism (47). MSC had no effect on neutrophil phagocytosis, expression of adhesion molecules, and chemotaxis in response to IL-8, f-MLP, or C5a (47). Stimulation with bacterial endotoxin induces chemokine receptor expression and mobility of MSCs, which secrete large amounts of inflammatory cytokines and recruit neutrophils in an IL-8 and MIF-dependent manner. Recruited and activated neutrophils showed a prolonged lifespan, an increased expression of inflammatory chemokines, and an enhanced responsiveness toward subsequent challenge with LPS, which suggest a role for MSCs in the early phases of pathogen challenge, when classical immune cells have not been recruited yet (48). Furthermore, MSC have shown the capability to mediate the preservation of resting neutrophils, a phenomenon that might be important in those anatomical sites, where large numbers of mature and functional neutrophils are stored, such as the bone marrow and lungs (49).
T-cells are major players of the adaptive immune response. After T-cell receptor (TCR) engagement, T cells proliferate and undergo numerous effector functions, including cytokine release and, in the case of CD8+ T cells (CTL), cytotoxicity. Abundant reports have shown that T-cell proliferation stimulated with polyclonal mitogens, allogeneic cells or specific antigen is inhibited by MSCs (28, 29, 50-56). The observation that MSCs can reduce T cell proliferation in vitro is mirrored by the in vivo finding through infusions of hMSCs that control GVHD following bone marrow transplantation. Nevertheless, there is no demonstrable correlation between the measured effects of MSCs in vitro and their counter effect in vivo due to the lack of universality of methodology correlating the in vitro findings with the in vivo therapeutic potential.
MSC inhibition of T-cell proliferation is not MHC restricted, since it can be mediated by both autologous and allogeneic MSCs and depends on the arrest of T-cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle (55, 57). Thus, MSCs do not promote T-cell apoptosis, but instead maintain T cell survival upon subjection to overstimulation through the TCR and upon commitment to undergo CD95CD95-ligand-dependent activation-induced cell death (57). MSC effects on T cell proliferation in vitro appear to have both contact-dependent and contact-independent components (58). Inhibition of T-cell proliferation by MSCs leads to decreased IFN- secretion in vitro and in vivo associated with increased IL-4 production by T helper 2 (TH2) cells (34, 59). Taken together, there is an implication for a shift from a pro-inflammatory state characterized by IFN- secretion to an anti-inflammatory state characterized by IL-4 secretion (Fig 1). An imperative role for effector T-cell is the MHC restricted killing of virally-infected or of allogeneic cells mediated via CD8+ CTLs, and which is down-regulated by MSC (60).
Regulatory T cells (Tregs), a subpopulation of T cells, are vital to keep the immune system in check, help avoid immune-mediated pathology and contain unrestricted expansion of effector T-cell populations, which results in maintaining homeostasis and tolerance to self antigens. Tregs are currently identified by co-expression of CD4 and CD25, expression of the transcription factor FoxP3, production of regulatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-, and ability to suppress proliferation of activated CD4+CD25+ T cells in co-culture experiments. Differential expression of CD127 (-chain of the IL-7 receptor) enable flow cytometry-based separation of human Tregs from CD127+ non-regulatory T-cells (61). MSCs have been reported to induce the production of IL-10 by pDCs, which, in turn, trigger the generation of regulatory T cells (Fig 1) (34, 40). Furthermore, Tregs secrete TGF- and when used in vitro, TGF- in combination with IL-2 directs the differentiation of T-cells into Tregs, while Tregs suppress the proliferation of TCR-dependent proliferation of effector CD25null or CD25low T-cells in a non-autologous fashion. Also TGF- alters angiogenesis following injury in experiments using MSC (62). In addition, after co-culture with antigen-specific T-cells, MSCs can directly induce the proliferation of regulatory T-cells through release of the immunomodulatory HLA-G isoform HLA-G5 (Fig 1) (63). Taken together, MSCs can modulate the intensity of an immune response by inhibiting antigen-specific T-cell proliferation and cytotoxicity and promoting the generation of regulatory T-cells.
Antibody producing B-cells constitute the second main cell type involved in adaptive immunity. Interactions between MSCs and B-cells have produced controversial results attributable to the inconsistent experimental conditions used (31, 55, 64). Initial reports on mice suggested that MSC exercise a dampening effect on the proliferation of B-cells (64), which is in concordance with most published works to date (31, 55, 64). Furthermore, MSCs can also inhibit B-cell differentiation and constitutive expression of chemokine receptors via the release of soluble factors and cell-cell contact mediated possibly by the Programmed Cell Death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (31, 64). The addition of MSCs, at the beginning of a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLC), considerably inhibited immunoglobulin production in standard MLC, irrespective of the MSC dose employed, which suggests that third-party MSC are able to suppress allo-specific antibody production, consequently, overcoming a positive cross-match in sensitized transplant recipients (65). However, other in vitro studies have shown that MSCs could support the survival, proliferation and differentiation to antibody-secreting cells of B-cells from normal individuals and from pediatric patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (66, 67). A major mechanism of B-cell suppression was hMSC production of soluble factors, as indicated by transwell experiments, where hMSCs inhibited B-cell differentiation shown as significant impairment of IgM, IgG, and IgA production. CXCR4, CXCR5, and CCR7 B-cell expression, as well as chemotaxis to CXCL12, the CXCR4 ligand, and CXCL13, the CXCR5 ligand, were significantly down-regulated by hMSCs, suggesting that these cells affect chemotactic properties of B-cells (Fig 1). B-cell costimulatory molecule expression and cytokine production were unaffected by hMSCs (64). Regardless of the controversial in vitro effects, B-cell response is mainly a T-cell dependent mechanism, and thus its outcome is significantly influenced by the MSC-mediated inhibition of T-cell functions. More recently, Corcione et al have shown that systemic administration of MSCs to mice affected by experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a prototypical disease mediated by self-reactive T cells, results in striking disease amelioration mediated by the induction of peripheral tolerance (52). In addition, it has been shown that tolerance induction by MSCs may occur also through the inhibition of dendritic-cell maturation and function (34, 35), thus suggesting that activated T cells are not the only targets of MSCs.
Low concentrations of IFN- upregulate the expression of MHC-II molecules by MSCs, which indicates that they could act as antigen presenting cells (APCs) early in an immune response, when the level of IFN- are low (68, 69). However, this process of MHC-II expression by MSCs, along with the potential APC characteristics, was reversed as IFN- concentrations increased. These observations could suggest that MSCs function as conditional APC in the early phase of an immune response, while later switch into an immunosuppressive function (68). Since bone marrow might be a site for the induction of T-cell responses to blood-borne antigens (70), and since MSC are derived from the stromal progenitor cells that reside in the bone marrow, therefore, MSC express a yet unidentified role in the control of the immune response physiology of the bone marrow. Dendritic cells are the main APC for T-cell responses, and MSC-mediated suppression of DC maturation would prohibit efficient antigen presentation and thus, the clonal expansion of T-cells. Direct interactions of MSCs with T-cells in vivo could lead to the arrest of T-cell proliferation, inhibition of CTL-mediated cytotoxicity and generation of CD4+ regulatory T-cells. As a consequence, impaired CD4+ T-cell activation would translate into defective T-cell help for B-cell proliferation and differentiation to antibody-secreting cells.
The hMSCs express few to none of the B7-1/B7-2 (CD80/CD86) costimulatorytype molecules; this appears to contribute, at least in part, to their immune privilege characteristic. Mechanisms that lead to immune tolerance rely on interrelated pathways that involve complex cross talk and cross regulation of T-cells and APCs by one another. Both soluble mediators and modulation exerted via complex networks of cytokines and costimulatory molecules appear to play a role in MSC regulation of T cells, and these mechanisms invoke both contact-dependent and -independent pathways.
Although many of the studies use MSC-conditioned medium, both contact-dependent and -independent mechanisms are probably invoked in the therapeutic use of MSCs (20, 71). In addition to cytokines, the network of costimulatory molecules is hypothesized to play a prominent role in modulating tolerance and inflammation. MSCs down-regulate the expression of costimulatory molecules (30, 72, 73). The discovery of new functions for B7 family members, together with the identification of additional B7 and CD28 family members, is revealing new ways in which the B7:CD28 family may regulate T-cell activation and tolerance. Not only do CD80/86:CD28 interactions promote initial T-cell activation, they also regulate self-tolerance by supporting CD4+CD25+ Treg homeostasis (74-76). Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) can exert inhibitory effects in both B7-1/B7-2dependent and independent fashions. B7-1 and B7-2 can signal bi-directionally through engaging CD28 and CTLA-4 on T cells and by delivering signals into B7-expressing cells (77). The B7 family membersinducible co-stimulator (ICOS) ligand, PD-L1 (B7-H1), PD-L2 (B7-DC), B7-H3, and B7-H4 (B7x/B7-S1)are expressed on professional APC cells, while B7-H4 and B7-H1 are expressed on hMSCs and on cells within non-lymphoid organs. These observations may provide a new means for regulating T-cell activation and tolerance in peripheral tissues (31, 71, 78). ICOS and PD-1 are expressed upon T-cell-induction, and they regulate previously activated T-cells (79). Both the ICOS:ICOSL pathway and the PD-1:PD-L1/PD-L2 pathway play a critical role in regulating T-cell activation and tolerance (79). There is consensus that both CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibit T-cell and B-cell activation and may play a crucial role in peripheral tolerance (79, 80). Both CTLA-4 and PD-1 functions are associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune diseases. PD-1 is over expressed on CD4+ T cells in the synovial fluid of RA patients (81). Whether or not these costimulatory molecules are critical mediators of MSC-mediated immune suppression and/or tolerance in vivo is still under current investigation.
Studies have shown that MSCs escape the immune system, and this makes them a potential therapeutic tool for various transplantation procedures. MSCs express intermediate levels of HLA major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules (16, 50, 82, 83), while they do not express HLA class II antigens of the cell surface. However, HLA class II is readily detectable by Western blot on whole-cell lysates of unstimulated adult MSCs, thus suggesting that MSCs contain intracellular deposits of HLA class II allo-antigens (83). Cell-surface expression can be induced by treatment of the cells with IFN- for 1 or 2 days. Unlike adult MSCs, the fetal liver derived cells have no intracellular nor cell surface HLA class II expression (84), but incubation with IFN- initiated their intracellular expression followed by surface expression. Differentiation of MSCs into their mesodermal lineages of bone, cartilage, or adipose tissue, both in adult and fetal MSCs continued to express HLA-I, but not class II (84). Undifferentiated MSCs in vitro fail to elicit a proliferative response from allogeneic lymphocytes, thus suggesting that the cells are not inherently immunogenic (28, 30, 50). When pre-cultured with IFN- for full HLA class II expression, MSCs still escape recognition by allo-reactive T-cells, (83, 84) as is the case with MSCs differentiated adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes. Limited in vivo data demonstrate the persistence of allogeneic MSCs into immunocompetent hosts after transplantation. In one patient treated with MSCs, DNA of donor MSC could not be detected in any organ at autopsy few weeks after the infusion, while in another patient receiving MSCs from two donors, the donor DNA from both donors was detected in lymph node and colon, the target organs of GVHD, within weeks after infusion (85). Data from our lab indicated that MSC were undetectable after two weeks in an allogeneic system (86). Therefore, the question of whether MSCs are recognized by an intact allogeneic immune system in vivo remains open, although the in vitro data support the theory that MSCs escape the immune system. MSCs do not express FAS ligand or costimulatory molecules, such as B7-1, B7-2, CD40, or CD40L (50). When costimulation is inadequate, T-cell proliferation can be induced by the addition of exogenous costimulation. However, MSCs differ from other cell types, and no T-cell proliferation can be observed when they are cultured with HLA-mismatched lymphocytes in the presence of a CD28-stimulating antibody (50). However, in agreement with the in vitro data, infusion or implantation of allogeneic and MHC-mismatched MSCs into baboons has been well tolerated (87-89). Unique immunologic properties of MSCs were also suggested by the fact that engraftment of human MSCs occurred after intra-uterine transplantation into sheep, even when the transplantation was performed after the fetuses became immunocompetent (90). MSC mainly fail to activate T-cells and show to be targets for CD8+ T cell-cytotoxicity, althought controversial (60). Phyto-hemagglutinin (PHA) blasts, generated to react against a specific donor, will lyse chromium-labeled mononuclear cells from that individual but it will not lyse MSCs derived from the same donor. Furthermore, killer cell inhibitory receptor (KIR ligand)mismatched natural killer cells do not lyse MSCs (60). Thus, MSCs, although incompatible at the MHC, tend to escape the immune system.
Although MSCs are transplantable across allogeneic barriers, a delayed type hypersensitivity reaction can lead to rejection in xenogenic models of human MSCs injected into immunocompetent rats (91). In this study, MSCs were identified in the heart muscle of severe compromised immune deficiency rats, in contrast to that of immunocompetent rats. In the latter group, peripheral blood lymphocytes proliferated after re-stimulation with human MSCs in vitro, thus suggesting cellular immunization. Such a proliferative response in vitro has not been detected in humans treated with intravenous (IV) infusion of allogeneic MSCs (Le Blanc and Ringdn, unpublished data, 2004).
Several studies have acknowledged the immunosuppressive activities of MSCs, but the underlying mechanisms are far from being fully characterized. The initial step in the interaction between MSCs and their target cells involves cellcell contact mediated by adhesion molecules, in concordance with studies showing the dependence of T-cell proliferation on the engagement of PD-1 by its ligand (31). Several soluble immunosuppressive factors, either produced constitutively by MSCs or released following cross-talk with target cells have been reported, including nitric oxide and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which are only released by MSC after IFN- stimulation with target cells (92, 93), and thus not in a constitutive manner. IDO induces the depletion of tryptophan from the local environment, which is an essential amino acid for lymphocyte proliferation. MSC-derived IDO was reported as a requirement to inhibit the proliferation of IFN--producing TH1 cells (92) and together with prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) to block NK-cell activity (Fig 1) (44). In addition, IFN-, alone or in combination with TNF-, IL-1 or IL-1, stimulates the production of chemokines by mouse MSCs that attract T-cells and stimulate the production of inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS), which in turn inhibits T-cell activation through the production of nitric oxide (56). It is worth noting that MSCs from IFN- receptor (IFN--R1) deficient mice do not have immunosuppressive activity, which highlights the vital role of IFN- in the immunosuppressive function of MSC (56).
Additional soluble factors, such as transforming growth factor-1 (TGF-1), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), IL-10, PGE-2, haem-oxygenase-1 (HO1), IL-6 and soluble HLA-G5, are constitutively produced by MSCs (28, 34, 51, 63, 94) or secreted in response to cytokines released by target cells upon interacting with MSC. TNF- and IFN- have been shown to stimulate the production of PGE-2 by MSCs above constitutive level (34). Furthermore, IL-6 was shown to dampen the respiratory burst and to delay the apoptosis of human neutrophils by inducing phosphorylation of the transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (47), and to inhibit the differentiation of bone-marrow progenitor cells into DCs (95).
The failure to reverse suppression, when neutralizing antibodies against IL-10, TGF- and IGF were added to MLR reactions does point to the possibility that MSC may secrete as yet uncharacterized immunosuppressive factors (93). Galectin-1 and Galectin-3, newly characterized lectins, are constitutively expressed and secreted by human bone marrow MSC. Inhibition of galectin-1 and galectin-3 gene expression with small interfering RNAs abrogated the suppressive effect of MSC on allogeneic T-cells (Fig 1) (96). The restoration of T-cell proliferation in the presence of - lactose indicates that the carbohydrate-recognition domain of galectins is responsible for the immunosuppression of T-cells and highlights an extracellular mechanism of action for the MSC-secreted galectins. In this respect, the inhibition of T-cell proliferation could result from either direct effects of galectin-1 and galectin-3 on T cells and/or through a direct or an indirect on effect on dendritic cells (97).
HLA-G5 represents another important molecule involved in MSC mediated regulation of the immune response, where its production has been shown to suppress T-cell proliferation, as well as NK-cell and T-cell cytotoxicity, while promoting the generation of Tregs (63, 98). HLA-G protein expression is constitutive and the level is not modified upon stimulation by allogeneic lymphocytes in MSC/MLR. HLA-G5 is detected on MSCs by real-time reverse-phase polymerase chain reaction, immune-fluorescence, flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the supernatant (99). Cell contact between MSCs and activated T-cells induces IL-10 production, which, in turn, stimulates the release of soluble HLA-G5 by MSCs (63). It is worth nothing that none of these molecules have an exclusive role and that MSC-mediated immune-regulation is a redundant system that is mediated by several molecules.
One important characteristic of hMSCs is their ability to suppress inflammation resulting from injury, as well as, resulting from allogeneic solid organ transplants, and autoimmune disease. Consistent with in vitro studies, murine allogeneic MSCs are effective cellular therapy models in the treatment of murine models of human disease (52, 100-102). Several studies have documented the substantial clinical improvements observed in animal models, when MSC were systemically introduced as a therapy in mouse models of multiple sclerosis (102, 103), inflammatory bowel disease (104-106), infarct, stroke, and other neurologic diseases (107, 108), as well as diabetes (109). These findings strongly suggest that xenogeneic hMSCs are not immunologically recognized by various immunocompetent mouse models of disease and are able to home to sites of inflammation. However, the mechanisms behind the immunosuppressive actions at the site of inflammation and its association with the homing activity have not yet been completely elucidated.
Nitric Oxide (NO) mediate its effect partly through phosphorylation of Stat-5, which results in suppression of T- cell proliferation, partly through the inhibition of NO synthase or the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. This reveals the MSC-dependent effects on proliferation. Although indoleamine-2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) has been hypothesized to be critical in mediating the effect of NO, neutralizing IDO by using a blocking antibody did not interfere with NOs suppressive effects (93, 110).
Within an in vivo setting, injury, inflammation, and/or foreign cells can lead to T-cell activation, which results in those T-cells producing proinflammatory cytokines including, but not limited to, TNF-, IFN-, IL-1, and IL-1. Combinations of cytokines may also induce cell production of chemokines, some of which bind to CXCR3-R expressing cells (including T cells) that co-localize with MSCs. MSCs then produce NO, which inhibits Stat-5 phosphorylation, thereby leading to cell-cycle arrest (and thus halting T cell proliferation) (Fig 1) (110). In addition, iNOS appears to be important in mouse MSC in vivo effects. MSCs from mice that lack iNOS (or IFN-R1) are unable to suppress GVHD. In contrast to mouse MSCs that use NO in mediating their immune-suppressive effect, hMSCs and MSCs from non-human primates appear to mediate their immune-suppressive effects via IDO (56). There is some controversy about whether the effect of IDO results from local depletion of tryptophan, or from the accumulation of tryptophan metabolites (which is suggested by data showing that use of a tryptophan antagonist, 1-methyl-L tryptophan, restored allo-reactivity that would otherwise have been suppressed by MSCs). In addition to its effect on the JAK-STAT pathway, NO may also influence mitogen activated protein kinase and nuclear factor B, which would cause a reduction in the gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines.
The clinical experience with and the safety of MSCs is of utmost interest for their wide therapeutic applications. The pioneering in vivo studies with MSC focused on the engraftment facilitation for the haematopoietic stem cells (111). Further work also focused on the regenerative functions of MSC in terms of functional repair of damaged tissues (112). Hypoimmunogenicity of MSC provided a critical advantage in their use for clinical and therapeutic purposes in vitro (50), followed by pre-clinical studies (29) and reaching the human clinical studies (32) with the use of allogeneic donors. Allogeneic MSC have proved to be an option with major advantages in clinical use, since the use of autologous MSC is hindered by the limited time frame for clonal expansion and the costly in vitro proliferation. However, some sub-acute conditions, such as autoimmune diseases, might allow the use of autologous MSCs and their culture in vitro. It is worth noting that some reports have recently challenged the belief that allogeneic MSCs are poorly immunogenic (113, 114), indicating that in some cases an autologous MSC source could be advantageous. Recent reports have shown that MSCs from patients with autoimmune disease have a normal capability to support hematopoiesis, (115) and to exercise immunomodulatory functions (116), and to show a normal phenotypic characteristics (117).
The perspective role of adult stem cells in degenerative disease conditions, where there is progressive tissue damage and an inability to repair, possibly due to the depletion of stem cell populations or functional alteration, has been considered. In cases of osteoarthritis, a disease of the joints where there is progressive and irreversible loss of cartilage characterized by changes in the underlying bone, Murphy et al showed that the proliferative capacity of the MSC was substantially reduced, and this was independent of the harvest site from patients with end-stage OA undergoing joint replacement surgery (118). In this study the marrow samples were harvested both from the site of surgery (either the hip or the knee) and also from the iliac crest. These effects were apparently disease-related, and not age-related. However, the data suggest that susceptibility to OA and perhaps other degenerative diseases may be due to the reduced mobilization or proliferation of stem cells. In addition, successfully recruited cells may have a limited capacity to differentiate, leading to defective tissue repair. Alternatively, the altered stem cell activity may be in response to the elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines seen in OA, which was confirmed by several other investigators (119, 120).
Similarly, the functional impairment of the anti-proliferative effect of MSCs derived from patients with aplastic anaemia (121) or multiple myeloma (122) might be resulting from an intrinsic abnormality in the microenvironment of the bone marrow, which is consistent with the possible use of autologous MSC for therapeutic purposes.
With the knowledge of the homing capacity of MSC and their capacity to engraft into the recipients bone after systemic administration, MSCs have been utilized to treat children with severe osteogenesis imperfecta, leading to improved parameters of increased growth velocity and total body mineral content associated with fewer fractures (123). Systemic infusion of allogeneic MSCs also led to encouraging bone marrow recovery in patients with tumors following chemotherapy (123). The immunosuppressive effect of infused MSCs has been successfully shown in acute, severe graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (32). The probable effect of MSC was the inhibition of donor T-cell reactivity to histocompatibility antigens of the recipient tissue. Currently, there is no successful therapy for steroid-refractory acute GVHD. The possible role of MSCs in this context is therefore of potential interest. Le Blanc et al reported a case of grade IV acute GVHD of the gut and liver in a patient who had undergone ASCT with cells from an unrelated female donor (32). The patient was unresponsive to all types of immunosuppression drugs. When the patient was infused with 2x 106 MSCs per kilogram from his HLA-haploidentical mother, his GVHD responded with a decline in bilirubin and normalization of stools. After the MSC infusion, DNA analysis of his bone marrow showed the presence of minimal residual disease (124). When immunosuppression was discontinued, the patient again developed severe acute GVHD, with its associated symptoms within a few weeks.
Modulation of host allo-reactivity led to accelerated bone-marrow recovery in patients co-transplanted with MSCs and haplo-identical HSCs (125). Clinical trials are being conducted on the immunomodulatory potential of MSCs in the treatment of Crohns disease, with the potential for those cells to contribute to the regeneration of gastrointestinal epithelial cells (126).
As described previously, MSCs are characterized by their hypoimmunogenicity. In 2000, data from several research groups demonstrated long-term allo-MSC engraftment in a variety of non-cardiac tissues in the absence of immunosuppression (88, 90). On the basis of these observations, investigators began to look into the possibility of allo-MSCs engraftment into affected myocardium in rats, and later in swine, where allo-MSCs were found to readily engraft in necrotic myocardium and favorably alter ventricular function (2). The allo-MSC engraftment occurred without evidence of immunologic rejection or lymphocytic infiltration in the absence of assisted immunosuppressive therapy emphasizing some of the apparent advantages of these cells over other cell populations for cellular cardiomyoplasty. The immunologically privileged status of MSCs was also observed in xenogeneic setting, where Saito et al injected MSC intravenously from C57BL/6 mice into immunocompetent adult Lewis rats (127). When these animals were later subjected to MIs, murine MSCs could be identified in the region of necrosis, and these cells expressed muscle specific proteins not present before coronary ligation.
Consistent with results from in vitro studies, murine allogeneic MSCs are effective in the treatment of murine models of human disease (52, 103, 128). Several studies have reported clinical improvements in mouse models of multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, stroke, diabetes, infarct and GVHD using I.V. injected xenogeneic hMSCs rather than allogeneic MSCs (108, 109). A major advantage in using hMSCs in mouse models of human disease is that the possibility of gathering mechanistic data through measuring biomarkers from body fluids or using noninvasive imaging technology, which may prove to be an advantage in clinical studies when applied on humans.
In experiments designed to study the trafficking of hMSCs, investigators used mouse models of severe erosive polyarthritis characterized by an altered transgene allele that results in chronic over-expression of TNF- and which resemble human RA patients (60, 72). The motive behind utilizing these mice models was to investigate similarities in MSC homing with mouse models of chronic asthma and acute lung injury. Injected hMSC revealed a reduction in ankle arthritis parameters associated with decrease appendage related erythema, possibly due to the MSC localization to ankle joints as revealed by bioluminescence (129). Similar observations for inducing tolerance were made using adipose-derived MSC, where Treg were induced in RA PBMC and in mouse models of arthritis (36, 130). Furthermore, studies of rheumatoid arthritis T-cells showed a down-regulation of effector response using adipose-derived MSCs (131). Variations in this potential described by the capability of MSCs to down-regulate collagen-induced arthritis, and in the ability to induce Tregs, depend on the source of MSC (mouse vs. human) and its characteristics (primary isolate of MSC line), which reflect on difference in function compared to primary expanded MSC (132). Other studies reported that in the collagen-induced model of arthritis, mice infused with MSCs have increased numbers of CD4+CD25+ cells that express FoxP3 and thus reveal a Treg phenotype (20). Recent data on collagen-induced arthritis model, where murine MSCs did not reveal therapeutic benefits against arthritis in vivo, but did show anti-proliferative effect in vitro suggest that there is no appropriate in vitro measures that can be accurately extrapolated into a potential therapeutic utility of MSCs in vivo, and that mouse MSCs show difference in functional characteristics to hMSC in terms of immunoregulatory capacity (133).
MSCs immunological properties appeared to have potential therapeutic advantages in other forms of autoimmune diseases, especially in type 1 diabetes. In NOD mouse model, several physiological defects that aim to maintain peripheral and central tolerance contribute to the development of autoimmune diabetes. These defects are summed up as a combination of immune cell dysfunction (including T-cell, NK cells, B-cells, and dendritic cells), associated with the presence of inflammatory cytokine milieu (134). MSCs possess specific immunomodulatory properties capable of halting autoimmunity through immunomodulation processes described in this chapter. The processes might be through a direct effect via the presentation of differential levels of negative costimulatory molecules and the secretion of regulatory cytokines that affect regulatory T-cells/autoreactive T-cells. Furthermore, MSCs could modulate the immunological dysregulation observed in antibody producing B-cells and cytotoxic NK cells. Dendritic cells have been shown to be defective in NOD mice characterized by higher levels of costimulation with a potential capability to shift to a TH-1 type of immune response.
In an experimental mouse model of diabetes induced by streptozotocin, it was observed that MSCs promoted the endogenous repair of pancreatic islets and renal glomeruli (109). Similarly, co-infusion of MSCs and bone-marrow cells inhibited the proliferation of -cell-specific T-cells isolated from the pancreas of diabetic mice and restored insulin and glucose levels through the induction of recipient-derived pancreatic -cell regeneration in the absence of trans-differentiation of MSCs (135). These studies show that the in vivo administration of MSCs is clinically efficacious through the modulation of pathogenic - and T-cell responses and through potent bystander effects on the target tissue.
The timing of MSC infusion seems to be a critical parameter in their therapeutic efficacy. In the EAE mouse model of multiple sclerosis, MSC systematically injected at disease onset ameliorated myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-induced EAE and further decreased the infiltration T-cells, B-cells and macrophages into the central nervous system (CNS). Furthermore, T cells isolated from the lymph nodes of MSC-treated mice did not proliferate after in vitro re-challenge with MOG peptide, which is an indication of the induction of T-cell anergy (52). Systematic injection of MSCs was found to inhibit the in vivo production of pathogenic plp-specific antibodies and to suppress the encephalitogenic potential of plp-specific T cells in passive-transfer experiments. In this model, the MSCs migrated to the lymphoid organs, as well as, to the inflamed CNS, where they exercised a protective effect on the neuronal axons in situ (135, 136). In these studies, the therapeutic effect of MSCs depended on the release of anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory and trophic molecules, as occurred in the case of stroke in rats (137), and, possibly, on the recruitment of local progenitors and their subsequent induction to differentiate into neural cells (138). As trophic effect, the MSCs appeared to favor oligo-dendrogenisis by neural precursor cells (139).
Several other studies have provided insights into the effects of MSCs mediated by cytokines. In a model of acute renal failure, the administration of MSCs increased the recovery of renal function through the inhibition of production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as Il-1, TNF and IFN, and through an anti-apoptotic effect on target cells (140). Along the same line, the anti-inflammatory activity of MSCs was revealed in a mouse model of lung fibrosis, where they inhibited the effects of IL-1-producing T cells and TNF-producing macrophages through the release of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) (141). The release of trophic factors such as the WNT-associated molecule secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRp2), which leads to the rescue of ischemic cardiomyocytes and the restoration of ventricular functions represent another important function for MSC (142).
With all the promising therapeutic potential of MSC, there seems to be a growing concern about their association with tumors. The immunoregulatory and anti-proliferative effects of MSCs led to several studies investigating the inhibitory effect of MSCs on tumor growth. Inhibition or, more frequently, stimulation of tumor-cell proliferation in vitro and/or tumor growth in vivo by MSCs has been reported (143-145). The heterogeneous nature of the MSC populations and the different experimental tumor models used, contribute to the effect of tumors on MSC in which the microenvironment generated by tumors influence the behavior of MSCs (146). Two main mechanisms are probably involved in the enhancement of tumor growth by MSCs. First, the cell-to-cell cross-talk between MSCs and tumor cells contribute to tumor progression, thus integrating within the tumor stroma (147), and second, the suppressive effects of MSCs on the immune system of tumor-bearing hosts might facilitate tumorigenesis, as shown for the inhibition of melanoma rejection, possibly mediated by regulatory CD8+ T cells (144). Irrespective of the possible interactions between cancer cells, immune cells and MSCs, the potential risk of stimulating the growth cancer by MSCs must be considered.
As a whole, the data accumulated from preclinical and clinical data indicate that bone marrow-derived MSCs have, in addition to their therapeutic purposes in regenerative medicine, effects that can result from other characteristics, such as their anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory properties. The immuno suppressive activity of MSCs provides means for inducing peripheral tolerance following systemic injection mediated through the inhibition of cell division, thereby preventing their responsiveness to antigenic triggers while maintaining them in a quiescent state. In addition, the clinical efficacy of MSCs in different experimental model seems to occur almost only during the acute phase of disease associated with limited trans-differentiation, which indicates that the therapeutic effectiveness of MSCs relies heavily on their ability to modify microenvironments. These modifications occur through the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, and anti-apoptotic and trophic molecules that promote the repair and protection of damaged tissues, as well as, maintain the integrity of the immune cells.
Read the rest here:
Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Immunology and Therapeutic ...
Posted in Stem Cell Videos
Comments Off on Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Immunology and Therapeutic …
What are Stem Cells? | Stem Cells | University of Nebraska …
Posted: July 17, 2016 at 6:40 am
What are Stem Cells?
Types of Stem Cells
Why are Stem Cells Important?
Can doctors use stem cells to treat patients?
Pros and Cons of Using Stem Cells
What are Stem Cells?
There are several different types of stem cells produced and maintained in our system throughout life. Depending on the circumstances and life cycle stages, these cells have different properties and functions. There are even stem cells that have been created in the laboratory that can help us learn more about how stem cells differentiate and function. A few key things to remember about stem cells before we venture into more detail:
Stem cells are the foundation cells for every organ and tissue in our bodies. The highly specialized cells that make up these tissues originally came from an initial pool of stem cells formed shortly after fertilization. Throughout our lives, we continue to rely on stem cells to replace injured tissues and cells that are lost every day, such as those in our skin, hair, blood and the lining of our gut.
Source ISSCR
Stem Cell History
Until recently, scientists primarily worked with two kinds of stem cells from animals and humans: embryonic stem cells and non-embryonic "somatic" or "adult" stem cells. Scientists discovered ways to derive embryonic stem cells from early mouse embryos nearly 30 years ago, in 1981. The detailed study of the biology of mouse stem cells led to the discovery, in 1998, of a method to derive stem cells from human embryos and grow the cells in the laboratory. These cells are called human embryonic stem cells. The embryos used in these studies were created for reproductive purposes through in vitro fertilization procedures. When they were no longer needed for that purpose, they were donated for research with the informed consent of the donor. In 2006, researchers made another breakthrough by identifying conditions that would allow some specialized adult cells to be "reprogrammed" genetically to assume a stem cell-like state. This new type of stem cell is now known as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).
Source NIH
Types of Stem Cells
Adult Stem Cells (ASCs):
ASCs are undifferentiated cells found living within specific differentiated tissues in our bodies that can renew themselves or generate new cells that can replenish dead or damaged tissue. You may also see the term somatic stem cell used to refer to adult stem cells. The term somatic refers to non-reproductive cells in the body (eggs or sperm). ASCs are typically scarce in native tissues which have rendered them difficult to study and extract for research purposes.
Resident in most tissues of the human body, discrete populations of ASCs generate cells to replace those that are lost through normal repair, disease, or injury. ASCs are found throughout ones lifetime in tissues such as the umbilical cord, placenta, bone marrow, muscle, brain, fat tissue, skin, gut, etc. The first ASCs were extracted and used for blood production in 1948. This procedure was expanded in 1968 when the first adult bone marrow cells were used in clinical therapies for blood disease.
Studies proving the specificity of developing ASCs are controversial; some showing that ASCs can only generate the cell types of their resident tissue whereas others have shown that ASCs may be able to generate other tissue types than those they reside in. More studies are necessary to confirm the dispute.
Types of Adult Stem Cells
Embryonic Stem Cells (ESCs):
During days 3-5 following fertilization and prior to implantation, the embryo (at this stage, called a blastocyst), contains an inner cell mass that is capable of generating all the specialized tissues that make up the human body. ESCs are derived from the inner cell mass of an embryo that has been fertilized in vitro and donated for research purposes following informed consent. ESCs are not derived from eggs fertilized in a womans body.
These pluripotent stem cells have the potential to become almost any cell type and are only found during the first stages of development. Scientists hope to understand how these cells differentiate during development. As we begin to understand these developmental processes we may be able to apply them to stem cells grown in vitro and potentially regrow cells such as nerve, skin, intestine, liver, etc for transplantation.
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)
Induced pluripotent stem cells are stem cells that are created in the laboratory, a happy medium between adult stem cells and embryonic stem cells. iPSCs are created through the introduction of embryonic genes into a somatic cell (a skin cell for example) that cause it to revert back to a stem cell like state. These cells, like ESCs are considered pluripotent Discovered in 2007, this method of genetic reprogramming to create embryonic like cells, is novel and needs many more years of research before use in clinical therapies.
NIH
Why are Stem Cells Important?
Stem cells are important for living organisms for many reasons. In the 3- to 5-day-old embryo, called a blastocyst, the inner cells give rise to the entire body of the organism, including all of the many specialized cell types and organs such as the heart, lung, skin, sperm, eggs and other tissues. In some adult tissues, such as bone marrow, muscle, and brain, discrete populations of adult stem cells generate replacements for cells that are lost through normal wear and tear, injury, or disease.
Given their unique regenerative abilities, stem cells offer new potentials for treating diseases such as diabetes, and heart disease. However, much work remains to be done in the laboratory and the clinic to understand how to use these cells for cell-based therapies to treat disease, which is also referred to as regenerative or reparative medicine.
Laboratory studies of stem cells enable scientists to learn about the cells essential properties and what makes them different from specialized cell types. Scientists are already using stem cells in the laboratory to screen new drugs and to develop model systems to study normal growth and identify the causes of birth defects.
Research on stem cells continues to advance knowledge about how an organism develops from a single cell and how healthy cells replace damaged cells in adult organisms. Stem cell research is one of the most fascinating areas of contemporary biology, but, as with many expanding fields of scientific inquiry, research on stem cells raises scientific questions as rapidly as it generates new discoveries.
Source NIH
Can doctors use stem cells to treat patients?
Some stem cells, such as the adult bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells, have been used in clinical therapies for over 40 years. Other therapies utilizing stem cells include skin replacement from adult stem cells harvested from hair follicles that have been grown in culture to produce skin grafts. Other clinical trials for neuronal damage/disease have also been conducted using neural stem cells. There were side effects accompanying these studies and further investigation is warranted. Although there is much research to be conducted in the future, these studies give us hope for the future of therapeutics with stem cell research.
Potential Therapies using Stem Cells
Adult Stem Cell Therapies
Bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplants have been utilized for over 40 years as therapy for blood disorders such as leukemia and lymphoma, amongst many others. Scientists have also shown that stem cells reside in most tissues of the body and research continues to learn how to identify, extract, and proliferate these cells for further use in therapy. Scientists hope to yield therapies for diseases such as type I diabetes and repair of heart muscle following heart attack.
Scientists have also shown that there is potential in reprogramming ASCs to cause them to transdifferentiate (turn back into a different cell type than the resident tissue it was replenishing).
Embryonic Stem Cell (ESC) Therapies
There is potential with ESCs to treat certain diseases in the future. Scientists continue to learn how ESCs differentiate and once this method is better understood, the hope is to apply the knowledge to get ESCs to differentiate into the cell of choice that is needed for patient therapy. Diseases that are being targeted with ESC therapy include diabetes, spinal cord injury, muscular dystrophy, heart disease, and vision/hearing loss.
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapies
Therapies using iPSCs are exciting because somatic cells of the recipient can be reprogrammed to en ESC like state. Then mechanisms to differentiate these cells may be applied to generate the cells in need. This is appealing to clinicians because this avoids the issue of histocompatibility and lifelong immunosuppression, which is needed if transplants use donor stem cells.
iPS cells mimic most ESC properties in that they are pluripotent cells, but do not currently carry the ethical baggage of ESC research and use because iPS cells have not been able to be manipulated to grow the outer layer of an embryonic cell required for the development of the cell into a human being.
Pros and Cons of Using Various Stem Cells
The rest is here:
What are Stem Cells? | Stem Cells | University of Nebraska ...
Posted in Stem Cell Videos
Comments Off on What are Stem Cells? | Stem Cells | University of Nebraska …
Stem Cell Key Terms | California’s Stem Cell Agency
Posted: July 17, 2016 at 6:40 am
En Espaol
The term stem cell by itself can be misleading. In fact, there are many different types of stem cells, each with very different potential to treat disease.
Stem Cell Pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cell Adult Stem Cell iPS Cell Cancer Stem Cell
By definition, all stem cells:
Pluripotent means many "potentials". In other words, these cells have the potential of taking on many fates in the body, including all of the more than 200 different cell types. Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent, as are induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells that are reprogrammed from adult tissues. When scientists talk about pluripotent stem cells, they mostly mean either embryonic or iPS cells.
Embryonic stem cells come from pluripotent cells, which exist only at the earliest stages of embryonic development. In humans, these cells no longer exist after about five days of development.
When isolated from the embryo and grown in a lab dish, pluripotent cells can continue dividing indefinitely. These cells are known as embryonic stem cells.
James Thomson, a professor in the Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology at the University of Wisconsin, derived the first human embryonic stem cell lines in 1998. He now shares a joint appointment at the University of California, Santa Barbara, a CIRM-funded institution.
Adult stem cells are found in the various tissues and organs of the human body. They are thought to exist in most tissues and organs where they are the source of new cells throughout the life of the organism, replacing cells lost to natural turnover or to damage or disease.
Adult stem cells are committed to becoming a cell from their tissue of origin, and cant form other cell types. They are therefore also called tissue-specific stem cells. They have the broad ability to become many of the cell types present in the organ they reside in. For example:
Unlike embryonic stem cells, researchers have not been able to grow adult stem cells indefinitely in the lab, but this is an area of active research.
Scientists have also found stem cells in the placenta and in the umbilical cord of newborn infants, and they can isolate stem cells from different fetal tissues. Although these cells come from an umbilical cord or a fetus, they more closely resemble adult stem cells than embryonic stem cells because they are tissue-specific. The cord blood cells that some people bank after the birth of a child are a form of adult blood-forming stem cells.
CIRM-grantee IrvWeissman of the Stanford University School of Medicine isolated the first blood-forming adult stem cell from bone marrow in 1988 in mice and later in humans.
Irv Weissman explains the difference between an adult stem cell and an embryonic stem cell (video)
An induced pluripotent stem cell, or iPS cell, is a cell taken from any tissue (usually skin or blood) from a child or adult and is genetically modified to behave like an embryonic stem cell. As the name implies, these cells are pluripotent, which means that they have the ability to form all adult cell types.
Shinya Yamanaka, an investigator with joint appointments at Kyoto University in Japan and the Gladstone Institutes in San Francisco, created the first iPS cells from mouse skin cells in 2006. In 2007, several groups of researchers including Yamanaka and James Thomson from the University of Wisconsin and University of California, Santa Barbara generated iPS cells from human skin cells.
Cancer stem cells are a subpopulation of cancer cells that, like stem cells, can self-renew. However, these cellsrather than growing into tissues and organspropagate the cancer, maturing into the many types of cells that are found in a tumor.
Cancer stem cells are a relatively new concept, but they have generated a lot of interest among cancer researchers because they could lead to more effective cancer therapies that can treat tumors resistant to common cancer treatments.
However, there is still debate on which types of cancer are propelled by cancer stem cells. For those that do, cancer stem cells are thought to be the source of all cells that make up the cancer.
Conventional cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy, may only destroy cells that form the bulk of the tumor, leaving the cancer stem cells intact. Once treatment is complete, cancer stem cells that still reside within the patient can give rise to a recurring tumor. Based on this hypothesis, researchers are trying to find therapies that destroy the cancer stem cells in the hopes that it truly eradicates a patients cancer.
John Dick from the University of Toronto first identified cancer stem cells in 1997. Michael Clarke, then at the University of Michigan, later found the first cancer stem cell in a solid tumor, in this case, breast cancer. Now at Stanford University School of Medicine, Clarke and his group have found cancer stem cells in colon cancer and head and neck cancers.
Find out More:
Catriona Jamieson talks about therapies based on cancer stem cells (4:32)
Stanford Publication: The true seeds of cancer
UCSD Publication: From Bench to Bedside in One Year: Stem Cell Research Leads to Potential New Therapy for Rare Blood Disorder
Updated 2/16
See the original post here:
Stem Cell Key Terms | California's Stem Cell Agency
Posted in Stem Cell Videos
Comments Off on Stem Cell Key Terms | California’s Stem Cell Agency