Page 209«..1020..208209210211..220230..»

Category Archives: Stem Cells

Twice Given, Twice Used: Infusion of Stem Cells and Specially Generated T-Cells From Same Donor Improves Leukemia …

Posted: February 28, 2013 at 4:51 pm

NEWS RELEASE

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE Until 2 p.m. ET, Feb. 27, 2013

TWICE GIVEN, TWICE USED: INFUSION OF STEM CELLS AND SPECIALLY GENERATED T-CELLS FROM SAME DONOR IMPROVES LEUKEMIA SURVIVAL

Newswise SEATTLE In a significant advance for harnessing the immune system to treat leukemias, researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center for the first time have successfully infused large numbers of donor T-cells specific for a key anti-leukemic antigen to prolong survival in high-risk and relapsed leukemia patients after stem cell transplantation. Both the stem cells for transplant and the T-cells came from the same matched donors.

Reporting results of a pilot clinical trial in the Feb. 27 issue of the journal Science Translational Medicine, researchers describe the use of T-cells that were taken from a donor, programmed in the lab to recognize the Wilms Tumor Antigen 1 (WT1) and kill leukemia cells, grown in large numbers, and then infused into patients to promote anti-leukemic activity. The WT1 protein is overexpressed in leukemias and is in part responsible for why the cells have become leukemic.

The best results were achieved when some of the patients received T-cell clones that were exposed to interleukin 21 (IL-21) during the programming and growth process, based on the hypothesis that such exposure would create cells that could survive longer and produce greater anti-leukemic activity after transfer. IL-21 promotes T-cell expansion while helping those cells acquire characteristics of central memory T-cells.

This is the first time patients have received an infusion of WT1 specific T-cells, and thus also the first demonstration that such cells can provide a therapeutic anti-leukemic effect, as has been suggested from earlier vaccine trials that induce less potent responses, said Philip Greenberg, M.D., corresponding author and head of the Immunology Program at Fred Hutch.

Ours is also the first report to show that greatly improved T-cell in-vivo persistence can be achieved after transfer by modifying the way cells are generated in tissue culture for therapy with inclusion of the cytokine IL-21, said Aude Chapuis, M.D., lead author on the study and a research associate in the Fred Hutch Immunology Program.

The findings support expanding efforts to target WT1 and provide insights into what is necessary to establish potent and persistent T-cell responses in patients, and such second generation studies have recently been initiated at Fred Hutch. All of the patients, who were treated post-transplant at Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchs site for patient care, received adoptively transferred infusions of billions of enhanced CD8 cytotoxic T-cell clones. They were considered at high risk of death because they had already relapsed and/or had a poor prognosis due to unfavorable characteristics of their leukemia.

Four of the 11 patients in the trial received infusions of T-cells that targeted WT1 and were generated in the presence of IL-21. One had detectable relapsed disease and entered complete remission shortly after the T-cells were infused. All four survived after T-cell therapy without relapse for more than 30 months without suffering graft-vs.-host-disease and required no additional anti-leukemic treatment, according to the study. GVHD is a major complication of stem cell transplantation.

Read more:
Twice Given, Twice Used: Infusion of Stem Cells and Specially Generated T-Cells From Same Donor Improves Leukemia ...

Posted in Stem Cells | Comments Off on Twice Given, Twice Used: Infusion of Stem Cells and Specially Generated T-Cells From Same Donor Improves Leukemia …

OHSU Doernbecher Scientists First To Grow Liver Stem Cells In Culture, Transplant Them With Demonstrated Therapeutic …

Posted: February 28, 2013 at 4:51 pm

New mouse research in Nature raises hope that human liver stem cells can be similarly grown, transplanted

For decades scientists around the world have attempted to regenerate primary liver cells known as hepatocytes because of their numerous biomedical applications, including hepatitis research, drug metabolism and toxicity studies, as well as transplantation for cirrhosis and other chronic liver conditions. But no lab in the world has been successful in identifying and growing liver stem cells in culture -- using any available technique until now.

In the journal Nature, physician-scientists in the Pap Family Pediatric Research Institute at Oregon Health & Science University Doernbecher Childrens Hospital, Portland, Ore., along with investigators at the Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research, Utrecht, Netherlands, describe a new method through which they were able to infinitely expand liver stem cells from a mouse in a dish.

This study raises the hope that the human equivalent of these mouse liver stem cells can be grown in a similar way and efficiently converted into functional liver cells, said Markus Grompe, M.D., study co-author, director of the Pap Family Pediatric Research Institute at OHSU Doernbecher Childrens Hospital; and professor of pediatrics, and molecular and medical genetics in the OHSU School of Medicine.

In a previous Nature study, investigators at the Hubrecht Institute, led by Hans Clever, M.D, Ph.D., were the first to identify stem cells in the small intestine and colon by observing the expression of the adult stem cell marker Lgr5 and growth in response to a growth factor called Wnt. They also hypothesized that the unique expression pattern of Lgr5 could mark stem cells in other adult tissues, including the liver, an organ for which stem cell identification remained elusive.

In the current Nature study, Grompe and colleagues in the Pap Family Pediatric Research Institute at OHSU Doernbecher used a modified version of the Clever method and discovered that Wnt-induced Lgr5 expression not only marks stem cell production in the liver, but it also defines a class of stem cells that become active when the liver is damaged.

The scientists were able to grow these liver stem cells exponentially in a dish an accomplishment never before achieved and then transplant them in a specially designed mouse model of liver disease, where they continued to grow and show a modest therapeutic effect.

We were able to massively expand the liver cells and subsequently convert them to hepatocytes at a modest percentage. Going forward, we will enlist other growth factors and conditions to improve that percentage. Liver stem cell therapy for chronic liver disease in humans is coming, said Grompe.

The study, In vitro expansion of single Lgr5+ liver stem cells induced by Wnt-driven regeneration, was funded by National Institutes of Health Grant R0I DK05192.

Investigators who contributed to this research include: Grompe, Craig Dorrell, Annelise Haft, Pap Family Pediatric Research Institute, OHSU Doernbecher Childrens Hospital; Clever, Meritxell Huch, Sylvia Boj, Johan van Es, Vivian Li, Mare van de Wetering, Toshiro Sato, Karien Hamer, Nobuo Sasaki, Robert Vries, Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research; and Milton Finegold, Texas Childrens Hospital Houston.

See the original post:
OHSU Doernbecher Scientists First To Grow Liver Stem Cells In Culture, Transplant Them With Demonstrated Therapeutic ...

Posted in Stem Cells | Comments Off on OHSU Doernbecher Scientists First To Grow Liver Stem Cells In Culture, Transplant Them With Demonstrated Therapeutic …

Infusion of stem cells and specially generated T-cells from same donor improves leukemia survival

Posted: February 28, 2013 at 4:51 pm

Public release date: 27-Feb-2013 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Dean Forbes dforbes@fhcrc.org 206-667-2896 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

SEATTLE In a significant advance for harnessing the immune system to treat leukemias, researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center for the first time have successfully infused large numbers of donor T-cells specific for a key anti-leukemic antigen to prolong survival in high-risk and relapsed leukemia patients after stem cell transplantation. Both the stem cells for transplant and the T-cells came from the same matched donors.

Reporting results of a pilot clinical trial in the Feb. 27 issue of the journal Science Translational Medicine, researchers describe the use of T-cells that were taken from a donor, programmed in the lab to recognize the Wilm's Tumor Antigen 1 (WT1) and kill leukemia cells, grown in large numbers, and then infused into patients to promote anti-leukemic activity. The WT1 protein is overexpressed in leukemias and is in part responsible for why the cells have become leukemic.

The best results were achieved when some of the patients received T-cell clones that were exposed to interleukin 21 (IL-21) during the programming and growth process, based on the hypothesis that such exposure would create cells that could survive longer and produce greater anti-leukemic activity after transfer. IL-21 promotes T-cell expansion while helping those cells acquire characteristics of central memory T-cells.

"This is the first time patients have received an infusion of WT1 specific T-cells, and thus also the first demonstration that such cells can provide a therapeutic anti-leukemic effect, as has been suggested from earlier vaccine trials that induce less potent responses," said Philip Greenberg, M.D., corresponding author and head of the Immunology Program at Fred Hutch.

"Ours is also the first report to show that greatly improved T-cell in-vivo persistence can be achieved after transfer by modifying the way cells are generated in tissue culture for therapy with inclusion of the cytokine IL-21," said Aude Chapuis, M.D., lead author on the study and a research associate in the Fred Hutch Immunology Program.

The findings support expanding efforts to target WT1 and provide insights into what is necessary to establish potent and persistent T-cell responses in patients, and such second generation studies have recently been initiated at Fred Hutch.

All of the patients, who were treated post-transplant at Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutch's site for patient care, received adoptively transferred infusions of billions of enhanced CD8 cytotoxic T-cell clones. They were considered at high risk of death because they had already relapsed and/or had a poor prognosis due to unfavorable characteristics of their leukemia.

Four of the 11 patients in the trial received infusions of T-cells that targeted WT1 and were generated in the presence of IL-21. One had detectable relapsed disease and entered complete remission shortly after the T-cells were infused. All four survived after T-cell therapy without relapse for more than 30 months without suffering graft-vs.-host-disease and required no additional anti-leukemic treatment, according to the study. GVHD is a major complication of stem cell transplantation.

Excerpt from:
Infusion of stem cells and specially generated T-cells from same donor improves leukemia survival

Posted in Stem Cells | Comments Off on Infusion of stem cells and specially generated T-cells from same donor improves leukemia survival

Stem cells aboard SpaceX will seed mice back on Earth

Posted: February 28, 2013 at 4:51 pm

Stem cell research is taking off literally. When the SpaceX Dragon capsule sets off for the International Space Station on 1 March, its cargo will include frozen embryonic stem cells kick-starting a clever experiment that uses short-lived mice to investigate the human health effects of long-haul space flights.

The idea is to expose mouse cells to space for stretches of time longer than a mouse's lifespan and then to use the cells to create live mice. Such experiments could represent the start of a boom in space biology enabled by commercial space firms such as SpaceX, based in Hawthorne California, that have been responsible for ferrying supplies and experiments to the space station since the NASA shuttle retired in 2011.

In May 2012, the Dragon capsule became the first commercial craft to dock with the space station. The latest launch, planned for next week, will be SpaceX's second official supply mission..

Takashi Morita of Osaka City University in Japan and colleagues are taking advantage of the trip to perform some experiments. Astronauts and animals sent to the space station have returned to Earth with damage to their immune systems, red blood cells, or reproductive systems thought to be caused by low gravity combined with high radiation from solar particles and cosmic rays.

Morita's team is using mice to study how humans sent on much longer missions for example, to a 501-day trip to Mars planned for 2018 and announced yesterday might fare. It is feared that exposure to radiation in space may make them infertile or more susceptible to cancer.

Mice only live for two years, so the researchers are sending frozen embryonic stem cells from the animals instead. These will stay on the space station for three years and, on return to Earth, the exposed cells will be injected into embryos, which will be implanted in female mice. The researchers will study the health of the resulting offspring as well as mutations to their DNA.

It is not known whether the embryos will even survive, says Morita. If baby mice are born, the findings might give clues as to how space radiation affects cells in the human body. This would allow researchers to develop drugs or shielding to protect space travellers on long voyages. The researchers will also study whether the mice grown from the exposed embryonic stem cells will pass on any effects to their offspring.

This isn't the first time embryonic stem cells have travelled into space. In 2010, NASA researchers sent stem cells to the ISS on a shuttle to investigate whether damage to such cells could explain why bone and muscle breaks down in space.

Julie Robinson, chief scientist for NASA's ISS program, expects a boom in space biology research as researchers and pharmaceutical companies begin using the SpaceX program for their experiments the ability to perform more experiments in space has been touted as a potential consequence of the nascent commercial space industry for several years.

Robinson suggests that the study of stem cells in space will also improve therapies on Earth. Low gravity appears to allow stem cells to grow faster and prevents them from differentiating.

The rest is here:
Stem cells aboard SpaceX will seed mice back on Earth

Posted in Stem Cells | Comments Off on Stem cells aboard SpaceX will seed mice back on Earth

LA Times: Stem Cell Agency Conflict-of-Interest Response Only a Bandage

Posted: February 28, 2013 at 2:02 pm

The Los Angeles Times yesterday modestly praised the $3 billion California stem cell agency for
taking some limited steps to deal with its longstanding conflict of
interest issues.

But the newspaper, which has the largest circulation in the state, said that was more was
needed if the agency plans to have a life after 2017, when funds for
new awards run out.
The Times editorial said,

“After years of resisting all
criticisms of its operations, the California Institute for
Regenerative Medicine
is finally listening — a little.“

The editorial continued,

“Yet the agency isn't exactly
embracing an ethical overhaul. It's doing just enough to address the
criticisms without triggering any oversight from the Legislature. The
modifications are more a bandage than a cure. Like a bandage, they
will probably do, but only for a limited time.”

The board plans to have 13 board
members with ties to recipient institutions voluntarily refrain from
voting on any grants that come before the board, not just the ones to
their institutions.
The Times said December's blue-ribbon
report from the Institute of Medicine identified the make-up of the
board as the “single biggest problem” at the agency. The
editorial cited figures prepared by the California Stem Cell Report
that show that about 90 percent of the $1.8 billion that the board
has awarded has gone to institutions linked to current or past
members of the board. Fifteen out of the 29 current board members
have ties to recipient institutions.
The editorial concluded,

“If the stem cell institute is just a
temporary agency that will last until its public funding runs out —
it plans to give its last grants with existing funds in 2017 — its
planned reforms will probably be enough. But if the institute wants
to be a permanent part of the research landscape — and possibly ask
for more public funding — voluntary recusals are an inadequate
patch. The agency's leaders should admit that the original setup was
flawed and seek a true fix. “

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/4TPMCEI6hDg/la-times-stem-cell-agency-conflict-of.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on LA Times: Stem Cell Agency Conflict-of-Interest Response Only a Bandage

Induced pluripotent stem cells in degenerative disease research

Posted: February 28, 2013 at 4:51 am

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were first created in 2006 when it was shown that four gene factors could be used to reprogramme somatic cells to a stem cell-like state. Using this protocol, scientists could have a large, ethical supply of stem cells for research. This article considers some of the uses of iPSCs in developing degenerative disease therapies and some of the hurdles yet to be overcome before iPSCs can be used clinically.

Stem cells are undifferentiated pluripotent cells that can give rise to any of the body’s cells. There are many different types of stem cells in the body, but they all share major characteristics including clonality and the ability to self-renew (Evans and Kaufman, 1981). There are numerous benefits of using stem cells in research including scientists’ ability to manipulate them into the desired differentiated cell type. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs), especially, have enabled research into degenerative human diseases and offer potential cures for many disease types. However, there are numerous ethical issues associated with ESCs due to their provenance. Differentiated adult tissue cells (somatic cells) have recently been shown to be reprogrammable, creating induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) (Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006). This process avoids many of the ethical issues associated with ESCs. This article will discuss the recent progresses made with using iPSCs and the challenges yet to be overcome.

The importance of stem cells in regenerative disease models

Degenerative diseases are characterised by the progressive loss of particular cell types. Some well known examples include Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis. However, despite the frequency of degenerative diseases, research into degeneration has been hindered due to the lack of representative in vitro models. So far, research has relied on the pluripotent characteristics of ESCs and has shown that lab-grown ESCs have the potential to replace lost tissues, for example by differentiating into brain, nerve and bone tissues amongst others (Lin, 2011; Handschel et al., 2011).

In spite of the advantages of ESCs, there are limitations to their use. ESCs cannot be cultured in sufficient quantities for regenerative medicine, partly due to their provenance: obtaining cells from embryos raises major ethical issues.

As a consequence, recent research has focused on finding alternative methods of generating representative disease models. Many barriers have arisen such as mature neurones not being able to divide, immortalised cell lines not being truly pluripotent and adult stem cells already being committed to a particular cell type. In this case, the cells rarely survived the neuronal differentiation process (Peng and Zeng, 2011).

The discovery of iPSCs

In 2006, it was discovered that gene factors could be used to induce somatic cell reprogramming. It was shown that any adult mouse tissue cell can be reprogrammed to an iPSC using a set of four gene factors (Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006). Just a year later, it was shown that the same four gene factors could also be used to genetically reprogramme human somatic cells (Takahashi et al., 2007). The four factors used by Takahashi and Yamanaka were Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc (OSKM), though later work successfully substituted Klf4 and c-Myc with Lin28 and Nanog respectively (giving OSLN).

This technique enabled scientists to culture iPSCs from any somatic cell, providing an unlimited supply of stem cells. Additionally, ESCs and iPSCs have been shown to share many characteristics including morphology, proliferation, gene expression and surface antigens (Takahashi et al., 2007; Kolios and Moodley, 2013). The reprogramming process bypasses the ethical issues and the quantitative limitations of ESCs. Disease-specific models can now be cultured, overcoming many limitations of previously available systems (Peng and Zeng, 2011).

Brief overview of the steps for reprogramming

Reprogramming is initiated by introducing the four factors, OSKM or OSLN, into mature adult somatic cells. These factors bind in a specific order to their targets and induce the cellular stress response to viruses and oncogenes. This in turn recruits p53, which is crucial in ensuring that only cells with genomic integrity survive to the pluripotent stage. It has been shown that c-Myc is fundamental in both the early stages of translation and in decreasing expression of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF)-enriched miRNAs, which are barriers to reprogramming (Yang and Rana, 2013).

The next step in reprogramming is mesenchymal-to-epithelial (MET) transition, which is essential for some cells to start their de-differentiation process. During MET transition, the reprogrammed cells start to display pluripotency markers. Of these markers, SSEA-1 is the first to be expressed and indicates potential iPSCs. The expression of additional factors mark a successful and complete reprogramming (Yang and Rana, 2013).

The potential for iPSCs

The unlimited supply and differentiation capacities of iPSCs means models of many diseases can now be created for research. These models enable scientists to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms of diseases, potentially leading to cell-based therapy.

Another major clinical opportunity for iPSCs is tolerance to treatment. Somatic cells can be taken and reprogrammed from the person requiring treatment, meaning a personalised diagnosis and the conservation of their specific cell markers. This should prevent immune rejection (Park et al., 2008). Disease models are expected to be more accurate with iPSCs; as the cells are taken directly from the diseased patients, the genetic makeup of the disease can be conserved (Dimos et al., 2008).

Drug development is another area made easier with iPSCs. Reprogramming means large quantities of pluripotent stem cells. iPSCs can be created as long as researchers have access to adult somatic cells. Drug development requires numerous assays and an increase in the quantity of pluripotent stem cells is invaluable for progress. Furthermore the reprogramming protocol is fairly straightforward (Oh et al., 2012). However, it should be noted that, at present, it is not yet known how iPSCs would behave in a clinical environment compared to ESCs (Kolios and Moodley, 2013).

Limitations to iPSC use: safety concerns

The main iPSC safety concern is genetic stability. The use of retroviral vectors and oncogenes such as c-Myc and Klf4 are a major cause of concern for clinical studies. The transcription factors are typically introduced into the somatic cells using vectors, generating a possibility of cancer formation (Kolios and Moodley, 2013; Okita et al., 2007).

There are new techniques emerging that prevent genetic instability. Reprogramming can be achieved using just two of the four gene factors mentioned. Oct4 and Soc2 can induce reprogramming without the other oncogenic factors in the presence of a histone deacetylase inhibitor (Huangfu et al., 2008).

Alternatively, microRNAs, along with Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4, can induce reprogramming and actually increase the rate of efficiency with respect to the OSKM factors alone. New viral vectors and recombinant proteins have also been considered as alternatives to the OSKM factors (Ebben et al., 2011).

Limitations to iPSC use: supply concerns

As research progresses, the main provenance of iPSCs will likely be from diseased patients’ somatic cells. This will make iPSCs much more easily available than ESCs, but will not necessarily solve supply problems completely. Reprogramming is not an efficient process, and many somatic cells do not complete it (Polo et al., 2012).  Stem cells are also known for their delicacy and specific culture requirements. A lot of laboratory equipment is too abrasive for stem cells and is susceptible to regularly blocking. This said, recent progress in automated liquid handlers design means that robots capable of handling stem cells do now exist (e.g. Redd&Whyte’s Preddator).

Conclusions

Since the first creation of iPSCs in 2006, research has come a long way. We are now able to create patient-specific and disease-specific degenerative disease models. However, before clinical trials with iPSCs can occur, some important barriers remain to be overcome. The full potential of iPSCs to improve our understanding of diseases is not yet clear, but progress in this field is clearly happening quickly.

About The Author: Clare Stewart is a biochemistry student at the University of Manchester, she has written this post on behalf of Redd & Whyte

References: 

Dimos, J. T., Rodolfa, K. T., Niakan, K. K., Weisenthal, L. M., Mitsumoto, H., Chung, W., Croft, G. F., Saphier, G., Leibel, R., Goland, R., Wichterle, H., Henderson, C. E. & Eggan, K. (2008) Induced pluripotent stem cells generated from patients with ALS can be differentiated into motor neurons. Science, 321(5893), 1218-1221.

Ebben, J. D., Zorniak, M., Clark, P. A. & Kuo, J. S. (2011) Introduction to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Advancing the Potential for Personalized Medicine. World Neurosurgery, 76(3-4), 270-275.

Evans, M. J. & Kaufman, M. H. (1981) Establishment In Culture Of Pluripotential Cells From Mouse Embryos. Nature, 292(5819), 154-156.

Handschel, J., Naujoks, C., Depprich, R., Lammers, L., Kubler, N., Meyer, U. & Wiesmann, H. P. (2011) Embryonic stem cells in scaffold-free three-dimensional cell culture: osteogenic differentiation and bone generation. Head & Face Medicine, 7.

Huangfu, D. W., Osafune, K., Maehr, R., Guo, W., Eijkelenboom, A., Chen, S., Muhlestein, W. & Melton, D. A. (2008) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nature Biotechnology, 26(11), 1269-1275.

Kolios, G. & Moodley, Y. (2013) Introduction to Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine. Respiration, 85(1), 3-10.

Lin, S. L. (2011) Concise Review: Deciphering the Mechanism Behind Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Generation. Stem Cells, 29(11), 1645-1649.

Oh, Y. Z., Wei, H. M., Ma, D. R., Sun, X. M. & Liew, R. (2012) Clinical applications of patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells in cardiovascular medicine. Heart, 98(6), 443-449.

Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. (2007) Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature, 448(7151), 313-U1.

Park, I. H., Lerou, P. H., Zhao, R., Huo, H. G. & Daley, G. Q. (2008) Generation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature Protocols, 3(7), 1180-1186.

Peng, J. & Zeng, X. M. (2011) The role of induced pluripotent stem cells in regenerative medicine: neurodegenerative diseases. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 2.

Polo, J. M., Anderssen, E., Walsh, R. M., Schwarz, B. A., Nefzger, C. M., Lim, S. M., Borkent, M., Apostolou, E., Alaei, S., Cloutier, J., Bar-Nur, O., Cheloufi, S., Stadtfeld, M., Figueroa, M. E., Robinton, D., Natesan, S., Melnick, A., Zhu, J. F., Ramaswamy, S. & Hochedlinger, K. (2012) A Molecular Roadmap of Reprogramming Somatic Cells into iPS Cells. Cell, 151(7), 1617-1632.

Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K. & Yamanaka, S. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 131(5), 861-872.

Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126(4), 663-676.

Yang, C. S. & Rana, T. M. (2013) Learning the molecular mechanisms of the reprogramming factors: let's start from microRNAs. Molecular Biosystems, 9(1), 10-17.

Posted in Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells | Comments Off on Induced pluripotent stem cells in degenerative disease research

Verastem Cofounders to Present at MIT Technology Breakfast on Breakthrough Discoveries in Cancer Stem Cells

Posted: February 27, 2013 at 1:47 pm

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Verastem, Inc., (VSTM) a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing drugs to treat cancer by the targeted killing of cancer stem cells, announced that Robert Weinberg, Ph.D., Verastem scientific cofounder and chair of the Scientific Advisory Board, and Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D., Verastem cofounder, Chairman and CEO, will present at the MIT Technology Breakfast on February 28, 2013, at 8am ET.

The Technology Breakfast series features breakthrough discoveries from research at MIT and brings together the researchers and entrepreneurs who accelerate and commercialize the technology. Drs. Weinberg and Westphal will speak on how they are changing the landscape of the current treatment paradigm in cancer.

Verastem was founded on work in the laboratories of Dr. Weinberg and Dr. Eric Lander, of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, that describes the underlying mechanisms of cancer stem cell development and methods to identify drugs that preferentially target them. Cancer stem cells have been implicated as a cause of tumor resistance to chemotherapy and driver of disease progression.

Verastem has advanced the discoveries made by Drs. Weinberg and Lander into clinical development and is currently testing lead compound, VS-6063, in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial for ovarian cancer in combination with the standard chemotherapy, paclitaxel. VS-6063 is an orally available, small molecule inhibitor of focal adhesion kinase (FAK).

Verastem is planning a potentially pivotal trial of VS-6063 in mesothelioma midyear 2013. In addition to VS-6063, the Company has multiple drugs targeting cancer stem cells in development. Verastem plans to initiate clinical trials of FAK inhibitor VS-4718 and PI3K/mTOR inhibitor VS-5584 during 2013 in patients with advanced cancers.

Dr. Robert Weinberg is a founding member of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and the Daniel K. Ludwig Professor for Cancer Research in the Department of Biology at MIT. Dr. Weinberg is an internationally recognized authority on the genetic basis of human cancer development and is the author or editor of five books and more than 350 articles. The Weinberg lab is known for its discovery of the first human oncogene -- the ras oncogene that causes normal cells to form tumors -- and the isolation of the first known tumor suppressor gene -- the Rb gene. He earned his S.B. and Ph.D. in biology/life science from MIT. Dr. Weinberg is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine and a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Dr. Christoph Westphal cofounded Verastem and is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Dr. Westphal is a partner of Longwood Fund, which founds and invests in medical companies. He was founder and chief executive officer of Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, which he took public and led as chief executive officer until 2010. Christoph cofounded Alnara Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Eli Lilly in 2010) and was cofounder and chief executive officer of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Momenta Pharmaceuticals. Currently, Dr. Westphal serves on the board of directors of Ovascience (which he cofounded), on the Board of Fellows of Harvard Medical School and on the Board of Overseers of the Boston Symphony Orchestra. He earned an M.D. from Harvard Medical School, Ph.D. in genetics from Harvard University and BA, summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa, from Columbia University.

About Verastem, Inc.

Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing drugs to treat cancer by the targeted killing of cancer stem cells. Cancer stem cells are an underlying cause of tumor recurrence and metastasis. Verastem is developing small molecule inhibitors of signaling pathways that are critical to cancer stem cell survival and proliferation: FAK, PI3K/mTOR and Wnt. For more information, please visit http://www.verastem.com.

Read more:
Verastem Cofounders to Present at MIT Technology Breakfast on Breakthrough Discoveries in Cancer Stem Cells

Posted in Stem Cells | Comments Off on Verastem Cofounders to Present at MIT Technology Breakfast on Breakthrough Discoveries in Cancer Stem Cells

Stem cells: Keeping differentiation in check

Posted: February 27, 2013 at 1:47 pm

The expression of Ski-related oncogene N (SNON) prior to (left) and after (right) the onset of differentiation. Credit: 2012 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Researchers at the A*STAR Institute of Medical Biology (IMB) have discovered a critical checkpoint protein that controls when human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) begin to differentiate.

The Nodal/Activin signaling pathway is an important regulator of hESC fate. Signaling molecules in this pathway trigger the downstream proteins SMAD2 and SMAD3 to activate a transcription factor known as NANOG, as well as other core pluripotency proteins. These regulatory factors, in turn, ensure that the self-renewing hESCs remain capable of forming all cell types in the embryo and avoid differentiation. When differentiation is triggered, however, the role of this signaling axis changes, and the very same pathway begins to drive the formation of primitive cell types, namely the mesoderm and endoderm.

To explain these contrasting effects of Nodal/Activin signaling, a team led by the IMB's Ray Dunn explored the role of repressor proteins in the pathway. "We reasoned that one explanation for why hESCs do not differentiate in the presence of Nodal/Activin is the existence of repressor proteins that decorate the regulatory elements of differentiation genes and turn them off," Dunn explains. "In my lab, we identified one such repressor that fits this bill, [it is] called SNON."

SNON, an abbreviation of Ski-related oncogene N, is a potent repressor of SMAD2 and SMAD3 and, as Dunn's team showed, is abundant in undifferentiated hESCs, but only at the promoters of differentiation genes. At the onset of differentiation, SNON is destroyed by the proteasome, the cell's clean-up machinery for unwanted proteins. SNON levels then drop precipitously (see image), which allows SMAD2 and SMAD3 to cooperate with other transcription factors involved in the determination of cell fate, including FoxA2. This leads to the formation of early mesoderm and endoderm, two of the three primitive germ layers.

"Our research shows that when hESCs begin to differentiate, SNON is targeted for degradation," says Dunn. This finding is consistent with many studies of cancer cell lines, which, like hESCs, retain the ability for continuous proliferation and also have elevated levels of SNON.

One outstanding question, according to Dunn, remains the identity of the molecules that target SNON for degradation. A protein called ARKADIA is one suspect. ARKADIA is known to regulate SNON stability in a cell type-dependent fashion, but its role in embryonic stem cells remains unclear. "Follow up experiments in our lab aim to determine whether ARKADIA acts alone or collaborates to degrade SNON in hESCs," says Dunn.

More information: Tsuneyoshi, N., et al. The SMAD2/3 corepressor SNON maintains pluripotency through selective repression of mesendodermal genes in human ES cells. Genes & Development 26, 24712476 (2012). genesdev.cshlp.org/content/26/22/2471.abstract

Journal reference: Genes & Development

Provided by Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore

Continued here:
Stem cells: Keeping differentiation in check

Posted in Stem Cells | Comments Off on Stem cells: Keeping differentiation in check

Stem cells cruise to clinic

Posted: February 27, 2013 at 1:47 pm

Induced pluripotent stem cells could soon be used in human trials in Japan.

Kathrin Plath lab, Univ. Calif. Los Angeles/CIRM

In the seven years since their discovery, induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells have transformed basic research and won a Nobel prize. Now, a Japanese study is about to test the medical potential of these cells for the first time. Made by reprogramming adult cells into an embryo-like state that can form any cell type in the body, the cells will be transplanted into patients who have a debilitating eye disease.

Masayo Takahashi, an ophthalmologist at the RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology in Kobe, Japan, plans to submit her application for the study to the Japanese health ministry next month, and could be recruiting patients as early as September. Stem-cell researchers around the world hope that if the trial goes forward, it will allay some of the safety concerns over medical use of the cells. And the Japanese government hopes that its efforts to speed iPS cells to the clinic by generously funding such work will be vindicated (see Nature 493, 465; 2013).

The entire field is very dependent on this group and the Japanese regulatory agencies to ensure that preclinical evidence for safety and efficacy is very strong, says Martin Pera, a stem-cell expert at the University of Melbourne in Australia.

Takahashi, who has been studying the potential of iPS cells to rebuild diseased tissue for more than a decade, hopes to treat around six people who have severe age-related macular degeneration, a common cause of blindness that affects at least 1% of people aged over50. The form of the disease that Takahashi will treat occurs when blood vessels invade the retina, destroying the retinal pigment epithelium that supports the light-sensitive photoreceptors. This form can be treated with drugs that block the growth of new blood vessels, but these often have to be injected repeatedly into the eye.

Takahashi will take a peppercorn-size skin sample from the upper arm and add proteins that reprogram the cells into iPS cells. Other factors will transform the iPS cells into retinal cells. Then a small sheet of cells will be placed under the damaged area of the retina, where, if things go well, the cells will grow and repair the pigment epithelium.

The researchers hope to see the transplants slow or halt the disease, but their main goal is to show that the cells are safe. One concern is that the reprogrammed cells will trigger an immune reaction as has been seen in mice (T.Zhao etal. Nature 474, 212215; 2011). But that concern has faded after a recent study suggested that iPS cells did not provoke an immune reaction after all (see R. Araki et al. Nature 494, 100104; 2013 and Nature 493,145; 2013). Immune compatibility seems to be as expected, so I am not so concerned about that issue, says stem-cell expert George Daley of Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.

A bigger worry is that the reprogrammed cells might multiply uncontrollably and form tumours instead of healthy tissue. But Pera and Daley are reassured by the pre-clinical data that Takahashi has presented at conferences. Takahashi says that these results, submitted for publication, show that her iPS cells do not form tumours in mice and are safe in non-human primates.

Pera adds that the procedure to treat macular degeneration requires just a few stem cells, reducing the chances that a tumour will form. Also, any tumours would be relatively easy to remove because the eye is more accessible than some organs.

See the original post:
Stem cells cruise to clinic

Posted in Stem Cells | Comments Off on Stem cells cruise to clinic

CIRM Director Prieto on Disclosure of Reviewer Financial Interests

Posted: February 27, 2013 at 10:09 am

A member of the governing board of the
$3 billion California stem cell agency is weighing in on an item on
the California Stem Cell Report that called for public disclosure of the financial interests of the scientific reviewers, who make 98
percent of the decisions on awards by the agency.

Francisco Prieto, a Sacramento
physician and a patient advocate member of the board, said in an email:

“ It seems to me there's a bit
of 'damned if we do and damned if we don't' here. If the ICOC (the
agency governing board) decides to listen to some of the members of
the public who come to our meetings and overrule a recommendation of
the Grants Working Group(GWG), we're slammed for letting emotion trump
science, or bowing to special interests. If we just accept the
rankings of the GWG and approve all their recommendations, we're
criticized for not being truly independent.  I think we don't do
it often (for good reason) but should and do retain the right to look
at other factors besides those our scientific reviewers do, and make
our own decisions about funding. We are ultimately responsible, not
the scientific reviewers. 

“As for the issue of their
disclosure of personal conflicts of interest, from what I've read of
the NIH processes, ours are no less strict. The NIH requires that
reviewers disclose any conflicts to their institutions which I
believe must disclose them to the NIH, but I have not seen anything
requiring them to disclose all their personal financial & other
interests publicly, as we (ICOC members) have to.  When we were
assembling our group of reviewers initially, the fear was that many
of the best scientists would turn us down if we required them to make
the kind of personal disclosures we have to. I don't know how many we
might actually lose if that were the case, but as you know we do
require them to disclose to CIRM, and they have to leave the room
when any application for which they have a conflict is discussed.”

Our take: Prieto is right about the
board being perched on the horns of a dilemma, which has a lot to do
with Proposition 71, which created the agency, and American
scientific traditions, which place an extraordinary value on the
“integrity” of the review process. In this case, integrity refers
to adherence to reviewers' scientific judgments.
Proposition 71 placed the legal
authority for grant approvals in the hands of the CIRM board, which
has overridden decisions by reviewers in only 2 percent of the cases
since 2005. However, that was enough, with at least one high profile
case coupled with public appeals, to cause the Institute of Medicine
to raise concerns about the integrity of the CIRM grant review
process. Traditionally, peer reviewers are deemed to be the most
capable of making the scientific decisions about grant applications,
rather than a board appointed by University of California chancellors
and elected state officials.
Yet, if the board concedes the
decisions to the grant reviewers, state law is likely to require
public disclosure of their financial interests, a move that the board
has opposed for years. Former CIRM Chairman Robert Klein repeatedly
advised the board during its public grant approval processes that
reviewers' actions were only ”recommendations” and that the board
was actually making the decisions. However, it has long been apparent
that the reviewers were making the de facto decisions. A CIRM memo in
January confirmed that, producing the 98 percent figure.
The issues involving disclosure by
reviewers, integrity of peer reviews, the language of Proposition 71
and state law are difficult and may, in some cases, be at odds.
However, it makes little difference
what the NIH is doing. It is a much different organization and has
had a history of conflict of interest problems that it has been
trying to work through.
The trend in the academic and
scientific research community has been towards more public disclosure
rather than less because of many well-documented instances of
problems. What is at stake is the public's faith in scientific
research and the integrity of public institutions.
Our thanks to Prieto for his comments
on this important subject.  

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/OlA8vhJTIsA/cirm-director-prieto-on-disclosure-of.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on CIRM Director Prieto on Disclosure of Reviewer Financial Interests

Page 209«..1020..208209210211..220230..»