Page 1,042«..1020..1,0411,0421,0431,044..1,0501,060..»

Beware wild meat: UWI doctor looks at connection to virus spread – Loop News Trinidad and Tobago

Posted: May 1, 2020 at 11:43 am

Hunters and wild meat lovers are being warned that the practice of eating wild meat could result in the spread of more viruses.

Dr Christine Carrington, Professor of Molecular Genetics and Virology and Head of the Department of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences at the University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, said its believed that the novel coronavirus may have been transmitted to humans from bats.

Its almost certain that its ancestor was a bat virus but its still not clear whether that virus moved from bats directly to humans or from bats to another species and then to humans.

The real risk comes from wild animals. All the wild animals out there that have a lot of viruses in them. When we encroach on them or we consume them or we butcher them, theres always the chance of getting infected by viruses that they carry.

However, she said wild animals are not to blame, but humans who insist on hunting and eating them.

The problem is our encroachment into their habitats and our destruction of their habitats. What were doing is creating more opportunities for viruses to jump from animal populations into human populations.

She said another factor which led to the rapid spread of the virus is air travel, which allows human hosts to transmit viruses from country to country within hours.

When somebody gets infected the chance of them moving that virus and spreading it to other people is much greater now than it was before.

Armadillos, locally known as tattoos, are a popular wild meat option and can carry leptospirosis and leprosy.

According to Smithsonian, armadillosare the only other animals besides humans to hostthe leprosy bacillus.

Leptospirosisis a bacterial infection obtained from animals including cattle, sheep, goats and deer.

Leprosy (Hansen's disease) is an infectious disease which can affect the nerves of hands, feet, nose, skin and respiratory tract.

In 2011, theNew England Journal of Medicine publishedan articleformally linked the creature to human leprosy casespeople and armadillos tested in the study both shared the same exact strain of the disease.

Studies have shown that red howler monkeys can also become infected by malariaand yellow fever which are transmitted via mosquitos. Red howler monkeys are protected by law.

Hunting is prohibited by law fromMarch 1st to September 30th each year.

Read the rest here:
Beware wild meat: UWI doctor looks at connection to virus spread - Loop News Trinidad and Tobago

Posted in Molecular Genetics | Comments Off on Beware wild meat: UWI doctor looks at connection to virus spread – Loop News Trinidad and Tobago

Virology professor: Possibility of covid19 re-infection still unconfirmed – Trinidad News

Posted: May 1, 2020 at 11:43 am

NewsNarissa FraserYesterdayImage courtesy CDC

CHRISTINE Carrington, UWI professor of molecular genetics and virology, says reports of covid19 re-infection should be looked at "very carefully" as this possibility remains uncertain and unconfirmed.

At the Health Ministry's virtual press briefing on Thursday, Dr Carrington noted international reports of people who recovered from the virus but later tested positive. She said people have been using this as evidence of the possibility of re-infection, but cautioned that scientists are uncertain of this.

"It is possible that some of the genetic material from the virus remains in their body after they have been declared free of the virus itself. And that sort of 'genetic junk' that's left over can be detected by the test."

She said she recently read a study where samples were taken from supposedly re-infected patients to see if the virus detected was infectious, but it was not.

"It does not appear to be a true re-infection, it seems when people are infected they mount an immune response that protects them from further infection.

"What we don't know is how s that immune response is and how long it lasts."

View original post here:
Virology professor: Possibility of covid19 re-infection still unconfirmed - Trinidad News

Posted in Molecular Genetics | Comments Off on Virology professor: Possibility of covid19 re-infection still unconfirmed – Trinidad News

Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market 2020 Strategic Insights and Impact Analysis | Arcxis Biotechnologies, Cepheid, Myconostica…

Posted: May 1, 2020 at 11:43 am

Futuristic Reports, The growth, and development of Global Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market Report 2020 by Players, Regions, Type, and Application, Forecast to 2026 provides industry analysis and forecast from 2020-2026. Global Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market analysis delivers important insights and provide a competitive and useful advantage to the pursuers. Simultaneously, we classify different Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing market based on their definitions. The downstream, and upstream scrutiny are also carried out. Each segment includes an in-depth explanation of the factors that are useful to drive and restrain it.

Global Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market Organizations are confronting issues in keeping their offices completely useful because of a lack of staff and assets in the midst of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) flare-up. Get a hands-on over key drivers and menace to the Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing market to prepare your company future-ready the pandemic. Profits out report at exciting prices to learn new opening doors that Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing players can gain by during and after the Coronavirus emergency.

Key Players Mentioned in the study are Arcxis Biotechnologies, Cepheid, Myconostica, Roche Diagn, NorDiag ASA (The DiaSorin Group), Affymetrix, AutoGenomics Inc., EraGen Biosciences, Myriad Genetics Inc, Asuragen Inc., Qiagen N.V, GenMark Diagnostics Inc., AdvanDx, Quidel, Abbott Laboratories

For Better Understanding, Download FREE Sample Copy of Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market Report @ https://www.futuristicreports.com/request-sample/30816

Key Issues Addressed by Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market: It is very significant to have segmentation analysis to figure out the essential factors of growth and development of the market in a particular sector. The report offers well summarized and reliable information about every segment of growth, development, production, demand, types, application of the specific product which will be useful for the player to focus and highlight.

Businesses Segmentation of Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market:

On the basis on the applications, this report focuses on the status and Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing outlook for major applications/end users, sales volume, and growth rate for each application, including-

Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Application 4 Application 5

On the basis of types/products, this Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing report displays the revenue (Million USD), product price, market share, and growth rate of each type, split into-

Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5

Grab Best Discount on Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market Research Report [Single User | Enterprise Users] @ https://www.futuristicreports.com/check-discount/30816

Here is the Quick Overview of Report:

Market Representation: A situation of the business, Analysis, Main players, Size, SWOT analysis 2020 to 2026. Regional Scope: North America (U.S., Mexico, Canada), Europe (Germany, U.K., France, Italy, Spain, Russia, etc), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, South Africa, etc), South America (Brazil, Argentina, etc) Methodology: Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative research analysis. Report Coverage: Opportunities, Challenges, Market Size, Statistics, Restraints, Drivers, Limits, Market Share, and Current Trends. Forecast Period: 2020-2026

Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market Regional Analysis Includes:

Asia-Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia) Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.) North America (the United States, Mexico, and Canada.) South America (Brazil etc.) The Middle East and Africa (GCC Countries and Egypt.)

Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Insights that Study is going to Provide:

Current economy opportunities, outline, outlook, challenges, and trends and market trends, dimension, and expansion, aggressive evaluation, major competitors; The report provides a comprehensive evaluation of changing Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing aggressive energetic; The analysis acknowledges that the sector players key drivers of both conflicts and Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing growth assess the impact of limitations as well as the opportunities on the sector; Data regarding Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing industry share by every item fragment, alongside their reasonable worth, have been served in the report; Supply-demand ratio analysis in different end-user industries; Thorough assessment and Technological advances expected to influence market growth in each region;

Inquire More Before Buying @ https://www.futuristicreports.com/send-an-enquiry/30816

For More Information Kindly Contact:

Futuristic ReportsTel: +1-408-520-9037Email: [emailprotected]Media Release: https://www.futuristicreports.com/press-releases

Follow us on Blogger @ https://futuristicreports.blogspot.com/

Link:
Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market 2020 Strategic Insights and Impact Analysis | Arcxis Biotechnologies, Cepheid, Myconostica...

Posted in Molecular Genetics | Comments Off on Molecular Diagnostics In Infectious Disease Testing Market 2020 Strategic Insights and Impact Analysis | Arcxis Biotechnologies, Cepheid, Myconostica…

Explainer: COVID-19 Testing, Testing, One, Two, Three – The Village Green

Posted: May 1, 2020 at 11:43 am

This story was written and produced by NJ Spotlight. It is being republished under a special NJ News Commons content-sharing agreement related to COVID-19 coverage. To read more, visitnjspotlight.com.

Clickhere for the original article published on April 30, 2020, written by Lilo H. Stainton.

Like leaders in other states hard-hit by the novel coronavirus, Gov. Phil Murphy has repeatedly stressed that New Jerseys public health and economic revival must be rooted in widespread, rapid-result testing of residents.

The governor called for doubling the Garden States testing capacity approximately 10,000 tests a day but has yet to detail what testing methods will be used and how these programs will be deployed across the Garden State. Since the outbreak began in early March, more than 116,000 residents have been diagnosed with COVID-19, including nearly 6,800 who died.

Having a robust and greatly expanded testing program in place is vital to our being able to begin to reopen responsibly our state, Murphy said last week during a daily press briefing that highlighted one of two COVID-19 tests developed by Rutgers University, one of which officials said could be scaled up in weeks to test 20,000 or even 30,000 people daily.

Without testing, we will not be able to take the necessary steps to contain future cases and prevent them from becoming boomerang outbreaks, he added.

Officials at the state Department of Health note that diagnostic tests which can tell if the virus is currently present in someones body are most useful for guiding public health actions, like deciding to quarantine infected individuals to prevent the spread of COVID-19. These tests can be performed in various ways, involving swabs or saliva, and are now in use at more than 100 public and private screening sites in New Jersey, officials said.

There is also growing interest in antibody tests, generally performed by analyzing blood or plasma to find out if someones body contains an immunoglobulin a protein developed by the immune system that indicates a person has at some point been infected. (Scientists are still studying how these antibodies may protect people against reinfection.) While the accuracy of some versions has been questioned, antibody screenings are now publicly available at some hospitals and labs in New Jersey and Trenton-based Capital Health is testing members of its workforce to give them peace of mind and to better understand the spread of the virus.

We realized the highest-risk group getting infected and dying was health care workers based on what we saw in Italy and New York, said Dr. Robert Remstein, director of accountable care at Capital. We said, we need to do something to protect our workforce beyond getting them personal protective equipment.

Patrick De Deyne, Capitals head of clinical research, said the program was developed weeks ago when testing options were extremely limited and it will eventually involve close to 2,000 staff members, from those on the COVID-19 wards to housekeeping professionals. Everyone is equally important, he said.

Some states have started to deploy public antibody testing, including California and New York, which conducted random screening on 3,000 people at grocery stores and big-box outlets. One in five residents of New York City were likely infected, the state found; rates were lower in other areas. New Jersey is considering similar efforts, officials suggest.

The two types of test provide very different information, but experts believe both will be important as New Jersey and other states move forward. Youve got two options here: the snapshot of a moment in time versus watching a movie, Murphy explained Wednesday, adding that state officials were working morning, noon and night on a testing strategy. I suspect we will firmly come down on we need both. And we need both for different reasons, he said.

In adiagnostic test, samples are taken from a patients respiratory system and analyzed for the presence of SARS-Cov-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Initially, this required a nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab, in which a clinician took a sample from deep within a patients nasal cavity or the back of their throat.

Specimens are sent to a lab, assembled into a batch and run through a machine, a process that can take as little as 24 hours to 48 hours but stretched to beyond a week as the system became overloaded. The results are either positive someone has the virus or negative; the test cannot determine if someone has been infected in the past, but it can detect the virus in someone who is not showing symptoms, experts note.

These were the techniques used at some of the first public testing sites in New Jersey, operated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in conjunction with state and local officials, and initially limited to individuals who had fever, coughing or other COVID-19 symptoms. To date, roughly 2.7% of state residents have been tested.

But the collection process is invasive and uncomfortable for patients and requires significant staff and personal protective equipment, or PPE, the masks, gowns and other gear health care workers wear to avoid becoming infected. And the delay in processing created problems for public health officials seeking to contain the spread.

Researchers at Rutgers University tackled several of these problems. In March, David Alland, director of the Public Health Institute at New Jersey Medical School, announced that his team had worked with a molecular diagnostics company to create a point-of-contact test that could be processed on site in45 minutes; the development was hailed as a game-changer in the coronavirus response. (Other even faster tests have since been developed elsewhere.)

In mid-April, Rutgers Professor Andrew Brooks, head of RUCDR a Rutgers genetics research group based in Piscataway announced his team had worked with a private lab to create a saliva-based diagnostic test, the first of its kind to receive federal approval. This version has the advantage of being noninvasive, thus requiring far fewer clinicians to collect samples and therefore less PPE; officials havechosen it for usein the states five centers for developmentally disabled adults and at 16 nursing homes in South Jersey. Processing the saliva does take 24 hours to 48 hours in a lab, however.

Another metric is theantibody or serologic test, which indicates exposure to the virus at some point in the past; different types of tests identify different forms of antibodies, which can change during the course of an immune response. But it could be another six months before experts can determine what level of protection these antibodies actually provide against reinfection, experts said.

At this time theres not enough information from these antibody tests to make a determination like a back-to-work determination, said Dr. Christina Tan, New Jerseys state epidemiologist.

While these tests arent useful in diagnosing a patient or making quarantine decisions, they can help researchers better understand the full impact of COVID-19, which can be spread by people who are asymptomatic. It can also be used to clear individuals who want to donate convalescent plasma in which white blood cells from those who had COVID-19 are given to new patients to help build their immunity.

But there are questions about the accuracy of these tests, and federal officials have approved just a handful of the more than 100 versions developed. People also react very differently to infections, with some producing more antibodies than others, further complicating the testing process.

Follow this link:
Explainer: COVID-19 Testing, Testing, One, Two, Three - The Village Green

Posted in Molecular Genetics | Comments Off on Explainer: COVID-19 Testing, Testing, One, Two, Three – The Village Green

The Republicans who were once so pro-life they fought over one woman on life support now want to sacrifice grandma for the economy – The Independent

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:44 am

Years after the United States elected a president with the motto America First, we just pulled ahead in a race no one wants to win: the most deaths from the novel coronavirus. In order to limit casualties from a catastrophic second wave, states have enacted measures of differing severity, from shutting down some businesses to move severe shelter in place orders mandating citizens stay in their homes.

However, months into this disruption, some restless Americans are looking for a way out and there are Republican politicians eager to placate them. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky bemoaned the lack of commerce on Twitter and threw his support behind re-opening the economy. Georgia Governor Brian Kemp is way ahead of him, announcing plans to lift restrictions on businesses from bowling alleys to hair salons amidst widespread pushback in his own state. Lt. Governor Dan Patrick of Texas skipped the subtext and went straight to the point with the breathtaking assertion that there are more important things than living, a statement that presumably doesnt include himself or his loved ones.

Its puzzling how these politicians think re-opening will lead to business as usual with an unpredictable contagion floating around. Commerce relies on consumers, and if a majority of those consumers are rightfully afraid for themselves and their families, how exactly is the government supposed to put things back to pre-pandemic levels without forcing us to go to the mall on pain of arrest?

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

Even if they just intend to let those who dont care about the risks shop, go to work and pretend everything is normal, theres a very real danger that way more Americans will die as a result. But according to Lt. Gov. Patrick, its a justifiable sacrifice for the good of the nations GDP.

This is fascinating coming from a party that has long labeled itself as pro-life over the years when it suits them. Lets look at one of the most extreme examples: Terri Schiavo, a woman whose private medical battle became a tool for the Republican party during the early 2000s. After a Florida trial court concluded that Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and would have wanted the feeding tube keeping her alive to be removed, Republicans at all levels became involved. Governor Jeb Bush pulled in everyone from his brother in the White House to the United States Congress to unsuccessfully fight the trial courts order for years. It would seem to a casual observer that this was a political party that would stop at nothing to save a life.

This wasnt the first time Republicans (or the Bushes) were performatively pro-life. During his first year in office President George W. Bush severely limited federal funding for research involving embryonic stem cells, giving evangelical conservatives an important win. Bush continued to oppose bills to loosen these restrictions, citing concerns that taxpayers would be funding the destruction of potential life. Again, if you didnt know anything else about the GOP you would think that their concerns were so pure as to encompass cells that could become a human being someday.

This stated concern for life didnt stop with the Bush brothers. Republicans took a stand during debates surrounding President Obamas signature legislation, the Affordable Care Act. This proposed legislation aimed to increase the amount of people with health insurance (which is positively correlated with life preservation). However, former GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin asserted repeatedly that the law would lead to death panels that would decide whether elderly Americans would live or die. Inspired by Palin, the right painted a dystopian picture of a future where liberal judges would decide grandmas fate. A decade later and pearl-clutching at treatment of older Americans has taken a turn since they are inconveniently deemed to be more at risk of dying of Covid-19. Now the elderly, it seems, are at best inessential to public life and, at worst, expendable sacrifices to the gods of capitalism.

Here is whats revealing in each of those episodes: championing the life of Terri Schiavo, or the potential life of stem cells, or the imaginary life of a condemned grandma didnt cost Republicans a nickel. But the people who would potentially die if re-opening measures are scaled back are expensive. Theyre also inconvenient for the partys narratives. They include the medical workers who counter-protest the Confederate flag-wavers who want to be able to get a haircut. They are immigrants who risk their lives to provide you with food. They are, disproportionately, black, indicative of the virulent racism in our country.

Championing their lives means economic sacrifice with no legislative gain. That is, apparently, a bridge too far.

View original post here:
The Republicans who were once so pro-life they fought over one woman on life support now want to sacrifice grandma for the economy - The Independent

Posted in Kentucky Stem Cells | Comments Off on The Republicans who were once so pro-life they fought over one woman on life support now want to sacrifice grandma for the economy – The Independent

Dr. Timothy Chan to lead Cleveland Clinic’s new Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology – Crain’s Cleveland Business

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:43 am

Dr. Timothy Chan, an immuno-oncology and cancer genomics expert, has been named director of the Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology at Cleveland Clinic, according to a news release.

He will lead the new center, which brings together multidisciplinary experts from across the system to advance research and treatment related to immuno-oncology, a rapidly growing field.

"Immunotherapy is the future of research in cancer and various other diseases and Cleveland Clinic has made it a priority by establishing this new center," Dr. Serpil Erzurum, chair of the Clinic's Lerner Research Institute, said in a prepared statement. "The Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology will empower clinicians and scientists throughout the enterprise to advance personalized cancer care and breakthrough immunotherapy research at Cleveland Clinic."

The center, which opened this month with the arrival of Chan, was approved in 2019.

Chan joins the system from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell School of Medicine, where he led the Immunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform and was a tenured professor, the PaineWebber Chair and the Translational Oncology Division chair, according to the release, which notes he is a pioneer in using genomics to determine which patients will respond best to certain types of immunotherapies. He also joins the leadership of the National Center for Regenerative Medicine of Case Western Reserve University and is on staff in the Genomic Medicine Institute of the Lerner Research Institute and the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Taussig Cancer Institute, according to the release.

The Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology will have four arms: a Cleveland cell therapy program in collaboration with the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center; immunologic medicine and immuno-oncology labs; a precision immuno-oncology program; and a precision immuno-oncology and developmental therapeutics program.

The center will recruit experts from around the country and globe who specialize in computational science, immunotherapy and cancer immunology, according to the release.

Initially, the new center will have sites focused on immunotherapy research and developmental therapeutics in both Cleveland and the Cleveland Clinic Florida Research and Innovation Center, a 107,000-square-foot laboratory and office space slated to open this summer in Port St. Lucie, Fla. Chan will also collaborate with experts in the new Center for Global and Emerging Pathogens, which was announced last week after a year and a half of planning. This center looks to broaden the understanding of emerging pathogens (from Zika virus to SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19) and expedite critically needed treatments and vaccines.

"Innovation in precision immunotherapy is one of the most exciting areas in cancer research," said Dr. Brian Bolwell, chairman of Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center, in a prepared statement. "The addition of Dr. Chan, a pioneer in cancer genomics, and the new center's focus on research and clinical trials will strengthen our ability to provide advanced treatment options for our patients."

Board certified in radiation oncology and an elected member of the Association of American Physicians, Chan earned his M.D. and Ph.D. in genetics from Johns Hopkins University, where he completed his residency in radiation oncology and a postdoctoral fellowship in the division of tumor biology, according to the release. He has published more than 200 articles in peer-reviewed journals, has made landmark discoveries in his field and has received numerous awards, including the National Cancer Institute Outstanding Investigator Award in 2018, according to the release.

Read more:
Dr. Timothy Chan to lead Cleveland Clinic's new Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology - Crain's Cleveland Business

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Dr. Timothy Chan to lead Cleveland Clinic’s new Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology – Crain’s Cleveland Business

Regenerative Medicine Market Share Analysis and Research Report by 2025 – News by aeresearch

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:42 am

The Regenerative Medicine Market report upholds the future market predictions related to Regenerative Medicine market size, revenue, production, Consumption, gross margin and other substantial factors. Also Regenerative Medicine Market is Segmented Regenerative Medicine Market Share, Size, Trends, & Industry Analysis Report, By Therapy (Tissue engineering, Cell Therapy, Immunotherapy, Gene Therapy); By Products (Acellular Products, Cellular Products); By Application (Oncology, Dermatology, Orthopedic, Cardiology, CNS Disease, Diabetes, Others); By Region: Segment Forecast, 2018 - 2026. It also examines the role of the prominent Regenerative Medicine market players involved in the industry including their corporate overview. While emphasizing the key driving factors for Regenerative Medicine market, the report also offers a full study of the future trends and developments of the market.

The Regenerative Medicine Market is anticipated to reach over USD 79.23 billion by 2026 according to a new research. In 2017, the cell therapy dominated the global Regenerative Medicine market, in terms of revenue. North America is expected to be the leading contributor to the global market revenue in 2017.

The regenerative medicine market is primarily driven by the increasing number of individuals suffering from cancer, rising need to monitor and treating these chronic diseases in the limited time. Furthermore, stringent government policies, proper reimbursement policies, and increasing government healthcare expenditure for developing healthcare infrastructure to also boost the market growth in coming years. Also, rising number of organ transplantation, and increasing number of products in pipeline that are waiting for approval create major opportunity for the regenerative medicines in the coming years. However, some of the ethical and religious concerns for the use of stem cells, and lack of proper regulatory for the approval of various drugs would impede the market growth during the forecast period.

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-sample/179813

The key players operating in the Regenerative Medicine market include Organogenesis Inc., Vericel Corporation, Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., Stryker Corporation, and NuVasive, Inc., Medtronic Plc., Acelity, Cook Biotech Inc., Integra LifeSciences, and C.R. Bard. These companies launch new products and collaborate with other market leaders to innovate and launch new products to meet the increasing needs and requirements of consumers.

North America generated the highest revenue in the Regenerative Medicine market in 2017, and is expected to be the leading region globally during the forecast period. Increasing number of patients suffering from chronic diseases, improved healthcare infrastructure and health facilities, accessibility of healthcare facilities, are the primary factors driving the market growth in this region. While, Asia Pacific to be the fastest growing region in the coming years. The growth in this region is majorly attributed to the developing healthcare infrastructure of the countries like India, & China, and rising awareness for the use of regenerative medicines as an effective treatment option for chronic diseases.

Regenerative medicine is a branch of medicine that regrows, and repairs the damaged cells in the human body. These medicines include the use of stem cells, tissue engineering, that further helps in developing new organ that function smoothly. These medicines have the caliber of developing an entire organ as these cells are multipotent. The cells are majorly isolated from bone marrow, and umbilical cord blood.

A Pin-point overview of TOC of Regenerative Medicine Market are:

Overview and Scope of Regenerative Medicine Market

Regenerative Medicine Market Insights

Industry analysis - Porter's Five Force

Company Profiles

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-for-customization/179813

See original here:
Regenerative Medicine Market Share Analysis and Research Report by 2025 - News by aeresearch

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Regenerative Medicine Market Share Analysis and Research Report by 2025 – News by aeresearch

Organoids: Exploring Liver Cancer Initiation and the Possibilities of Personalized Glioblastoma Treatment – Technology Networks

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:42 am

In the search for improved and high-throughput in vitro models, organoids have emerged as a promising 3D cell culture technology.1 Defined as a three-dimensional multicellular in vitro tissue construct, organoids are derived from cells that spontaneously self-organize into properly differentiated functional cell types to mimic at least some function of an organ.2 Organoid formation is driven by signaling cues in the extracellular matrix and medium, and is influenced by the particular cell types that are present.2 Compared with two-dimensional cultures, organoids incorporate more physiologically relevant cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, and are a better reflection of the complex network found in vivo.With significant opportunities for studies of human-specific disease mechanisms, personalized medicine, drug discovery, pharmacokinetic profiling and regenerative medicine, organoids are being pursued across a range of disciplines. Many anticipate that these cell culture models will result in more efficient translation of research into clinical success. In this article, we explore the various types of organoids under development and shine a spotlight on some of the different approaches to organoids in cancer research.

Organoids can be derived from pluripotent stem cells (including embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells) or neonatal or adult stem cells from healthy or diseased tissue.1,2 Cancer organoids have been generated from a range of human cancer tissues and cell lines including colon, pancreas, prostate, liver, breast, bladder and lung.6-12 This year, a research group led by Hongjun Song, Professor of Neuroscience at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, published a report in Cell detailing methods for the rapid generation of patient-derived glioblastoma organoids.13Fresh tumor specimens were removed from 53 patient cases to produce microdissected tumor pieces that could survive, develop a spherical morphology and continuously grow in culture for at least two weeks (Figure 1). The production of glioblastoma organoids was achieved while maintaining a high level of similarity between the organoids and their parental tumors, with the expression levels of specific markers showing stability over long-term culture (48 weeks). Importantly, native cell-cell interactions were preserved by avoiding mechanical and enzymatic single-cell dissociation of the resected tumor. As Song explains, this was achieved on a clinically relevant timescale: Normally, the treatment for glioblastoma patients starts one month after surgery. The idea is that glioblastoma organoids can be generated within two weeks and subjected to testing of different treatment strategies to come up with the best option for a personalized treatment strategy.

Figure 1: Glioblastoma organoid generation, from fresh tumor pieces to frozen spherical organoids. Image used with permission from Jacob et al. 2020.One concern with organoid formation and expansion is the potential variability of the serum or Matrigel that can exist across batches and sources, creating variable exogenous factors that could cause the organoid to divert. This ultimately compromises reproducibility, a major bottleneck of current organoid systems.2,13 To avoid this source of error, Songs group used an optimized and defined medium devoid of variable factors that could contribute to the clonal selection of specific cell populations in culture.Glioblastoma is the most prevalent primary malignant brain tumor in adults,14 and having glioblastoma organoids available for research would present significant opportunities, explains Song: They can be used to test different drugs based on mutation profiles and to investigate mechanisms underlying tumor progression, drug sensitivity and resistance. While the accuracy of these predictions would need to be verified, researchers hope that patient-derived organoids will be used to help inform oncologists, accelerate drug discovery, and lead to better clinical trial design.Live-Cell Monitoring: Optimizing Workflows for Advanced Cell Models

As cell-based assays become technically more complex, the need to holistically capture dynamic and sometimes subtle cellular events becomes ever more important. By providing real-time imaging data of cellular events without disturbing the sample during the cell culture workflow, live-cell monitoring can support the optimization of these advanced models. Download this whitepaper to discover how live-cell monitoring can support such optimization, with a breadth of applications.

Sponsored Content

For this to be achieved, techniques for the culture and genetic manipulation of primary human hepatocytes need to be refined. This has mostly been pursued through the culture of liver progenitors or fetal hepatocytes, which facilitate studies of liver cancers related to stem cells.16-18 To address the need for organoids derived from functional hepatocytes, researchers across 14 universities, research institutes and hospitals in China and Japan collaborated to genetically engineer reprogrammed human hepatocytes.18 The study, published in Nature Cell Biology, details the successful generation of organoids that represented two major types of liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma: HCC and intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: ICC), derived from directly reprogrammed human hepatocytes (hiHeps).Lead author Lulu Sun, of the Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology at the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, provides an overview of how the liver cancer organoids were developed: Genomic aberrations begin to occur during cancer initiation, and the normal cells gradually became malignant. We modeled this process by introducing HCC/ICC-related oncogenes into the organoids with a lentivirus. Oncogenes were selected based on their mutation frequency and previous results in animals. Sun notes that gradual changes in cell and organoid morphology were observed in vitro, along with changes in the expression of HCC-related markers, before the organoids were transplanted to inspect their malignancy in vivo: We cultured these organoids in vitro for about two weeks and transplanted them into the liver lobule of immunodeficient mice. Six to eight weeks later, they formed features identical to HCCs.Even though numerous oncogenes have been identified through whole genome sequencing, it has been difficult to determine whether they can drive the initiation of human liver cancers. Ultrastructural analyses revealed that c-Myc, a well-known oncogene, induced HCC-initiation and a unique cellular phenotype in the hiHep organoids. In these cells, mitochondria were in unusually close contact with endoplasmic reticulum membranes. This excessive coupling between mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (referred to as a MAM phenotype) was shown to facilitate HCC-initiation and when blocked, prevented the progression towards HCC, says Sun: Not only were the expression levels of HCC-related genes in organoids reduced, but significantly reduced cancers were formed in mice.Resolving these alterations in mitochondrial organization represents a new potential approach to liver cancer therapies, and possibly others, Sun explains: Restoration of a proper MAM interface may be a useful approach in preventing c-MYC-initiated HCCs. In addition, recently, an increasing number of works captured ultrastructural alterations, including MAMs, in the course of diseases including Alzheimer's disease and fatty liver diseases. Our results showed that the alterations between communications of organelles may also contribute to the cancer initiation process.All About Organoids

Organoids are 3D cell clusters with the structural and functional features of an organ, and can be generated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) or adult stem cells acquired from a specific patient. Consequently, organoids make it possible to study the impact of a drug on a specific disease, even a persons own disease they are changing the face of research and medicine as we know it. Download this eBook to discover more about organoids including their analysis and how they are effecting personalized medicine.

Sponsored Content

2. Huch, M., Knoblich, J. A., Lutolf, M. P, et al. (2017). The hope and the hype of organoid research. Development, 144(6), 938941. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.150201

3. Hutchinson, L., & Kirk, R. (2011). High drug attrition ratesWhere are we going wrong? Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 8(4), 189190. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.34

4. Fan, H., Demirci, U., Chen, P. (2019). Emerging organoid models: Leaping forward in cancer research. Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 12(142). https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-019-0832-4

5. Drost, J., Clevers, H. (2018). Organoids in cancer research. Nature Reviews Cancer, 18(7), 407418. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-018-0007-6

6. van de Wetering, M., Francies, H. E., Francis, J. M., et al. (2015). Prospective Derivation of a Living Organoid Biobank of Colorectal Cancer Patients. Cell, 161(4), 933945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.053

7. Boj, S. F., Hwang, C.-I., Baker, L. A., et al. (2015). Organoid Models of Human and Mouse Ductal Pancreatic Cancer. Cell, 160(12), 324338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.021

8. Puca, L., Bareja, R., Prandi, D., et al. (2018). Patient derived organoids to model rare prostate cancer phenotypes. Nature Communications, 9(1), 2404. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04495-z

9. Broutier, L., Mastrogiovanni, G., Verstegen, M. M., et al. (2017). Human primary liver cancerderived organoid cultures for disease modeling and drug screening. Nature Medicine, 23(12), 14241435. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4438

10. Sachs, N., de Ligt, J., Kopper, O., et al. (2018). A Living Biobank of Breast Cancer Organoids Captures Disease Heterogeneity. Cell, 172(12), 373-386.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.010

11. Lee, S. H., Hu, W., Matulay, J. T., et al. (2018). Tumor Evolution and Drug Response in Patient-Derived Organoid Models of Bladder Cancer. Cell, 173(2), 515-528.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.017

12. Kim, M., Mun, H., Sung, C. O., et al. (2019). Patient-derived lung cancer organoids as in vitro cancer models for therapeutic screening. Nature Communications, 10(1), 3991. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11867-6

13. Jacob, F., Salinas, R. D., Zhang, D. Y., et al. (2020). A Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Organoid Model and Biobank Recapitulates Inter- and Intra-tumoral Heterogeneity. Cell, 180(1), 188-204.e22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.03

14. Ostrom, Q. T., Gittleman, H., Truitt, G., et al. (2018). CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 20112015. Neuro-Oncology, 20(suppl_4), iv1iv86. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy131

15. Bruix, J., Han, K.-H., Gores, G., et al. (2015). Liver cancer: Approaching a personalized care. Journal of Hepatology, 62(1), S144S156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.007

16. Hu, H., Gehart, H., Artegiani, B., et al. (2018). Long-Term Expansion of Functional Mouse and Human Hepatocytes as 3D Organoids. Cell, 175(6), 1591-1606.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.013

17. Zhang, K., Zhang, L., Liu, W., et al. (2018). In Vitro Expansion of Primary Human Hepatocytes with Efficient Liver Repopulation Capacity. Cell Stem Cell, 23(6), 806-819.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2018.10.018

18. Sun, L., Wang, Y., Cen, J., et al, (2019). Modelling liver cancer initiation with organoids derived from directly reprogrammed human hepatocytes. Nature Cell Biology, 21(8), 10151026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-019-0359-5

19. Madhavan, M., Nevin, Z. S., Shick, H. E., et al. (2018). Induction of myelinating oligodendrocytes in human cortical spheroids. Nature Methods, 15(9), 700706. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0081-4

20. Post, Y., Puschhof, J., Beumer, J., et al. (2020). Snake Venom Gland Organoids. Cell, 180(2), 233-247.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.038

21. Calandrini, C., Schutgens, F., Oka, R., et al. (2020). An organoid biobank for childhood kidney cancers that captures disease and tissue heterogeneity. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1310. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15155-6

22. Subramanian, A., Sidhom, E.-H., Emani, M., et al. (2019). Single cell census of human kidney organoids shows reproducibility and diminished off-target cells after transplantation. Nature Communications, 10(1), 5462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13382-0

Read the original post:
Organoids: Exploring Liver Cancer Initiation and the Possibilities of Personalized Glioblastoma Treatment - Technology Networks

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Organoids: Exploring Liver Cancer Initiation and the Possibilities of Personalized Glioblastoma Treatment – Technology Networks

Missouri S&T student teams to compete in regional entrepreneur competition finals – Missouri S&T News and Research

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:42 am

Two teams of students from Missouri S&T will compete in the final rounds of the Regnier Venture Creation Challenge 2020, a University of Missouri-Kansas City business plan and pitch competition open to university students in Missouri, Iowa, Kansas and Nebraska.

Missouri S&Ts two teams will compete live virtually in the final round on Friday, May 1, in the Blue KC Healthcare Innovation segment of the competition. So far, the teams have competed against 50 other teams from seven colleges and universities, with projects ranging from medicine to computer science to accounting.

One team is named The GuideLine and is comprised of Deshawn Jones, a senior in biological sciences from Chicago, and David Clausen, a senior in mechanical engineering from Jefferson City, Missouri. The two have created a device to streamline lumbar puncture procedures and reduce the 25 percent of punctures that create potentially severe complications, such as paralysis.

Another team is named Striae Away and is comprised of Nathaniel Blackwell, a senior in biological sciences from St. Louis, and Jessica Crites, a senior in biological sciences from Marthasville, Missouri. Their project uses a bioactive glass composite that could treat pre-existing scars with pregnancy stretch marks as its first market.

The two projects were developed while the students were in a biodesign class taught by Dr. Julie Semon, an assistant professor of biological sciences and director of the Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine at S&T.

For more information about the competition, visit bloch.umkc.edu/entrepreneurship.

See the original post here:
Missouri S&T student teams to compete in regional entrepreneur competition finals - Missouri S&T News and Research

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Missouri S&T student teams to compete in regional entrepreneur competition finals – Missouri S&T News and Research

How to get rid of sore muscles, and why your muscles get sore – Insider – INSIDER

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:42 am

Sore muscles can occur any time you exercise in a new way that your body isn't used to, or when you increase the intensity of your usual workouts.

Here's what you need to know about why your muscles feel sore and how to relieve soreness.

There are two types of muscle soreness: acute and delayed onset.

Acute muscle soreness happens during the activity say if the exercise is too intense or you're using bad form and is an indication you should stop immediately because it could lead to muscle or joint damage, according to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM).

Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), on the other hand, sets in about 12 to 24 hours after exercise. It's why you feel so sore the morning after a workout. These sore muscles usually last one to three days, though it can take up to 10 days for soreness to resolve completely. And while DOMS may hurt, it can be helpful for muscle repair.

As you're working out, your muscle fibers may tear slightly. Those tiny muscle tears lead to hypertrophy, which means the muscle cells get bigger, says Julia Iafrate, DO, an assistant professor of rehabilitation and regenerative medicine at Columbia University Medical Center. Once you let the muscle fibers recover, the muscle ends up stronger than it was before.

Just make sure you don't work out those muscles before they're done healing trying to perform intense exercise on sore muscles can result in further pain or even injury.

While there's no way to speed up the body's muscle repair process, you can treat or reduce the symptoms of soreness in a few ways:

You may also be tempted to pop an anti-inflammatory medication like Advil or Aleve until the soreness subsides, but Iafrate warns this could delay muscle repair.

"If the inflammation is too much to bear, then sure, take an Aleve, but it's not something you want to do continuously," she says. "You actually need that inflammation in order to heal."

Run-of-the-mill soreness doesn't warrant a doctor's visit. "But there's a fine line of what's too much soreness," Iafrate says.

Soreness can feel achy, while a muscle strain, which is more serious, may be accompanied by swelling, bruising, and pain, according to Harvard Health.

Iafrate says if your soreness lasts longer than a week, it could indicate something concerning. As long as you have a safe workout regimen, the risk is low for these conditions, but they may occur:

You'll also want to take debilitating pain, swollen limbs, or darker-than-normal urine as a sign to seek medical attention, according to the ACSM. Iafrate suggests seeing a primary care physician or a sports medicine specialist if you're concerned about muscle pain.

Go here to see the original:
How to get rid of sore muscles, and why your muscles get sore - Insider - INSIDER

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on How to get rid of sore muscles, and why your muscles get sore – Insider – INSIDER

Page 1,042«..1020..1,0411,0421,0431,044..1,0501,060..»