Page 1,044«..1020..1,0431,0441,0451,046..1,0501,060..»

‘Science Sam’ to explore U of T research with new 3Qs at the U video series – News@UofT

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:41 am

The global pandemic has led us to connect through screens more than ever for learning, working, and checking in with family and friends.

Now, starting May 4, you'll be able to connect with and learn from University of Toronto experts in a new weekly video series hosted by U of T alumna Samantha Yammine, the neuroscientist and science communicator better known as Science Sam on social media.

Yammine will host 3Qs at the Uwith some of the university's top researchers, asking each onethree questions in an effort to better understand their area of expertise.

Join me each week for 3Qs at the U, where we will talk with some amazing experts from all three U of T campuses about some interesting ideas, says Yammine, who completed two degrees at U of T, including a PhD in molecular genetics.

Read the original post:
'Science Sam' to explore U of T research with new 3Qs at the U video series - News@UofT

Posted in Molecular Genetics | Comments Off on ‘Science Sam’ to explore U of T research with new 3Qs at the U video series – News@UofT

Clinicians Treating COVID-19 Warn: Dont Rush to Try Novel Therapies – SciTechDaily

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:41 am

Intensivists caution against the use of premature novel therapies in lieu of traditional critical care principles in patients with COVID-19 in a recent correspondence letter in the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology.

In A Call for Rational Intensive Care in the Era of COVID-19, Benjamin Singer, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry & Molecular Genetics, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, and co-authors write that the intensive care unit is already optimized for the care of COVID-19 patients and that departures from standard of care require evidence

The COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented, resulting in a surge of critically ill patients that have tested the resources of medical centers around the country. The overwhelming patient demand and dwindling resources combined to trigger a cascade of emotions, stress, and fatigue. As hospital staff mobilize to meet the growing demand of COVID-19 patients, some clinicians are making note of a pattern that has emerged where proven interventions are neglected or even rejected.

Intensivists caution against novel therapies in lieu of traditional critical care principles. Credit: ATS

Dr. Singer, who is also associate editor of the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, argues that this is not the time to abandon reason. Instead, he calls for a rational approach to translating science to the bedside as we care for patients with severe COVID-19. We want to come out of the COVID-19 pandemic knowing what works and what doesnt work for severe viral pneumonia patients.

He added that physicians continuously learn from their patients by making observations and so far what theyve learned is that the most effective treatment for COVID-19 patients is supportive therapy. Until there are clinical trials that offer clear direction on a different treatment approach, state-of-the-art supportive care is the best option.

Off-label and off-study use of novel or repurposed therapeutics prevents potential benefits or harms from being clearly defined and puts some of our most vulnerable people at risk, cautioned Dr. Singer.

Reference: A Call for Rational Intensive Care in the Era of COVID-19 by Benjamin D. Singer, MD; Manu Jain, MD; G.R. Scott Budinger, MD and Richard G. Wunderink, MD, 21 April 2020, American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology.DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2020-0151LE

See more here:
Clinicians Treating COVID-19 Warn: Dont Rush to Try Novel Therapies - SciTechDaily

Posted in Molecular Genetics | Comments Off on Clinicians Treating COVID-19 Warn: Dont Rush to Try Novel Therapies – SciTechDaily

Needham Keeps a Buy Rating on NeoGenomics (NEO) – Analyst Ratings

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:41 am

In a report released today, Stephen Unger from Needham maintained a Buy rating on NeoGenomics (NEO Research Report), with a price target of $33.00. The companys shares closed last Tuesday at $27.97.

According to TipRanks.com, Unger is a 5-star analyst with an average return of 13.5% and a 75.4% success rate. Unger covers the Healthcare sector, focusing on stocks such as Myriad Genetics, Thermo Fisher, and PerkinElmer.

NeoGenomics has an analyst consensus of Strong Buy, with a price target consensus of $33.00, implying an 8.7% upside from current levels. In a report issued on April 21, Stephens also resumed coverage with a Buy rating on the stock with a $33.00 price target.

See todays analyst top recommended stocks >>

The company has a one-year high of $34.97 and a one-year low of $18.53. Currently, NeoGenomics has an average volume of 930.8K.

Based on the recent corporate insider activity of 51 insiders, corporate insider sentiment is negative on the stock. This means that over the past quarter there has been an increase of insiders selling their shares of NEO in relation to earlier this year. Last month, Steven C. Jones, a Director at NEO bought 125,000 shares for a total of $597,500.

TipRanks has tracked 36,000 company insiders and found that a few of them are better than others when it comes to timing their transactions. See which 3 stocks are most likely to make moves following their insider activities.

NeoGenomics, Inc. is a clinical laboratory, which specializes in cancer genetics diagnostic testing and pharma services. It operates through the following two segments: Clinical and Pharma Services. The Clinical Services segment offers clinical cancer testing services to community-based pathologists. The Pharma Services segments supports pharmaceutical firms in their drug development programs by supporting various clinical trials and research. The Clinical Services Segment provides various clinical testing services to community-based pathology practices, hospital pathology labs and academic centers with reimbursement from various payers including client direct billing, commercial insurance, Medicare and other government payers, and patients. The Pharma Services segment: provides comprehensive testing services in supports pharmaceutical clients oncology programs from discovery to commercialization. Its services include cytogenetics, fluorescence in-situ hybridization, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, anatomic pathology and molecular genetic testing. The company was founded by Michael T. Dent on October 29, 1998 and is headquartered in Fort Myers, FL.

The rest is here:
Needham Keeps a Buy Rating on NeoGenomics (NEO) - Analyst Ratings

Posted in Molecular Genetics | Comments Off on Needham Keeps a Buy Rating on NeoGenomics (NEO) – Analyst Ratings

MRC scientists elected Fellows of the Royal Society – Cambridge Network

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:41 am

As the UKs independent academy for science, the Royal Society seeks to promote excellence in science through its fellowships and foreign memberships. Each year, the Royal Society elects up to 52 new Fellows and up to 10 new Foreign Members, recognising scientists who have made substantial contributions to the improvement of knowledge in the sciences.

Professor Gordon Brown, Director of the MRC Centre for Medical Mycology at the University of Exeter, is an international leader in the fields of innate immunity and medical mycology. Professor Browns work is recognised for significantly advancing our understanding of host-pathogen interactions, and his research has helped to bring mycology into the mainstream interest of the immunology community.

Dr Francois Guillemot is a Senior Group Leader focused on molecular neurobiology at the Francis Crick Institute. Dr Guillemots Group aims to learn exactly how cells of the nervous system form, where and at what stage in development, in order to generate new ideas for therapies to treat brain disorders.

Professor Andrew Jackson is a clinical geneticist and Programme Leader at the MRC Human Genetics Unit at the University of Edinburgh and is the Deputy Chair of the MRC Molecular and Cellular Medicine Board. Professor Jacksons research has focussed on the identification of genes for inherited neurological disorders and in defining the functional role of the proteins they encode, in particular human disease genes acting in growth and inflammation, involved in fundamental cellular processes.

Dr William Schafer is a Group Leader in the Division of Neurobiology at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology. Dr Schafers research addresses basic questions about how ion channels and signaling molecules function in the context of neural circuitry to produce behaviour and he is recognised for being instrumental in developing optical approaches for measuring neural activity, and applying these methods to investigate how individual genes affect the activities of neurons in defined neural circuits, and how this impacts behaviour.

Visit the Royal Society website for a full list of the Fellows and Foreign Members elected in 2020.

Follow this link:
MRC scientists elected Fellows of the Royal Society - Cambridge Network

Posted in Molecular Genetics | Comments Off on MRC scientists elected Fellows of the Royal Society – Cambridge Network

Five UC San Diego Professors Elected to National Academy of Sciences – UC San Diego Health

Posted: April 30, 2020 at 4:41 am

Clockwise from top left, Dmitri Basov, Lawrence Goldstein, Terence Hwa, Clifford Kubiak, Kimberly Prather

The National Academy of Sciences elected five professors affiliated with the University of California San Diego to membership in the prestigious National Academy of Sciences, one of the highest honors bestowed on U.S. scientists and engineers.

UC San Diego faculty members Dmitri Basov, Lawrence Goldstein, Terence Hwa, Clifford Kubiak, and Kimberly Prather whose work spans fields ranging from medicine and biological sciences to atmospheric chemistry and physics were recognized Monday in recognition of their distinguished and continuing achievements in original research, according to the Academy. They were among 120 American scientists and 26 international members named this year.

For a young institution such as ours, having five professors inducted into the National Academy of Sciences speaks volumes of the innovative and visionary nature of this university and our well-respected and accomplished faculty, said UC San Diego Chancellor Pradeep K. Khosla. I am proud to see the career accomplishments of these five professors recognized on such a distinguished national platform, alongside the countrys other leading researchers.

This brings the total number of National Academy of Sciences members from UC San Diego to 86.

Dmitri Basov is an affiliated UC San Diego professor in the Department of Physics, where he served as chair between 2010 and 2015. He is also a Higgins professor in the Department of Physics at Columbia University, where he is the principal investigator of the Basov Infrared Laboratory, the director of the DOE Energy Frontiers Research Center on Programmable Quantum Materials and co-director of the Max Planck Society New York Center for Nonequilibrium Quantum Phenomena. His research interests include physics of quantum materials, superconductivity, two-dimensional materials and infrared nano-optics. Basov has received numerous prizes and awards including a Sloan Fellowship (1999), the Genzel Prize (2014), a Humboldt research award (2009), the Frank Isakson Prize, American Physical Society (2012), Moore Investigator (2014), the K.J. Button Prize (2019) and the Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship (U.S. Department of Defense, 2019).

Basov earned his PhD at the Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (1991). He served as postdoctoral research associate at McMaster University (1992-96) and as an assistant physicist at Brookhaven National Laboratory (1996) before joining UC San Diego.

Lawrence Goldstein, PhD, is Distinguished Professor in the Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Department of Neurosciences in the UC San Diego School of Medicine. He founded and directed the UC San Diego Stem Cell Program and the Sanford Stem Cell Clinical Center at UC San Diego Health and is founding scientific director of the Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine. He was instrumental in the development and passage of Proposition 71 in 2004, which created an unprecedented $3 billion fund and infrastructure for stem cell medical research in California.

For more than 25 years, Goldsteins research focus has been to unravel how molecular motors interact with and control the behavior of axonal vesicles in neurons, and how defects in these processes underlie neurological conditions, such as Alzheimers disease (AD).In 2012, his lab was the first to create stem cell-derived in vitro neurons of sporadic and hereditary AD, giving researchers a much-needed method for studying the diseases causes and pathologies and a new tool for developing and testing drugs to treat a disorder that afflicts 5.4 million Americans.

More recently, this work has led to the identification of new cellular targets in AD drug development and a deeper understanding of AD genetics and disease progression. He is among the nations leading scientific figures in promoting AD research and evidence-based treatments.

Terence Hwa is the Presidential Chair and Distinguished Professor in the Department of Physics with a joint appointment in the Division of Biological Sciences. Trained in theoretical physics, Hwa launched a biology wet-lab 15 years ago and developed a unique quantitative approach to studying bacterial physiology. During this time, the Hwa Research Group established a number of bacterial growth laws and formulated a principle of proteomic resource allocation. This line of study culminated in a theory of bacterial growth control, accurately predicting bacterial behaviors and gene expression for a variety of environmental and genetic perturbations, and resolving a number of long-standing mysteries in microbiology. Hwas research team continues to extend its quantitative approaches to characterize bacterial species singly and in consortium, to uncover underlying principles governing the spatiotemporal dynamics of microbial communities.

Hwa is a champion of interdisciplinary research. In 2001, he launched an extended program at the Kavli Institute of Theoretical Physics in Santa Barbara, which has been regarded as a watershed event in bringing physicists to post-genome biology. He is also the founder and co-director of the Quantitative Biology specialization program at UC San Diego. Hwa received fellowships and awards from the Sloan, Beckman, Guggenheim and Burroughs-Wellcome Foundations, and is a Fellow of the American Physical Society and the American Academy of Microbiology. Hwa received his PhD in physics from MIT. After postdoctoral research at Harvard University in condensed-matter physics, he joined UC San Diegos physics faculty in 1995.

Clifford Kubiak is a Distinguished Professor and former chair of the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, who holds the Harold C. Urey Chair in Chemistry. His Kubiak Research Group at UC San Diego is especially known for its work on developing catalysts for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. Kubiak is also a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Chemical Society (ACS). He has received several awards including the prestigious ACS Award in Organometallic Chemistry (2018), the Tolman Medal (2018), the Basolo Medal for Outstanding Research in Inorganic Chemistry (2015), the Inter-American Photochemical Society, Award in Photochemistry (2013) and the ACS Award in Inorganic Chemistry (2012). Kubiak has held visiting appointments at Tohoku University, University of Chicago and University of Erlangen, and he was a visiting associate in chemistry at the Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis at Caltech. He has served on the Editorial Advisory Boards of Accounts of Chemical Research, Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. He is the author of more than 290 scientific articles.

Before joining UC San Diego in 1998, Kubiak was a faculty member at Purdue University (1982-98). Before that he was a postdoctoral associate with Mark S. Wrighton at MIT (1980-81). He received his PhD in chemistry from the University of Rochester (1980), where he worked with Richard Eisenberg.

Kimberly Prather is a Distinguished Professor who holds a joint appointment between UC San Diegos Scripps Institution of Oceanography and the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry. Prathers research focuses on understanding the influence of atmospheric aerosols on clouds, human health, and climate. Early in her career, she developed a technique known as aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry that is widely used in atmospheric field studies around the world to determine the origin and chemistry of aerosols. She is the founding director of the National Science Foundation Center for Aerosol Impacts on Chemistry of the Environment (CAICE), the largest federally funded center in the history of UC San Diego. CAICE researchers replicate ocean/atmosphere interactions in a laboratory setting to study the influence of ocean biology on atmospheric chemistry, clouds, and climate.

Prather joined UC San Diego in 2001. She was elected as a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a fellow of the American Geophysical Union in 2010. In 2019, she became the first woman at UC San Diego to be elected as a member of the National Academy of Engineering. Previously this year, she won the 2020 Frank H. Field and Joe L. Franklin Award for Outstanding Achievement in Mass Spectrometry from the American Chemical Society. She received her PhD in chemistry from the University of California, Davis.

Originally posted here:
Five UC San Diego Professors Elected to National Academy of Sciences - UC San Diego Health

Posted in Molecular Genetics | Comments Off on Five UC San Diego Professors Elected to National Academy of Sciences – UC San Diego Health

Science Becomes A Dividing Issue In Year Of Election And Pandemic – Iowa Public Radio

Posted: April 29, 2020 at 11:49 am

It now seems apparent that COVID-19 will dominate American life for months to come, quite possibly through the national election in November.

That means the disease, and efforts to respond to it, will likewise dominate the 2020 campaign and make it largely about something it has never been about before.

That something is science.

It is hard to think of a time when hard science biology, virology, epidemiology has been so much the core of our political conflict. Issues from evolution to stem cells to vaccination have long been a part of our political conversation, but not at the forefront of presidential elections.

This virus crisis has largely taken over the political conversation. Americans are all learning new, polysyllabic vocabulary and complex truths about threats they cannot see.

And that is likely to bring out all of the culture's ambivalence about science.

Trust in science

Last summer, a Pew Research Center survey found that 86% of Americans expressed "a fair amount or a great deal of faith" that scientists act in their best interests.

But the survey's co-author told NPR, "It tends to be kind of soft support." In fact, only 48% were willing to say that medical doctors "make fair and accurate research statements and recommendations all or most of the time." And only 32% were willing to say as much for "medical research scientists."

A YouGov poll in April 2017 found an even less sanguine attitude, as reported in Scientific American. That measure found only 35% of Americans had "a lot of confidence" in scientists. A plurality (45%) had "a little," while those with "none at all" had grown substantially since YouGov polled the same question in 2013.

Little wonder then that political figures such as Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, a Republican, and media personalities such as Fox News' Tucker Carlson pounce on the difference between various projections of deaths from COVID-19.

They interpret lower death totals (thus far) as evidence that the threat was overblown, even though public health experts consider it proof that shutdowns and social distancing are working and note that the threat is not over.

Rejecting expertise

Scientific experts, like experts in general, have fared poorly in the populist atmosphere of the past decade in Europe and the United States.

"Voters say they reject expertise because experts, whom they think of as indistinguishable from governing elites, have failed them," writes Tom Nichols, a professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College.

Nichols published a book in 2017 called The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. Summing up his argument for Politico, Nichols observed that Americans have always had a healthy skepticism about "eggheads" of various kinds.

He says that skepticism renewed itself in the "social and political traumas" of the 1960s and 1970s. But since then, he argues, "Globalization and technological advances have created a gulf between people with enough knowledge and education to cope with these changes and people who feel threatened and left behind in the new world of the 21st century."

Lacking "scientific merit"

The plain fact is that for many, science is a source of wisdom but by no means the only one. There can be a "balancing" of science with religious teaching or humanistic ethics or what people may regard as their own common sense.

That is why so many Americans may identify with President Trump's overeagerness about potential drug therapies for COVID-19 that have worked on other diseases.

Trump's hopefulness for the antimalarial hydroxychloroquine, for example, was apparently not shared by one of the administration's own leading vaccine scientists, Richard Bright. Bright tried to limit broad use of the drug because its application lacked "scientific merit." As a result, he says, he was removed as director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.

In a statement released by his attorneys last week, Bright sounded the alarm: "To combat this deadly virus, science, not politics or cronyism, has to lead the way."

Also this past week, the president stood at the podium of the White House briefing room and cast doubt on the survival of the coronavirus in the fall. He then deferred to his top scientific adviser on the question.

"We will have the virus in the fall," said Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institutes of Health.

Trump also insisted the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had been misquoted about the difficulties of managing COVID-19 in the fall. Dr. Robert Redfield took the lectern to say he had not been misquoted.

But all this was prelude to the Thursday night stunner, when the president extended his embrace of "game-changer" therapy ideas to raising the question of whether injecting a disinfectant (which can kill the coronavirus on a surface) into a person could kill the virus (in reality, doing so would be toxic).

This prompted such immediate blowback from scientists, hospital personnel and even the makers of Lysol that the president later insisted he had made the comment sarcastically. And the next evening's briefing was cut off at just 22 minutes, with the president taking no questions.

A long-term struggle

The crisis is spreading through the body politic even as it spreads through the human population. It will stress both in myriad ways. Americans' conflicted relationship with science will play a role in how they deal with that stress.

For the moment, most are accepting the scientific approach of social distancing in service of a greater good. But there are rejections of stay-at-home orders in street protests and in some statehouses.

Saturday night, Trump repeated a line used to argue for reopening the country sooner rather than later: "Remember, the Cure can't be worse than the problem itself." He added, "Be careful, be safe, use common sense!"

The struggle has been joined, and it will likely outlast both this one campaign season and this one pandemic.

The rest is here:
Science Becomes A Dividing Issue In Year Of Election And Pandemic - Iowa Public Radio

Posted in Iowa Stem Cells | Comments Off on Science Becomes A Dividing Issue In Year Of Election And Pandemic – Iowa Public Radio

Clinical prospects for stem cells begin to emerge

Posted: April 28, 2020 at 6:49 pm

Twenty years after the University of WisconsinMadisons James Thomson derived the first human embryonic stem cell lines (ESC), his revolutionary discovery is just beginning to emerge on the clinical landscape.

To date, a handful of clinical trials of embryonic stem cell-derived therapies have been completed, withabout16 more now underway worldwide.

From a patients perspective, 20 years may seem like a frustratingly long time for an important discovery to get from bench to bedside. For physicians and researchers, however, the strong desire to give hope to patients is balanced with realism about the path forward. Responsible science is almost always a slow, grueling process. But experts in the field of stem cell and regenerative medicine feel more optimistic than ever, due to a critical mass of small successes.

Perhaps no field of medicine has as much reason to be hopeful about stem cell therapy as ophthalmology. Of the human trials underway, all but two involve therapies for eye disorders. David Gamm, MD, PhD, associate professor of ophthalmology and visual sciences at the UW School of Medicine and Public Health, attributes this to three factors: practicality, safety and cost.

Most new stem cell therapies require new surgical techniques and devices, but not always for the eye, Gamm explains. That reduces the cost of development and quickens the pace of getting new therapies through the FDA and into patients.

But Gamm, who also directs UWMadisons McPherson Eye Research Institute, understands patients frustrations. He likens the process of developing stem cell therapies to the first attempts at human flight.

If the Wright brothers claimed they could build a plane that would fly across the Atlantic, they would have been laughed at, Gamm says. What they were really trying to do was glide off a hill safely, with the hope of greater things to come. And thats where this field is right now.

Most of the advances in the field to date have involved the development of human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Theretinal pigment epithelium is a single layer of cells that regulates the transport of nutrients and waste products to and from the retina and is considered to be the part of the eye where macular degeneration begins. In 2012, 18 adults with severe eye disease received transplants created from human embryonic stem cells and continue to have no apparent complications.

Thirteen of those patients had an increase in pigmentation, suggesting that the transplanted cells were still alive. The results of the study, reported by researchers at Advanced Cell Technology in Massachusetts, provided the first evidence of the medium- to long-term safety and graft survival, and possible biological activity of pluripotent stem cells in individuals with any disease.

Gamm says the numerous stem cell experts at UWMadison work together, often across disparate disciplines, from cell biology to engineering to ethics.

This is where Jamie Thomson and UW have led the way. We have a very strong sense of integrity and ethics here, and because we have this multidisciplinary approach to stem cells we also have a sense of realism, Gamm says. So, while we may not have flown that far yet, what we have done has allowed us to land safely. And that has allowed us to dust ourselves off, re-evaluate, climb back up that hill and try again.

Gamms own company, Opsis Therapeutics, is working with Cellular Dynamics International, founded by Thomson and now owned by Fujifilm, toward clinical trials for retinitis pigmentosa, a group of genetic diseases that lead to blindness at an early age. Currently, there are no treatments for these debilitating diseases.

Clinical trials for other diseases, including Parkinsons, diabetes, spinal cord injury and heart disease, will likely use induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), adult cells genetically reprogrammed to behave like embryonic stem cells.

CardiologistTim Kamp, MD, PhD, a UWMadison professor of medicine and director of theUW Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, shares Gamms cautious optimism.

Stem cell biology is a dynamic landscape; things are constantly evolving, Kamp says. With every new legitimate effort, though, itll get easier for the rest of us to get approval from the FDA and our therapies into patients.

Kamp cites Geron, the first company to get a stem cell trial approved by the FDA, as an example of how each success helps accelerate progress.

Gerons final FDA application was more than 20,000 pages, Kamp explains. It took them many years and millions of dollars, but that initial process educated the FDA and provided answers to some previously unanswered questions. And that was great news for the rest of us.

Kamp is conducting preclinical work with colleagues from Duke University and the University of Alabama on a patch made of contracting heart muscle derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. He and his collaborators hope one day these cells can be used to treat patients who lose heart muscle after a heart attack.

Another of Kamps collaborators, French researcher Philippe Menasch, recently completed a phase 1 trial that transplanted embryonic stem cell-derived cardiac progenitor cells into patients with severe heart failure. That therapy seems to be safe, but its too early to tell how effective it was in re-muscularizing damaged parts of the heart.

Diabetes is another cell-based disease in the crosshairs of UW School of Medicine and Public Health researchers. Earlier this year, results of the first human trial of a stem cell-derived beta cell replacement therapy were published. Professor of Surgery Jon Odorico, MD, who organized the conference at which the results of the trial were presented, says while the findings were not a home run, the trial helped blaze an important trail through the FDA. Conducted by the company Viacyte, the trial was the first involving stem cells and a macroencapsulation device designed to protect the transplanted cells from a patients immune system.

A second trial is underway in the same patient population (adult patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemia unawareness) and a handful of others are planned, including one through Odoricos own company Regenerative Medical Solutions. He hopes to have a product in clinical trials within the next few years.

There is now a critical mass of experts involved in this field and things are moving a lot faster, with more money and more industry involvement, Odorico says. Wisconsin has played a leading role in getting the field to this point and we are poised to take an even more prominent role, both nationally and internationally.

As for Gamm and his patients, the conversation has begun to shift from one of resignation to one that allows for guarded optimism. He recalls a time when there wasnt much he could offer patients, and while there are still no approved and proven stem cell therapies on the market, his message in the clinic has changed dramatically:

Its great to be able to tell my patients that they are not forgotten, Gamm says. I can finally tell them that the hope is real.

Original post:
Clinical prospects for stem cells begin to emerge

Posted in Wisconsin Stem Cells | Comments Off on Clinical prospects for stem cells begin to emerge

Answering your sweet onion question and the science of why onions make you cry – Green Bay Press Gazette

Posted: April 28, 2020 at 6:49 pm

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

A reader left a voicemail asking: "Where can I get some good sweet onions that are not bitter ... like ones like you get at McDonald's."

The short answer to finding onions short on bitterness is to buysweet onion varieties with names like Vidalia and Walla Walla.

As far as finding McDonald's onions at the local grocery storewell, you don't become a global restaurant powerhouse by broadcasting trade secrets.However, there are plenty of online posts on how to replicate McDonald's onions at home by hydratingminced onions.

I tried a method that callsfor 1 tablespoon of minced onions mixed with an cup of water mixed in a bowl. Microwavethe soaked onion bits for 30 seconds and let sit for 15 minutes.

It worked. The onions were sweet and plumped up but no larger than the minced onions on McDonald's burgers.

Hydrating dried minced onions creates tiny pieces that add onion flavor with minimal bitterness.(Photo: Daniel Higgins/USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin)

Still, there's no need to reconstitute dried onions to satisfy your sweet onion tooth. Sweet onions are available nearly year-round in Wisconsin.

University of Wisconsinhorticulture professor Irwin Goldman wrote in an email response to my onion inquiries that most sweet onions are grown in the southern United States, Mexico, and both Central and South America. A smaller amount are grown in the Pacific Northwest.

When it comes to onions, Goldman has many layers of knowledge. Since joining the UW faculty in 1992 he's headed up the Goldman Lab that focuses on research, breeding and genetics of table beets, carrotsand onions.

Goldman explains the science of why onions make us cry and the varying bitterness as follows:

Before being cut, compartments in the onion's cells isolate a specific enzymefrom a sulfur-based substrate a substrate is a substance acted upon by an enzyme.

When the onion is cut,the cells are ruptured,allowing the enzyme and substrate to combine and produce propanethial sulfoxidethatacts a little like sulfuric acid on the nerve cell membrane of the eye and causes tearing.

The substrate concentration levels vary based on the onion variety and where and how the onion is grown. Higher substrateconcentrations and a more activeenzyme can lead to larger amounts of propanethial sulfoxide.

Variety, growing conditions and how long onions have been stored all impact their flavor.(Photo: Daniel Higgins/USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin)

Onions grown in soil with lower levels of sulfur produce substrates with lower sulfur concentrations and therefore result in a milder flavor. Soil with lower levels of sulfur is more widely found in states like Georgia, Floridaand Texas. This is why sweeter, milder onions typically come from the southern states, whereas stronger flavored onions come from northern regions.

Stored onion bulbs generally increase in pungency up to about 90 days after harvest,and some continue to increase up to 120 days. There are a few that get milder with storage, but most onions simply lose water and further concentrate the substrate, which in turn makes the onion a bit more pungent with time. Also, the onion bulb goes dormantafter harvest, but its dormancy is broken after a few months. Onions that are a few months old may be producing green sprouts because their dormancy has been broken and the sulfur compounds in the substrate are being mobilized into the new leaves.

The greatest pungency of the onion is found in the tissues at the base of the bulb. Cutting through that part of a bulb releases the most pungency and would make you tear up faster than if you kept the basal portion intact and cut other parts of the onion.(Photo: Daniel Higgins/USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin)

The greatest pungency of the onion is found in the tissues at the base of the bulb, near where the stem is located. If you were holding an onion in the palm of your hand with the roots at the bottom, the base would be the centimeter or so of tissue closest to your palm. Disrupting this part of a bulb releases the most pungency and would make you tear up faster than if you kept the basal portion or the onion bulb intact and cut other parts.

My thanks to professor Irwin Goldman for answering our onion questions. If you have a food question, send it my way via email or leave a voicemail message. I can't promise every answer will come from an expert of Goldman's stature, but I will get your questions answered.

More: Higgins Eats ingestigative report: These five frozen pizzas have surprisingly distinct flavor profiles

More: Spruce up spaghetti night with sausage and green pepper version | No Budget Cooking Series

More: Kits from Wisconsin restaurants pull double duty as meal solutions and family activity

Contact Daniel at (920) 996-7214or dphiggin@gannett.com. Follow himon Twitter and Instagram at @HigginsEats.

Our subscribers make this coverage possible. Subscribe to a USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin site today with one of our special offers and support local journalism.

Read or Share this story: https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/life/food/2020/04/28/onion-tears-chemical-reaction-say-university-wisconsin-expert/3020044001/

Original post:
Answering your sweet onion question and the science of why onions make you cry - Green Bay Press Gazette

Posted in Wisconsin Stem Cells | Comments Off on Answering your sweet onion question and the science of why onions make you cry – Green Bay Press Gazette

Sarepta Therapeutics Announces Research Agreement with US Department of Defense to Evaluate Multiple Constructs From its Proprietary RNA Platform as…

Posted: April 28, 2020 at 6:47 pm

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., April 28, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. (NASDAQ:SRPT), the leader in precision genetic medicine for rare diseases, today announced that the Company and the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), the Department of Defenses lead laboratory for medical biological defense research, have entered into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA). The purpose of the CRADA is to jointly identify antisense oligonucleotides using Sareptas proprietary phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer (PMO) platform with activity against SARS-CoV-2 for the potential treatment of COVID-19.

Previously published clinical and preclinical studies of Sareptas RNA technology have found evidence of antiviral activity of Sareptas PMO technology in coronaviruses and other viruses.i,ii,iii, iv Pursuant to the CRADA, Sarepta will design, synthesize, manufacture and provide to USAMRIID multiple peptide-conjugated PMO (PPMO) constructs based on genetic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 for COVID-19. USAMRIID will evaluate the constructs on characterized wild-type SARS-CoV-2 viruses for their potential to inhibit viral infection. Based on the results, Sarepta and USAMRIID will consider collaborative funding proposals to advance the development of treatments for COVID-19.

We should all be proud and grateful that in collaboration with health agencies, many innovative companies across the biopharmaceutical ecosystem have mobilized to fight and solve this COVID-19 pandemic, investing significant resources to rapidly build diagnostics, find treatments, and develop effective vaccines, said Doug Ingram, Sareptas President and Chief Executive Officer. While Sareptas mission to rapidly advance treatments for rare and often fatal genetic disease is focused, unwavering and undeterred, we cannot ignore the impact of this global pandemic on human health, and have answered the call to contribute our scientific expertise and provide our technology in the race to develop an effective treatment for COVID-19. Indeed, we have already built and manufactured therapeutic PPMO constructs and are providing them now to USAMRIID for testing and evaluation.

About the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious DiseasesFor over 50 years, USAMRIID has provided leading edge medical capabilities to deter and defend against current and emerging biological threat agents. The Institute is the only laboratory in the Department of Defense equipped to safely study highly hazardous viruses requiring maximum containment at Biosafety Level 4. Research conducted at USAMRIID leads to medical solutionsvaccines, drugs, diagnostics, and training programsthat benefit both military personnel and civilians. Established in 1969, the Institute plays a key role as the lead military medical research laboratory for the Defense Threat Reduction Agencys Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical and Biological Defense. USAMRIID is a subordinate laboratory of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command. For more information, visit http://www.usamriid.army.mil

AboutSarepta TherapeuticsAt Sarepta, we are leading a revolution in precision genetic medicine and every day is an opportunity to change the lives of people living with rare disease. The Company has built an impressive position in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and in gene therapies for limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs), mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA, Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT), and other CNS-related disorders, with more than 40 programs in various stages of development. The Companys programs and research focus span several therapeutic modalities, including RNA, gene therapy and gene editing. For more information, please visitwww.sarepta.com or follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook.

Sarepta Forward-Looking StatementThis press release contains forward-looking statements. Any statements contained in this press release that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Words such as "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects," "will," "intends," "potential," "possible" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding the purpose of the CRADA to jointly identify antisense oligonucleotides using Sareptas PMO platform with activity against SARS-CoV-2; the parties commitments under the CRADA; Sarepta and USAMRIIDs plan, subject to an evaluation of the constructs, to consider collaborative funding proposals to advance the development of treatments for COVID-19; the potential of the collaboration between Sarepta and USAMRIID to develop a treatment for COVID-19; and Sareptas mission to rapidly advance treatments for rare and often fatal genetic disease.

These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Sareptas control. Known risk factors include, among others: the expected benefits and opportunities related to the CRADA may not be realized or may take longer to realize than expected due to challenges and uncertainties inherent in product research and development; in particular, the collaboration may not result in any viable treatments suitable for commercialization due to a variety of reasons, including any inability of the parties to perform their commitments and obligations under the agreement, the results of research may not be consistent with past results or may not be positive or may otherwise fail to meet regulatory approval requirements for the safety and efficacy of product candidates, possible limitations of company financial and other resources, manufacturing limitations that may not be anticipated or resolved for in a timely manner, and regulatory, court or agency decisions, such as decisions by the United States Patent and Trademark Office with respect to patents that cover Sareptas product candidates; and those risks identified under the heading Risk Factors in Sareptas most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 and most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as well as other SEC filings made by the Company which you are encouraged to review.

Any of the foregoing risks could materially and adversely affect the Companys business, results of operations and the trading price of Sareptas common stock. For a detailed description of risks and uncertainties Sarepta faces, you are encouraged to review Sarepta's 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K and most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as well as other SEC filings made by Sarepta. We caution investors not to place considerable reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this press release. Sarepta does not undertake any obligation to publicly update its forward-looking statements based on events or circumstances after the date hereof.

Internet Posting of InformationWe routinely post information that may be important to investors in the 'For Investors' section of our website atwww.sarepta.com. We encourage investors and potential investors to consult our website regularly for important information about us.

Source: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Investors:Ian Estepan, 617-274-4052iestepan@sarepta.com

Media:Tracy Sorrentino, 617-301-8566tsorrentino@sarepta.com

i NeumanBW, et al. J Virol.2004Jun;78(11):5891-9. Antisense morpholino-oligomers directed against the 5' endofthe genome inhibit coronavirus proliferation and growth.

ii Burrer R, et al. J Virol.2007 Jun;81(11):5637-48. Antiviral effectsofantisensemorpholinooligomers in murine coronavirus infection models.

iii NeumanBW, et al. J Virol.2005 Aug;79(15):9665-76. Inhibition, escape, and attenuated growthofsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus treated withantisensemorpholinooligomers.

iv HealdAE, et al. AntimicrobAgentsChemother.2014 Nov;58(11):6639-47. Safety and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Phosphorodiamidate Morpholino Oligomers with Activity Against Ebola Virus and Marburg Virus: Results of Two Single-Ascending-Dose Studies.

Read more:
Sarepta Therapeutics Announces Research Agreement with US Department of Defense to Evaluate Multiple Constructs From its Proprietary RNA Platform as...

Posted in Genetic medicine | Comments Off on Sarepta Therapeutics Announces Research Agreement with US Department of Defense to Evaluate Multiple Constructs From its Proprietary RNA Platform as…

Which companies are returning their PPP loan? Here’s the list. – NBCNews.com

Posted: April 28, 2020 at 6:47 pm

Facing public backlash, government warnings, and private misgivings, more than a dozen publicly traded companies and big businesses have so far announced they have returned, or intend to return, small-business coronavirus relief loans issued by the Small Business Administration.

Under the Paycheck Protection Program launched midnight April 3, businesses can apply for loans with their banks to help them shore up payroll and fund essential expenses, such as rent and utilities. If the businesses follow certain rules, such as using the bulk of the funds to keep employees hired and paid, the loan turns into a forgivable grant.

Over a million businesses large and small applied under the loose guidelines that said companies must have fewer than 500 employees and be able to demonstrate economic injury due to the coronavirus shutdowns.

But after the $350 billion of initial funding started to run dry and publicly traded companies with more access to funds started making headlines for receiving government assistance while smaller businesses were left out, some companies had second thoughts.

The SBA and Treasury Department issued new guidance this week, clarifying that the loans were not intended for companies with access to the equity market. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin warned companies last week that could suffer consequences if they could not certify they were facing economic injury. Companies have until May 7 to return funds "in good faith."

On Tuesday, Mnuchin said companies receiving loans over $2 million would be audited, and warned of potential criminal liability.

Out of the over $900 million received by the 250 public companies that disclosed PPP loans, the total amount returned by the companies is nearly $120 million. Together, the 15 companies have a combined market cap of over $17 billion.

Under the program, the maximum loan size is $10 million, based on payroll calculations. Two firms, Ruths Chris Hospitality Group and J. Alexander's Holdings, received in excess of $10 million because each had two subsidiaries that applied for a separate loan.

Aquestive Therapeutics

Description: Specialty pharmaceutical company and maker of Suboxone, an opioid addiction treatment.

Loan: $4,830,000

Market cap: $139,702,093

Full-time employees: 232

Ballantyne Strong

Description: Holding company whose subsidiaries make cinema equipment, projectors and lighting.

Loan: $3,173,900

Market cap: $23,300,000

Full-time employees: 290

BioLife Solutions

Description: Supplier of cell and gene therapy tools, including design and manufacturing of liquid nitrogen tanks and cryogenic equipment.

Loan: $2,175,320

Market cap: $229,678,262

Full-time employees: Not disclosed

BK Technologies Corporation

Description: Suppliers of two-way radio equipment.

Loan: $2,196,335

Market cap: $30,200,000

Full-time employees: 109

CalAmp Corp.

Description: Sellers of equipment and systems for remotely monitoring vehicles.

Loan: $10,000,000

Market cap: $218,274,636

Full-time employees: 882

Hallmark Financial Services

Description: Property and casualty insurers for businesses and consumers.

Loan: $8,311,000

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

Market cap: $56,362,819

Full-time employees: 439

IDT Corporation

Description: Newark, NJ-based telecommunications company that offers service and sells prepaid phone cards.

Loan: $10,000,000

Market cap: $152,360,276

Full-time employees: 1,270

J. Alexander's Holdings, Inc.

Description: Holding company for several casual restaurant chains, including the Stoney River Steakhouse & Grill, Redlands Grill, and Lyndhurst Grill steak chains.

Loan: $15,100,000

Market cap: $66,201,491

Full-time employees: 4,200

Kura Sushi USA, Inc.

Description: American subsidiary of a Japanese sushi chain, with over 400 locations.

Loan: $5,983,290

Market cap: $106,894,657

Full-time employees: 1,400

L.A. Lakers

Description: Los Angeles NBA franchise.

Loan: $4.6 million

Estimated value: $3.7 billion

Nathan's Famous

Description: Casual restaurant chain specializing in hot dogs.

Loan: $1.2 million

Market cap: $253,346,932

Full-time employees: Not available

OptiNose, Inc.

Description: Pharmaceutical company focused on delivering products for treating ear, nose, throat and allergy patients.

Loan: $4,400,000

Market cap: $195,101,189

Full-time employees: 221

Potbelly Corporation

Description: Restaurant chain with nearly 500 locations, specializing in heated sandwiches.

Loan: $10,000,000

Market cap: $72,096,379

Full-time employees: 6,000

Ruth's Hospitality Group

Description: Holding company that owns the chain of high-end Ruths Chris Steak House locations.

Loan: $20,000,000

Market cap: $273,802,586

Full-time employees: 5,740

Shake Shack

Description: Fast casual chain of made-to-order ground beef burgers and its namesake milkshakes.

Loan: $10,000,000

Market cap: $1,912,811,047

Full-time employees: 7,603

Ultralife Corporation

Description: Battery and communications manufacturer.

Loan: $3,459,278

Market cap: $112,523,178

Full-time employees: 573

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Description: Clinical-stage genetic medicine company based in Singapore.

Loan: $7,234,890

Market cap: $300,165,896

Full-time employees: 301

Data source: NBC News analysis of SEC filings, FactSquared, Google Finance, Forbes. Last updated: 4/28 4 p.m. ET.

Visit link:
Which companies are returning their PPP loan? Here's the list. - NBCNews.com

Posted in Genetic medicine | Comments Off on Which companies are returning their PPP loan? Here’s the list. – NBCNews.com

Page 1,044«..1020..1,0431,0441,0451,046..1,0501,060..»