Page 1,495«..1020..1,4941,4951,4961,497..1,5001,510..»

Cool talk alert: Epigenetics and what genes can’t tell us – Technical.ly Brooklyn

Posted: August 27, 2017 at 1:47 pm

That our lifestyle and environment affect our health is not new, but you might not be aware that it can also affect our genetic makeup.

An upcoming talk by Andrew Abrams and hosted by Biotech Without Borders at Genspace, the Downtown Brooklyn community bio lab, will explore the topic of epigenetics, the changes in our genome or gene expression that come with changes in our environment.

There are many profound biological questions that genetics is unable to resolve, not least among them some of our most intimate concerns about human health and disease, and the critical role of our lifestyle and other environmental factors in shaping these, according to the events page. The exploding field of epigenetics has the potential to address these questions. In this talk we will explore what we mean by epigenetics, why it is so important, and how we might be able to harness it for a healthier future.

Tickets are free and open to the public. The talk will be in two weeks, on Wednesday, Sept. 6, at 7 p.m.

See the original post:
Cool talk alert: Epigenetics and what genes can't tell us - Technical.ly Brooklyn

Posted in Epigenetics | Comments Off on Cool talk alert: Epigenetics and what genes can’t tell us – Technical.ly Brooklyn

Global Epigenetics Market – Analysis, Technologies & Forecasts to 2021 – Increasing Use of Epigenetics as a Tool to … – PR Newswire (press…

Posted: August 27, 2017 at 1:47 pm

The global epigenetics market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 13.22% during the period 2017-2021.

The report, Global Epigenetics Market 2017-2021, has been prepared based on an in-depth market analysis with inputs from industry experts. The report covers the market landscape and its growth prospects over the coming years. The report also includes a discussion of the Key vendors operating in this market.

One trend in the market is increasing demand for personalized medicine. The demand for personalized medicine is increasing and is expected to grow in future with a CAGR of more than 10%. The development of whole genome technology, companion diagnostics, and the growing number of retail clinics are some reasons for its growth.

According to the report, one driver in the market is increasing prevalence of cancer. Epigenetic mechanisms are essential for the normal development and maintenance of tissue-specific gene expression patterns in mammals. The disruption of epigenetic processes can lead to the malicious transformation of cells and altered gene function. Alteration in the heritable epigenetic marks can result in inappropriate activation or inhibition of various signaling pathways and lead to disease states such as cancer. Cancer is one of the major public health problems globally. It is one of the leading causes of death. It was estimated that in 2012, more than 2% new cancer cases occurred globally.

Key vendors

Other prominent vendors

Key Topics Covered:

Part 01:Executive Summary

Part 02: Scope Of The Report

Part 03: Research Methodology

Part 04: Introduction

Part 05: Market Landscape

Part 06: Market Segmentation By Product

Part 07: Geographical Segmentation

Part 08: Decision Framework

Part 09: Drivers And Challenges

Part 10: Market Trends

Part 11: Vendor Landscape

Part 12: Key Vendor Analysis

Part 13: Appendix

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/wlt52b/global.

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-epigenetics-market---analysis-technologies--forecasts-to-2021---increasing-use-of-epigenetics-as-a-tool-to-understand-development--disease-300508416.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

Read the rest here:
Global Epigenetics Market - Analysis, Technologies & Forecasts to 2021 - Increasing Use of Epigenetics as a Tool to ... - PR Newswire (press...

Posted in Epigenetics | Comments Off on Global Epigenetics Market – Analysis, Technologies & Forecasts to 2021 – Increasing Use of Epigenetics as a Tool to … – PR Newswire (press…

Pregnant Moms’ Exposure to Pollution May Epigenetically Increase Child’s Asthma Susceptibility – WhatIsEpigenetics.com

Posted: August 27, 2017 at 1:47 pm

Exposure to environmental pollution, such as diesel exhaust or concentrated urban air particles, during pregnancy could increase a childs risk of developing asthma via epigenetic mechanisms. Recent research in the Journal of Physiology Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology suggests that this allergic susceptibility might even be epigenetically passed down for several generations.

Asthma forms as a result of the complex interaction between someones genes, epigenetic marks, and the environment. Epigenetics, the study of how chemical tags impact the expression of genes, is coming more into focus as researchers attempt to understand this widespread respiratory condition and its origins.

Previous research has uncovered an association betweeninhaling diesel exhaust fumes and notable epigenetic changes which can affect around 400 genes. Other studies link birth season and allergy risk and uncover new gene targets for creating drugs to combat allergic diseases and reduce allergic responses.

In this study, researchers from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, along with Bringham and Womens Hospital, expanded on their prior observations that maternal particle or allergen exposure can be connected to increased asthma onset risk in the immediate progeny, known as the F1 generation. Interestingly, their new research supports the notion that it actually extends all the way to the third generation (F3), even though the effect is not as strong.

Using a mouse model, they found that pregnant mothers exposed to pollutants increased the risk of asthma in their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren. The scientists assessed key immune cells known as dendritic cells from within the mices lungs, since these special cells are thought to be critical in early-life onset of asthma and maternal transmission of asthma risk.

All three generations of offspring exposed to diesel exhaust had an abnormal boost in dendritic cells, used as a common marker for allergy. Descendants of pollutant-exposed mothers also had increased levels of interleukin proteins that are linked to immune system regulation.

They assessed the pattern of DNA methylation, a common epigenetic mechanism defined as the addition of a methyl mark which often suppresses the expression of genes, in dendritic cells of each generation. After purifying the dendritic cells and isolating the DNA, the researchers used enhanced reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (eRRBS).

Our methylome analysis suggests that the transmission is associated with aberrant DNA methylation, the team reported. Increased asthma susceptibility after a single maternal exposure to [diesel exhaust particles] or [concentrated urban air particles] transmits risk to F1, F2, and, to a lesser extent, F3 generations. This was associated with altered methylation of promoters of genes associated with lung development, IL-4 signaling, and chromatin dynamics.

Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is a highly debated topic that certainly requires more research. An effect must be observed in generations that were not exposed to the triggering stimulus in this case, pollution in order to qualify as transgenerational. Recent research has suggested that mothers exposed to lead may influence DNA methylation patterns of her children and grandchildren. Other studies, however, show that nutrition memory does not epigenetically persist to great grandchildren.

To further substantiate the epigenetic effect the group observed, the researchers treated a subset of immediate offspring with a DNMT inhibitor, which inhibits the epigenetic enzyme that catalyzes DNA methylation. This drug can modify DNA methylation in the epigenome and could potentially reduce the transmission of asthma susceptibility. Indeed, they found that injecting the F1 generation with a DNMT inhibitor called decitabine for three days immediately before mating was able to attenuate the asthma risk in grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

Expanding our knowledge of epigenetic origins of asthma may lead to novel prevention and treatment strategies. Not only is asthma an inflammatory disease but it is an epigenetic disease as well, explained corresponding researcher Alexey Fedulov. According to him, This approach may allow entirely new therapeutic strategies.

Source: Gregory, D.J. et al. (2017). Transgenerational transmission of asthma risk after exposure to environmental particles during pregnancy. American Journal of Physiology Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 313(2): L395-L405.

Reference: The American Physiological Society. Environmental Pollution Exposure during Pregnancy Increases Asthma Risk for Three Generations. The American Physiological Society Press Release. 17 May 2017. Web.

Read the original:
Pregnant Moms' Exposure to Pollution May Epigenetically Increase Child's Asthma Susceptibility - WhatIsEpigenetics.com

Posted in Epigenetics | Comments Off on Pregnant Moms’ Exposure to Pollution May Epigenetically Increase Child’s Asthma Susceptibility – WhatIsEpigenetics.com

ORGANOID – Science Magazine

Posted: August 27, 2017 at 1:45 pm

By Gunjan SinhaAug. 23, 2017 , 9:00 AM

UTRECHT, THE NETHERLANDSBy her 50th birthday, Els van der Heijden felt sicker than ever. Born with the hereditary disorder cystic fibrosis (CF), she had managed to work around her illness, finishing college and landing a challenging job in consulting. But Van der Heijden, who lives in a small Dutch town, says she always felt "a dark cloud hanging over my head." When she began feeling exhausted and easily out of breath in 2015, she thought it was the beginning of the end.

Then she read a newspaper article about a child with CF named Fabian whose life had been saved after scientists grew a "mini-organ" from a tissue sample snipped from his colon, one organ that CF affects. Doctors had used the mini-organ to test ivacaftor (Kalydeco), a drug so expensive that Dutch insurers refuse to cover it without evidence that it will help an individual CF patient. No such data existed for Fabian, whose CF was caused by an extremely rare mutation. But his minigut responded to ivacaftor, and he improved within hours of taking it. His insurance eventually agreed to pay for the drug.

Van der Heijden's doctor arranged to have a minigut made for her as well; it responded to a drug marketed as Orkambi that combines ivacaftor and another compound, lumacaftor. Within weeks after she began taking that combination, "I had an enormous amount of energy," she says. "For the first time ever, I felt like my body was functioning like it should."

The life-altering test was developed in the lab of Hans Clevers, director of the Hubrecht Institute here. More than a decade ago, Clevers identified a type of mother cell in the gut that can give birth to all other intestinal cells. With the right nutrition, his team coaxed such stem cells to grow into a 3D, pencil tip-sized version of the gut from which it came. The minigut was functionally similar to the intestine and replete with all its major cell typesan organoid.

That was the start of a revolution. Clevers and others have since grown organoids from many other organs, including the stomach, pancreas, brain, and liver. Easy to manipulate, organoids are clarifying how tissues develop and repair injury. But perhaps most exciting, many researchers say, is their ability to model diseases in new ways. Researchers are creating organoids from tumor cells to mimic cancers and introducing specific mutations into organoids made from healthy tissue to study how cancer arises. And as Clevers's lab has shown, organoids can help predict how an individual will respond to a drugmaking personalized medicine a reality. "It is highly likely that organoids will revolutionize therapy of many severe diseases," says Rudolf Jaenisch, a stem cell scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge.

For Clevers, the bonanza has come as a surprise. A basic biologist at heart, he says he never had real-world applications in mind. "I was always driven by curiosity," he says. "For 25 years we published papers with no practical relevance for anyone on this planet."

Organoids can be used to study how pathogens interact with human tissues. In this lung organoid grown in Hans Clevers's lab, cells colored green are infected with respiratory syncytial virus.

NORMAN SACHS

On a bright July morning at the Hubrecht Institute, Clevers listens patiently to presentations during a weekly lab meeting. One postdoc presents data on her efforts to develop an organoid model for small-cell lung cancer; another reports progress on culturing hormone-secreting organoids from human gut tissue. Whenever their research questions strike him as uninspired, Clevers urges them to be more ambitious: "Why don't you pursue something you don't know?" he asks.

"Hans is capable of raising questions that are not contaminated by the anticipated answer," says Edward Nieuwenhuis, chairman of pediatrics at University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) and a good friend. "He has a better nose than most for sniffing around and finding interesting stuff," says Ronald Plasterk, who co-directed the Hubrecht lab with Clevers from 2002 to 2007 and is now the Dutch Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. That approach has earned Clevers many awards. In June, for example, he was inducted into the Orden Pour le Mrite, an elite German order with just 80 members worldwide.

Clevers began his career studying immune cells as a postdoc at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. He landed his first job at UMCU's clinical immunology department in 1989, where he quickly became department head. Most of the work was clinical, such as leukemia diagnostics and blood work for transplants. "But my research interests were always much more basic than the environment that I was in," he says.

In early work, he identified a key molecule, T cell-specific transcription factor 1 (TCF-1), that signals the immune cells known as T lymphocytes to proliferate. Later he found that TCF-1 is part of the larger Wnt family of signaling molecules that's important not only for immune responses, but also for embryonic development and tissue repair. In 1997, his lab team discovered that mice lacking the gene for one of those signals, TCF-4, failed to develop pockets in their intestinal lining called crypts. Soon after, a study with Bert Vogelstein at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, showed that TCF-4 also helps initiate human colon cancer. Fascinated, Clevers switched his focus from the immune system to the gut.

Inspired by a flurry of research on stem cells at the time, Clevers began hunting for intestinal stem cells. More than 50 years ago, researchers deduced that rodent crypts produce many cells that survive only a few days, suggesting some unidentified, longer-lived source for the cells.

After almost a decade of tedious experiments, Clevers's postdoc Nick Barker struck gold in 2007: He discovered that cells carrying a receptor named LGR5 give rise to all cells in mouse intestines and that molecules in the Wnt pathway signal those cells to divide. Barker later found LGR5-positive cells in other organs as well. In some, the cells were always active; in others, such as the liver, they multiplied only when tissues sensed injury.

At the time, culturing stem cells was notoriously hard, but after combing through previous lab experiments, another postdoc in Clevers's lab, Toshiro Sato, concocted a mix of growth factors that coaxed the gut stem cells to replicate in a dish. He hoped to see a flat layer of cells. But what emerged in 2009 from a single LGR5-positive cell was "a beautiful structure that surprised and intrigued me," says Sato, now at Keio University in Tokyo: a 3D replica of a gut epithelium. The structure self-organized into crypts and finger-shaped protrusions called villi, and it began making its own biochemicals. A paper about the feat was rejected several times before being published. Clevers recalls: "No one wanted to believe it."

Soon, the lab began culturing LGR5-positive cells and growing organoids from the stomach, liver, and other organs. "It was an exciting time, and I really felt like we were on the frontiers of discovery," says another postdoc at the time, Meritxell Huch, now at the Gurdon Institute in Cambridge, U.K. "But we certainly didn't think we were opening a new field."

Organoids, lab-grown miniature versions of organs, are transforming science and medicine. Researchers have grown them from many different organs; they have also created organoids from tumor cells to mimic cancers.

V. ALTOUNIAN/SCIENCE

Captivated by stem cells and their potential to regenerate tissues, other labs were starting to make organoids. A few months before Sato's 2009 paper, Akifumi Ootani, a postdoc in Calvin Kuo's group at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, reported using a different strategy to grow gut organoids. Kuo's method starts with tissue fragments rather than individual stem cells and grows them in a gel partly exposed to air instead of submerged in nutrient medium. Around the same time, Yoshiki Sasai of the RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology in Kobe, Japan, cultured the first brain organoids, starting not with adult stem cells but with embryonic stem cells. Other researchers grew organoids from induced pluripotent stem cells, which resemble embryonic stem cells but are grown from adult cells.

The various methods create different kinds of organoids, each with advantages and drawbacks. Kuo's organoids contain a mix of cell types, which enables "observation of higher-order behaviors such as muscle contraction," he says. Because those organoids include stroma, a scaffold of connective tissue essential for tumor growth, they may prove better for studying therapies that target the stroma, such as cancer immunotherapy. Clevers's mix of growth factors grows organoids consisting primarily of epithelial cells, so his technique doesn't work for the brain and other organs with few or no epithelial cells. Nor can his organoids be used to test drugs targeting blood vessels or immune cells because organoids have neither.

Both methods can generate organoids from individual patients, producing a personalized minigut in just 1 to 3 weeks. (Although Clevers's organoids originate from adult stem cells, isolating those cells isn't necessary; culturing a tissue fragment with the right nutrients is enough.) The methods are reproducible, and the organoids remain genetically stable in culture; they can also be stored in freezers for years.

In 2013, Clevers and others founded a nonprofit, Hubrecht Organoid Technology (HUB), to market applications. Clevers first proposed using organoids for tissue transplants, says HUB Managing Director Rob Vries. Studies showed that healthy organoids implanted in mice with diseased colons could repair injury. "But we bagged the idea because there were too many regulatory hurdles and the chance of success was low," Vries says.

The idea of enlisting organoids to treat CF came from Jeffrey Beekman, a researcher at UMCU who studies that disease. All Dutch newborns are screened for CF, and colon biopsy samples are taken from babies who test positive. The tissue is tested to gauge how dysfunctional the defective gene is and then stored. Growing organoids from those samples would be relatively simple, argued Beekman, who has since spearheaded the project.

CF can arise from more than 2000 mutations in one gene, which cripple the ion channels that move salt and water through cell membranes. The disease affects all tissues, but the primary symptom is excess mucus in the lungs and gut, causing chest infections, coughing, difficulty breathing, and digestive problems.

Ivacaftor and the combination drug lumacaftor and ivacaftor, both marketed by Vertex Pharmaceuticals in Boston, restore the ion channels' function. But the drugs don't work equally well for everyone, and they have been tested and approved only for people with the most common mutations, together accounting for roughly half of all CF patients. Vertex, which declined to answer questions for this story, has been reluctant to spend millions on trials in patients with rare mutations because the potential payoff is small. And with the price tagboth drugs cost between 100,000 and 200,000 per year in Europehealth services and insurance companies have been unwilling to pay for the medicines for people with those untested mutations.

Van der Heijden falls into that category because only two other people in the Netherlands share her mutation. But when organoids grown from her gut were exposed to lumacaftor and ivacaftor, the organoids swelled like normal gut tissue, a sign that the defective protein was working and that salt and water were flowing through. The result helped persuade Vertex to give her the drug through a compassionate-use program, without payment. (Regulatory agencies require her to be monitored in a clinical trial.) Her side effects included fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea, but after a few months, "it was as if someone opened the curtain and said, Look, the sun is there, come out and play," she says. "And I did."

Cystic fibrosis patient Els van der Heijden received a new drug combination based on organoid tests. Within weeks, "I had an enormous amount of energy," she says.

TESSA NEDEREND

In collaboration with Vertex, HUB has tested ivacaftor on organoids grown from CF patients who had taken part in a clinical trial of that drug. The study confirmed that organoids can predict who will respond to the drug.

HUB has also tested ivacaftor on organoids from 50 patients with nine rare mutations. On the basis of the results, insurers agreed to pay for the drug in six more Dutch patients, and Vertex is following up with the first clinical trial of ivacaftor in CF patients with rare mutations. Meanwhile, HUB is building a biobank, financed by Dutch health insurers, containing organoids from all 1500 Dutch CF patients for testing both existing drugs and new candidates.

"This is the next big thing in CF research," says Eitan Kerem, head of pediatrics at Hadassah Medical Center in Jerusalem, who is building a similar biobank and has launched a trial in patients with rare mutations. Organoids are especially useful because no great animal models for CF exist, Kerem says; ferrets and pigs are sometimes used, but "they are expensive and not available to most researchers."

Drug and biotech companies are now striking deals with HUB to explore organoids in other diseases. The success with CF suggests that they can model other single-gene disorders, such as -1 antitrypsin deficiency, which causes symptoms primarily in the lungs and liver. Some companies are also testing failed drugs on organoids and comparing the results with animal and clinical data, hoping to find ways to predict and avoid such failures.

Cancer is also a major target. By growing organoids from tumor samples, researchers can create minitumors and use them to study how cancer develops or to test drugs. Soon after the minigut paper came out in 2009, David Tuveson, who heads the cancer center at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York, began prodding Clevers to develop organoids for pancreatic cancer, which is notoriously hard to treat. Existing cell culture models were not very realistic, Tuveson says, and creating genetically engineered mice took up to a year, compared with up to 3 weeks for pancreatic cancer organoids.

The organoids have already helped clarify new pathways that lead to pancreatic cancer, Tuveson says, and unpublished data suggest that they will help researchers predict which treatments will be most effective. He and Clevers are trying to make the organoids resemble real cancer more closely by adding stroma and immune cells. The Hubrecht lab is also involved in two trials to assess whether colon cancer organoids grown from individual patients can predict drug response.

Charles Sawyers of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City is trying to make prostate cancer organoids, but he says they are finicky. Organoids from primary tumors generally don't grow; those from metastatic tissue sometimes do, but normal cells often outgrow cancer cells. "They seem to need a lot of tender love and care, and there is no method to the madness," says Sawyers, who has succeeded with only 20 patients so far.

But Sawyers discovered that he could easily grow organoids from normal prostate tissue"it just works beautifully," he saysand then use gene-editing techniques such as CRISPR to study any cancer mutation he wants. "Is this a tumor suppressor gene? Is this an oncogene? Does it collaborate with geneXY? You can play the kind of games on the scale that you always wanted to," he says. As Kuo puts it, "We can build cancer from the ground up."

Other cancer researchers want in, too. Tuveson received so many requests for organoid training that he began hosting regular workshops at his laboratory. In 2016, the U.S. National Cancer Institute launched a scheme to develop more than 1000 cell culture models, including organoids, for researchers around the world to use, together with Cancer Research UK in London, the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Hinxton, U.K., and HUB.

Using personalized organoids to treat cancer still faces hurdles. Organoid culture time, which varies by cancer, must be shortened, and the cost, a few thousand dollars per patient, needs to come down. Also, cancers accumulate genetic mutations as they progress, which could mean that an organoid grown from a patient's cancer early on might not reflect its later state. Nevertheless, "from my perspective it's the most transformative advance in cancer research that I know of," Tuveson says.

If all of that excites Clevers, he rarely shows it. He avoids emotional language while discussing his research, preferring instead to describe and explain. Even close friends sometimes find his pragmatism puzzling. "He talks about his research like someone talking about screwing in a screw," Nieuwenhuis says.

Clevers says he gets his high from "the satisfaction of finding something novel," regardless of practical applications. Recent experiments, for instance, suggest that when an organ lacks LGR-5-positive cells, differentiated cells may be able to "dedifferentiate" and repair tissuesa radical change from the one-way street toward specific identities that stem cells were thought to travel. "Some organs may not have a professional stem cell at all," Clevers says, with a hint of wonder. But when asked how he felt when he saw his findings have profound benefits for patients such as Fabian and Els van der Heijden, he simply says, "I did not expect that."

Here is the original post:
ORGANOID - Science Magazine

Posted in Massachusetts Stem Cells | Comments Off on ORGANOID – Science Magazine

Mouse Model of Human Immune System Inadequate for Stem Cell … – Technology Networks

Posted: August 27, 2017 at 1:45 pm

A type of mouse widely used to assess how the human immune system responds to transplanted stem cells does not reflect what is likely to occur in patients, according to a study by researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine. The researchers urge further optimization of this animal model before making decisions about whether and when to begin wide-scale stem cell transplants in humans.

Known as humanized mice, the animals have been engineered to have a human, rather than a murine, immune system. Researchers have relied upon the animals for decades to study, among other things, the immune response to the transplantation of pancreatic islet cells for diabetes and skin grafts for burn victims.

However, the Stanford researchers found that, unlike what would occur in a human patient, the humanized mice are unable to robustly reject the transplantation of genetically mismatched human stem cells. As a result, they cant be used to study the immunosuppressive drugs that patients will likely require after transplant. The researchers conclude that the humanized mouse model is not suitable for studying the human immune response to transplanted stem cells or cells derived from them.

In an ideal situation, these humanized mice would reject foreign stem cells just as a human patient would, said Joseph Wu, MD, PhD, director of Stanfords Cardiovascular Institute and professor of cardiovascular medicine and of radiology. We could then test a variety of immunosuppressive drugs to learn which might work best in patients, or to screen for new drugs that could inhibit this rejection. We cant do that with these animals.

Wu shares senior authorship of the research, which was published Aug. 22 in Cell Reports, with Dale Greiner, PhD, professor in the Program in Molecular Medicine at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, and Leonard Shultz, PhD, professor at the Jackson Laboratory. Former postdoctoral scholars Nigel Kooreman, MD, and Patricia de Almeida, PhD, and graduate student Jonathan Stack, DVM, share lead authorship of the study.

Although these mice are fully functional in their immune response to HIV infection or after transplantation of other tissues, they are unable to completely reject the stem cells, said Kooreman. Understanding why this is, and whether we can overcome this deficiency, is a critical step in advancing stem cell therapies in humans.

Humanized mice are critical preclinical models in many biomedical fields helping to bring basic science into the clinic, but as this work shows, it is critical to frame the question properly, said Greiner. Multiple laboratories remain committed to advancing our understanding and enhancing the function of engrafted human immune systems.

Greiner and Shultz helped to pioneer the use of humanized mice in the 1990s to model human diseases and they provided the mice used in the study.Understanding stem cell transplants

The researchers were studying pluripotent stem cells, which can become any tissue in the body. They tested the animals immune response to human embryonic stem cells, which are naturally pluripotent, and to induced pluripotent stem cells. Although iPS cells can be made from a patients own tissues, future clinical applications will likely rely on pre-screened, FDA-approved banks of stem cell-derived products developed for specific clinical situations, such as heart muscle cells to repair tissue damaged by a heart attack, or endothelial cells to stimulate new blood vessel growth. Unlike patient-specific iPS cells, these cells would be reliable and immediately available for clinical use. But because they wont genetically match each patient, its likely that they would be rejected without giving the recipients immunosuppressive drugs.

Humanized mice were first developed in the 1980s. Researchers genetically engineered the mice to be unable to develop their own immune system. They then used human immune and bone marrow precursor cells to reconstitute the animals immune system. Over the years subsequent studies have shown that the human immune cells survive better when fragments of the human thymus and liver are also implanted into the animals.

Kooreman and his colleagues found that two varieties of humanized mice were unable to completely reject unrelated human embryonic stem cells or iPS cells, despite the fact that some human immune cells homed to and were active in the transplanted stem cell grafts. In some cases, the cells not only thrived, but grew rapidly to form cancers called teratomas. In contrast, mice with unaltered immune systems quickly dispatched both forms of human pluripotent stem cells.

The researchers obtained similar results when they transplanted endothelial cells derived from the pluripotent stem cells.

A new mouse model

To understand more about what was happening, Kooreman and his colleagues created a new mouse model similar to the humanized mice. Instead of reconstituting the animals nonexistent immune systems with human cells, however, they used immune and bone marrow cells from a different strain of mice. They then performed the same set of experiments again.

Unlike the humanized mice, these new mice robustly rejected human pluripotent stem cells as well as mouse stem cells from a genetically mismatched strain of mice. In other words, their newly acquired immune systems appeared to be in much better working order.

Although more research needs to be done to identify the cause of the discrepancy between the two types of animals, the researchers speculate it may have something to do with the complexity of the immune system and the need to further optimize the humanized mouse model to perhaps include other types of cells or signaling molecules. In the meantime, they are warning other researchers of potential pitfalls in using this model to screen for immunosuppressive drugs that could be effective after human stem cell transplants.

Many in the fields of pluripotent stem cell research and regenerative medicine are pushing the use of the humanized mice to study the human immune response, said Kooreman. But if we start to make claims using this model, assuming that these cells wont be rejected by patients, it could be worrisome. Our work clearly shows that, although there is some human immune cell activity, these animals dont fully reconstitute the human immune system.

The researchers are hopeful that recent advances may overcome some of the current models limitations.

The immune system is highly complex and there still remains much we need to learn, said Shultz. Each roadblock we identify will only serve as a landmark as we navigate the future. Already, weve seen recent improvements in humanized mouse models that foster enhancement of human immune function.

This article has been republished frommaterialsprovided byStanford Medicine. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Reference:

Kooreman, N. G., Almeida, P. E., Stack, J. P., Nelakanti, R. V., Diecke, S., Shao, N., . . . Wu, J. C. (2017). Alloimmune Responses of Humanized Mice to Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapeutics. Cell Reports, 20(8), 1978-1990. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.003

Here is the original post:
Mouse Model of Human Immune System Inadequate for Stem Cell ... - Technology Networks

Posted in Massachusetts Stem Cells | Comments Off on Mouse Model of Human Immune System Inadequate for Stem Cell … – Technology Networks

Current humanized mice not good models for studying stem cell transplants, say researchers – Scope (blog)

Posted: August 27, 2017 at 1:45 pm

Laboratory mice have made valuable contributions to biological research for centuries, at first as a model to study broad questions such as blood circulation and respiration, and then, increasingly to home in on more-specific questions in health and medicine. In particular, researchers hit on the idea in the 1980s to replace a mouses immune system with that of a humans.

These humanized mice have been useful models in some situations, such as the study of the human immune response to HIV infection or the transplantation of certain types of tissue. But recent research bycardiologist and stem cell expertJoseph Wu, MD, PhD, together with former postdoctoral scholars Nigel Kooreman, MD, and Patricia de Almeida, PhD, and graduate student Jonathan Stack, DVM, suggest that these mice dont adequately mimic the human immune response to stem cell transplantation.

They described their research today in Cell Reports.According to our release:

the Stanford researchers found that, unlike what would occur in a human patient, the humanized mice are unable to robustly reject the transplantation of genetically mismatched human stem cells. As a result, they cant be used to study the immunosuppressive drugs that patients will likely require after transplant. The researchers conclude that the humanized mouse model is not suitable for studying the human immune response to transplanted stem cells or cells derived from them.

The researchers also collaborated with Dale Greiner, PhD, from the University of Massachusetts Medical School, and Leonard Shultz, PhD, from the Jackson Laboratory.Greiner and Shultz helped to pioneer the use of humanized mice in the 1990s to model human diseases and they provided the mice used in the study.

Wu and his colleagues caution against using the current humanized mice as models for human stem cell transplantation, and urge the development of optimized models for use in clinical decision-making.

Many in the fields of pluripotent stem cell research and regenerative medicine are pushing the use of the humanized mice to study the human immune response. But if we start to make claims using this model, assuming that these cells wont be rejected by patients, it could be worrisome, Kooreman said. Our work clearly shows that, although there is some human immune cell activity, these animals dont fully reconstitute the human immune system.

Previously: When mice mislead, medical research lands in the trap, Fortune teller: Mice with humanized livers predict HCV drug candidates behavior in humansand Stroke of luck: Stem cell transplants show strong signs of efficacy in clinical safety trial for strokePhoto by Jakub Solovsky

Read the original:
Current humanized mice not good models for studying stem cell transplants, say researchers - Scope (blog)

Posted in Massachusetts Stem Cells | Comments Off on Current humanized mice not good models for studying stem cell transplants, say researchers – Scope (blog)

‘Nanotransfection’ Turns Animal Skin into Blood Vessels and Brain … – Medical Device and Diagnostics Industry

Posted: August 26, 2017 at 6:42 pm

The research has implications for people with diabetes-induced ischemia and stroke.

Nancy Crotti

Researchers have developed tissue nanotransfection, a process for regrowing tissue inside the human body.

Researchers at Ohio State University have developed breakthrough stem cell technology that can regrow tissue inside the human body, rather than in a laboratory.

Their work has implications for critical limb ischemia, brain disorders, and possibly even organ engineering and bone regrowth, according to Chandan Sen, PhD, director of the Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell-Based Therapies at Ohio States Wexner Medical Center in Columbus. Sen led the team that developed the technology.

Heres how the process, known as nanotransfection, works: The scientists make synthetic RNA and DNA to match that of the patient. They load it into nanochannels inside tiny needles embedded in a chip and apply the chip to the skin. The needles electrocute about 2% of the cell surface with the patients nucleic acid. The procedure takes 1/10th of a second, and has been shown to work with up to 98% efficiency.

In experiments on mice, the technology restored blood flow to injured legs by reprogramming the animals skin cells to become vascular cells. With no other form of treatment, active blood vessels had formed within two weeks, and by the third week, blood flow returned and the legs of the mice were saved.

The researchers also induced strokes in mice and used the chips to grow new brain tissue from the animals skin and transplant it to their brains. Bodily function damaged by the strokes was restored. The study of the technique, which worked with up to 98% efficiency, was reported in the journal Nature Nanotechnology.

The technology marks an advance over cell regeneration conducted in a laboratory, because those cells mostly underperform or die once transplanted into the body, according to Sen. The researchers use skin cells in their work because, as Sen explained, everybody has some to spare.

We grow it in you and we move it over to the organ so you have your own cells populating your organ, he said. Its all coming from you.

The synthetic RNA and DNA reprogram cells in the same way that fetal cells develop different functions to become different body parts, Sen added. The researchers worked on the technology for more than four years, also conducting successful blood flow restoration experiments on pigs. When they begin human trials, their first patients will likely be those whose critical limb ischemic has reached the stage where amputation is the only option.

The scientists work has generated interest in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and in the United States. Ohio State will decide where to pursue human trials first, and is searching for industry partners.

The cost is extremely low and complexity-wise it is extremely low. I see very little barrier to take it to humans, Sen said.

The researchers work marks another interface between silicon chips and biology. Other applications picked up by manufacturers include DNA sequencing machines, miniaturized diagnostic tests using disposable photonic chips, accurate body monitoring sensors, and brain stimulation probes.

Sen and his team acknowledge that their work will be met with skepticism.

Whenever you do something that is sort of transformative, you will expect that, Sen said. Therefore, we actually published this in the most rigorous journal possible. We went through 16 months of criticism and response, after which this was published.

Nancy Crotti is a freelance contributor to MD+DI.

[Image courtesy of THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER]

Follow this link:
'Nanotransfection' Turns Animal Skin into Blood Vessels and Brain ... - Medical Device and Diagnostics Industry

Posted in Ohio Stem Cells | Comments Off on ‘Nanotransfection’ Turns Animal Skin into Blood Vessels and Brain … – Medical Device and Diagnostics Industry

Salk faces ‘daunting’ need for money despite big success with … – The San Diego Union-Tribune

Posted: August 26, 2017 at 6:42 pm

La Jollas fabled Salk Institute says its in great financial shape. Just two years ago, it raised a record $361 million in private donations far exceeding its goal.

But a short time later, the Salk noted in private documents that it still faces daunting money issues that come as it tries to preserve the singular approach it takes to studying human disease.

Like other biomedical research institutes, the Salk is under great pressure to develop discoveries to the point where they will attract big money from drug companies, the government and appreciative donors.

The people who underwrite science say scientists can and must speed up the process of finding ways to alleviate suffering.

The 57-year-old Salk has long preferred to focus on more basic questions about how and why disease occurs work that has aided in the creation of such cancer drugs as Gleevec and Iressa. Its painstaking research that doesnt always have a clear payoff, and can make it hard to compete for money.

The challenge comes as the Salk is coping with the fallout from three of its female professors filing lawsuits that accuse the institute of gender discrimination. The suits, filed in July, say the Salk favors men when it comes to pay, promotions, grants and leadership opportunities.

The allegations have been staunchly denied by Salk President Elizabeth Blackburn, a Nobel laureate.

The matter was further complicated on Friday when Ted Waitt, the billionaire who chairs the Salks board of trustees, unexpectedly announced that he will leave the position in November for personal reasons.

Waitt played a key role in helping the Salk raise $361 million in private donations during a capital campaign that ended in 2015. His announcement came a day before the institute holds Symphony for Salk, a community-building concert held every August.

Theres broad agreement that the Salk, which is determined to remain small, needs to raise a lot more money for everything from recruiting faculty to buying pricey scientific equipment.

Despite the success of the recent capital campaign, there are significant and daunting financial challenges facing the institute, many which need to be addressed through increased private philanthropy, the Salk says in internal documents obtained by the Union-Tribune.

Documents: Salk Finances

The documents also show that, over the past couple of years, the Salk has considered a number of provocative ideas for dealing with the issue, including:

The Salk told the Union-Tribune on Thursday, The document leaked to you includes the preliminary brainstorming of several individuals holding various positions within Salk, including a number not serving in faculty or management roles, who were invited to present a wide-range of ideas for early consideration.

In no way is it equivalent to a strategic plan, which remains in development. It is simply a collection of initial thoughts.

Without question, the Salk Institute, in many ways, is now in the best financial and operational position it has ever been. It is entirely inaccurate and irresponsible to suggest otherwise.

The institute added that it decided not to pursue a short-term endowment campaign, a hospital affiliation, or a name change.

The Salk is charting its future at a moment when its scientific neighbors in La Jolla are rapidly expanding in translational medicine, the term for turning discoveries into drugs and therapies.

Theyre being driven, in part, by big donors who want scientists to shorten the time it takes to develop treatments for everything from dementia and cancer to diabetes, spinal cord injuries and aging.

The demand has been pressed especially hard by donors like T. Denny Sanford, who gave UC San Diego $100 million in 2013 to speed up the quest to find ways to use stem cells to treat a variety of afflictions.

Sanford said, It is time to move stem cell research from animals into humans for trials, especially in areas like ALS (Lou Gehrigs disease) and spinal cord injuries, where I believe we can make a lot of progress.

His gift helped the university create a seven-story translational medicine building thats physically linked to the new Jacobs Medical Center to make it easier for researchers and clinicians to collaborate.

Researchers there are doing such things as using smartphones to help determine the severity of cystic fibrosis in patients, and developing devices similar to the medical tri-corder seen in Star Trek.

The new building also has enabled UC San Diego to carry out drug trials, which helped the university raise a record $1.12 billion in research funding last year. And it helped the campus recruit such star scientists as Jeremy Rich, a brain tumor specialist who came from the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.

A lot of people think that taking an idea or discovery from lab to clinic is simple. Its not; its almost impossibly difficult and exhausting, said Gary Firestein, the universitys associate vice chancellor of translational medicine.

The problem isnt just the science, but also the regulatory maze that stands between scientist and patient, he added. Translational medicine was invented to somehow bridge that gap.

The struggle has been playing out at places like The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) in La Jolla, which is led by CEO Peter G. Schultz, an accomplished chemist also at home in the business world.

Schultz brought in an affiliate called Calibr to advance research to the clinical trial stage, where therapies are first tested in people. At that point much of the risk in development is gone, and drug companies will pay more to license products.

Earlier this year, Schultz revamped TSRIs board of directors to include more biomedical and business leaders and wealthy individuals. This high-powered board provides not only more credibility, but has members with money to make large donations themselves.

If Schultz achieves his goals, the institute will greatly speed up its pipeline of therapies from the laboratory bench to the patients bedside. That means patients will get new therapies faster and TSRI will get more money to continue churning out discoveries.

The Salk Institute faces pressure to do likewise, or be left behind. And it clearly sees this as a pivotal moment in its history. The institute summed up the challenge in a document obtained by the Union-Tribune.

A part of the document asks, simply: How do we make sure Salk is financially prepared to continue to be a leader in biological research?

For further reading

Salk board chairman stepping down amid institute turmoil

Salk president softens criticism of 2 faculty who sued for gender discrimination

Gender discrimination controversy grows at fabled Salk Institute

Salk Institute strikes back in gender discrimination feud

Salk Institute hires two noted researchers

From one cell to billions: Juan Carlos Izpisa Belmonte studies all stages of life

Salk Institute, UCSD scientists decode DNA's 3D shape

Scripps, Salk scientists independently make key biological advance

Twitter: @grobbins

gary.robbins@sduniontribune.com

See more here:
Salk faces 'daunting' need for money despite big success with ... - The San Diego Union-Tribune

Posted in Ohio Stem Cells | Comments Off on Salk faces ‘daunting’ need for money despite big success with … – The San Diego Union-Tribune

Regenerative Medicine Market to Reach $5.5 Billion by 2025 … – PR Newswire (press release)

Posted: August 26, 2017 at 6:41 pm

The global regenerative medicine market size is expected to reach USD 5.59 billion by 2025, according to this new report. Increased prevalence of neurodegenerative, orthopedic, and other aging-related disorders in geriatric population coupled with rising global geriatric population is anticipated to drive market growth.

Developments in biotechnology have enabled gaining in-depth knowledge pertaining to cell division and differentiation as well as the metabolism mechanism of various cells. This enriched knowledge, coupled with emergence of novel streams of biotechnology such as gene therapy and nanotechnology, further prospered use of cell-based technology in therapeutic treatment.

Identification of ability of stem cells to develop into various different cell lines further propelled the advancements in regenerative medicine. Frequent media exposure due to regulatory as well as ethical controversies around embryonic stem cells has increased awareness among the masses. This encouraged researchers to explore and develop other potential fields for similar applications, such as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC).

Furthermore, the emergence of gene therapy techniques with potential to rectify and restore effects of gene mutations in cells is under development. Conditions caused due to Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) as well as mutations that induce degenerative characteristics are primarily targeted.

Companies Mentioned

Key Topics Covered:

1 Research Methodology

2. Executive Summary

3. Regenerative Medicnie Market Variables, Trends & Scope

4. Regenerative Medicine Market: Product Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

5. Regenerative Medicine Market: Therapeutic Category Estimates & Trend Analysis

6. Regenerative Medicine Market: Regional Estimates & Trend Analysis, by Product And Therapeutic Category

7. Competitive Landscape

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/948x9s/regenerative

Media Contact:

Laura Wood, Senior Manager press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/regenerative-medicine-market-to-reach-55-billion-by-2025-increased-prevalence-of-neurodegenerative-orthopedic--other-aging-related-disorders-300506534.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

Here is the original post:
Regenerative Medicine Market to Reach $5.5 Billion by 2025 ... - PR Newswire (press release)

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Regenerative Medicine Market to Reach $5.5 Billion by 2025 … – PR Newswire (press release)

Stem Cell Treatment for Children With Spina Bifida Helps Dogs First … – UC Davis

Posted: August 26, 2017 at 6:40 pm

A pair of English bulldog puppies are the first patients to be successfully treated with a unique therapy a combination of surgery and stem cells developed at the University of California, Davis, to help preserve lower-limb function in children with spina bifida.

(Editorsnote: Photos and b-roll available.)

Because dogs with the birth defect frequently have little control of their hindquarters, they also have little hope for a future. They are typically euthanized as puppies.

At their postsurgery re-check at 4 months old, however, the siblings, named Darla and Spanky, showed off their abilities to walk, run and play to their doctor, veterinary neurosurgeon Beverly Sturges.

The initial results of the surgery are promising, as far as hind limb control, said Sturges. Both dogs seemed to have improved range of motion and control of their limbs.

The dogs have since been adopted, and continue to do well at their home in New Mexico.

Spina bifida occurs when spinal tissue improperly fuses in utero, causing a range of cognitive, mobility, urinary and bowel disabilities in about 1,500 to 2,000 children born in the U.S. each year. The dogs procedure, which involved surgical techniques developed by fetal surgeon Diana Farmer of UC Davis Health together with a cellular treatment developed by stem cell scientists Aijun Wang and Dori Borjesson, director of the universitys Veterinary Institute for Regenerative Cures, represents a major step toward curing spina bifida for both humans and dogs.

Farmer pioneered the use of surgery prior to birth to improve brain development in children with spina bifida. She later showed that prenatal surgery combined with human placenta-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (PMSCs), held in place with a cellular scaffold, helped research lambs born with the disorder walk without noticeable disability.

Sturges wanted to find out if the surgery-plus-stem-cell approach could give dogs closer-to-normal lives along with better chances of survival and adoption. At 10-weeks old, Darla and Spanky were transported from Southern California Bulldog Rescue to the UC Davis veterinary hospital, where they were the first dogs to receive the treatment, this time using canine instead of human PMSCs.

Another distinction for Darla and Spanky is that their treatment occurred after birth, since prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida is not performed on dogs, Sturges explained. The disorder becomes apparent between 1 and 2 weeks of age, when puppies show hind-end weakness, poor muscle tone, incoordination and abnormal use of their tails.

UC Davis is the only place where this type of cross-disciplinary, transformational medicine could happen, according to Farmer.

Its rare to have a combination of excellent medical and veterinary schools and strong commitment to advancing stem cell science at one institution, she said.

UC Davis is also home to the One Healthinitiative aimed at finding novel treatments like these for diseases that affect both humans and animals.

Ive often said that I have the greatest job on the planet, because I get to help kids, Farmer said. Now my job is even better, because I get to help puppies too.

With additional evaluation and U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval, Farmer and Wang hope to test the therapy in human clinical trials. Sturges and Borjesson hope to do the same with a canine clinical trial. They hope the outcomes of their work help eradicate spina bifida in dogs and humans.

In the meantime, the team wants dog breeders to send more puppies with spina bifida to UC Davis for treatment and refinements that help the researchers fix an additional hallmark of spina bifida incontinence. While Darla and Spanky are very mobile and doing well on their feet, they still require diapers.

Further analysis of their progress will determine if the surgery improves their incontinence conditions, Sturges said.

Funding for this project was provided by the Veterinary Institute for Regenerative Cures (VIRC) at the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, and the Surgical Bioengineering Lab at the UC Davis School of Medicine. Private donations to the veterinary school for stem cell research also contributed to this procedure. Farmer and Wangs spina bifida research is supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Shriners Hospitals for Children and the March of Dimes Foundation.

Original post:
Stem Cell Treatment for Children With Spina Bifida Helps Dogs First ... - UC Davis

Posted in Stem Cell Research | Comments Off on Stem Cell Treatment for Children With Spina Bifida Helps Dogs First … – UC Davis

Page 1,495«..1020..1,4941,4951,4961,497..1,5001,510..»