Page 151«..1020..150151152153..160170..»

Stem cell: $137 million buys more clinical trials, shared labs …

Posted: November 24, 2022 at 12:11 am

It was a $137 million day for the Golden States stem cell agency no small event even for an enterprise that is backed by billions.

The scientific scope covered by the $137 million was impressive. It ranged from bolstering the vauntedAlpha Clinic Networkinitiated around the state by theCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), as the agency is legally known, to raising the number ofCIRMs clinical trials to 83. Plus, CIRM directors gave the go-ahead to a $50 million program to finance shared labs around the state.

CIRMs cash comes from $5.5 billion that voters approved in 2020. The money is borrowed by the state via state bonds. The agency, however, does not have all its boodle lying around in a vault in its South San Francisco headquarters. CIRM can only receive $540 million in bond funding annually. But the cash carries over from year to year.

CIRMs $137-million-day came on Oct. 27, a few days before CIRM officially turned 18.

Nonetheless, awarding the money sooner rather than later is in CIRMs best interest. No research is done without cash. CIRM needs to generate results that will convince voters to approve more billions in about 10 years when its funding runs out. Given the slow pace of therapy development, a decade may span only the initial steps in the process.

CIRMs $137-million-day came on Oct. 27, a few days before CIRM officially turned 18. The ballot measure that gave birth to the agency, the largest such state enterprise in the country, was approved on Nov. 2, 2004. Voters awarded CIRM an initial $3 billion, hoping for quick development of miraculous stem cell therapies available to the general public. CIRM is still working on that promise.

The biggest chunk of last months $137 million went for the Alpha Clinics $72 million on top of the $40 million already invested in the network. Continued CIRM funding of the existing Alpha Clinic sites does raise questions about the initial rationale behind network

The first request for applicationsfor Alpha clinic was posted in 2013. It said the applications would be judged on whether they present a feasible and compelling business/fundraising proposal, and the likelihood that implementation of the plan would support the Alpha Stem Cell Clinics beyond the 5-year funding provided by this RFA. Last months awards are also for five years.

One criterion considered by reviewers was whether the (UCSD) application met the needs of underserved and disproportionately affected communities.

The clinics are aimed at expanding existing capacities for delivering stem cell, gene therapies and other advanced treatment to patients, according to CIRM. They also serve as a competency hub for regenerative medicine training, clinical research, and the delivery of approved treatments.

At last months meeting, CIRM directors expanded the program to includeStanford UniversityplusCedars-Sinaiand theUniversity of Southern California, both in Los Angeles. The network already includedUCLA, UC Davis, UC San Francisco, UC Irvine, UC San Diegoand theCity of Hope.

UC San Diegos bid for $8 million more hit a roadblock, however, when it was rejected prior to the Oct. 27 board by CIRMs application reviewers, who make the de facto decisions on grants while meeting behind closed doors. The board almost never overturns a positive decision by the reviewer on applications.

The reviewers found significant flaws in the UC San Diego application (number INFR4-13597). They included criticism of the diversity plan and problems with training. One criterion considered by reviewers was whether the application met the needs of underserved and disproportionately affected communities.

In other awards, the sole clinical trial application for $12 million went toJana Portnowat theBeckman Research InstituteofCity of Hope

The review summary said that was an underdeveloped portion of the proposal. Ability to effectively increase DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) in enrollment seems to be there but so many aspects of recruitment, retention, etc were missing.

The review summary also cited the limited number of patients enrolled clinically in stem cell and gene therapy trials.

Catriona Jamieson, director of the current Alpha program at UC San Diego, successfully appealed the rejection of the application by reviewers ina five-page, single-spaced letterto CIRM directors.

CIRM ChairmanJonathan Thomastold the board that the San Diego program, which will extend into rural Imperial County, is absolutely first rate and has produced many excellent projects.

In other awards, the sole clinical trial application for $12 million went toJana Portnowat theBeckman Research InstituteofCity of Hopefor a phase one trial involving the development of a delivery vehicle for a cancer-killing virus that targets brain tumor cells (application number CLIN2-13162 #2). It was the second try by Portnow for CIRM funding.

Another $3 million was awarded toBoris MinevofCalidi Biotherapeuticsof La Jolla, Ca., for work to initiate a clinical trial involving skin cancer (application number CLIN1-14080).

The $50 million shared labs planwas approved by directors but does not immediately involve individual awards. CIRM plans a deadline of next spring for applications. They are scheduled to be approved in late 2023.

The aim of the labs effort is to overcome hurdles in stem cell research. Not all research laboratorieshave local access to relevant infrastructure and training, nor do all have the opportunity to collaborate with a stem cell-based modeling laboratory, CIRM said in the plan proposal.

Laboratories well-versed in stem cell-based modeling that share their expertise and/or provide models collaboratively cant meet demand, as it is time-consuming and costly to divert resources to educating and supporting other researchers.

Regarding the Alpha awards, below are the names of the recipient institutions and principal scientists, along with their application numbers. The numbers are needed to locate the specific application review summaries, which do not identify the applicants. The review summaries include both positive and negative comments about the applications. All of the awards are for $8 million.All of the review summaries can be found at this link.

Cedars Sinai Michael Lewis, INFR-13586

City of Hope Leo Wang, INFR4-13587

Stanford University Matthew Porteus,INFR4-13579

UC Davis Mehrdad Abedi, INFR4-13596

UC Irvine Daniela Bota,INFR4-13952

UC Los Angeles Noah Federman, INFR4-13685

UC San Diego Catriona Jamieson,INFR4-13597

UC San Francisco Mark Walters, INFR4-13581Editors Note: David Jensenis a retired newsman who has followed the affairs of the $3 billion California stem cell agency since 2005 via his blog, the California Stem Cell Report,where this story first appeared.He has published thousands of items on California stem cell matters.

Want to see more stories like this? Sign up for The Roundup, the free daily newsletter about California politics from the editors of Capitol Weekly. Stay up to date on the news you need to know.

Sign up below, then look for a confirmation email in your inbox.

See the original post here:
Stem cell: $137 million buys more clinical trials, shared labs ...

Posted in Stem Cell Treatments | Comments Off on Stem cell: $137 million buys more clinical trials, shared labs …

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis – Wikipedia

Posted: November 16, 2022 at 2:45 am

Medical condition

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis is the general name for a family of at least eight genetically separate neurodegenerative lysosomal storage diseases that result from excessive accumulation of lipopigments (lipofuscin) in the body's tissues.[1] These lipopigments are made up of fats and proteins. Their name comes from the word stem "lipo-", which is a variation on lipid, and from the term "pigment", used because the substances take on a greenish-yellow color when viewed under an ultraviolet light microscope. These lipofuscin materials build up in neuronal cells and many organs, including the liver, spleen, myocardium, and kidneys.

The classic characterization of the group of neurodegenerative, lysosomal storage disorders called the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs) is through the progressive, permanent loss of motor and psychological ability with a severe intracellular accumulation of lipofuscins,[2][3] with the United States and Northern European populations having slightly higher frequency with an occurrence of one in 10,000.[4] Four classic diagnoses have received the most attention from researchers and the medical field, differentiated from one another by age of symptomatic onset, duration, early-onset manifestations such as blindness or seizures, and the forms which lipofuscin accumulation takes.[2]

In the early infantile variant of NCL (also called INCL or Santavuori-Haltia), probands appear normal at birth, but early visual loss leading to complete retinal blindness by the age of 2 years is the first indicator of the disease; by 3 years of age, a vegetative state is reached, and by 4 years, isoelectric encephalograms confirm brain death. Late infantile variant usually manifests between 2 and 4 years of age with seizures and deterioration of vision. The maximum age before death for late infantile variant is 1012 years.[5][6][7][8] Juvenile NCL (JNCL, Batten disease, or Spielmeyer-Vogt), with a prevalence of one in 100,000, usually arises between 4 and 10 years of age; the first symptoms include considerable vision loss due to retinal dystrophy, with seizures, psychological degeneration, and eventual death in the mid- to late 20s or 30s ensuing.[9] Adult variant NCL (ANCL or Kuf's disease) is less understood and generally manifests milder symptoms; however, while symptoms typically appear around 30 years of age, death usually occurs 10 years later.[1]

All the mutations that have been associated with this disease have been linked to genes involved with the neural synapses metabolism most commonly with the reuse of vesicle proteins.[citation needed]

Childhood NCLs are generally autosomal recessive disorders; that is, they occur only when a child inherits two copies of the defective gene, one from each parent. When both parents carry one defective gene, each of their children faces a one in four chance of developing NCL. At the same time, each child also faces a one in two chance of inheriting just one copy of the defective gene. Individuals who have only one defective gene are known as carriers, meaning they do not develop the disease, but they can pass the gene on to their own children. The most commonly identified mutations are in the CLN3 gene, which is located on the short arm of chromosome 16 (16p12.1). The normal function of the gene is not presently known, but results in a transmembrane protein.[citation needed]

Adult NCL may be inherited as an autosomal recessive (Kufs), or less often, as an autosomal dominant (Parry's) disorder. In autosomal dominant inheritance, all people who inherit a single copy of the disease gene develop the disease. As a result, no carriers of the gene are unaffected.[citation needed]

Many authorities refer to the NCLs collectively as Batten disease.[10]

Because vision loss is often an early sign, NCL may be first suspected during an eye exam. An eye doctor can detect a loss of cells within the eye that occurs in the three childhood forms of NCL. However, because such cell loss occurs in other eye diseases, the disorder cannot be diagnosed by this sign alone. Often, an eye specialist or other physician who suspects NCL may refer the child to a neurologist, a doctor who specializes in disease of the brain and nervous system. To diagnose NCL, the neurologist needs the patient's medical history and information from various laboratory tests.[citation needed]

Diagnostic tests used for NCLs include:

The older classification of NCL divided the condition into four types (CLN1, CLN2, CLN3, and CLN4) based upon age of onset, while newer classifications divide it by the associated gene.[11][12]

CLN4 (unlike CLN1, CLN2, and CLN3) has not been mapped to a specific gene.

Nonsense and frameshift mutations in the CLN1 gene (located at1p32[15][16][17]) always induce classical INCL, while some missense mutations have been associated with ANCL in addition to the infantile and juvenile forms. The mutation typically results in a deficient form of a lysosomal enzyme called palmitoyl protein thioesterase 1 (PPT1).[18]

The wild-type PPT1 is a 306-amino acid polypeptide that is typically targeted for transport into lysosomes by the mannose 6-phosphate (M6P) receptor-mediated pathway.[5][18] Here, the protein appears to function in removing palmitate residues by cleaving thioester linkages in s-acylated (or palmitoylated) proteins, encouraging their breakdown.[5][6] Defective polypeptides, however, are unable to exit the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), most likely due to misfolding; further analyses of this pathway could serve to categorize INCL among lysosomal enzyme deficiencies. The human PPT gene shows 91% similarity to bovine PPT and 85% similarity to rat PPT; these data indicate that the PPT gene is highly conserved and likely plays a vital role in cell metabolism.[5] In addition, buildup of defective PPT1 in the ER has been shown to cause the increased release of Ca2+. This homeostasis-altering event leads to increased mitochondrial membrane permeability and subsequent activation of caspase-9, eventually leading to an accumulation of cleft and uncleft poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and eventual apoptosis.[6]

The CLN2 gene encodes a 46kDa protein called lysosomal tripeptidyl peptidase I (TPP1), which cleaves tripeptides from terminal amine groups of partially unfolded proteins.[7][19] Mutations of this gene typically result in a LINCL phenotype.[20]

On April 27, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved cerliponase alfa (Brineura) as the first specific treatment for NCL. It is enzyme replacement therapy manufactured through recombinant DNA technology. The active ingredient in Brineura, cerliponase alfa, is intended to slow loss of walking ability in symptomatic pediatric patients 3 years of age and older with late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2), also known as TPP1 deficiency. Brineura is administered into the cerebrospinal fluid by infusion via a surgically implanted reservoir and catheter in the head (intraventricular access device).[21]

All mutations resulting in the juvenile variant of NCL have been shown to occur at the CLN3 gene on 16p12;[16] of the mutations known to cause JNCL, 85% result from a 1.02-kb deletion, with a loss of amino acids 154438, while the remaining 15% appear to result from either point or frameshift mutations.[9] The wild-type CLN3 gene codes for a protein with no known function,[3] but studies of the yeast CLN3 ortholog, the product of which is called battenin (after its apparent connections to Batten's disease, or JNCL), have suggested that the protein may play a role in lysosomal pH homeostasis. Furthermore, recent studies have also implied the protein's role in cathepsin D deficiency; the overexpression of the defective protein appears to have significant effects on cathepsin D processing, with implications suggesting that accumulation of ATP synthase subunit C would result.[22] Only recently have studies of human patients shown deficiency of lysosomal aspartyl proteinase cathepsin D.[citation needed]

Between 1.3 and 10% of cases are of the adult form. The age at onset is variable (662 yr). Two main clinical subtypes have been described: progressive myoclonus epilepsy (type A) and dementia with motor disturbances, such as cerebellar, extrapyramidal signs and dyskinesia (type B). Unlike the other NCLs, retinal degeneration is absent. Pathologically, the ceroid-lipofuscin accumulates mainly in neurons and contains subunit C of the mitochondrial ATP synthase.[citation needed]

Two independent families have been shown to have mutations in the DNAJC5 gene one with a transversion and the other with a deletion mutation.[23] The mutations occur in a cysteine-string domain, which is required for membrane targeting/binding, palmitoylation, and oligomerization of the encoded protein cysteine-string protein alpha (CSP). The mutations dramatically decrease the affinity of CSP for the membrane. A second report has also located this disease to this gene.[24]

Currently, no widely accepted treatment can cure, slow down, or halt the symptoms in the great majority of patients with NCL, but seizures may be controlled or reduced with use of antiepileptic drugs. Additionally, physical, speech, and occupational therapies may help affected patients retain functioning for as long as possible.[citation needed] Several experimental treatments are under investigation.[citation needed]

In 2001, a drug used to treat cystinosis, a rare genetic disease that can cause kidney failure if not treated, was reported to be useful in treating the infantile form of NCL. Preliminary results report the drug has completely cleared away storage material from the white blood cells of the first six patients, as well as slowing down the rapid neurodegeneration of infantile NCL.Currently, two drug trials are underway for infantile NCL, both using Cystagon.[citation needed]

A gene therapy trial using an adenoassociated virus vector called AAV2CUhCLN2 began in June 2004 in an attempt to treat the manifestations of late infantile NCL.[25] The trial was conducted by Weill Medical College of Cornell University[25] and sponsored by the Nathan's Battle Foundation.[26] In May 2008, the gene therapy given to the recipients reportedly was "safe, and that, on average, it significantly slowed the disease's progression during the 18-month follow-up period"[27] and "suggested that higher doses and a better delivery system may provide greater benefit".[28]

A second gene therapy trial for late infantile NCL using an adenoassociated virus derived from the rhesus macaque (a species of Old World monkey) called AAVrh.10 began in August 2010, and is once again being conducted by Weill Medical College of Cornell University.[28] Animal models of late infantile NCL showed that the AAVrh.10 delivery system "was much more effective, giving better spread of the gene product and improving survival greatly".[28]

A third gene therapy trial, using the same AAVrh.10 delivery system, began in 2011 and has been expanded to include late infantile NCL patients with moderate tosevere impairment or uncommon genotypes, and uses a novel administration method that reduces general anesthesia time by 50% to minimize potential adverse side effects.[29]

A painkiller available in several European countries, flupirtine, has been suggested to possibly slow down the progress of NCL,[30] particularly in the juvenile and late infantile forms. No trial has been officially supported in this venue, however. Currently, the drug is available to NCL families either from Germany, Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, or the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto.[citation needed]

On October 20, 2005, the Food and Drug Administration approved a phase-I clinical trial of neural stem cells to treat infantile and late infantile Batten disease. Subsequent approval from an independent review board also approved the stem cell therapy in early March 2006. This treatment will be the first transplant of fetal stem cells performed on humans. The therapy is being developed by Stem Cells Inc and is estimated to have six patients. The treatment was to be carried out in Oregon.[31]

Juvenile NCL has recently been listed on the Federal Clinical Trials website to test the effectiveness of bone-marrow or stem-cell transplants for this condition. A bone-marrow transplant has been attempted in the late infantile form of NCL with disappointing results; while the transplant may have slowed the onset of the disease, the child eventually developed the disease and died in 1998.[citation needed]

Trials testing the effectiveness of bone-marrow transplants for infantile NCL in Finland have also been disappointing, with only a slight slowing of disease reported.[32]

In late 2007, Dr. David Pearce et al. reported that Cellcept, an immunosuppressant medication commonly used in bone-marrow transplants, may be useful in slowing down the progress of juvenile NCL.[33]

On April 27, 2017, the U.S. FDA approved cerliponase alfa as the first specific treatment for NCL.[21]

Incidence can vary greatly from type-to-type, and from country-to-country.[34]

In Germany, one study reported an incidence of 1.28 per 100,000.[35]

A study in Italy reported an incidence of 0.56 per 100,000.[36]

A study in Norway reported an incidence of 3.9 per 100,000 using the years from 1978 to 1999, with a lower rate in earlier decades.[37]

The first probable instances of this condition were reported in 1826 in a Norwegian medical journal by Dr. Christian Stengel,[38][39][40][41] who described 4 affected siblings in a small mining community in Norway. Although no pathological studies were performed on these children the clinical descriptions are so succinct that the diagnosis of the Spielmeyer-Sjogren (juvenile) type is fully justified.[citation needed]

More fundamental observations were reported by F. E. Batten in 1903,[42] and by Heinrich Vogt in 1905,[43] who performed extensive clinicopathological studies on several families. Retrospectively, these papers disclose that the authors grouped together different types of the syndrome. Furthermore, Batten, at least for some time, insisted that the condition that he described was distinctly different from TaySachs disease, the prototype of a neuronal lysosomal disorder now identified as GM2 gangliosidosis type A. Around the same time, Walther Spielmeyer reported detailed studies on three siblings,[44] who have the Spielmeyer-Sjogren (juvenile) type, which led him to the very firm statement that this malady is not related to TaySachs disease. Subsequently, however, the pathomorphological studies of Kroly Schaffer made these authors change their minds to the extent that they reclassified their respective observations as variants of TaySachs disease, which caused confusion lasting about 50 years.[citation needed]

In 191314, Max Bielschowsky delineated the late infantile form of NCL.[45] However, all forms were still thought to belong in the group of "familial amaurotic idiocies", of which TaySachs was the prototype.

In 1931, Torsten Sjgren, a Swedish psychiatrist and geneticist, presented 115 cases with extensive clinical and genetic documentation and came to the conclusion that the disease now called the Spielmeyer-Sjogren (juvenile) type is genetically separate from TaySachs.[46]

Departing from the careful morphological observations of Spielmeyer, Hurst, and Sjovall and Ericsson, Zeman and Alpert made a determined effort to document the previously suggested pigmentary nature of the neuronal deposits in certain types of storage disorders.[47] Simultaneously, Terry and Korey[48] and Svennerholm[49] demonstrated a specific ultrastructure and biochemistry for TaySachs disease, and these developments led to the distinct identification and also separation of the NCLs from TaySachs disease by Zeman and Donahue. At that time, it was proposed that the late-infantile (JanskyBielschowsky), the juvenile (SpielmeyerVogt), and the adult form (Kufs) were quite different from TaySachs disease with respect to chemical pathology and ultrastructure and also different from other forms of sphingolipidoses.[citation needed]

Subsequently, Santavuori and Haltia showed that an infantile form of NCL exists,[50] which Zeman and Dyken had included with the Jansky Bielschowsky type.[citation needed]

See the article here:
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis - Wikipedia

Posted in Oregon Stem Cells | Comments Off on Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis – Wikipedia

M.A. Biotechnology Program – Columbia University

Posted: November 16, 2022 at 2:42 am

CLICK HERE FOR PROGRAM NEWS, EVENTS, AND ANNOUNCEMENTS!

The Biotechnology MA program trains students in modern aspects of molecular biology with a particular emphasis on approaches used in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. The program provides students with an advanced scientific education and prepares them scientifically for diverse careers in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical industries. These careers include:

The program is intended for students who would like a career in biotechnology without making the 5-7 year commitment to attain a Ph.D. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are among the largest in the U.S. and there is a great demand for professionals with biotechnology expertise.

Thirty (30) points of coursework plus a Master's thesis are required for the MA in Biotechnology. The thesis includes a review of a topic in biotechnology chosen with the help of a program advisor. An intensive laboratory course in Biotechnology is required to give students hands on experience in biotechnology methods. Elective courses (five or more) are selected according to the students specific interests. The program can be completed by full-time students in 1 year including the summer semester or at a reduced pace by part-time students.

See the rest here:
M.A. Biotechnology Program - Columbia University

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on M.A. Biotechnology Program – Columbia University

Current Opinion in Biotechnology | Journal – ScienceDirect

Posted: November 16, 2022 at 2:42 am

Current Opinion in Biotechnology (COBIOT) publishes authoritative, comprehensive, and systematic reviews. COBIOT helps specialists keep up to date with a clear and readable synthesis on current advances biotechnology. Expert authors annotate the most interesting papers from the expanding volume of information published today, saving valuable time and giving the reader insight on areas of importance.

Current Opinion in Biotechnology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the new primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Biotechnology (CRBIOT). CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy?of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach?to ensure they are a widely read resource that is integral to scientists? workflow.

Current Opinion in Biotechnology is divided into themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year. Themes include analytical biotechnology; plant biotechnology; food biotechnology; energy biotechnology; environmental biotechnology; systems biology; nanobiotechnology; tissue, cell and pathway engineering; chemical biotechnology; and pharmaceutical biotechnology.

The journal builds on Elsevier?s reputation for excellence in scientific publishing and long-standing commitment to communicating reproducible biomedical research targeted at improving human health.

Selection of topics to be reviewed Section Editors, who are major authorities in the field, are appointed by the Editors of the journal. They divide their section into a number of topics, ensuring that the field is comprehensively covered and that all issues of current importance are emphasised. Section Editors commission reviews from authorities on each topic that they have selected.

ReviewsAuthors write short review articles in which they present recent developments in their subject, emphasising the aspects that, in their opinion, are most important. In addition, they provide short annotations to the papers that they consider to be most interesting from all those published in their topic over the previous year.

Review articles in Current Opinion in Biotechnology are by invitation only.

Editorial OverviewSection Editors write a short overview at the beginning of the section to introduce the reviews and to draw the reader's attention to any particularly interesting developments.

Ethics in Publishing: General StatementThe Editor(s) and Publisher of this Journal believe that there are fundamental principles underlying scholarly or professional publishing. While this may not amount to a formal 'code of conduct', these fundamental principles with respect to the authors' paper are that the paper should: i) be the authors' own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere, ii) reflect the authors' own research and analysis and do so in a truthful and complete manner, iii) properly credit the meaningful contributions of co-authors and co-researchers, iv) not be submitted to more than one journal for consideration, and v) be appropriately placed in the context of prior and existing research. Of equal importance are ethical guidelines dealing with research methods and research funding, including issues dealing with informed consent, research subject privacy rights, conflicts of interest, and sources of funding. While it may not be possible to draft a 'code' that applies adequately to all instances and circumstances, we believe it useful to outline our expectations of authors and procedures that the Journal will employ in the event of questions concerning author conduct. With respect to conflicts of interest, the Publisher now requires authors to declare any conflicts of interest that relate to papers accepted for publication in this Journal. A conflict of interest may exist when an author or the author's institution has a financial or other relationship with other people or organizations that may inappropriately influence the author's work. A conflict can be actual or potential and full disclosure to the Journal is the safest course. All submissions to the Journal must include disclosure of all relationships that could be viewed as presenting a potential conflict of interest. The Journal may use such information as a basis for editorial decisions and may publish such disclosures if they are believed to be important to readers in judging the manuscript. A decision may be made by the Journal not to publish on the basis of the declared conflict.

For more information, please refer to: https://www.elsevier.com/conflictsofinterest

See the original post:
Current Opinion in Biotechnology | Journal - ScienceDirect

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on Current Opinion in Biotechnology | Journal – ScienceDirect

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

Posted: November 16, 2022 at 2:42 am

Public UK Research Council on Life Sciences

Region served

Chair

Main organ

Parent organization

Budget

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), part of UK Research and Innovation, is a non-departmental public body (NDPB), and is the largest UK public funder of non-medical bioscience. It predominantly funds scientific research institutes and university research departments in the UK.

Receiving its funding through the science budget of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), BBSRC's mission is to "promote and support, by any means, high-quality basic, strategic and applied research and related postgraduate training relating to the understanding and exploitation of biological systems".[1]

BBSRC's head office is at Polaris House [2] in Swindon - the same building as the other councils of UK Research and Innovation, AHRC EPSRC, ESRC, Innovate UK, MRC, NERC, Research England and STFC, as well as the UKSA. Funded by Government, BBSRC invested over 498 million in bioscience in 201718. BBSRC also manages the joint Research Councils' Office in Brussels the UK Research Office (UKRO).

BBSRC was created in 1994, merging the former Agricultural and Food Research Council (AFRC) and taking over the biological science activities of the former Science and Engineering Research Council (SERC).[3]

Chairs

Chief executives

Executive chairs

BBSRC is managed by the BBSRC Council consisting of a chair (from 2015, Professor Sir Gordon Duff), an executive chair (Professor Melanie Welham) and from ten to eighteen representatives from UK universities, government and industry. The council approves policies, strategy, budgets and major funding.

A research panel provides expert advice which BBSRC Council draws upon in making decisions. The purpose of the research panel is to advise on:

In addition to the council and the research panel, BBSRC has a series of other internal bodies for specific purposes.

The council strategically funds eight research institutes in the UK, and a number of centres (BBSRC: Institutes and centres).

They have strong links with business, industry and the wider community, and support policy development.[citation needed]

The institutes' research underpins key sectors of the UK economy such as agriculture, bioenergy, biotechnology, food and drink and pharmaceuticals. In addition, the institutes maintain unique research facilities of national importance.

Other research institutes have merged with each other or with local universities. Previous BBSRC (or AFRC) sponsored institutes include:

Here is the original post:
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

Should Biotechnology Stock LogicBio Therapeutics Inc (LOGC) Be in Your Portfolio Tuesday? – InvestorsObserver

Posted: November 16, 2022 at 2:42 am

Should Biotechnology Stock LogicBio Therapeutics Inc (LOGC) Be in Your Portfolio Tuesday?  InvestorsObserver

Go here to read the rest:
Should Biotechnology Stock LogicBio Therapeutics Inc (LOGC) Be in Your Portfolio Tuesday? - InvestorsObserver

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on Should Biotechnology Stock LogicBio Therapeutics Inc (LOGC) Be in Your Portfolio Tuesday? – InvestorsObserver

PDS BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (form 10-Q) – Marketscreener.com

Posted: November 16, 2022 at 2:42 am

PDS BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (form 10-Q)  Marketscreener.com

Read more:
PDS BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (form 10-Q) - Marketscreener.com

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on PDS BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (form 10-Q) – Marketscreener.com

Ashland introduces sclareance biofunctional natural sclareolide through biotechnology to visibly limit the appearance of dandruff – Marketscreener.com

Posted: November 16, 2022 at 2:42 am

Ashland introduces sclareance biofunctional natural sclareolide through biotechnology to visibly limit the appearance of dandruff  Marketscreener.com

See original here:
Ashland introduces sclareance biofunctional natural sclareolide through biotechnology to visibly limit the appearance of dandruff - Marketscreener.com

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on Ashland introduces sclareance biofunctional natural sclareolide through biotechnology to visibly limit the appearance of dandruff – Marketscreener.com

Is Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc (BCLI) Stock at the Top of the Biotechnology Industry? – InvestorsObserver

Posted: November 16, 2022 at 2:42 am

Is Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc (BCLI) Stock at the Top of the Biotechnology Industry?  InvestorsObserver

More here:
Is Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc (BCLI) Stock at the Top of the Biotechnology Industry? - InvestorsObserver

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on Is Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc (BCLI) Stock at the Top of the Biotechnology Industry? – InvestorsObserver

Where Does Axsome Therapeutics Inc (AXSM) Stock Fall in the Biotechnology Field After It Is Lower By -1.80% This Week? – InvestorsObserver

Posted: November 16, 2022 at 2:42 am

Where Does Axsome Therapeutics Inc (AXSM) Stock Fall in the Biotechnology Field After It Is Lower By -1.80% This Week?  InvestorsObserver

Excerpt from:
Where Does Axsome Therapeutics Inc (AXSM) Stock Fall in the Biotechnology Field After It Is Lower By -1.80% This Week? - InvestorsObserver

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on Where Does Axsome Therapeutics Inc (AXSM) Stock Fall in the Biotechnology Field After It Is Lower By -1.80% This Week? – InvestorsObserver

Page 151«..1020..150151152153..160170..»