Page 1,767«..1020..1,7661,7671,7681,769..1,7801,790..»

Stem Cells – Research | UC San Francisco

Posted: August 22, 2015 at 5:40 pm

Since the success in 1998 by the University of Wisconsins James Thomson in deriving human embryonic stem cells from embryos, the stem cell research field has exploded.

The discovery by Japans Shinya Yamanaka, MD, PhD,in 2006, of how to transform ordinary adult skin cells into cells that, like embryonic stem cells, are capable of developing into any cell in the human body, has revolutionized stem cell research.

At top, Robert Blelloch, MD, PhD, performs stem cell research. Above,Shinya Yamanaka, MD, PhD, a scientist at the UCSF-affiliated Gladstone Institutes, UCSF and Kyoto University, was recognized for a revolutionary achievement in the field of stem cell science with a Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2012.

In between and since, there has been major progress in scientists understanding of stem cells. Today, fueled in part by the robust research enterprise at UCSF, the field is burgeoning.Yamanaka, a senior investigator at the UCSF-affiliated Gladstone Institutes and a professor of anatomy at UCSF, shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine with John B. Gurdon of the Gurdon Institute in Cambridge, England, in 2012.

In about 125 labs of the Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research at UCSF one of the largest such programs in the country scientists are carrying out the basic research needed to understand how stem cells could be manipulated to treat diseases, to translate these findings into clinical research and to develop novel therapies.

In studies conducted in the culture dish and in animals, scientists are learning how to prompt stem cells to develop into specialized cells of tissues such as the heart, pancreas and brain. The ultimate goal is to transplant these cells into patients to regenerate damaged tissues.

The scientists also are exploring the use of stem cells as vehicles for delivering drugs into diseased tissues, and are using specialized cells produced by stem cells, such as liver and heart muscle cells, to test the effectiveness of experimental drugs in the culture dish. In addition, they are studying the role of stem cells in generating many forms of cancer, an important first step for targeting the cells for therapies.

The center is structured along seven research pipelines aimed at driving discoveries from the lab bench to clinical care. Each pipeline focuses on a different organ system: the blood, pancreas and liver, heart, reproductive organs, nervous system, musculoskeletal tissues and skin. And each pipeline is overseen by two leaders of international standing one representing the basic sciences and one representing clinical research. The approach has proven successful in the private sector for driving the development of new therapies.

Among the basic science studies being conducted by UCSF investigators are:

Exploring a novel stem cell strategy for treating brain diseases Five UCSF labs are pioneering a novel approach to treating brain diseases and injuries, using a particular type of embryonic stem cell to manipulate the brains neural circuitry. They recently reported the first use of the cells, which mature into neurons, in creating a new period of plasticity, or capacity to change, in the brains of rodents.

The approachcould be used to treat neural circuits disrupted in abnormal fetal or postnatal development, stroke, traumatic brain injury, psychiatric illness, and aging. The labs alsoreportedthe use of the cells in dampening the excitation that occurs in the neural circuits of people with epilepsy and Parkinsons disease. If the research continues to show promise, the team ultimately will attempt to produce the cells in the culture dish from human embryonic stem cells.

Moving in on the cause of adult leukemia Scientists led by Emmanuelle Passegu, PhD, have discovered one key reason why blood stem cells are susceptible to developing the genetic mutations that can lead to adult leukemia. Their finding also may explain, they say, why some other age-related hematological disorders develop. The study opens a new frontier for studying the molecular underpinnings of adult leukemia.

Our discovery also suggests a strategy for reducing the risk of leukemia that results from chemotherapy used to treat solid tumors, says Passegu.Existing drugs, such as G-CSF and prostaglandins, could be used to induce blood stem cells to proliferate prior to the use of therapy with DNA-damaging agents. This could enhance the precision of DNA repair and thus reduce the risk of leukemia development. She is discussing this possible tactic with UCSF clinical researchers.

Obtaining a pure sample of stem cells for treatments Researchers led by Harold Bernstein, MD, PhD, have reported the first success in very rapidly purifying one type of embryonic stem cell from a mix of many different types of embryonic stem cells in the culture dish. The technique, which avoids the need to genetically alter the cells to distinguish them, is a key advance, the researchers say, toward obtaining the appropriate cells for repairing specific damaged tissues.

Identifying a molecular tool to manipulate stem cells and cancers UCSFs Robert Blelloch, MD, PhD, is pioneering studies of microRNAs, molecules that regulate the switch between proliferationand differentiationin both stem cells and cancer. He and others worldwide are excited about the prospect of using microRNAs to manipulate cells at will: either inducing adult cells to de-differentiate to stem cells which could be expanded, manipulated and returned to the patient or promoting differentiation to produce tissues of choice that would remain robustly integrated in the body once reintroduced.

MicroRNAs give us a new tool to manipulate the fate of cells, says Blelloch. The goal is to use them to reprogram adult cells back to an embryonic-like fate, so that they can then be prompted to specialize as specific cell types and be used to repair damaged tissues.

Discovering role of tiny filament in development, birth defects, cancers UCSF scientists led by Jeremy Reiter, MD, PhD, have discovered that primary cilia the tiny filaments extending from cells help orchestrate embryonic development. The finding could lead to insights into the development of stem cells, as well as birth defects and cancers, and thus fuel therapeutic strategies.

In studies in the culture dish and in zebrafish and mouse embryos, the scientists showed that primary cilia play a key role in a form of cell-to-cell communication known as Hedgehog signaling. This molecular pathway helps prompt embryonic and adult stem cells to differentiate into specialized cells, such as those of the brain, pancreas and skin. The finding, says Reiter, will advance scientists efforts to use signaling molecules to direct the differentiation of embryonic stem cells in the culture dish, with the goal of using them to replace or replenish damaged tissues in patients.

Revolutionizing the stem cell fieldthrough a major discovery Shinya Yamanaka, MD, PhD, now a senior investigator at the UCSF-affiliated J. David Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, UCSF professor of anatomy and faculty member at Kyoto University, received the 2009 Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award often a precursor to the Nobel Prize for his breakthrough in reprogramming adult skin cells back to an embryonic-like state. He named these cells induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.

The discovery has revolutionized the stem cell field, offering a new frontier for scientists to study embryonic development, the ways diseases develop and how cells respond to experimental drugs. The cells also have become a focus of research for their potential use in regenerating damaged tissues of the body. UCSF scientists Robert Blelloch, MD, PhD, and Miguel Ramalho-Santos, PhD, are leaders in efforts to perfect the technique.

With the February 2011 grand opening of its new headquarters building on the Parnassus campus, the Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regeneration Medicine at UCSF continues to support a program that extends across all UCSF departments. The facility is constructed on a 60-degree slope, a metaphor for the ongoing political challenges faced by the field and the determination of the UCSF scientific community to pursue the research in spite of these challenges.

The building, a series of split-level floors with terraced grass roofs and solar orientation, consists of open labs that flow into each other, with office and communal areas located on the circulation routes between them. The layout is designed to allow the entire research community in the building to interact, a key to allowing the cross-pollination of ideas that fuels discovery.

The building, which at full capacity will house 25 principal investigators and their teams, will free up space in existing laboratories and offices, allowing for additional recruitments. UCSF has recruited 16 new faculty members to the center in the last three years. The building is located near UCSF Medical Center, symbolizing UCSFs long-term goal of translating basic science research findings into clinical treatments.

Link:
Stem Cells - Research | UC San Francisco

Posted in Stem Cell Research | Comments Off on Stem Cells – Research | UC San Francisco

Stem Cell Research – American Medical Association

Posted: August 22, 2015 at 5:40 pm

Stem cells can give rise to any tissue found in the body and thus provide nearly limitless potential for medical applications (regenerative medicine). Numerous regulatory and ethical constraints exist for this area of research. Debates often focus onthe sourcefrom whichstem cells are derived: embryonicor adult tissues.

To learn more about recent scientific advances in stem cell research and AMA policy in this area, readthe 2003 AMA report entitledCloning and Stem Cell Research. To learn more about the ethical appropriateness of using embryonic stem cells in biomedical research, particularly where stem cells are derived from cloned human embryos, read the 2003 AMA report entitledCloning-for-Biomedical-Research(PDF, 112KB).

For more information on stem cell research, visit the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stem Cell InformationWeb site.

Basics of stem cell research Questions and answers about stem cell research.

Human cloning Recent advances in applying somatic cell nuclear transfer technology to produce cloned human embryos has raised concerns about human cloning.

Visit link:
Stem Cell Research - American Medical Association

Posted in Stem Cell Research | Comments Off on Stem Cell Research – American Medical Association

Stem Cell Research: Uses, Types & Examples – Healthline

Posted: August 22, 2015 at 5:40 pm

What Are Stem Cells?

Stem cells are undifferentiated, or blank, cells that have the potential to develop into cells that serve many different functions in many parts of the body, such as the heart, lungs, and brain. Most cells in the body are differentiated cells. This means that they can only serve a specific function in a particular organ. For example, red blood cells are cells designed specifically to carry oxygen through the blood.

All human beings start out as only one cell. This cell is called a zygote, or a fertilized egg. The zygote divides into two cells, then four cells, and so on. Eventually, the cells begin to specialize and take on the function of a particular part of the body. This process is called differentiation.

Stem cells are cells that have not yet differentiated. They have the ability to divide and make an indefinite number of copies of themselves. Other cells in the body can only replicate a limited number of times before they begin to break down. When a stem cell divides, it can either remain a stem cell, or it can turn into a differentiated cell, such as a muscle cell or a red blood cell.

Since stem cells have the potential to turn into many other types of cells, scientists believe that they can be useful for treating and understanding diseases. Researchers at the Academic Health Center at the University of Minnesota (UMN) believe these cells can be used to:

Embryonic stem cells are stem cells that come from a human embryo. These cells are harvested during a process called in-vitro fertilization, in which an embryo is fertilized in a laboratory instead of inside the female body. These cells can give rise to virtually any other type of cell.

Adult stem cells have a misleading name, because they are also found in infants and children. These stem cells come from already developed organs and tissues in the human body. They are used by the body to repair and replace damaged tissue in the same area in which they are found. For example, hematopoietic stem cells are found in bone marrow and make new red blood cells, white blood cells, and other types of blood cells. Adult stem cells cannot differentiate into as many other types of cells as embryonic stem cells can.

Adult stem cells do not present any ethical problems. However, in recent years there has been controversy about the way human embryonic stem cells are obtained. These cells are harvested through in-vitro fertilization, meaning that the egg is artificially fertilized in a laboratory.

The cells are harvested between five and 14 days after fertilization, when they undergo various testing for research purposes. In the process, the embryo (a fertilized egg that has begun cell division) is destroyed, and this raises ethical concerns for people who believe that destruction of a fertilized embryo is morally wrong.

Opponents believe that an embryo is a living human being, and do not want the fertilized eggs used for research. They believe that the embryo should have the same rights as every other human being and that these rights should be protected.

Supporters of stem cell research believe that the embryos are not yet humans, and note that they receive consent from the donor couple whose eggs and sperm were used to create the embryo. Additionally, supporters argue that the extra fertilized eggs created during IVF would be discarded anyway and might be put to better use for scientific research.

According to the National Institutes of Health, in August 2001, former President George W. Bush approved a law that would provide federal funding for limited research on embryonic stem cells, so long as research fit the following criteria (NIH, 2009):

In March 2009, President Barack Obama revoked President Bushs statement and released Executive Order 13505 entitled Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem Cells. The order removed the restrictions on federal funding for stem cell research to allow the NIH to fund research that uses embryonic stem cells.

The NIH then published guidelines to establish the policy under which it would fund research. The guidelines were written to help make sure that all NIH-funded research on human stem cells is morally responsible and scientifically worthy. (NIH, 2009)

Executive Order 13505 can be found here: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-03-11/pdf/E9-5441.pdf

Stem cell research is ongoing at universities, research institutions, government laboratories, and hospitals around the world. Examples of stem cell projects include:

We won't share your email address. Privacy policy

Please note that we are unable to respond back directly to your questions or provide medical advice.

We won't share your email address. Privacy policy

Sorry, we don't provide individual diagnosis or prescribe treatments. If this is an emergency, contact your doctor or call 911

Close

We are unable to collect your feedback at this time. However, your feedback is important to us. Please try again later.

Thank you for your feedback. Your health and well being are important to us. We're sorry you couldn't find the information you were looking for this time, but your comments will help us identify gaps and improve our content.

We applaud you for taking an active role in your health!

To your health, The Healthline Team

14 Things You Didnt Know About Alzheimers

Are Dogs Really a Restaurant Health Risk?

12 Ice Pop Recipes to Get You Through Summer

8 Reasons Why Coffee Is Good for You

7 Fun Kids Activities to Beat Summer Boredom

See the rest here:
Stem Cell Research: Uses, Types & Examples - Healthline

Posted in Stem Cell Research | Comments Off on Stem Cell Research: Uses, Types & Examples – Healthline

Obama Ends Stem Cell Research Ban – CBS News

Posted: August 22, 2015 at 5:40 pm

President Barack Obama said Monday he is allowing federal taxpayer dollars to fund significantly broader research on embryonic stem cells because "medical miracles do not happen simply by accident," and promised his administration would make up for the ground lost under his predecessor.

Fulfilling a campaign promise, Mr. Obama signed an executive order expected to set in motion increased research that supporters believe could uncover cures for serious ailments from diabetes to paralysis.

Mr. Obama's action, before a packed East Room audience, reverses former President George W. Bush's policy on stem cell research by undoing a 2001 directive that banned federal funding for research into stem lines created after that date.

Mr. Bush limited the use of taxpayer money to only the 21 stem cell lines that had been produced before his decision. He argued he was defending human life because days-old embryos - although typically from fertility clinics and already destined for destruction - are destroyed to create the stem cell lines.

The Obama order reverses that without addressing a separate legislative ban, which precludes any federal money paying for the development of stem cell lines. The legislation, however, does not prevent funds for research on those lines created without federal funding. (Read more about what this Executive Order will do -- and won't do.)

Researchers say the newer lines created with private money during the period of the Bush ban are healthier and better suited to creating treatment for diseases. Embryonic stem cells are master cells that can morph into any cell of the body. Scientists hope to harness them so they can create replacement tissues to treat a variety of diseases - such as new insulin-producing cells for diabetics, cells that could help those with Parkinson's disease or maybe even Alzheimer's, or new nerve connections to restore movement after spinal injury.

Mr. Obama called his decision a "difficult and delicate balance," an understatement of the intense emotions generated on both sides of the long, contentious debate. He said he came down on the side of the "majority of Americans" who support increased federal funding for the research, both because strict oversight would prevent problems and because of the great and lifesaving potential it holds.

CBS News polling on the topic shows that Americans do support medical research using embryonic stem cells. In 2007, the last time CBS News asked the question, sixty-five percent said they approved compared to twenty-five percent who disapproved. The number of those who approved had gone up steadily since the 2004 when fifty percent approved. (Read more about the polling.)

"Rather than furthering discovery, our government has forced what I believe is a false choice between sound science and moral values," Mr. Obama said. "In this case, I believe the two are not inconsistent. As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for each other and work to ease human suffering. I believe we have been given the capacity and will to pursue this research and the humanity and conscience to do so responsibly." (Read all of Mr. Obama's remarks.)

Mr. Obama warned against overstating the eventual benefits of the research. But he said his administration "will vigorously support scientists who pursue this research," taking a slap at his predecessor in the process.

"I cannot guarantee that we will find the treatments and cures we seek. No president can promise that. But I can promise that we will seek them actively, responsibly, and with the urgency required to make up for lost ground."

It's a matter of competitive advantage globally as well, the president argued.

"When government fails to make these investments, opportunities are missed. Promising avenues go unexplored. Some of our best scientists leave for other countries that will sponsor their work. And those countries may surge ahead of ours in the advances that transform our lives," Mr. Obama said.

Early Show medical contributor Dr. Holly Phillips pointed out that such research was never banned or illegal. "The question that we're addressing today is what role, if any, federal funding should have" in this research.

"Many scientists for the last eight years have been complaining that they're spending more time trying to find funding for their research than actually doing their research. So for them this will really have a profound effect," Phillips said. "Certainly on an international level in medicine we're so excited about this research and the potential for healing that it has. So I think less red tape will have a profound effect."

Of the diseases or conditions that may be most affected by the end of the federal ban, Phillips said, "People are most excited about the neurological illnesses, things like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. A group in California will start using embryonic stem cells in humans to hopefully cure spinal cell injuries for people who have been paralyzed from the waist down. We're also seeing some hope in treating diabetes, heart disease and even strokes. So really, millions of people could be affected by this research."

"We've got eight years of science to make up for," said Dr. Curt Civin, whose research allowed scientists to isolate stem cells and who now serves as the founding director of the University of Maryland School of Medicine's Center for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. "Now the silly restrictions are lifted."

Mr. Bush and his supporters said they were defending human life; days-old embryos - typically from fertility-clinic leftovers otherwise destined to be thrown away - are destroyed for the stem cells.

Family Research Council, which advocates for a "Judeo-Christian worldview" and warns against the reproductive cloning of a human being, opposes the use of embryonic stem cells, promoting instead adult stem cells as being superior.

Of Mr. Obama's new order, FRC's Dr. David Prentice told CBS' The Early Show, "In terms of scientific advances I don't think we are going to see anything for this. This is more of an ideological move."

House Republican Leader John Boehner said the president's repeal of the ban, "runs counter to President Obama's promise to be a president for all Americans. For a third time in his young presidency, the president has rolled back important protections for innocent life, further dividing our nation at a time when we need greater unity to tackle the challenges before us." (Read more about Republican reaction to the move.)

The president was insistent that his order would not open the door to human cloning.

"We will develop strict guidelines, which we will rigorously enforce, because we cannot ever tolerate misuse or abuse," Mr. Obama said. "And we will ensure that our government never opens the door to the use of cloning for human reproduction. It is dangerous, profoundly wrong, and has no place in our society, or any society."

Mr. Obama also issued a memo promising to restore "scientific integrity to government decision-making." That policy change was aimed more broadly than the stem cell debate, to reach into areas such as climate change as well.

"Promoting science isn't just about providing resources it is also about protecting free and open inquiry," Mr. Obama said. "It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient especially when it's inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.

Mr. Obama said the presidential memorandum was the beginning of a process that would ensure that his administration: bases its decision "on the soundest science," appoints scientific advisers based on their credentials and experience, not their politics or ideology, and is "open and honest" about the science behind its decisions.

"We view what happened with stem cell research in the last administration is one manifestation of failure to think carefully about how federal support of science and the use of scientific advice occurs," said Harold Varmus, chairman of the White House's Council of Advisers on Science and Technology.

2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

View original post here:
Obama Ends Stem Cell Research Ban - CBS News

Posted in Stem Cell Research | Comments Off on Obama Ends Stem Cell Research Ban – CBS News

Stem cell research | University of Maryland Medical Center

Posted: August 22, 2015 at 5:40 pm

Toggle: English / Spanish

A stem cell is a generic cell that can make exact copies of itself indefinitely. A stem cell has the ability to make specialized cells for various tissues in the body, such as heart muscle, brain tissue, and liver tissue. Stem cells can be saved and usedlater to make specialized cells, when needed.

There are two basic types of stem cells:

Potential uses for stem cells

There are many areas in medicine in which stem cell research could have a significant impact. For example, there are a variety of diseases and injuries in which a patient's cells or tissues are destroyed and must be replaced by tissue or organ transplants. Stem cells may be able to make brand new tissue in these cases, and even cure diseases for which there currently is no good therapy. Diseases that could be helped by stem cells include

Stem cells could also be used to gain a better understanding of how genetics work in the early stages of cell development. This can help scientists understand why some cells develop abnormally and lead to medical problems such as birth defects and cancer. This might help scientists learn how to prevent some of these diseases.

Finally, stem cells may be useful in the testing and development of drugs. Because stem cells can be used to create unlimited amounts of specialized tissue, such as heart tissue, it may be possible to test how drugs react onsuch tissues before testing the drugs on animals and humans. Drugs could be tested for effectiveness and side effects more rapidly.

Controversy about stem cell research

In August 2001, President George W. Bush approved limited federal funding for stem cell research. While stem cell research has the potential to provide major medical advances, including cures for many diseases, stem cell research is controversial.

The stem cell controversy is based on the belief by opponents that a fertilized egg is fundamentally a human being with rights and interests that need to be protected. Those who oppose stem cell research do not want fetuses and fertilized eggs used for research purposes. However, a team of scientists have developed a technique that was successful in generating mouse stem cells without destroying the mouse embryo. This technique has not yet been attempted on human embryonic tissue. Many other scientists are attempting to create more universally accepted forms of human embryonic stem cells, as well as other types of adult stem cells.

Supporters of stem cell research argue that the fertilized eggs are donated with consent from each couple and would be discarded anyway. Therefore, there is no potential for those fertilized eggs to become human beings. Fertilized eggs are not (at this time) being created specifically for stem cell research.

As with any moral and ethical issue, the controversy surrounding stem cell research will likely continue for quite some time.

The U.S. government released new stem cell guidelines in 2009. The new guidelines cover issues such as informed consent of donors and the wording of consent, as well as the issue of financial gain. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) maintains a register of stem cells, including human embryonic lines, that are eligible for government funding.

Okie S. Stem-cell research--signposts and roadblocks. N Engl J Med.2005 Jul 7;353(1):1-5.

Lindvall O, Kokaia Z. Stem cell therapy for human brain disorders. Kidney Int. 2005 Nov;68(5):1937-9.

Fukuda H, Takahashi J. Embryonic stem cells as a cell source for treating Parkinson's disease. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2005 Oct;5(10):1273-80.

Green R. Can we develop ethically universal embryonic stem-cell lines? Nature Genet Rev. June 2007;8:480-485.

Lougheed T. New US guidelines for research on human embryos. CMAJ.2005 Jun 21;172(13):1672.

Zwillich T. Guidelines set ethical bar for US stem cell research. Lancet. 2005 May 7-13;365(9471):1612.

A.D.A.M., Inc. is accredited by URAC, also known as the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission (www.urac.org). URAC's accreditation program is an independent audit to verify that A.D.A.M. follows rigorous standards of quality and accountability. A.D.A.M. is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial policy, editorial process and privacy policy. A.D.A.M. is also a founding member of Hi-Ethics and subscribes to the principles of the Health on the Net Foundation (www.hon.ch)

The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical professional should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. 1997-2013 A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.

Original post:
Stem cell research | University of Maryland Medical Center

Posted in Stem Cell Research | Comments Off on Stem cell research | University of Maryland Medical Center

Stem Cell Research Controversy – HowStuffWorks

Posted: August 22, 2015 at 5:40 pm

Stem cell research has become one of the biggest issues dividing the scientific and religious communities around the world. At the core of the issue is one central question: When does life begin? At this time, to get stem cells that are reliable, scientists either have to use an embryo that has already been conceived or else clone an embryo using a cell from a patient's body and a donated egg. Either way, to harvest an embryo's stem cells, scientists must destroy it. Although that embryo may only contain four or five cells, some religious leaders say that destroying it is the equivalent of taking a human life. Inevitably, this issue entered the political arena.

In 1996, Congress passed a rider to the federal appropriations bill called the Dickey-Wicker amendment. Representatives Jay Dickey and Roger Wicker proposed banning the use of federal monies for any research in which a human embryo is created or destroyed. Federal monies are a primary source of funding for stem cell research. The amendment has been renewed every year since that time.

In 2001, President George W. Bush further restricted federal stem cell research. In an executive order, Bush stated that federal funds could only be used for research on human embryonic stem cell lines that had already been established (only 22 cell lines). This prevented researchers from creating more embryonic stem cell lines for research.

In 2009, President Barack Obama issued an executive order to expand embryonic stem cell research. Obama's administration allowed federal funding of embryonic stem cell research if the following conditions applied:

According to the administration, the new policy did not violate the Dickey-Wicker amendment because the money did not finance the creation of new embryos (they had already been created by private means) and did not finance the destruction of them.

In 2009, two researchers from Boston, Dr. James Sherley of the Boston Biomedical Research Institute and Dr. Theresa Deisher of the Ava Maria Biotechnology Company, and other agencies filed a lawsuit against the government. Initially, the lawsuit was dismissed because the judge ruled that the plaintiffs had no legal standing (i.e. they were not affected materially by the new rules). However, a court of appeals overturned the initial ruling. The two scientists remained plaintiffs. The scientists claimed that, because they used adult stem cells exclusively in their research, the new rules would increase competition for federal research dollars, thereby affecting their ability to obtain funding. Federal Judge Royce Lamberth upheld the appeals court ruling. He placed an injunction preventing the new rules from going into place. He claimed that the rules violated the Dickey-Wicker amendment because embryos must be destroyed in the process of creating embryonic stem cell lines.

In September 2010, The New York Times reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that federal funding of embryonic stem cell research could continue under the new rules while the court considers Judge Lamberth's ruling [source: New York Times]. This ruling allows researchers to continue feeding embryonic stem cell cultures, experimenting with mice, and other research activities until this court rules, the U.S. Supreme Court weighs in, or Congress passes legislation that clarifies the issues. In the meantime, stem cell research and the careers of stem cell researchers hang on a legal roller coaster. Although stem cells have great potential for treating diseases, much work on the science, ethical and legal fronts remains.

For more on stem cells, investigate the links on the following page.

See original here:
Stem Cell Research Controversy - HowStuffWorks

Posted in Stem Cell Research | Comments Off on Stem Cell Research Controversy – HowStuffWorks

stem cell research – The ALS Association

Posted: August 22, 2015 at 5:40 pm

Quick links:

Stem cells are cells that have the ability to divide for indefinite periods in culture and give rise to multiple specialized cell types. They can develop into blood, bone, brain, muscle, skin and other organs.

Stem cells occur naturally, or they can be created from other kinds of cells. Stem cells form during development (embryonic stem cells). They are also present in small numbers in many different tissues (endogenous adult stem cells). Most significantly, stem cells can be created from skin cells (induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS cells).

iPS cells have emerged in recent years as by far the most significant source of stem cells for ALS research. A simple skin biopsy provides the skin cells (fibroblasts). These cells are treated in a lab dish with a precise cocktail of naturally occurring growth factors that turns back the clock, transforming them back into cells much like those that gave rise to themstem cells.

Embryonic stem cells can be isolated from fertilized embryos less than a week old. Before the development of iPS cells, human embryos were the only source of human stem cells for research or therapeutic development. The ethical issues involved hindered development of this research. Most stem cell research in ALS is currently focused on iPS cells, which are not burdened with these issues.

Stem cells are being used in many laboratories today for research into the causes of and treatments for ALS. Most commonly, iPS cells are converted into motor neurons, the cells affected in ALS. These motor neurons can be grown in a dish and studied to determine how the disease develops. They can also be used to screen for drugs that can alter the disease process. The availability of large numbers of identical neurons, made possible by iPS cells, has dramatically expanded the ability to search for new treatments.

Because iPS cells can be made from skin samples of any person, researchers have begun to make individual cell lines derived from dozens of individuals with ALS. Comparing the motor neurons derived from these cells lines allows them to ask what is common, and what is unique, about each case of ALS, leading to further understanding of the disease process.

Stem cells may also have a role to play in treating the disease. The most likely application may be to use stem cells or cells derived from them to deliver growth factors or protective molecules to motor neurons in the spinal cord. Clinical trials of such stem cell transplants are in the early stages, but appear to be safe.

While the idea of replacing dying motor neurons with new ones derived from stem cells is appealing, there are multiple major hurdles that must be overcome before it is a possibility. Perhaps the most challenging is coaxing the implanted cells to grow the long distances from the spinal cord, where they would be implanted, out to the muscle, where they cause contraction. While work is ongoing to overcome these challenges, it is likely that providing support and protection to surviving neurons represents a more immediate possible form of stem cell therapy.

The presence of endogenous stem cells in the adult brain and spinal cord may provide an alternative to transplantation, eliminating the issues of tissue rejection. If there were a way to stimulate resident stem cells to replace dying cells the limitations of transplantation could be overcome. Small biotech companies are pursuing this direction in the hope of finding therapeutic compounds that will do this. Further research into molecules and genes that govern cell division, migration and specialization is needed, ultimately leading to new drug targets and therapies for ALS.

The mechanism of motor neuron death in ALS remains unclear. It is not certain that transplanted stem cells would be resistant to the same source(s) of damage that causes motor neurons to die and stem cells may need to be modified to protect against the toxic environment. There is also the potential that cultured stem cells used in transplant medicine could face rejection by the body's immune system.

The NeuralStem trial demonstrated the safety of transplanting human embryonic stem cells into the spinal cord of people with ALS. As of late 2014, a larger trial of the same technique is underway, to determine whether treatment can improve function or slow decline. More information can be found here: http://www.alsconsortium.org/news_neuralstem_phaseII_first_patient.php

The BrainStorm trial is underway as of late 2014, examining the safety and efficacy of transplantation of autologous mesenchymal stem cells secreting neurotrophic factors. These stem cells are extracted from the patients own bone marrow, then treated to increase their production of protective factors, and then injected into muscle and the region surrounding the spinal cord. More information can be found here: http://www.alsconsortium.org/

Read The ALS Associations Statement on Stem Cell Research.

Last update: 08/26/14

More here:
stem cell research - The ALS Association

Posted in Stem Cell Research | Comments Off on stem cell research – The ALS Association

Cancer Stem Cell Research Program – Stanford Cancer …

Posted: August 22, 2015 at 5:40 pm

Although cancer cell lines provide information about cancer biology, their adaptation to the in vitro environment often results in biological properties that differ in crucial ways from de novo cancer cells. Members of this Research Program have developed a novel mouse model system that reliably permits individual cancer cells isolated directly from patients tumors to be transplanted orthotopically to the same organ or tissue in immunodeficient mice; cells are assayed for the ability to form a new tumor. Members of the program have prospectively identified a minority population of cancer cells in epithelial and hematopoietic malignancies, called cancer stem or initiating cells. The cancer stem cells have the unique ability to drive the growth (through self-renewing cell divisions) and spread of a malignancy in the mouse model system. The prospective isolation of cancer stem cells enables critical regulatory processes of these cells to be studied directly. This should result in the discovery of new therapeutic targets that can be exploited to develop novel and more effective cancer treatments. The specific goals of the Program and how the expertise of the Program members will facilitate their achievement are listed below.

Goal 1. To investigate potential pathways critical for self renewal, spread and survival of normal and cancer stem cells.

Self-renewal is the critical process by which stem cells regenerate themselves. In the absence of cancer stem cell self-renewal, tumor growth would eventually cease. If we can identify differences in self-renewal pathways in normal and malignant stem cells, these differences could be exploited to eliminate cancer stem cells. Thus, understanding self-renewal pathways should lead to elucidation of new drug targets.

Goal 2. To develop new therapies directed against cancer stem cells.

One of the major goals of this Program is to translate significant advances in our knowledge of cancer stem cell biology gained from basic bench research to the bedside in innovative clinical trials. The discovery of cancer stem cells has implications for the diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of cancer. We envision unique clinical studies that will exploit all of these possibilities. This aim will be informed by the progress on previous aims as novel cancer stem cells are identified and it is determined what distinguishes them from their normal tissue counterparts. The isolation and characterization of cancer stem cells together with the xenograft models of human cancers will allow us to investigate potential novel therapies against these cells.

Michael Clarke, MD

Roeland Nusse, PhD

View original post here:
Cancer Stem Cell Research Program - Stanford Cancer ...

Posted in Stem Cell Research | Comments Off on Cancer Stem Cell Research Program – Stanford Cancer …

NIH Clinical Center: Graduate Medical Education (GME …

Posted: August 22, 2015 at 4:47 pm

Graduate Medical Education (GME): Medical Genetics

Maximilian Muenke, MD

Eligibility CriteriaCandidates with the MD degree must have completed an accredited U.S. residency training program and have a valid U.S. license. Previous training is usually in, but not limited to, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine or Obstetrics and Gynecology.

OverviewThe NIH has joined forces with training programs at the Children's National Medical Center, George Washington University School of Medicine and Washington Hospital Center. The combined training program in Medical Genetics is called the Metropolitan Washington, DC Medical Genetics Program. This is a program of three years duration for MDs seeking broad exposure to both clinical and research experience in human genetics.

The NIH sponsor of the program is National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). Other participating institutes include the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Eye Institute (NEI), the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Metropolitan area participants include Children's National Medical Center (George Washington University), Walter Reed Army Medical Center, and the Department of Pediatrics, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Washington Hospital Center. The individual disciplines in the program include clinical genetics, biochemical genetics, clinical cytogenetics, and clinical molecular genetics.

The primary goal of the training program is to provide highly motivated physicians with broad exposure to both clinical and research experiences in medical genetics. We train candidates to become effective, independent medical geneticists, prepared to deliver a high standard of clinical genetics services, and to perform state-of-the-art research in the area of genetic disease.

Structure of the Clinical Training Program

RotationsThis three year program involves eighteen months devoted to learning in clinical genetics followed by eighteen months of clinical or laboratory research.

Year 1Six months will be spent on rotation at the NIH. Service will include time spent on different outpatient genetics clinics, including Cancer Genetics and Endocrine Disorders and Genetic Ophthalmology; on the inpatient metabolic disease and endocrinology ward; on inpatient wards for individuals involved in gene therapy trials; and on the NIH Genetics Consultation Service.

Three months will be spent at Children's National Medical Center and will be concentrated on pediatric genetics. Fellows will participate in outpatient clinics, satellite and outreach clinics. They will perform consults on inpatients and patients with metabolic disorders and on the neonatal service. Fellows will be expected to participate in the relevant diagnostic laboratory studies on patients for whom they have provided clinical care.

One month will be spent at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and will concentrate on adult and pediatric clinical genetics. One month will be spent at Washington Hospital Center on rotations in prenatal genetics and genetic counseling.

Year 2 Fellows will spend one month each in clinical cytogenetics, biochemical genetics, and molecular diagnostic laboratories. The remaining three months will be devoted to elective clinical rotations on any of the rotations previously mentioned. The second six months will be spent on laboratory or clinical research. The fellow will spend at least a half-day per week in clinic at any one of the three participating institutions.

Year 3This year will be devoted to research, with at least a half day per week in clinic.

NIH Genetics Clinic (Required)Fellows see patients on a variety of research protocols. The Genetics Clinic also selectively accepts referrals of patients requiring diagnostic assessment and genetic counseling. Areas of interest and expertise include: chromosomal abnormalities, congenital anomalies and malformation syndromes, biochemical defects, bone and connective tissue disorders, neurological disease, eye disorders, and familial cancers.

Inpatient Consultation Service (Required)Fellows are available twenty-four hours daily to respond to requests for genetics consultation throughout the 325-bed hospital. Written consultation procedures call for a prompt preliminary evaluation, a written response within twenty-four hours, and a subsequent presentation to a senior staff geneticist, with an addendum to the consult, as needed. The consultant service fellow presents the most interesting cases from the wards during the Post-Clinic Patient Conference on Wednesday afternoons during which Fellows present interesting clinical cases for critical review. Once a month the fellow presents relevant articles for journal club.

Metropolitan Area Genetics Clinics

Other Clinical Opportunities: Specialty Clinics at NIHThe specialty clinics of NIH treat a large number of patients with genetic diseases. We have negotiated a supervised experience for some of the fellows at various clinics; to date, fellows have participated in the Cystic Fibrosis Clinic, the Lipid Clinic, and the Endocrine Clinic.

Lectures, Courses and SeminarsThe fellowship program includes many lectures, courses and seminars. Among them are a journal club and seminars in medical genetics during which invited speakers discuss research and clinical topics of current interest. In addition, the following four courses have been specifically developed to meet the needs of the fellows:

Trainees are encouraged to pursue other opportunities for continuing education such as clinical and basic science conferences, tutorial seminars, and postgraduate courses, which are plentiful on the NIH campus.

Structure of the Research Training ProgramFellows in the Medical Genetics Program pursue state-of-the-art research related to genetic disorders. Descriptions of the diverse interests of participating faculty are provided in this catalog. The aim of this program is to provide fellows with research experiences of the highest caliber and to prepare them for careers as independent clinicians and investigators in medical genetics.

Fellows entering the program are required to select a research supervisor which may be from among those involved on the Genetics Fellowship Faculty Program. It is not required that this selection be made before coming to NIH.

In addition to being involved in research, all fellows attend and participate in weekly research seminars, journal clubs and laboratory conferences, which are required elements of each fellow's individual research experience.

Program Faculty and Research Interests

Examples of Papers Authored by Program Faculty

Program GraduatesThe following is a partial list of graduates including their current positions:

Application Information

The NIH/Metropolitan Washington Medical Genetics Residency Program is accredited by the ACGME and the American Board of Medical Genetics. Upon successful completion of the three year program, residents are eligible for board certification in Clinical Genetics. During the third residency year, residents may elect to complete either (a) the requirements for one of the ABMG laboratory subspecialties, such as Clinical Molecular Genetics, Clinical Biochemical Genetic
s or Clinical Cytogenetics, or (b) a second one year residency program (e.g., Medical Biochemical Genetics).

Candidates should apply through ERAS, beginning July 1 of the year prior to their anticipated start date. Candidates with the MD or MD and PhD degree must have completed a U.S. residency in a clinically related field. Previous training is usually in, but not limited to, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine or Obstetrics and Gynecology. Four new positions are available each year. Interviews are held during August and September.

Electronic Application The quickest and easiest way to find out more about this training program or to apply for consideration is to do it electronically.

The NIH is dedicated to building a diverse community in its training and employment programs.

NOTE: PDF documents require the free Adobe Reader.

Originally posted here:
NIH Clinical Center: Graduate Medical Education (GME ...

Posted in Genetic medicine | Comments Off on NIH Clinical Center: Graduate Medical Education (GME …

Transhumanism | Foreign Policy

Posted: August 22, 2015 at 6:42 am

For the last several decades, a strange liberation movement has grown within the developed world. Its crusaders aim much higher than civil rights campaigners, feminists, or gay-rights advocates. They want nothing less than to liberate the human race from its biological constraints. As "transhumanists" see it, humans must wrest their biological destiny from evolutions blind process of random variation and adaptation and move to the next stage as a species.

It is tempting to dismiss transhumanists as some sort of odd cult, nothing more than science fiction taken too seriously: Witness their over-the-top Web sites and recent press releases ("Cyborg Thinkers to Address Humanitys Future," proclaims one). The plans of some transhumanists to freeze themselves cryogenically in hopes of being revived in a future age seem only to confirm the movements place on the intellectual fringe.

But is the fundamental tenet of transhumanism that we will someday use biotechnology to make ourselves stronger, smarter, less prone to violence, and longer-lived really so outlandish? Transhumanism of a sort is implicit in much of the research agenda of contemporary biomedicine. The new procedures and technologies emerging from research laboratories and hospitals whether mood-altering drugs, substances to boost muscle mass or selectively erase memory, prenatal genetic screening, or gene therapy can as easily be used to "enhance" the species as to ease or ameliorate illness.

Although the rapid advances in biotechnology often leave us vaguely uncomfortable, the intellectual or moral threat they represent is not always easy to identify. The human race, after all, is a pretty sorry mess, with our stubborn diseases, physical limitations, and short lives. Throw in humanitys jealousies, violence, and constant anxieties, and the transhumanist project begins to look downright reasonable. If it were technologically possible, why wouldnt we want to transcend our current species? The seeming reasonableness of the project, particularly when considered in small increments, is part of its danger. Society is unlikely to fall suddenly under the spell of the transhumanist worldview. But it is very possible that we will nibble at biotechnologys tempting offerings without realizing that they come at a frightful moral cost.

The first victim of transhumanism might be equality. The U.S. Declaration of Independence says that "all men are created equal," and the most serious political fights in the history of the United States have been over who qualifies as fully human. Women and blacks did not make the cut in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson penned the declaration. Slowly and painfully, advanced societies have realized that simply being human entitles a person to political and legal equality. In effect, we have drawn a red line around the human being and said that it is sacrosanct.

Underlying this idea of the equality of rights is the belief that we all possess a human essence that dwarfs manifest differences in skin color, beauty, and even intelligence. This essence, and the view that individuals therefore have inherent value, is at the heart of political liberalism. But modifying that essence is the core of the transhumanist project. If we start transforming ourselves into something superior, what rights will these enhanced creatures claim, and what rights will they possess when compared to those left behind? If some move ahead, can anyone afford not to follow? These questions are troubling enough within rich, developed societies. Add in the implications for citizens of the worlds poorest countries for whom biotechnologys marvels likely will be out of reach and the threat to the idea of equality becomes even more menacing.

Transhumanisms advocates think they understand what constitutes a good human being, and they are happy to leave behind the limited, mortal, natural beings they see around them in favor of something better. But do they really comprehend ultimate human goods? For all our obvious faults, we humans are miraculously complex products of a long evolutionary process products whose whole is much more than the sum of our parts. Our good characteristics are intimately connected to our bad ones: If we werent violent and aggressive, we wouldnt be able to defend ourselves; if we didnt have feelings of exclusivity, we wouldnt be loyal to those close to us; if we never felt jealousy, we would also never feel love. Even our mortality plays a critical function in allowing our species as a whole to survive and adapt (and transhumanists are just about the last group Id like to see live forever). Modifying any one of our key characteristics inevitably entails modifying a complex, interlinked package of traits, and we will never be able to anticipate the ultimate outcome.

Nobody knows what technological possibilities will emerge for human self-modification. But we can already see the stirrings of Promethean desires in how we prescribe drugs to alter the behavior and personalities of our children. The environmental movement has taught us humility and respect for the integrity of nonhuman nature. We need a similar humility concerning our human nature. If we do not develop it soon, we may unwittingly invite the transhumanists to deface humanity with their genetic bulldozers and psychotropic shopping malls.

Twitter Facebook Google + Reddit

More:
Transhumanism | Foreign Policy

Posted in Transhumanism | Comments Off on Transhumanism | Foreign Policy

Page 1,767«..1020..1,7661,7671,7681,769..1,7801,790..»