Page 2,451«..1020..2,4502,4512,4522,453..2,4602,470..»

Head Injury Improves After Stem Cell Therapy – Video

Posted: January 21, 2013 at 6:44 pm


Head Injury Improves After Stem Cell Therapy
Stem Cell Therapy done at NeuroGen Brain and Spine Institute Surana Sethia Hospital Sion-Trombay Rd, Suman Ngr Opp Corporate Park, Chembur, Mumbai -- 71. Tel : 022 - 25283706, 022 - 25281610, Mob : +91 9920 200 400 http://www.neurogen.in http://www.stemcellsmumbai.com

By: neurogenbsi

Read the original here:
Head Injury Improves After Stem Cell Therapy - Video

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Head Injury Improves After Stem Cell Therapy – Video

Recent Developments In The Cancer Stem Cell Theory

Posted: January 21, 2013 at 4:51 pm

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are an important population of tumour cells. They can self-renew, are thought to contribute to metastasis and are resistant to chemo- and radiotherapy. CSCs’ specific properties mean that new cancer treatments are required to target these cells. This article reviews some recent developments in the field including new therapeutic strategies and techniques that researchers are using to overcome some of the main challenges they face. These studies are proving vital in understanding the biology of CSCs and tumour survival.

Cancer was first suggested to originate from adult stem cells in the nineteenth century. This theory acquired credibility in the twentieth century when acute myeloid leukaemia cells were shown to be able to give rise to new tumours [Bonnet and Dick, 1997]. The ‘cancer stem cell’ theory, as it is now known [reviewed by Behbod and Rosen, 2004], suggests that adult stem cells may play an important part in cancer due to their association with tumour initiation, maintenance and metastasis [Reya et al. 2001; Zhao et al., 2012].  All tumours are thought to contain populations of cancer stems cells (CSCs) that undergo asymmetric division to form phenotypically distinct cells within the same tumour cell population [Castano et al. 2012].

Research has demonstrated that CSCs behave differently from normal stem cells. Their molecular regulation is disrupted, which induces changes in their phenotype. CSCs have deregulated cell cycles, which result in DNA damage, and are suggested to play a key role in the tumour, contributing to its survival through unlimited self-renewal capacity [Baccelli and Trumpp, 2012].

Clinical challenges of cancer stem cells

The CSC concept has accumulated credibility over the past fifteen years or so. However, recent research has also emphasised the clinical challenges provoked by this theory. For example, genetically and phenotypically distinct sub-populations of CSCs can exist within the same tumour. Despite this, non-CSCs have been shown to form the main bulk of the tumour, prompting debate on the roles of the different cell types within a tumour [Zhao, 2012]. CSC phenotypes also vary between individuals [Baccelli and Trumpp, 2012].

An important discovery is that CSCs are resistant to current standard therapies that are used to treat patients. CSCs are not killed by chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery. In fact, it has been shown that chemotherapy increases the ability of CSCs to survive [Zhao et al., 2012]. These cells are also capable of entering a dormant or quiescent state before re-entering the cell cycle and rebounding to form new tumours when their environment is more favourable [Castano et al., 2012].

CSCs have also been suggested to originate from progenitors that undergo reverse phenotypic changes due to an accumulation of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities [Baccelli and Trumpp, 2012]. These re-generated stem cells may go on to form CSCs that can differentiate into any cell type the tumour may require [Baccelli and Trumpp, 2012], forming a hierarchy within the tumour’s multiple cell populations.

 The Challenges of working with CSCs

One main hypothesis for treatment is the ‘dandelion phenomenon’ insomuch as treating the visible ‘flower’ (tumour growth) does not treat the underlying problem and you need to aim for the ‘roots’ (CSCs) [Zhao et al., 2012]. Targeting the root of the problem, however, means finding new drug therapies to specifically eradicate CSCs and this has challenged researchers due to the difficulties experienced in culturing CSCs and performing assays. The large quantities of cells required for assays are hard to cultivate. New drugs are routinely screened using high throughput assays that allow thousands of compounds to be tested simultaneously in a small timeframe. Each test requires the use of microtitre plates that contain 1,536 or 3,456 wells. Robotic instruments are usually used for the assay testing due to their reliability and rapidity in dispensing the small volumes needed for these assays. However, cells and especially stem cells are very delicate and require specific growth media, rendering them difficult to work with using laboratory equipment, notably causing blockages in robotic instruments. Due to their fragility and specific growth requirements for culture, all stem cells are very precious and waste needs to be kept to a minimum. To resolve these assay problems, innovative microplate dispensers have been developed, which enables reliable stem cell dispensing.

New therapeutic targets

Recent research has identified new potential targets in CSCs. These include targeting specific receptors and specific molecular pathways. It has been reported that breast CSCs can be selectively eradicated by salinomycin [Gupta et al., 2009]. An important mechanism of CSC drug resistance involves ABC-transporters and in human myeloid leukemia stem cells, salinomycin is thought to overcome ABC-transporter-mediated multidrug resistance. This drug may also prevent apoptosis resistance [Naujokat and Steinhart, 2012]. Recently, salinomycin has also been shown to target CSCs in other types of human cancers including gastric and prostate cancers [Zhi et al., 2011; Ketola et al., 2012].

It has also been shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) are frequently deregulated in human cancer, suggesting that they could be a new means of testing for and diagnosing the disease [Ali et al. 2012]. Research has also targeted molecular pathways used by CSCs. By targeting the functional pathways that CSCs rely upon, it is hoped that CSCs can be eradicated. One problem with this method is that normal stem cells and CSCs share many pathways so any drug would have to be very selective. One main target is the Wnt signalling pathway, which is thought to play a role in self-renewal of mammary tumour stem cells [Behdod and Rosen, 2004]. The hedgehog, notch and hox family pathways have also been successfully inhibited by researchers, eradicating CSCs in some tumour types [Zhao et al., 2012].

In conclusion, current cancer therapies have proved unsuccessful in eliminating CSCs, thought to be the main cause of metastasis and tumour regrowth following treatment. Our understanding of CSCs has improved greatly since the beginning of the century, enabling scientists to explore potential new cancer cures. As explained by the dandelion phenomenon, much research is going into eradicating CSCs as an integral part of cancer therapies. A combination of therapies, which target the tumour as well as the CSCs, could lead to dramatic improvements in cancer therapies and survival rates.

References

Ali AS, Ahmad A, Ali S, Bao B, Philip PA, Sarkar FH (2012). The role of cancer stem cells and miRNAs in defining the complexities of brain metastasis, Journal of Cellular Physiology 228: 36-42

Baccelli I, Trumpp A (2012). The evolving concept of cancer and metastasis stem cells. Journal of Cell Biology 198(3): 281-293.

Behbod F, Rosen JM (2004). Will cancer stem cells provide new therapeutic targets? Carcinogenesis 26(4): 703-711.

Bonnet D, Dick JE. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organised as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nature Medicine 3(7): 730-737

Castano Z, Fillmore CM, Kim CF, McAllister SS (2012). The bed and the bugs: Interactions between the tumor microenvironment and cancer stem cells, Seminars in Cancer Biology 22:462-470

Gupta PB, Onder TT, Jiang G, Tao K, Kuperwasser C, Weinberg RA, Lander ES (2009). Identification of selective inhibitors of cancer stem cells by high-throughput screening. Cell 138: 645-659.

Ketola K, Hilva M, Vuoristo A, Ruskeepaa AL, Oresic M, Kallioniemi O, Iljin K (2012). Salinomycin inhibits prostate cancer growth and migration via induction of oxidative stress, British Journal of Cancer 106(1): 99-106

Naujokat C and Steinhart R (2012). Salinomycin as a drug for targeting human cancer stem cells, Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/950658

Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL (2001). Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 414(6859): 105-111.

Zhao L, Zhao Y, Bao Q, Niess H, Jauch K-W, Bruns CJ (2012). Clinical implications of targeting of stem cells. European Surgical Research 49: 8-15.

Zhi QM, Chen XH, Ji J, Zhang JN, Li JF, Cai Q, Lui BY, Gu QL, Zhu ZG, Yu YY (2011). Salinomycin can effectively kill ALDHhigh stem-like cells on gastric cancer, Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 65(7): 509-515

Posted in Stem Cells | Comments Off on Recent Developments In The Cancer Stem Cell Theory

Moderate Mental Retardation with Behavioral Issues Improves with Stem Cell Therapy – Video

Posted: January 20, 2013 at 12:45 pm


Moderate Mental Retardation with Behavioral Issues Improves with Stem Cell Therapy
Stem Cell Therapy done at NeuroGen Brain and Spine Institute Surana Sethia Hospital Sion-Trombay Rd, Suman Ngr Opp Corporate Park, Chembur, Mumbai -- 71. Tel : 022 - 25283706, 022 - 25281610, Mob : +91 9920 200 400 http://www.neurogen.in http://www.stemcellsmumbai.com

By: neurogenbsi

More here:
Moderate Mental Retardation with Behavioral Issues Improves with Stem Cell Therapy - Video

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Moderate Mental Retardation with Behavioral Issues Improves with Stem Cell Therapy – Video

Things to know about the real fountain of youth

Posted: January 20, 2013 at 7:59 am

Fountain of youth is referred to a spring. If a person drinks the water of it, he or she can easily restore the youth again in themselves. In his writing Herodotus has also mentioned about this concept. This has become a kind of legend and many a famous author like Homer or Shakespeare have also discussed about in the literature. Now the biggest question is that whether there is really any kind of such fountain on this earth or not.

How the search goes on:

The search of such a fountain goes generation after generation because men have always wanted more youth. With the progress of science men have made many an incredible thing successful. The use of stem cells and many other related inventions have made huge change in human life. Men and women are getting longer and fitter life. More researches on cells are going on and scientists are working very hard to invent various things by the help of which we can keep our youth for longer time.

What the concept is:

Though the whole thing comes from a myth but the main aspect of this thought is to get back the life again. Man has always searched for immortality. According to scientists, now they have found out a way to continue your youth for longer time. Actually our body can have the charm of youth because of cell division. Normally a cell can divide for fifty times and then gradually it stops and the characteristics of old age begin to come in the body. Now the scientists have succeeded to produce such a cell which can divide it over 90 times and still it will not get slow down. Scientists have used an enzyme with the chromosomes the name of which is Telomerase. Telomere shortening is the actual reason of gradually getting old. Now this enzyme will stop the normal shortening process of telomere and thus it can help you to keep your youth in yourself for longer time.

Its drawback:

This enzyme is undoubtedly one of the most incredible inventions at the moment but it may have some drawbacks. According to some of the scientists this shortening process of telomere is a natural process. Now this natural process can eventually ward off cancer. Now by adding this enzyme this natural process of body defense will be destroyed. Some of the scientists are worried of the consequences of that. More experiments are going on and after the successful completion of them the scientists will be able to state the result of this new invention.

Searching for longer life:

Most of the people on this earth like to have a longer life especially a longer youth in which he will have ample energy to enjoy all the entertaining aspects of life. The concept of fountain of youth has been traditionally carried forward generation after generation because of this continuous wish of longer life of human being.

The myth of finding a fountain where the water can be found which can bring back youth may not be found physically. However, progress of science can assure a longer youth for human. In recent future man is going to live a longer enjoyable life.

About The Author: Claudia is a writer/ blogger. She loves writing, travelling and reading books. She contributes to Caribbean Cruise Line Scam 

Source:
http://www.biotechblog.org/entry/real-fountain-youth/

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on Things to know about the real fountain of youth

StemCells, Inc., Still Looking for $40 Million from California Stem Cell Agency

Posted: January 20, 2013 at 7:59 am

Remember StemCells, Inc., and the $40
million it was awarded by the California stem cell agency.
The Newark, Ca., firm, founded by
eminent Stanford researcher Irv Weissman, received an award of $20
million last July and then again in September. Nearly five months
later, however, the stem cell agency has yet to cut a check for the
company, a spokesman for the agency told the California Stem Cell
Report
in response to a query.
The hang-up is the $40 million in
matching funds that the company promised the agency. The stem cell
agency has yet to be satisfied that StemCells, Inc., can actually
produce the match, although the spokesman did not offer details.
The StemCells, Inc., awards were
unusual in a number of ways. It was the first time that former CIRM
Chairman Robert Klein lobbied the CIRM governing board on behalf of a
company(see here and here). It was the first time that the governing
board approved an application that had been rejected twice by grant
reviewers. It was the first time that the board said explicitly in a
public session that it wanted proof of the matching funds as a
condition of the award.
It was the first time that a CIRM award
to a company received a careful and critical scrutiny from a major
California newspaper. Michael Hiltzik, a Pulitzer Prize-winning
business columnist and author, wrote in October in the Los Angeles
Times
that the award was “redolent of cronyism.” He referred
particularly to longstanding ties between Klein and Weissman.
The CIRM board vote on the StemCells,
Inc., grant in September was 7-5, which amounted to 12 out of 29
members of the board.
In December, a blue-ribbon panel of the
Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended that the agency tighten its
conflict of interest standards to avoid such perceptions as have been
generated by the StemCells, Inc., awards. The IOM said,

“(C)om­peting personal and
professional interests com­promise the perceived independence of
the (governing board), introduce potential bias into the board’s decision
making, and threaten to undermine confidence in the board.”

Concerns about conflicts of interest have long been of concern to observers of the stem cell agency for years. Indeed, the prestigious journal Nature in 2008 warned of "cronyism" at the $3 billion research enterprise.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/5BdZ8FguJp8/stemcells-inc-still-looking-for-40.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on StemCells, Inc., Still Looking for $40 Million from California Stem Cell Agency

Stem Cell Agency Chair Pressing for Consensus on IOM Recommendations

Posted: January 20, 2013 at 7:59 am

The chairman of the $3 billion
California stem cell agency, Jonathan Thomas, yesterday outlined how
he intends to proceed next week when the agency's governing board
considers the far-reaching recommendations of a blue-ribbon Institute
of Medicine
panel.

“While some of the IOM’s
recommendations are administrative in nature and can be implemented,
others are much more complex and would require changes in (governing)
board policy or legislative changes.” 

Jonathan Thomas, chairman of CIRM governing board at far right. Art
Torres (center), co-vice chair and former state Democratic party chairman,
who would  play key role in dealing with lawmakers. Robert Klein is at the
 left in this 2011 meeting, Klein's last as chairman of the agency and the one
 in which Thomas was elected chairman. 
He continued,

“My goal is to strive to reach
consensus on a course of action on the 23rd. However, if the board
isn’t able to choose a course of action at this time we will
continue the conversation and bring it up at future board meetings
until we reach agreement.”

It is worth noting that Thomas did not
mention the possibility of having to ask the people of California to
amend the state constitution, which would require a statewide election. Opponents to change at the agency have
used that possibility to discourage action. (See here and here.) An
election would be costly, politically difficult and could open the
door to additional unwelcome changes at the eight-year-old research
enterprise.
Thomas' desire for a consensus among
the 29 board members – instead of a simple majority – could be a
stumbling block as the board becomes snarled internally, perhaps for
months or more. The board normally meets only about once a month and
has a full slate of regular business on those occasions. The agency
will run out of money for new grants in less than four years, and
action on the IOM recommendations seems a necessary prelude to
winning continued financial support.
While four years would appear to an ample
period of time, making the sort of changes the IOM recommends would
require legislative action, which probably would take a minimum of a
year. Timing is important as well. The current leaders in the state
Senate and Assembly will be termed out in 2014. Starting all over
with novice leadership, changes in key committee chairmanships and so
forth would make the task even more difficult. Then there is the need
to address strategies for continued financial support. Should the
agency seek a new statewide bond measure (the current funding
mechanism)? If so campaign committees need to be formed, electoral
strategies planned and tested and tens of millions of dollars raised
for campaign expenses. If private funds instead are to be raised to
the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars(the agency spends about
$300 million a year), such an effort would also require considerable time.
To keep the funding pipeline full, all of this should be completed
well before the money runs out in 2017.
Dilly-dallying this year in drawn-out, fruitless debate over
the IOM proposals would be an unfortunate beginning should CIRM
directors actually want to continue the existence of the
organization.
In his blog item, Thomas sounded this
final note.

“It’s likely the debate will be
passionate – everyone involved in this work cares deeply about it –
and there will undoubtedly be disagreements, but ultimately we all
share the same goal, a desire to make sure that whatever we decide
helps make the stem cell agency even stronger and more effective, and
is in the best interests of the people of California.”

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/xriRP02aekU/stem-cell-agency-chair-pressing-for.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Stem Cell Agency Chair Pressing for Consensus on IOM Recommendations

UC Davis Stem Cell Researcher: ‘Ivory Tower’ IOM Recommendations Harmful to California Stem Cell Agency

Posted: January 20, 2013 at 7:59 am

The $3 billion California stem cell
agency has funded in the neighborhood of 500 to 600 scientists and
institutions, reviving and starting careers and stimulating
construction of $1 billion in new research labs around the state.

None of those recipients, as far as we
know, has come forward to comment publicly on the sweeping recommendations by Institute of Medicine for changes at the agency.
Until today, that is.
UC Davis researcher Paul Knoepfler, who
may be the only stem cell scientist in the United States with a stem
cell blog, weighed in with his thoughts today, which do not align
with those of the blue-ribbon IOM panel.
“Harmful” is one word that Knoepfler, who is a stem cell agency grant recipient,  used to describe the recommendations. He predicted “extremely negative repercussions” that “would
actually make CIRM less effective and less responsive to patients and
California citizens.”
He wrote that the IOM report, which
will come before stem cell agency governing board next week “...seems more like an ivory tower
intellectual exercise than an operative, realistic guide to a dynamic
agency that must operate in the real world.”
He defended the CIRM governing board,
which came under fire from the IOM for conflicts of interest.
Institutions linked to board members have received about 90 percent
of the $1.7 billion that the board has awarded, according to compilations by the California Stem Cell Report. The IOM said,

“Far too many board mem­bers
represent organizations that receive CIRM funding or benefit from
that funding. These com­peting personal and professional
interests com­promise the perceived independence of the ICOC,
introduce potential bias into the board’s decision making, and
threaten to undermine confidence in the board."

Knoepfler said,

“(The) IOM itself admits there is no
evidence that any conflicts of interest have ever guided (the agency's governing board) decisions. Not one example.”

Knoepfler also wrote,

“Interestingly, highlighting the
extremely sensitive nature of this issue, while I’ve been talking
with many bigwigs about this, at this point no one is wiling to go on
the record with an opinion about it except one courageous soul, Don
Reed
(see
his piece here
).”

There is a reason for that. The IOM is the most prestigious organization of its sort. Its studies are
described as the gold standard. And it has a rareified membership
that many scientists seek to join. So few are ready to give the
organization a smack on the nose. Likewise, California researchers
are loath to publicly criticize the stem cell agency because it
holds the strings to the purse that finances their careers.
California scientists, however, should
be asking themselves a bottom-line question. Do they want to see the
stem cell agency continue for another 10 to 20 years? Under the best
of circumstances, that may be unlikely given the other pressing needs
that the state faces. But if CIRM directors do not forthrightly
address the recommendations of the IOM panel, the fate of the stem
cell agency is exceedingly uncertain.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/pW_1A2nkyrM/uc-davis-stem-cell-researcher-ivory.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on UC Davis Stem Cell Researcher: ‘Ivory Tower’ IOM Recommendations Harmful to California Stem Cell Agency

Patient Advocate Says IOM Recommendations Would ‘Destroy’ California Stem Cell Agency

Posted: January 20, 2013 at 7:59 am

California's “beloved,” $3 billion
stem cell research program should not be altered despite
recommendations from the most prestigious scientific organization of
its kind. So says longtime patient advocate Don Reed of Fremont, Ca.

Reed says the recommendations by the
Institute of Medicine (IOM) are a “threat” that would “destroy” an
agency that “is like nothing else on earth.” Reed is urging other
patient advocates to turn out at next week's critical meeting of the stem cell agency's board and lobby against alterations in how it does
business.
Reed and CIRM's Amy Adams
World Stem Cell Summit photo
Reed is a fixture in stem cell circles
nationally and in California and has been a regular at the stem cell
agency's public meetings since 2004. He is also vice president of
Americans for Cures, a private stem cell lobbying group created by
Robert Klein when he was chairman of the stem cell agency,  formally known as the California Institute for Regenerative
Medicine(CIRM)
.
Reed has written twice about the IOM
report on his blog with duplicate publication on the Huffington Post.
Yesterday, he said IOM “defies” the voters' will when they
created the stem cell agency in 2004. On Dec. 19, he said the
$700,000, 17-month study was “staggeringly misguided.” He wrote,

“If its recommendations were enacted,
they would silence stem cell patient advocate involvement, eliminate
public debate on funding proposals, and delegate the real decisions
to secret proceedings by an out-of-state-controlled board.”

Reed described the stem cell agency as
“fantastic” and wrote,

“So why mess with it, in such a
brutal and insulting manner?”

This writer has known Reed since the
early days of the stem cell agency and respects him. But in this
case he has many of his facts wrong. To mention just a few key
points: Patient advocates would not be silenced; their role would be
changed. Public comment would not be eliminated. Scientists could
still appeal negative decisions by reviewers to the full board if
they so choose, although the “extraordinary petition” process
would be eliminated. The voters' will would not be defied; they provided for a mechanism for making changes in the stem cell program.
While Bob Klein has not been heard from
publicly on the IOM report, some of Reed's comments reflect Klein's
past positions against altering the agency. Klein, an attorney and
real estate investment banker, might well be considered the father of
the agency. He directed the writing of the 10,000-word measure, Prop. 71, that created the program and wrote much of ballot initiative himself. The initiative contained a detailed description of the
qualifications for the chairman, which fit only one person in
California. It was no surprise when he won the post.
In years past, Klein has been extraordinarily protective of the ballot measure, at one point boxing
in the board on earlier proposals for changes that he disliked and that the IOM report now echoes.
In 2010, he was the prime
advocate for commissioning the IOM report which he expected
to serve as the basis for continued funding of the agency. It will
run out of cash for new grants in 2017.
To keep the money rolling in, Klein
said the IOM report would constitute a “gold standard” that would
generate increased enthusiasm for the research.
According to the transcript of the Aug.18, 2010, governing board meeting, Klein declared,

“(We will) never convince the people
that are adamant against us. But for the public and for the
constituent groups that are reasoned and prepared to look at
evidence, this is a very important validation that they can look to
to separate out what is a false claim from real performance.”

Also writing yesterday about the IOM
study was Bradley Fikes of the San Diego U-T, the dominant daily
newspaper in that area.
He summarized Reed's latest item as well as this on the California Stem Cell Report yesterday. Fikes
plans to file his own story within the next few days.
Feel free to file your own comments by
clicking on the word “comment” below or with the stem cell agency
at info@cirm.ca.gov. Anonymous
comments are permitted on this blog.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/wX7BEi46lc8/patient-advocate-says-iom.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Patient Advocate Says IOM Recommendations Would ‘Destroy’ California Stem Cell Agency

Live Audiocast Available for Next Week’s CIRM-IOM Meetings

Posted: January 20, 2013 at 7:59 am

The California stem cell agency will
provide a live audiocast of next week's critical discussions of
action on the sweeping recommendations proposed for the agency by the
Institute of Medicine.
Instructions for hooking into the
telephonic arrangement can be found on the agendas for Wednesday and
Thursday. Also expected to be posted soon on the Wednesday agenda are
recommendations by CIRM Chairman J.T. Thomas.
The audiocast will only provide the
opportunity to listen and no opportunity to provide testimony. If you
are interesting in making suggestions or comments ahead of the
meeting, email them to info@cirm.ca.gov. The public can also testify at the board meeting.
The meeting is scheduled for the
Claremont Hotel in the Berkeley hills across the bay from CIRM's San
Francisco headquarters.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/XiZzHp3Zp_s/live-audiocast-available-for-next-weeks.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Live Audiocast Available for Next Week’s CIRM-IOM Meetings

California Stem Cell Face-Off: CIRM Directors Wrestle with Tough IOM Recommendations

Posted: January 20, 2013 at 7:59 am

Two days next week at the posh
Claremont Hotel in the Berkeley hills could settle the fate of
California's $3 billion stem cell agency.

At 9 a.m. next Wednesday, the governing
board of the state research effort will begin a critical, two-day
public session. On the table will be the $700,000, blue-ribbon
report from the prestigious Institute of Medicine (IOM). The study
recommends sweeping changes in the structure and operations of the
California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), as the stem
cell agency is formally known.
The IOM report alone poses major
challenges for the agency. But the recommendations are freighted with
even more significance. Below the surface lies the hard fact of
CIRM's dwindling resources and possible demise. In less than four
years – without either renewed public support or private
contributions – the research effort will begin a shriveling,
downward spiral.
Claremont Hotel

The IOM report places a special burden
on the agency governing board. The board paid the IOM to evaluate its
performance. In 2010, then CIRM Chairman Robert Klein trumpeted the
value of an IOM study, saying it would serve as a springboard for a
new, multibillion-dollar state bond measure for the agency(see here and here). Given the
state's difficult financial condition – not to mention the position
of potential private sector investors – winning approval of that
kind of investment will be more than difficult. 

California's major newspapers already have editorially backed the IOM proposals. Indeed, if the
directors choose to ignore the major IOM recommendations, they will
hand opponents a devastating weapon, one that could be used to convince voters to reject
any proposal for continued funding. The board
would also give private investors more major reasons to say no to
CIRM pitches for cash.
Under Klein's leadership, the 29-member
board has rejected similar proposals for changes in the past. When
the IOM presented the study to the board just last month, the
reception was not much different. Several board members bristled. One
influential board member, Sherry Lansing, chair of the University of
California
board of regents, said the directors' “hands are tied”
because some of the recommendations might require a vote of the people. Her comments echoed similar statements from Klein in 2009,
when he said board members would violate their oath of office if they
supported recommendations for changes that he opposed.
The IOM discussion in December,
however, was relatively brief and less than definitive. Klein has
been off the board since June 2011, replaced by Los Angeles bond
financier Jonathan Thomas, who is regarded as a welcome change by a
number of board members.
Nonetheless, the recommendations of the IOM could mean that some members of the board would lose their seats; others would lose important roles in the grant-award process or
within the agency itself. Conflict of interest rules would be
tightened. In some ways, the board would lose power, which would be
shifted to the president. The board would no longer vote on
individual applications – only a slate recommended by reviewers.
Applicants for CIRM awards would be directly affected, being barred
from making the sort of direct and public appeals that clogged the
CIRM board meetings last year. And that would be just the beginning.
Thomas, the CIRM chairman, is expected
to make his recommendations for action on the report, although they
have not yet been posted on the CIRM web site. Under what might be considered “normal” leadership, Thomas would be testing sentiment
among board members via personal conversations and phone calls.
However, in California that would be illegal – a violation of open
meeting laws that bar what are called “serial meetings” at nearly
all public agencies.
Thomas' task is not easy. Rounding up a
majority vote for anything significant among 29 strong-minded
individuals is not simple. But it is even more difficult when facing
a board that has a tradition of consensus management and
oversight.
The site of next week's meetings is
interesting. The nearly 100-year-old, iconic Claremont hotel has a
troubled financial history. It was up for sale for $80 million last
spring but there were no takers. In the early 20th century, the
property on which it is located was lost and won in a checkers game
in Oakland, or so the story goes.
The stakes are also high for the
California stem cell agency. Moves next week by directors could
easily determine whether CIRM becomes nothing more than an
interesting scientific footnote or establishes a path that will lead
it to long-lasting leadership in regenerative medicine.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/SS09uwQmVDQ/california-stem-cell-face-off-cirm.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on California Stem Cell Face-Off: CIRM Directors Wrestle with Tough IOM Recommendations

Page 2,451«..1020..2,4502,4512,4522,453..2,4602,470..»