Page 2,480«..1020..2,4792,4802,4812,482..2,4902,500..»

Stem Cells Therapy by Dr BS Rajput – Video

Posted: December 19, 2012 at 10:45 pm


Stem Cells Therapy by Dr BS Rajput
Dr.BS Rajput Sr.Consultant Orthopedic Stem Cell Transplant Surgeon mob-+91 9820850187,9811763787 drrajput09820850187@gmail.com http://www.drrajput.inFrom:ZandZMediaViews:1 2ratingsTime:05:00More inScience Technology

Read the original:
Stem Cells Therapy by Dr BS Rajput - Video

Posted in Stem Cells | Comments Off on Stem Cells Therapy by Dr BS Rajput – Video

BioTime Reports Isolation of Seven Diverse Cartilage and Bone Cell Types From Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Posted: December 19, 2012 at 10:45 pm

ALAMEDA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

BioTime, Inc. (NYSE MKT: BTX), a biotechnology company that develops and markets products in the field of regenerative medicine, and its subsidiaries OrthoCyte Corporation and LifeMap Sciences reported today a means of manufacturing seven distinct types of cartilage, bone, and tendon cells from human embryonic stem cells. The paper, scheduled to be published online (ahead of print) at 1600 GMT today in the peer-reviewed journal Regenerative Medicine, characterizes the seven cell types generated using BioTimes proprietary PureStemTM technology. The study compared the novel cells with adult stem cells, known as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and revealed properties of the new cell lines that are suggestive of a wide array of future applications in the practice of orthopedic medicine.

In the study published today, it was demonstrated that BioTimes cells, which can be manufactured on an industrial scale, are progenitors to diverse skeletal tissues of the human body. These cell lines bear diverse molecular markers that distinguish them from each other and from MSCs. The molecular markers of BioTimes cell lines suggest the lines may therefore be applicable to the repair of different types of bone, cartilage, and tendon for the treatment of degenerative diseases afflicting these tissue types such as non-healing bone fractures, osteoarthritis and degeneration of intervertebral discs, and tendon tears (tendinosis).

Chronic orthopedic disorders such as osteoarthritis, degeneration of the discs in the spine, osteoporosis, and tendon tears are among the leading complaints and causes of disability in an aging society. The recent isolation of new pluripotent stem cells such as human embryonic stem (hES) cells and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells opens the door to the manufacture of all of the cell types in the human body on an industrial scale. These achievements in the emerging field of regenerative medicine have made it feasible to introduce new modalities of repairing these and other tissues in the body.

As promising as these new stem cells may be for eventual human tissue repair, there has been little progress to date in identifying new ways to generate pure populations of the diverse cellular components of the human body using methods that are also compatible with industrial-scale manufacture. To address this need, BioTime scientists developed a novel and proprietary manufacturing process. These isolated PureStemTM(previously ACTCellerateTM) cell lines allow for the scale-up of more than 200 highly purified and identified cell types.

In today's publication, BioTime scientists reported on seven PureStemTM cell lines representing diverse cells of the developing human skeleton. One of these cell lines, 4D20.8, was previously shown by BioTime scientists to exhibit site-specific markers of craniofacial mesenchyme, and in particular, markers of proximal mandibular mesenchyme. This tissue type is of significance in that it naturally produces one of the strongest joint cartilages of the body. In todays report, this line was compared to the BioTimes lines 7PEND24, 7SMOO32, E15, MEL2, SK11, SM30, and to other commonly studied MSCs. BioTimes cell lines displayed markers that indicated the cells were progenitors of diverse cartilage, bone, and tendon cell types in the body.

There remains the need for safe methods of manufacturing cells at a high degree of purity and site-specific identity, in addition to an FDA-approvable combination with a matrix to facilitate the stable transplantation of those cells into the body. BioTimes HyStem technology is designed to be an effective means of transplanting cells in an injectable liquid that can polymerize safely in the body into a tissue construct. BioTime anticipates that during the first quarter of 2013, a submission of a Phase I safety trial in humans will be made to the appropriate European Committee for review and approval of HyStem formulated for the delivery of autologous fat-derived cells for skin applications, a product called Renevia. In todays publication, the seven novel osteochondral cell lines were demonstrated to be successfully differentiated in HyStem in laboratory experiments, supporting the potential use of the product together with these and other PureStemTM cell lines in combination products.

The studys demonstration of the manufacture of diverse site-specific tissue progenitors from pluripotent stem cells serves to highlight the utility of LifeMap Discovery, a powerful new database that provides a roadmap to the complex fabric of cells constituting the human body. In todays publication, BioTime and LifeMap scientists collaborated to map the molecular markers of the published PureStemTM cell lines within the database, thus making the lines available for the research community in the context of the human developmental tree.

We are gratified to finally report in a scientific publication the power of monoclonal human embryonic progenitor cell lines to scale diverse cell types of the human body, said Michael D. West, Ph.D., BioTime's Chief Executive Officer. Our confidence that many other cell types of the human body can be manufactured in this manner is the reason for our focus on this platform and for participating in building LifeMap DiscoveryTM to help the medical research community navigate this fascinating yet complex network of product development.

Arnold Caplan, Ph.D., OrthoCyte's Chief Scientific Officer and Director of the Skeletal Research Center at Case Western Reserve University, commented that the paper by Sternberg and colleagues emphasizes the scalability of clonal human embryonic stem cell-derived cell lines for musculoskeletal tissue engineering.The analysis at the molecular level of the biological markers gives us confidence that these groups of cells can be used for cartilage repair and regeneration. The amount of cells that can be generated is really practical for human musculoskeletaltissue regeneration.

Here is the original post:
BioTime Reports Isolation of Seven Diverse Cartilage and Bone Cell Types From Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on BioTime Reports Isolation of Seven Diverse Cartilage and Bone Cell Types From Human Embryonic Stem Cells

TiGenix: Positive Interim Safety Results of Phase IIa Rheumatoid Arthritis Study With Allogeneic Adult Stem Cells …

Posted: December 19, 2012 at 10:43 pm

LEUVEN, BELGIUM and MADRID, SPAIN--(Marketwire - Dec 19, 2012) - TiGenix ( EURONEXT BRUSSELS : TIG ), the European leader in cell therapy, announced today positive interim safety results of its Phase IIa study of Cx611 in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Cx611 is an intravenously injected suspension of expanded allogeneic adult stem cells derived from human adipose (fat) tissue. The Phase IIa clinical trial is a 53-subject, multicenter, placebo-controlled study in 3 cohorts with different dosing regimens, designed to assess safety, feasibility, tolerance, and optimal dosing. The study is being conducted at 23 centers. The Company believes that this clinical trial can set the stage not only for the further development of Cx611 in RA, but also in a wide range of other autoimmune disorders.

The interim results cover the first three months of the Phase IIa's six-month follow-up, and the data are still blinded. The primary endpoint of this study is safety, and the data collected so far support the good safety profile of all three doses of Cx611. Only two patients (4%) have suffered serious adverse events and only in one case (2%) it led to discontinuation of the treatment. All other side effects were mild and transient.

"We are delighted to report that the safety profile of Cx611 appears to be excellent," said Eduardo Bravo, CEO of TiGenix. "We have recruited patients who have failed at least two biologicals. If, in addition to this promising safety data, we can demonstrate a first indication of efficacy in this difficult to treat patient population, we will have a strong rationale to move forward with this product. We are looking forward to reporting the final results of the study at the end of April 2013."

About TiGenix

TiGenix NV ( EURONEXT BRUSSELS : TIG ) is a leading European cell therapy company with a marketed product for cartilage repair, ChondroCelect, and a strong pipeline with clinical stage allogeneic adult stem cell programs for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. TiGenix is based out of Leuven (Belgium) and has operations in Madrid (Spain), and Sittard-Geleen (the Netherlands). For more information please visit http://www.tigenix.com.

Forward-looking informationThis document may contain forward-looking statements and estimates with respect to the anticipated future performance of TiGenix and the market in which it operates. Certain of these statements, forecasts and estimates can be recognised by the use of words such as, without limitation, "believes", "anticipates", "expects", "intends", "plans", "seeks", "estimates", "may", "will" and "continue" and similar expressions. They include all matters that are not historical facts. Such statements, forecasts and estimates are based on various assumptions and assessments of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which were deemed reasonable when made but may or may not prove to be correct. Actual events are difficult to predict and may depend upon factors that are beyond TiGenix' control. Therefore, actual results, the financial condition, performance or achievements of TiGenix, or industry results, may turn out to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements, forecasts and estimates. Given these uncertainties, no representations are made as to the accuracy or fairness of such forward-looking statements, forecasts and estimates. Furthermore, forward-looking statements, forecasts and estimates only speak as of the date of the publication of this document. TiGenix disclaims any obligation to update any such forward-looking statement, forecast or estimates to reflect any change in TiGenix' expectations with regard thereto, or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement, forecast or estimate is based, except to the extent required by Belgian law.

View post:
TiGenix: Positive Interim Safety Results of Phase IIa Rheumatoid Arthritis Study With Allogeneic Adult Stem Cells ...

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on TiGenix: Positive Interim Safety Results of Phase IIa Rheumatoid Arthritis Study With Allogeneic Adult Stem Cells …

Why Biotech ETFs are a Top Sector in 2012

Posted: December 19, 2012 at 10:42 pm

Biotechnology exchange traded funds have reaped the performance benefits of merger and acquisition activity and the so-called patent cliff. This sector has produced some of the best-performing ETFs in 2012.

The past few years were particularly tough for small- and mid-cap biotechs. The unprofitable ones were trapped: They needed to burn cash, push their pipelines forward, and attract partners, but the debt and equity markets were essentially closed for business. Not surprisingly, merger activity has heated up in the biotech industry, providing another potential catalyst for investors, Robert Goldsborough wrote for Morningstar.

The potential for biotechnology to continue outperforming into 2013 is high. The generic competition is heating up putting the pressure on big pharma to find the best merges and acquisitions. Within the next few years, if Medicaid starts to cover more people, volume will be boosted for the drug industry. Morningstar believes this sector to be less vulnerable to government intervention than other healthcare sub-sectors. [More M&A Deals Could Boost Biotech ETFs]

The sector as a whole has been one of the best-performing in 2012. The Market Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) gained 61% this year. The index tracks companies that create treatments for health conditions. 25 of the largest, publicly traded biotech firms are represented, with Amgen, Gilead, and Biogen top holdings. The SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) has gained 467% year-to-date. This ETF equally-weights 50 companies, taking on a completely different approach.[Biotech ETFs Hold Up During Rocky November]

The iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) has gained about 44% this year. A history of five years with a cumulative return of 60% makes it hard to deny this ETF. Similar to BBH, IBB tracks large-cap biotech and pharmaceutical companies.[Election Could Make or Break Healthcare ETFs]

The biotechnology sector has managed to outperform all three major U.S. indices over the past year. While the sector is not noted for stable growth over the long term, it is known for dramatic performance and potential in innovative fields such as stem cell research, according to a report on Seeking Alpha. ETFs will continue to be the premiere method of investing in this sector due to the nature of young, upstart companies. An ETF allows investors exposure to several companies, while mitigating the risk of an upstart or smaller company going bankrupt.

Market Vectors Biotech ETF

Biotech ETFs Remain Hot Sector

Tisha Guerrero contributed to this article.

Here is the original post:
Why Biotech ETFs are a Top Sector in 2012

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on Why Biotech ETFs are a Top Sector in 2012

Stem Cell Therapy at Integra Medical Center IMC – Video

Posted: December 19, 2012 at 10:42 pm


Stem Cell Therapy at Integra Medical Center IMC
New Project 64From:OmarGonzalezMDViews:0 0ratingsTime:06:12More inScience Technology

Read the rest here:
Stem Cell Therapy at Integra Medical Center IMC - Video

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Stem Cell Therapy at Integra Medical Center IMC – Video

Exploring the Straw Man Argument Against IOM Reforms at California Stem Cell Agency

Posted: December 19, 2012 at 10:38 pm

Constitutional objections to some of
the Institute of Medicine's sweeping recommendations for changes at
the $3 billion California stem cell agency amount to little more than
a straw man, at least based on a legal memo produced earlier by the
agency.

The legal objections to structural reforms at the
agency were initially advanced in 2009 when the stem cell agency was
fighting an unwelcome analysis of its activities by the state's good
government agency, the Little Hoover Commission. The objections were
voiced again at a meeting earlier this month by some governing board
members, particularly Sherry Lansing, who is also chairwoman of the
University of California regents. Her comments came within minutes of
the start of the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) presentation to the
board.
She said directors' hands “are tied”
because of requirements in Proposition 71, the ballot initiative that
created the stem cell agency, which is formally known as the
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine(CIRM). While Lansing
did not elaborate, some of the initiative is written into the state
constitution, which can only be amended by a vote of the people.
However, Proposition 71 can also be amended by a 70 percent vote of
each house of the Legislature and the signature of the governor,
which is no small task to achieve.
The 2009 legal memo (see the full text
below) dealt with the recommendations of the Little Hoover
Commission, some of which were cited and echoed by the IOM. The legal
memo contended that the legislature was barred from making major
changes in the structure of the stem cell agency governing board
because the changes supposedly would not “enhance the ability of
the (agency) to further the purposes of the grant and loan programs.”
The argument was that only the people could make “non-enhancing”
changes. The vague “enhancement” requirement was written into
Proposition 71 by its authors, one of whom is James Harrison, the
outside counsel to the board, who was also the lead author on the
2009 memo. Harrison is revisiting the supposed constitutional issues in the wake of the IOM study.
However, the objections cited in his earlier memo are dubious and easily overcome. The meaning of “enhance” is
so vague as to permit wide interpretations. Certainly, removing
public suspicion about conflicts of interest would seem to help move
the agency forward. Straightening out the muddled management
structure of the agency, with its overlapping responsibilities for
the chairman and president, would certainly seem to enhance the
functioning of the agency. Assuring that the governing board has the
full ability to exercise strong oversight over the conduct of the
agency would certainly seem to be an enhancement and long overdue.
At least that is what the most
prestigious body of its sort says. The Institute of Medicine studied
the agency for 17 months under a $700,000 contract with CIRM. The
IOM's charge was to evaluate the performance of the agency and make
recommendations for improvements. The IOM recommendations echoed
findings not only of the Little Hoover Commission, but some in two
earlier studies also funded by the agency.
For CIRM directors now to reject the
IOM findings and turn away would be to indicate that their earlier
admiration and respect for the IOM was something of a sham or, more
likely, now inconvenient.
As for removing ambiguity about what
does or does not enhance the agency's mission, the 29-member board
could simply adopt a resolution declaring that all the IOM
recommendations would enhance the CIRM mission.
One of major obstacles to acting on the
earlier recommendations for changes was Robert Klein, the first
chairman of the agency board. Klein, an attorney and real estate investment
banker, also directed the writing of Proposition 71 and wrote
portions of it himself. He would often make numerical code citations
to the initiative during agency board meetings.
Klein is now gone from the board,
leaving in 2011 at the end of his term. He was replaced by Jonathan
Thomas
, a Los Angeles bond financier, who has ushered in a new and
different era at the stem cell agency. Some might say a more
reasonable era. He says he and governing board
take the IOM study seriously. 
The report is scheduled for discussion
Jan. 23 at a public workshop at the Claremont Hotel in Berkeley, Ca.,
the day before the regular board meeting. .
The IOM's recommendations have won theeditorial endorsement of all the California newspapers that have so
far written about them. The newspapers believe that the proposals
would indeed enhance the agency's mission and are, in fact, necessary
if the agency is to survive beyond 2017, when the money for new
grants runs out.
Directors of the stem cell agency are
currently mulling the future of their efforts. If they are to be
successful in raising additional hundreds of millions of dollars –
be they private or public – the directors must confront the
findings of the IOM in a forthright manner. And they must move to
dispel the cloud that now hangs over the stem cell agency.
(Editor's note: The full text of the
2009 legal memo can be found below. Also below is another related
legal memo from Americans for Cures, a stem cell lobbying group
sponsored by Robert Klein at the same time he was chairman of the
stem cell agency. Despite the language on the Americans for Cures
memo, it is a public record. It became a public document when Klein
submitted it to the Little Hoover Commission.) 

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/8TDUJVXl3rw/exploring-straw-man-argument-against.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Exploring the Straw Man Argument Against IOM Reforms at California Stem Cell Agency

Global Transfection (Gene Delivery, DNA Delivery, Protein Delivery, SiRNA Delivery) Technologies (Lipofection, Calcium …

Posted: December 19, 2012 at 3:41 pm

NEW YORK, Dec. 19, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

http://www.reportlinker.com/p01057834/Global-Transfection-Gene-Delivery-DNA-Delivery-Protein-Delivery-SiRNA-Delivery-Technologies-Lipofection-Calcium-Phosphate-Electroporation-Nucleofection-Magnetofection-Gene-Gun-Viral-Market-2012--2017.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Genetically_Modified_Organism,_GMO

Transfection is an enabler technology used for many cell based research activities with applications spanning production of recombinant proteins and recombinant cell lines, gene therapy, delivery of therapeutics and also drug discovery. This research report provides a brief description on transfection technologies, its evolution, comparative analysis, market landscape analysis, competitive scenario and emerging technology and application trends. Global research and development Network, Innovation and Spin offs have been discussed. The report tracks regional adoption and development trends, providing strategic recommendation to stay active and compete in the market space. An impact analysis of major drivers and restraints influencing the growth of the market is mapped for five year period.

Cell research is a major driving factor for transfection market, as more than 60% of the users are of academic institutions and researchers. Research in gene transfer is being performed in in vivo conditions for different therapeutic applications; there is a growing demand for new transfection technologies to address unmet needs for therapeutic delivery which is driving the transfection market.

Key Restraint:

Home brewReagents restricts sale of commercial kits

Home brew reagents are still the preferred choice of reagents for transfection by researchers all over the world. Most of the researchers prepare their own reagents from their laboratory to conduct their research. This is true for most of the reagent based transfection reactions. This allows them to reduce cost involved in purchasing commercial kits.

Transfection is an enabler technology which is used in many cell research activities, however only few cell lines are majorly used in these experiments restricting the scope of the study. Transfection in hard to transfect cells is the need of hour and it is a major challenge. There are few upcoming transfection technologies like nucleofection and magnetofection which are an off-shoot of electroporation, which have the potential to address these challenges but are currently cost prohibitive due to which the technologies may have a much slower uptake in the developing world.

The report also discusses new opportunities for investment in the upcoming areas like Gene therapy, Stem cell research and Electro-chemotherapy.

Different transfection technologies are analyzed through a multi-criteria based decision making process which provides competitive benchmarking. Further, the report analyses technology management strategies and technology road mapping for the forecast period. Profiles of over 20 Key companies in the area of Transfection technology sector have been provided. Key players include Life Technologies, Sigma Aldrich, Lonza, Promega, Qiagen, Bio-Rad, Roche, Polyplus Transfection, Mirius Bio, Maxcyte, etc.

More here:
Global Transfection (Gene Delivery, DNA Delivery, Protein Delivery, SiRNA Delivery) Technologies (Lipofection, Calcium ...

Posted in Gene therapy | Comments Off on Global Transfection (Gene Delivery, DNA Delivery, Protein Delivery, SiRNA Delivery) Technologies (Lipofection, Calcium …

The Science of the Next 150 Years

Posted: December 19, 2012 at 12:32 pm

What scientific and technological milestones can we envision 50, 100 and 150 years hence?

[More]



Add to digg
Add to StumbleUpon
Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Add to del.icio.us
Email this Article



Source:
http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=bb22bbe61dfa476fb230c7787f0d7954

Posted in Gene therapy | Comments Off on The Science of the Next 150 Years

Balloting Begins on Stem Cell Person of the Year

Posted: December 19, 2012 at 2:38 am

The nominations are in. Voting has
begun, with about 1,000 ballots cast so far. But only one vote truly
counts. That belongs to Paul Knoepfler, who is running the The Stem
Cell Person of the Year
contest and will pony up $1,000 of his
hard-earned cash to honor the winner.
On Monday, Knoepfler announced 16 finalists out of 30 nominees. They range from scientists to patients
to advocates. Voting began instantly and will continue until Dec. 31
at 11:59 p.m. Votes will count for something, but Knoepfler makes it clear that they are only advisory. He makes the decision.
This is Knoepfler's first year at the
contest. The UC Davis stem cell researcher, patient advocate and
blogger wants to recognize someone who made a difference and took
some risks in doing so.
You can find the entire list of
candidates on Knoepfler's blog, but we wanted to note that they have
a father and son competing against each other – Don Reed and his
son, Roman. (Could be tense around the holiday tables in the
Reeds' households.) Also on the list is Jeanne Loring of Scripps,
whose nominator said engages the wider community with great
effectiveness. I once heard Loring say that every stem cell
researcher should have a spiel that could be delivered in five
minutes in a taxi and that would not only explain stem cell research,
but persuade the cab driver of its virtues.
All of the nominees have much to
recommend them. Knoepfler will be chewing his fingernails before this
is all over.  

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/_Zshc3lQops/balloting-begins-on-stem-cell-person-of.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Balloting Begins on Stem Cell Person of the Year

Stem cells and desensitization in renal transplantation. Prof. Gamal saadi. Cairo University – Video

Posted: December 18, 2012 at 5:44 pm


Stem cells and desensitization in renal transplantation. Prof. Gamal saadi. Cairo University
Stem cells and desensitization in renal transplantation. Prof. Gamal saadi. Cairo UniversityFrom:mansvuViews:2 0ratingsTime:29:32More inEducation

View post:
Stem cells and desensitization in renal transplantation. Prof. Gamal saadi. Cairo University - Video

Posted in Stem Cell Videos | Comments Off on Stem cells and desensitization in renal transplantation. Prof. Gamal saadi. Cairo University – Video

Page 2,480«..1020..2,4792,4802,4812,482..2,4902,500..»