Page 2,483«..1020..2,4822,4832,4842,485..2,4902,500..»

Seattle Genetics Reports Data from Phase I Trial of ADCETRIS® (Brentuximab Vedotin) in Front-line Hodgkin Lymphoma at …

Posted: December 16, 2012 at 10:41 pm

ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Seattle Genetics, Inc. (SGEN) today announced results from a phase I clinical trial of ADCETRIS (brentuximab vedotin) in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. The data were presented at the 54th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition being held December 8-11, 2012 in Atlanta, GA. ADCETRIS is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) directed to CD30, a defining marker of classical HL. ADCETRIS is currently not approved for use in the front-line treatment of HL.

In the phase I trial, newly diagnosed patients received ADCETRIS concomitantly with either ABVD (Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) or AVD, which removes bleomycin from the regimen. At the end of front-line therapy, 24 of 25 patients (96 percent) treated with ADCETRIS plus AVD and 21 of 22 (95 percent) patients treated with ADCETRIS plus ABVD had a complete remission. None of the patients treated in the ADCETRIS plus AVD cohort experienced pulmonary toxicity, compared with an expected rate of pulmonary toxicity caused by ABVD alone of 10-25 percent. The trial was designed to establish the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose when adding ADCETRIS to ABVD or AVD. Antitumor activity was assessed as a secondary endpoint.

"For over 30 years, the standard of care for front-line HL has been a chemotherapy regimen called ABVD that has demonstrated a complete remission rate of 70 to 80 percent and is associated with considerable life-threatening toxicities. There is a significant need to identify better treatment options for patients in the front-line HL setting, said Clay B. Siegall, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Genetics. "Our goal is to redefine front-line treatment of HL with the addition of ADCETRIS, and the encouraging results of this phase I trial clearly support this goal and provide rationale for the ongoing ADCETRIS phase III trial in this setting."

Front-line Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin Combined with ABVD or AVD in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (Abstract #798)

In this open-label, multicenter trial, cohorts of patients received an escalating dose of ADCETRIS (0.6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), 0.9 mg/kg, 1.2 mg/kg) every two weeks concomitantly with ABVD or a dose of 1.2 mg/kg every two weeks concomitantly with AVD.

Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the phase I study and 47 were evaluable for response at trial completion. The 47 evaluable patients included 25 in the ADCETRIS plus AVD cohort and 22 in the ADCETRIS plus ABVD cohorts. All patients were previously untreated and 45 percent had Stage IV HL. The median age of patients across all cohorts of the trial was 33 years. Key findings, which were highlighted in an oral presentation by Dr. Stephen Ansell, Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology, from the Mayo Clinic, included:

For decades researchers have strived to improve our front-line HL treatment strategy by enhancing the activity of traditional chemotherapy regimens while reducing the significant toxicities and long-term side effects of such regimens, said Stephen Ansell,M.D., Ph.D., Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic. There is a significant need to identify better treatment options for patients in the front-line setting. With a complete response rate of 96 percent and a manageable safety profile, data from this trial support further evaluation of ADCETRIS administered concomitantly with AVD in previously untreated HL patients to potentially improve the current standard of care.

Seattle Genetics and Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company have initiated a phase III clinical trial in advanced stage front-line HL patients. The randomized trial is comparing progression-free survival in patients receiving ADCETRIS in combination with AVD to patients receiving ABVD alone. For more information about the trial visit http://www.seattlegenetics.com or http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

About ADCETRIS

More here:
Seattle Genetics Reports Data from Phase I Trial of ADCETRIS® (Brentuximab Vedotin) in Front-line Hodgkin Lymphoma at ...

Posted in Genetics | Comments Off on Seattle Genetics Reports Data from Phase I Trial of ADCETRIS® (Brentuximab Vedotin) in Front-line Hodgkin Lymphoma at …

Seattle Genetics Announces Data from Investigator-Sponsored Trials of ADCETRIS® (Brentuximab Vedotin) in Cutaneous T …

Posted: December 16, 2012 at 10:41 pm

ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Seattle Genetics, Inc. (SGEN) today announced that results from two ongoing investigator-sponsored phase II clinical trials of ADCETRIS (brentuximab vedotin) in patients with relapsed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) were presented at the 54th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition being held December 8-11, 2012 in Atlanta, GA. ADCETRIS is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) directed to CD30. ADCETRIS has not been approved for use in the treatment of CTCL.

Brentuximab Vedotin Demonstrates Significant Clinical Activity in Relapsed or Refractory Mycosis Fungoides with Variable CD30 Expression (Abstract #797)

The ongoing phase II clinical trial is enrolling CTCL patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sezary syndrome. Twenty patients have been enrolled to date with a median of six prior systemic therapies. The primary endpoint of the trial is clinical response rate. Secondary endpoints include correlation of clinical response with CD30 expression levels, duration of response and safety. The study was led by principle investigator Dr. Youn H. Kim from Stanford University School of Medicine in Stanford, CA, and was presented in an oral session. Key findings include:

Results of a Phase II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) for CD30+ Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas and Lymphoproliferative Disorders (Abstract #3688)

Data were presented from a phase II investigator-sponsored trial evaluating the use of ADCETRIS in CD30-positive CTCL patients, including lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP), primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL) or MF. The ongoing study is being conducted by Dr. Madeleine Duvic from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX. Among 54 patients enrolled to date, 46 patients were evaluable at the time of analysis. The primary endpoint of the trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ADCETRIS in CD30-positive CTCL. The key findings include:

Seattle Genetics and Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company have initiated the ALCANZA trial, a randomized phase III clinical trial of ADCETRIS for relapsed CD30-positive CTCL patients. The trial is assessing ADCETRIS versus investigators choice of methotrexate or bexarotene in patients with CD30-positive CTCL, including those with pcALCL or MF. The primary endpoint of the study is overall response rate lasting at least four months. Approximately 124 patients will be enrolled in the pivotal trial. The ALCANZA trial is being conducted under a Special Protocol Assessment agreement from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study also received European Medicines Agency scientific advice.

About CTCL

Lymphoma is a general term for a group of cancers that originate in the lymphatic system. There are two major categories of lymphoma: Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cutaneous lymphomas are a category of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that primarily involve the skin. According to the Cutaneous Lymphoma Foundation, CTCL is the most common type of cutaneous lymphoma and typically presents with red, scaly patches or thickened plaques of skin that often mimic eczema or chronic dermatitis. Progression from limited skin involvement is variable and may be accompanied by tumor formation, ulceration and exfoliation, complicated by itching and infections. Advanced stages are defined by involvement of lymph nodes, peripheral blood and internal organs. According to published literature, up to 50 percent of CTCL patients lesions express CD30.

About ADCETRIS

Original post:
Seattle Genetics Announces Data from Investigator-Sponsored Trials of ADCETRIS® (Brentuximab Vedotin) in Cutaneous T ...

Posted in Genetics | Comments Off on Seattle Genetics Announces Data from Investigator-Sponsored Trials of ADCETRIS® (Brentuximab Vedotin) in Cutaneous T …

Clinical Data from NewLink Genetics' HyperAcute Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy Published in Journal of Immunotherapy

Posted: December 16, 2012 at 10:41 pm

AMES, Iowa, Dec. 13, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --NewLink Genetics Corporation (NLNK) today announced that the results of a Phase 1 dose escalation study with its proprietary HyperAcute Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy were published in the Journal of Immunotherapy. The article, entitled "Cellular Immunotherapy Study of Prostate Cancer Patients and Resulting IgG Responses to Peptide Epitopes Predicted From Prostate Tumor-associated Autoantigens," is featured in the current edition of the Journal.

The study was conducted at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and included eight patients. Patients were scheduled to receive a priming dose on day one, followed by eleven boost doses every two weeks and patients received up to 12 intradermal vaccinations at doses ranging from 30 million to 500 million cells per injection. Patients were tested for safety, immunological and clinical responses arising after immunotherapy.

The study demonstrated that the immunotherapy was safe, and that the first immunization differentially increased the anti-alphaGal IgG response in all patients compared with baseline levels. These data indicated that administration of HyperAcute-Prostate immunotherapy increases the immune response against alphaGal epitopes, demonstrating the immunogenicity of the vaccine in prostate cancer patients.

The patients that received the highest dose of immunotherapy developed antibody responses against prostate tumor-associated antigens that were not seen in a control group of untreated volunteers. Data demonstrated that 37.5 percent (3/8) of patients responded with Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level stabilization for more than 100 days.

The adverse events data reported in this publication confirm the safety of this immunotherapy, consistent with previous studies on the safety of alpha-Gal-expressing allogeneic vaccines (HyperAcute immunotherapy) in the treatment of lung, melanoma and pancreatic cancers. Median overall survival for the study was 25.1 months with one patient with bone metastases surviving for more than 70 months.

"The favorable safety profile of this agent combined with evidence of vaccine induced immunologic responses in patients clearly suggests this therapy should be studied in a large controlled trial," said Dr. George P. Hemstreet, III, University of Nebraska Medical Center, the Principal Investigator for the study.

NewLink Genetics is currently evaluating its lead immunotherapy product candidate algenpantucel-L (HyperAcute-Pancreas) in a Phase 3 clinical trial in surgically-resected pancreatic cancer patients.

About HyperAcute Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy

NewLink's HyperAcute Prostate Cancer immunotherapy product candidate consists of two allogeneic prostate cancer tumor cell lines modified to express alpha-Gal. These cell lines were chosen to provide a broad coverage of prostate cancer antigens. Each of the modified cell lines is grown in large cultures, harvested, packaged and irradiated. Each of the two vaccine components was administered separately.

About Prostate Cancer

Original post:
Clinical Data from NewLink Genetics' HyperAcute Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy Published in Journal of Immunotherapy

Posted in Genetics | Comments Off on Clinical Data from NewLink Genetics' HyperAcute Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy Published in Journal of Immunotherapy

Seattle Genetics Highlights Next Generation Antibody-Drug Conjugate SGN-CD33A at ASH Annual Meeting

Posted: December 16, 2012 at 10:41 pm

ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Seattle Genetics, Inc. (SGEN) today presented preclinical data from SGN-CD33A, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) in development for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), at the 54th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition being held December 8-11, 2012 in Atlanta, GA. SGN-CD33A is a novel CD33-directed ADC utilizing Seattle Genetics next generation technology. The CD33 antibody is attached to a highly potent cytotoxic agent called a pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer via a proprietary site-specific conjugate technology to a monoclonal antibody with engineered cysteines (EC-mAb). Seattle Genetics expects to advance SGN-CD33A into a phase I clinical trial in 2013.

Our SGN-CD33A program showcases our next generation ADC technology, including our latest highly potent cell-killing agent and our new engineered antibody technology, said Jonathan Drachman, M.D., Senior Vice President, Research and Translational Medicine at Seattle Genetics. Of approximately 30 ADCs in development, more than 50 percent utilize Seattle Genetics technology. Through our continued innovation we are leading the development of novel ADCs, and believe that ADCs can transform the way cancer is treated.

ADCs are monoclonal antibodies that are designed to selectively deliver cytotoxic agents to tumor cells. This approach is intended to spare non-targeted cells and thus reduce many of the toxic effects of traditional chemotherapy while enhancing antitumor activity.

PBDs are a class of DNA-crosslinking agents that are significantly more potent than systemic chemotherapeutic drugs. Seattle Genetics has been working with PBDs since 2008 under an exclusive licensing arrangement with Spirogen Ltd. Over the past four years, Seattle Genetics has selected and optimized specific PBD molecules combined with novel linkers for use in ADCs, and has conducted process development and scale-up activities to create robust synthetic GMP manufacturing processes for these PBD drug-linkers.

SGN-CD33A: A Novel CD33-Directed Antibody-Drug Conjugate, Utilizing Pyrrolobenzodiazepine Dimers, Demonstrates Preclinical Antitumor Activity Against Multi-Drug Resistant Human AML (Abstract #3589)

Key findings from the preclinical evaluation of SGN-CD33A included:

About Seattle Genetics

Seattle Genetics is a biotechnology company focused on the development and commercialization of monoclonal antibody-based therapies for the treatment of cancer. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval of ADCETRIS in August 2011 for two indications. ADCETRIS is being developed in collaboration with Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company. In addition, Seattle Genetics has three other clinical-stage ADC programs: SGN-75, ASG-5ME and ASG-22ME. Seattle Genetics has collaborations for its ADC technology with a number of leading biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, including Abbott, Agensys (an affiliate of Astellas), Bayer, Celldex Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Millennium, Pfizer and Progenics, as well as ADC co-development agreements with Agensys and Genmab. More information can be found at http://www.seattlegenetics.com.

Certain of the statements made in this press release are forward looking, such as those, among others, relating to the initiation of future clinical trials with SGN-CD33A. Actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected or implied in these forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such a difference include the inability to generate the appropriate data and information to support an investigational new drug submission to the FDA. More information about the risks and uncertainties faced by Seattle Genetics is contained in the companys 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Seattle Genetics disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Visit link:
Seattle Genetics Highlights Next Generation Antibody-Drug Conjugate SGN-CD33A at ASH Annual Meeting

Posted in Genetics | Comments Off on Seattle Genetics Highlights Next Generation Antibody-Drug Conjugate SGN-CD33A at ASH Annual Meeting

Seattle Genetics Highlights Data Presentations from Genentech ADC Collaborator Programs at ASH Annual Meeting

Posted: December 16, 2012 at 10:41 pm

ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Seattle Genetics, Inc. (SGEN) today highlighted clinical data from two antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) programs in development by Genentech, a member of the Roche Group (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) that utilize Seattle Genetics technology. The data were presented at the 54th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition being held December 8-11, 2012 in Atlanta, GA. Phase I data from both ADCs, an anti-CD22 ADC (DCDT2980S, RG7593) and an anti-CD79b ADC (DCDS4501A, RG7596), demonstrated antitumor activity in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients at generally well-tolerated doses. These ADC programs are currently being evaluated in a phase II clinical trial for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL.

Genentechs phase I data and their advancement of these two ADCs into phase II clinical development, as well as their utilization of our technology in six other clinical-stage programs,illustrates their commitment to ADCs as an innovative, targeted approach to treat cancer,saidEric Dobmeier, ChiefOperatingOfficer of Seattle Genetics. Across our ADC collaborations, there is broad potential for our industry-leading technologyto address thesignificant needformore effective and better tolerated treatment options.

Anti-CD22-MMAE and anti-CD79b-MMAE are ADCs designed to deliver potent cytotoxic treatment to targeted cells with improved tolerability. With over a decade of experience and knowledge in ADC innovation, Seattle Genetics has developed proprietary technology employing synthetic cytotoxic agents, such as monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), and stable linker systems that attach these cytotoxic agents to the antibody. Seattle Genetics linker systems are designed to be stable in the bloodstream and release the potent cell-killing agent once inside targeted cancer cells. This approach is intended to spare non-targeted cells and thus reduce many of the toxic effects of traditional chemotherapy while enhancing antitumor activity. ADCETRIS (brentuximab vedotin) is the first drug approved utilizing Seattle Genetics ADC technology.

A Phase I Study of the Anti-CD79b Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) DCDS4501A Targeting CD79b in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (Abstract #56)

A phase I clinical trial is being conducted to evaluate the safety and activity of DCDS4501A in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL. DCDS4501A is an ADC consisting of an anti-CD79b monoclonal antibody conjugated to the cytotoxic agent MMAE using Seattle Genetics ADC technology. In this analysis, 47 patients were evaluable for safety and 32 were evaluable for efficacy.

Key findings included:

A Phase I Study of DCDT2980S, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Targeting CD22, in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (Abstract #59)

A phase I clinical trial is being conducted to evaluate the safety and activity of DCDT2980S in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL. DCDT2980S is an ADC candidate consisting of an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the cytotoxic agent MMAE using Seattle Genetics ADC technology. In this analysis, 43 patients were evaluable for safety and 33 were evaluable for efficacy.

Key findings included:

More here:
Seattle Genetics Highlights Data Presentations from Genentech ADC Collaborator Programs at ASH Annual Meeting

Posted in Genetics | Comments Off on Seattle Genetics Highlights Data Presentations from Genentech ADC Collaborator Programs at ASH Annual Meeting

Southern California Newspaper Tackles Stem Cell Agency and UC Irvine Grants

Posted: December 16, 2012 at 3:43 pm

The Orange County Register today zeroed
in on the $3 billion California stem cell agency and its relationship
to the local University of California campus in the wake of sweeping
recommendations for changes at the eight-year-old agency.

The article by Melody Petersen was
headlined “Ties to stem cell board lucrative.”
Petersen began her article with story of the $20 million award to StemCells, Inc., earlier this year and
the firm's partnership with Frank LaFerla of UC Irvine, which is located in Orange County.
The award was rejected twice by
reviewers at the stem cell agency but the governing board of the
agency (CIRM) approved it on a 7-5 vote in September following
lobbying on behalf of the company by the board's former chairman,
Robert Klein, and others.
Petersen said the award was not the first time that questions have been raised about stem cell agency grants. She said that the 17-month study by the prestigious Institute of
Medicine (IOM)
and some of its findings, particularly those dealing
with conflicts of interest, echoed criticisms that have been raised for years.
She wrote,

“Repeated independent reviews of the
agency, including one by the (IOM) released this month, have found
that its board is rife with conflicts of interest. In fact, of the
$1.7 billion that the agency has awarded so far, about 90 percent has
gone to research institutions with ties to people sitting on the
board, according to an analysis by David Jensen at the California
Stem Cell Report
, which closely follows the agency's operations.

While the agency has yet to produce a
cure, Petersen said,

“What's clear already is that the
money has transformed stem cell research in California and poured
hundreds of millions of dollars into the state's universities,
including UC Irvine.”

She noted that the CIRM governing board
is dominated by members from the UC system, including two professors
at UC Irvine.
Peterson continued,

“Before Proposition 71 (the measure
that created the agency) passed, UC Irvine had less than ten stem
cell scientists, who received about $1.5 million in funding each
year. Now, after receiving $100 million in grants from the state
agency, the university has sixty scientists working to advance stem
cell research and teaching. It touts itself as one of the top stem
cell research centers in the world. In 2010, it opened an $80 million
four-story stem cell research center with the agency picking up $27
million of the cost.

“As UC Irvine has won increasing
amounts of taxpayer money, its two professors who sit on the agency's
board have risen in status on campus.

Susan Bryant
UC Irvine photo

“Professor Susan Bryant, an expert in
regenerative medicine, was dean of the School of Biological Sciences
when she was named to the agency's board in 2004. She was then
promoted to vice-chancellor of research. In July, she was named the
university's interim executive vice-chancellor and provost, its
second most powerful administrator.

“When Professor Oswald Steward, a
stem cell scientist, joined the agency's board in 2004, he was
director of UCI's Reeve-Irvine Research Center for Spinal Injury.
Since then, the scientists working in his center have received
millions of dollars in grants from the agency. In May, the university
rewarded Steward with an additional title: senior associate dean of
research for the School of Medicine.”

“The two professors are prohibited
from receiving any agency funds for their own scientific work. But so
much money has been funneled into the stem cell field in California
that it can be difficult to show their continued scientific efforts
are not somehow benefiting. For example, Bryant co-authored a
scientific article in 2009 with nine other scientists about the
genetics of salamanders, which can regenerate limbs. In the report,
the group recognized the state agency for partially funding their
work. Bryant said that the money was received by another scientist in
the group who was not employed by UC Irvine. She said the state
agency has never given a grant for research involving salamanders. 'I
have never-ever benefited from CIRM funding,' Bryant said using the
agency's acronym.

Os Steward
UC Irvine photo

“Steward said he stopped his stem
cell research when he joined the board in 2004. His board position,
he said, 'has prevented me from taking on lines of research I
otherwise would do.'

Tom Vasich, a campus spokesperson,
said Bryant and Stewart's positions on the agency's board played no
part in their promotions and success at the school.”

Petersen additionally reported that
Steward and Bryant are not allowed to vote on grants to UC Irvine.
Petersen pointed out that the
University of California has 16 members on the 29-member board. One
of those is the chairwoman of the UC Regents, Sherry Lansing.
Petersen also noted that three of the UC officials, including
Steward, hold seats on the board as patient advocates.

Petersen is a recent addition to the
Register's staff, joining it in November as an investigative
reporter. She worked as a business reporter for the New York Times and authored  "Our Daily Meds," a book about the pharmaceutical industry. She shared in the top award in newspaper financial journalism when she was at the San Jose Mercury News.  

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/41IPNEUfHpo/southern-california-newspaper-tackles.html

Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Southern California Newspaper Tackles Stem Cell Agency and UC Irvine Grants

The ROI on pant-wearing and other social media tips

Posted: December 16, 2012 at 8:02 am

With many things in life, there is a payoff for doing them.  Do the dishes and the kitchen is cleaner, your household is more functional, and hopefully one or more family members notice and appreciate you for it.



For other things, however,  the people around you have such high expectations you'll do them that you only lose points if you don't but gain very little if you do.  For you, this may be true of the dishes.  Certainly I've always maintained this is true for Valentine's Day.  Get flowers and you simply maintain the relationship's status quo; fail to do anything and you lose big points fast.  


Similarly, at some point certain things become so ubiquitous that they are expected as a baseline.  This is true of putting on your pants.

The global head of social media for Ford Motor Company, Scott Monty, once asked, "What's the ROI* of putting your pants on in the morning?".   The truth is that there is very little benefit to putting on your pants other than to avoid the significant cost of not doing so.

Certainly this is true now of having a website or an email address for your company.  Unlike a couple decades ago, no company gets kudos for having a website or email addresses but it would certainly raise eyebrows of criticism if your company failed to have them.

Arguably social media participation is not quite there yet but it is, I submit, fast approaching.  Someday in the not-too-distant future you will receive the cringe of shame if your company is not active in the leading social media platforms of the day.  Today - for companies - these are LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook.  This will be true irrespective of whether yours is a B2B or B2C company.
Recently I was invited to write an article for Future Medicine's special issue for the World Stem Cell Report.  I was asked to make the case for why and how participating in social media stood to benefit the scientists, companies, executives, employees, academics, activists, and other stakeholders in the cell therapy industry.  

The result is "Why the stem cell sector must engage with social media".  What I attempted to succinctly outline are the ways social media primarily benefit one's career and organization or company.


"I can tell you without the slightest hesitation of conviction – having experienced it myself and seen it repeated countless times – is that active and successful social media engagement translates into:

  • Unparalleled learning: accessing more information relevant to your discipline, specialty and company than you otherwise will. 
  • Enhanced profile: higher profile within your industry, profession, specialty and community. Social media is not the only way to build a profile but it can be very effective.
  • Wider network: more touch points and meaningful relationships with people than you otherwise will accomplish by any other means combined."
The measurable impacts and benefits are real and certainly include:
  • Traffic: "For companies, increased traffic equals increased opportunity to call readers/viewers to your intended action – interaction, citation, linking, investing, buying or engaging in some other action you solicit. For individual professionals, increased viewers translate into more chances for collaboration, citation, engagement, etc."
  • Collaboration: "There is an intrinsic correlation between one’s profile and the opportunities one has for collaboration. For companies this means finding the right partnerships, joint ventures, strategic alliances, collaborators, employees, management and so on. For individual professionals, this means more and/or better quality invites to speak, write or collaborate in other ways. It also means finding quality grad students, faculty, employees and interns
  • Revenue/IncomeThis is about translating a broader knowledge base and a wider network over which you have some level of influence (if only just that they are listening) into more money for your company, organization and yourself. For companies, this means finding the right partners, investors, customers and so on. For organizations this means finding the right donors, impressing the right grant reviewers and/or recruiting the right rain-maker faculty. For individual professionals this translates into promotions or job offers."

As I conclude my article I will conclude here:

    "In order to create the kinds of perceptions and solicit the kinds of actions we want from the world around us, we must engage the world around us. The world around us is engaging online. 

    For all kinds of selfish and selfless reasons you, your company or organization and your career will benefit from you engaging there too."

    and this prediction:

    "...in less than the blink it took for the commercial world to accept websites and email, it will seem similarly ridiculous for professionals, academics and companies to operate and succeed without actively using social media."

    ____________


    If this topic is of interest to you, here are some great resources particularly focused on the value of social media to those in life sciences.


    Canaday, M. Is Life Science Social Media Worth It Yet? Three Tenets Behind Its Relevance To Your Business. Comprendia. 6 December 2012. 


    Bersenev A. Scientific blogging as a model for professional networking online. Cellular Therapy and Transplantation. 2010;2(7). 10.3205/ctt-2010-en-000084.01. 


    Bersenev, A. Scientific blogging as a model for professional networking online. 4 August 2010. StemCellAssays.com 


    Bersenev, A. Who’s Who in the Stem Cell Blogosophere.  27 June 2011. StemCellAssays.com 


    Bishop, D.  How to bury your academic writing. Bishop’s Blog. 26 August 2012. 



    Buckler, L. If You’re Breathing, You’re in PR. Cell Therapy Blog. 11 June 2010.  

    Buckler, L. Don’t feel the pain of ignoring social media? Just wait a minute…. CellTherapyBlog.com 22 October 2008.    

    Jewell, T. Survey: How our scientists use social media. AZHealthConnections.com. 12 February 2012. 


    Knoepfer, P. Top ten tips for blogging for scientists. 2 August 2012. IPScell.com   


    Shipman, M. Why Scientists Should Publicize Their Findings – for Purely Selfish Reasons. Scientific America. Blog. 18 June 2012. 
         
    Shipman, M. A gentle introduction to Twitter for the apprehensive academic. Scientific America. Blog.  14 June 2011.  


    Small, G. Time to Tweet. Nature 2011. 479 141 2 November 2011 


    Wilcox, C. Social Media for Scientists Part 1: It’s Our Job. Scientific American Blog. 27 September 2011.  


    Wilcox, C. Social Media for Scientists Part 2: You Do Have time. Scientific American Blog. 29 September 2011.  


    Wilcox, C. Social Media for Scientists Part 3: Win-Win. Scientific American Blog. 10 October 2011.  

    Wilcox, C. Guest Editorial: It’s time to e-Volve. Taking Responsibility for Science Communication in a Digital Age. Biol Bull. 22285-87. (April 2012)  

    The Rules of Social Media.  Fast Company.  8 August 2012. 


    Source:
    http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CellTherapyBlog/~3/k7ANTnLXNjc/the-roi-on-pant-wearing-and-other.html

    Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on The ROI on pant-wearing and other social media tips

    A proposed 6-step platform for the cell therapy industry to consider in combating non-compliant cell therapy treatments

    Posted: December 16, 2012 at 8:01 am

    Tweet 


    Further to my recent post, "Six steps to fighting non-compliant cell therapy treatments. The stuff of grey shades, spades, ivory towers and (ahem) balls.", I have crafted a 6-point platform that I propose to submit (with potential edits based on preliminary feedback) to several of the leading  industry and professional organizations for their consideration including ARM, ISCT, ISSCR, FACTAABB  ICMS, and perhaps, in due course, to patient groups, physician groups, disease-specific professional organizations (e.g, cardiology, oncology, neurology, cosmetic, etc).



    I welcome comments and feedback. 


    1. In addition to helping patients distinguish between compliant and non-compliant treatments (and providers) we must do more to help patients distinguish between non-compliant cell therapy treatments (and providers) which are more or less risky. 


    2. Whatever we do in response to this issue should be done with an eye to being practical and helpful to patients in the real-life context of their decision about whether or not to buy a non-complaint cell therapy.


    3. Our response to this issue should be based on a risk-based approach recognizing that not all non-compliance is created equal.  We should create a framework for risk-based analysis (both for us and our audiences) and focus initiatives around those which present the highest risk.


    4. We recognize the problem of non-compliant cell therapies is not just a problem that exists in jurisdictions with little, no, or poor regulation but that is a growing problem even in the most highly regulated jurisdictions meaning the solution cannot be regulated it depends on education and enforcement.


    5. We recognize regulatory agencies cannot enforce non-compliance on their own.  We as an industry need to complement their efforts through our own standards and enforcement.


    6. Stakeholder groups should support the formation of a multi-organizational  initiative to, based on a risk-based assessment, spotlight the categories or signs of highest-risk offenders for use by patients and/or their physicians in identifying  whether or not treatments (and providers) they may be considering fall into the that category associated with the highest level of risk.


    What do you think?

    Source:
    http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CellTherapyBlog/~3/wkSMxAV9938/a-proposed-6-step-platform-for-cell.html

    Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on A proposed 6-step platform for the cell therapy industry to consider in combating non-compliant cell therapy treatments

    Two More Editorials: The California Stem Cell Agency Should Heed IOM Recommendations for Reform

    Posted: December 16, 2012 at 8:01 am

    Two other major California newspapers
    today said the $3 billion California stem cell agency needs to “clean
    up its act” if it wants to be successful in continuing its efforts
    at turning stem cells into cures.

    The editorials appeared in the Los Angeles
    Times
    , the state's largest circulation newspaper at more than
    700,000, and the San Jose Mercury News in California's Silicon Valley.
    The Mercury News has a reported circulation of nearly 600,000,
    although that figure includes other Bay Area newspaper owned by the
    same chain.
    Both editorials focused on the 17-month evaluation of the agency by the prestigious Institute of Medicine (IOM) as did earlier editorials in The Sacramento Bee and the San Francisco Chronicle. The IOM recommended sweeping reforms at the agency that would alter its structure and target conflicts of interest. 

    “The $700,000 spent on the
    study...will be wasted if the institute's oversight board fails to
    heed the (IOM) committee's
    criticisms,
     which echo the findings of the Little Hoover
    Commission
    and other groups over the years.”

    The editorial continued,

    “The 29-member board is made up
    almost entirely of representatives of advocacy groups and research
    institutions that have a direct interest in how the money is spent.”

    The Times cited the California Stem
    Cell Report'
    s calculations that about 90 percent of the $1.7 billion awarded by CIRM has gone to institutions linked to current and former members of its governing board. 
    The Times noted an award to a Northern California firm that has stirred some criticism. The editorial said,

    “The board also overrode the advice
    of its scientific advisors — twice on a single application when it
    considered a grant for a well-connected company, StemCells Inc. based
    in Newark, Calif. The board granted the company $20 million after Robert Klein, the driving force behind the passage of Proposition 71,
    which created and funded the agency in 2004, and its former head,
    lobbied so intensively for the company that one board member
    described it as 'arm-twisting.'"

    The Times concluded,

    “The agency has used more than half
    of its funding and one day will almost certainly want to ask
    taxpayers for more. It should remember that voters will look for
    evidence of public accountability as well as respected research.”

    The San Jose paper sounded a similar
    note about the agency. Its editorial said,

    “(I)f it wants to survive...it
    should heed the Institute of Medicine's advice to eliminate conflicts
    of interest on its board -- and do it before awarding the remaining
    $1.2 billion of the $3 billion voters approved for stem cell
    research.”

    But the paper said the stem cell agency
    should not be provided any more state funding.

    “Long-term funding was never the
    intent when Proposition 71 passed in 2004. It was supposed to
    kick-start research at a time when federal funding was blocked and to
    establish California as a major player in the rapidly advancing
    medical field. 

    “The agency could continue to bring
    value to the state as an advocate and funder of research, but only if
    it can attract private donors, partners and investors. For that to
    happen, it will need a board that passes the ethics test, with more
    independent experts and industry executives free of conflicts. 

    “At the outset, stem cell advocates
    took immense pride in structuring the agency to keep it relatively
    free of legislative interference despite the use of public money.
    Politicians kept their hands off, which was good. But the agency
    created its own inappropriate influences in the way it constituted
    its board. Now it needs to clean up its act.“

    Source:
    http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/hjDmQPb6wDs/two-more-editorials-california-stem.html

    Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Two More Editorials: The California Stem Cell Agency Should Heed IOM Recommendations for Reform

    Meager Coverage of Yesterday’s Bristling IOM-CIRM Meeting

    Posted: December 16, 2012 at 8:01 am

    Mainstream news coverage today was skimpy, to put it mildly, of the testy session yesterday involving the governing board of the California stem
    cell agency and representatives of the prestigious Institute of
    Medicine(IOM).

    Only two pieces appeared, one in the
    San Diego U-T and another on the web site of the Los Angeles Times. Both
    discussed what the Michael Hiltzik of the Times column called “overt hostility” on the
    part of several board members (see yesterday's item here). Bradley
    Fikes
    of the San Diego paper said the patient advocates on the board
    “strongly criticized” the IOM report on the grounds that it
    “unfairly suggests that they have a conflict of interest.”
    One of the recommendations of the IOM
    is that the agency develop ways to manage personal conflicts of
    interest dealing with patient advocates and others at the agency.
    Fikes wrote,

    "'I'm a
    colon cancer survivor,' said Art Torres, vice chairman of the
    oversight committee, and a patient advocate designate. 'Does having
    colon cancer make me biased?'
    Jeff
    Sheehy
    , another patient advocate designate, protested what he called
    a 'defenestration' of patient advocates, whose interests often span
    multiple diseases.”

    Ron Leuty of the San Francisco Business
    Times
    skipped the IOM matter and wrote about the awarding of $36
    million in grants. However, a list of the most popular stories on the
    Business Times web site, ranked as No. 5 Leuty's story last week on the IOM
    study, just below an article about Stanford's $111 million
    concert hall.
    Fikes also had a piece on ViaCyte,
    which is in his area, receiving another $3 million from CIRM.

    Source:
    http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/sTuRbsA7d_w/meager-coverage-of-yesterdays-bristling.html

    Posted in Stem Cells, Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Meager Coverage of Yesterday’s Bristling IOM-CIRM Meeting

    Page 2,483«..1020..2,4822,4832,4842,485..2,4902,500..»