Page 383«..1020..382383384385..390400..»

Gene & Cell Therapy FAQs | ASGCT – American Society of Gene & Cell …

Posted: June 22, 2022 at 1:56 am

For more in-depth learning, we recommend Different Approaches in our Patient Education program.

The challenges of gene and cell therapists can be divided into three broad categories based on disease, development of therapy, and funding.

Challenges based on the disease characteristics: Disease symptoms of most genetic diseases, such as Fabrys, hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy, Huntingtons, and lysosomal storage diseases are caused by distinct mutations in single genes. Other diseases with a hereditary predisposition, such as Parkinsons disease, Alzheimers disease, cancer, and dystonia may be caused by variations/mutations in several different genes combined with environmental causes. Note that there are many susceptible genes and additional mutations yet to be discovered. Gene replacement therapy for single gene defects is the most conceptually straightforward. However, even then the gene therapy agent may not equally reduce symptoms in patients with the same disease caused by different mutations, and even the samemutationcan be associated with different degrees of disease severity. Gene therapists often screen their patients to determine the type of mutation causing the disease before enrollment into a clinical trial.

The mutated gene may cause symptoms in more than one cell type. Cystic fibrosis, for example, affects lung cells and the digestive tract, so the gene therapy agent may need to replace the defective gene or compensate for its consequences in more than one tissue for maximum benefit. Alternatively, cell therapy can utilizestem cellswith the potential to mature into the multiple cell types to replace defective cells in different tissues.

In diseases like muscular dystrophy, for example, the high number of cells in muscles throughout the body that need to be corrected in order to substantially improve the symptoms makes delivery of genes and cells a challenging problem.

Some diseases, like cancer, are caused by mutations in multiple genes. Although different types of cancers have some common mutations, every tumor from a single type of cancer does not contain the same mutations. This phenomenon complicates the choice of a single gene therapy tactic and has led to the use of combination therapies and cell elimination strategies. For more information on gene and cell therapy strategies to treat cancer, please refer to the Cancer and Immunotherapy summary in the Disease Treatment section.

Disease models in animals do not completely mimic the human diseases and viralvectorsmay infect various species differently. The testing of vectors in animal models often resemble the responses obtained in humans, but the larger size of humans in comparison to rodents presents additional challenges in the efficiency of delivery and penetration of tissue.Gene therapy, cell therapy, and oligonucleotide-based therapy agents are often tested in larger animal models, including rabbit, dog, pig and nonhuman primate models. Testing human cell therapy in animal models is complicated by immune rejections. Furthermore, humans are a very heterogeneous population. Their immune responses to the vectors, altered cells, or cell therapy products may differ or be similar to results obtained in animal models.

Challenges in the development of gene and cell therapy agents: Scientific challenges include the development of gene therapy agents that express the gene in the relevant tissue at the appropriate level for the desired duration of time. There are a lot of issues in that once sentence, and while these issues are easy to state, each one requires extensive research to identify the best means of delivery, how to control sufficient levels or numbers of cells, and factors that influence duration of gene expression or cell survival. After the delivery modalities are determined, identification and engineering of a promoter and control elements (on/off switch and dimmer switch) that will produce the appropriate amount of protein in the target cell can be combined with the relevant gene. This gene cassette is engineered into a vector or introduced into thegenomeof a cell and the properties of the delivery vehicle are tested in different types of cells in tissue culture. Sometimes things go as planned and then studies can be moved onto examination in animal models. In most cases, the gene/cell therapy agent may need to be improved further by adding new control elements to obtain the desired responses in cells and animal models.

Furthermore, the response of the immune system needs to be considered based on the type of gene or cell therapy being undertaken. For example, in gene or cell therapy for cancer, one aim is to selectively boost the existing immune response to cancer cells. In contrast, to treat genetic diseases like hemophilia and cystic fibrosis the goal is for the therapeutic protein to be accepted as an addition to the patients immune system.

If the new gene is inserted into the patients cellularDNA, the intrinsic sequences surrounding the new gene can affect its expression and vice versa. Scientists are now examining short DNA segments that may insulate the new gene from surrounding control elements. Theoretically, these insulator sequences would also reduce the effect of vector control signals in the gene cassette on adjacent cellular genes. Studies are also focusing on means to target insertion of the new gene into safe areas of the genome, to avoid influence on surrounding genes and to reduce the risk of insertional mutagenesis.

Challenges of cell therapy include the harvesting of the appropriate cell populations and expansion or isolation of sufficient cells for one or multiple patients. Cell harvesting may require specific media to maintain the stem cells ability toself-renew and mature into the appropriate cells. Ideally extra cells are taken from the individual receiving therapy. Those additional cells can expand in culture and can be induced to becomepluripotent stem cells(iPS), thus allowing them to assume a wide variety of cell types and avoiding immune rejection by the patient. The long term benefit of stem cell administration requires that the cells be introduced into the correct target tissue and become established functioning cells within the tissue. Several approaches are being investigated to increase the number of stem cells that become established in the relevant tissue.

Another challenge is developing methods that allow manipulation of the stem cells outside the body while maintaining the ability of those cells to produce more cells that mature into the desired specialized cell type. They need to provide the correct number of specialized cells and maintain their normal control of growth and cell division, otherwise there is the risk that these new cells may grow into tumors.

Challenges in funding: In most fields, funding for basic or applied research for gene and cell therapy is available through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and private foundations. These are usually sufficient to cover the preclinical studies that suggest a potential benefit from a particular gene and cell therapy. Moving into clinical trials remains a huge challenge as it requires additional funding for manufacturing of clinical grade reagents, formal toxicology studies in animals, preparation of extensive regulatory documents, and costs of clinical trials.Biotechnology companies and the NIH are trying to meet the demand for this large expenditure, but many promising therapies are slowed down by lack of funding for this critical next phase.

Read this article:
Gene & Cell Therapy FAQs | ASGCT - American Society of Gene & Cell ...

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Gene & Cell Therapy FAQs | ASGCT – American Society of Gene & Cell …

CAR T-cell Therapy: A New Era in Cancer Immunotherapy

Posted: June 22, 2022 at 1:55 am

Background: Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Over the years, a number of conventional cytotoxic approaches for neoplastic diseases has been developed. However, due to their limited effectiveness in accordance with the heterogeneity of cancer cells, there is a constant search for therapeutic approaches with improved outcome, such as immunotherapy that utilizes and enhances the normal capacity of the patient's immune system.

Methods: Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy involves genetic modification of patient's autologous T-cells to express a CAR specific for a tumor antigen, following by ex vivo cell expansion and re-infusion back to the patient. CARs are fusion proteins of a selected single-chain fragment variable from a specific monoclonal antibody and one or more T-cell receptor intracellular signaling domains. This T-cell genetic modification may occur either via viral-based gene transfer methods or nonviral methods, such as DNA-based transposons, CRISPR/Cas9 technology or direct transfer of in vitro transcribed-mRNA by electroporation.

Results: Clinical trials have shown very promising results in end-stage patients with a full recovery of up to 92% in Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia. Despite such results in hematological cancers, the effective translation of CAR T-cell therapy to solid tumors and the corresponding clinical experience is limited due to therapeutic barriers, like CAR T-cell expansion, persistence, trafficking, and fate within tumors.

Conclusion: In this review, the basic design of CARs, the main genetic modification strategies, the safety matters as well as the initial clinical experience with CAR T-cells are described.

Keywords: Cancer; T-cell therapy; chimeric antigen receptor (CAR); genetic engineering; immunotherapy; safety..

View original post here:
CAR T-cell Therapy: A New Era in Cancer Immunotherapy

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on CAR T-cell Therapy: A New Era in Cancer Immunotherapy

NorthX Biologics expands into cell therapy; partners with Alder Therapeutics – The Pharma Letter

Posted: June 22, 2022 at 1:55 am

Sweden-based NorthX Biologics is expanding into cell therapy manufacturing at its existing GMP-facility, as well as in premises at the Karolinska University Hospital campus in Stockholm.

This initiative is part of NorthXs Innovation Hub, an Innovation Track designed to provide development and GMP-manufacturing services to the next generation of drug development companies and innovative research groups in need of NorthXs Good Manufacturing

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user pleaselogin. If your trial has come to an end, you cansubscribe here.

Try before you buy

All the news that moves the needle in pharma and biotech. Exclusive features, podcasts, interviews, data analyses and commentary from our global network of life sciences reporters. Receive The Pharma Letter daily news bulletin, free forever.

Become a subscriber

Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech. Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results. Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech. Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news. Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription.

See more here:
NorthX Biologics expands into cell therapy; partners with Alder Therapeutics - The Pharma Letter

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on NorthX Biologics expands into cell therapy; partners with Alder Therapeutics – The Pharma Letter

MD Anderson, Invectys and CTMC partner to develop CAR T cell therapy – Pharmaceutical Technology

Posted: June 22, 2022 at 1:55 am

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Invectys and the Cell Therapy Manufacturing Center (CTMC) have entered a strategic partnership to co-develop a compliant and mountable process for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy to treat solid tumours.

CTMC is a joint venture between MD Anderson and National Resilience.

The partnership will be based on Invectyss HLA-G platform to progress new CAR T cell therapies until the preclinical development stage with CTMC into initial-phase clinical trials at MD Anderson.

Furthermore, the alliance will combine the technology of Invectys with the cell therapy development and manufacturing capabilities of CTMC and MD Andersons clinical trial knowledge.

CTMC was launched by merging the complementary expertise of the parties to expedite new cell therapies development and production for cancer patients.

The HLA-G molecule is a key modulator of the human immune system that is usually found during pregnancy when it works to offer protection for the foetus from rejection by the immune system of the mother.

However, it is unusually expressed in cancer, making it a desirable tumour-specific antigen as the tumour cells suppress the innate immune responses of the patient.

Invectys technology is intended to act on and remove HLA-G-expressing tumour cells, thereby lowering these immunosuppressive effects to reactivate the immune system of the patient.

The companys researchers and the CTMC team will jointly develop a clinical-grade HLA-G targeted CAR T cell therapy for solid tumours that can be manufactured in bulk.

The latest partnership will aid in progressing the therapeutic to a Phase I clinical trial at MD Anderson.

MD Anderson Investigational Cancer Therapeutics professor Aung Naing said: Immunotherapies have revolutionised the treatment landscape for cancer, but currently approved treatments are able to overcome immune suppression only in limited groups of patients.

This novel HLA-G technology can revitalise immune cells by identifying and killing solid tumour cancer cells, thereby offering the potential to improve treatment outcomes for a wider group of cancer patients.

In August 2019, MD Anderson and Boehringer Ingelheim partnered to create a joint Virtual Research and Development Center for oncology research.

Cell & Gene Therapy coverage on Pharmaceutical Technology is supported by Cytiva.

Editorial content is independently produced and follows thehighest standardsof journalistic integrity. Topic sponsors are not involved in the creation of editorial content.

The development of cell therapies is changing healthcare, delivering new hope to thousands of patients around the world. The vein-to-vein workflow for these therapies, however, is not without challenges, many of which will increase as we scale up to treat more patients. Download this free guide from Cytiva to learn more about the challenges and risks associated with the cryogenic supply chain for cell therapies, and how supply chain disruptions can best be mitigated.

By clicking the Download Free Whitepaper button, you accept the terms and conditions and acknowledge that your data will be used as described in the Cytiva Thematic privacy policy By downloading this Whitepaper, you acknowledge that we may share your information with our white paper partners/sponsors who may contact you directly with information on their products and services.

Visit our privacy policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

Here is the original post:
MD Anderson, Invectys and CTMC partner to develop CAR T cell therapy - Pharmaceutical Technology

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on MD Anderson, Invectys and CTMC partner to develop CAR T cell therapy – Pharmaceutical Technology

The Future of CAR T-Cell Therapy: Will Off-the-Shelf Options Soon Enter the Playing Field? – www.oncnursingnews.com/

Posted: June 22, 2022 at 1:55 am

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies. Many researchers eagerly anticipate the advent of allogeneic CAR T cells, which would help alleviate the long engineering process associated with autologous therapy.

Before CAR T-cell therapy entered the oncology treatment arena, there were patients with hematologic malignancies (ie, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and mantle cell lymphomas) for whom traditional chemotherapy and immunotherapy were unsuccessful. These patients were often told not much more could be done. However, CAR T-cell therapy has dramatically shifted that narrative to one of possibility and promise.1

Growth in CAR T-cell research is inspiring. In 2017, the FDA approved 2 autologous CAR T-cell therapies. Since then, 3 autologous therapies have been approved and clinical trials for allogeneic CAR T-cell therapies are back on track, offering more hope to patients.

To learn more about these therapies and their impact on patient outcomes, Oncology Nursing News interviewed Brittney Baer, BSN, RN, patient nurse care coordinator for patients undergoing immune effector cell therapies, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee; and Kelly Garvin, BSN, RN, OCN, a lymphoma specialist and primary nurse for Bijal Shah, MD, in the Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida. Baer and Garvin are enthusiastic about the trajectory of CAR T-cell therapy and excited about future possibilities. CAR T-cell therapy has given relapsed/ refractory patients another chance, Baer said. Before this treatment was available, they might find themselves running out of options. CAR T-cell therapy allows us to harness their immune system and use it to their advantage.

Baer said patients are thrilled with the treatment. Its a 1-and-done dose unlike chemotherapy and radiation, which require multiple treatment sessions. In addition, the adverse effects are much easier on patients and more transitory than those accompanying traditional therapy. Patients are grateful, even when treatment is not successful, because it provided them with 1 more option.

CAR T-cell therapy is a targeted treatment, Garvin noted. Unlike traditional treatmentwhich kills anything dividing, including hair, nail, [gastrointestinal], and bone marrow cellsthis therapy is designed to enhance the efficiency of the immune system to kill only the targeted malignancy.

The CAR T-cell process begins with collection of the patients T cells, known as leukapheresis; they are then sent to a manufacturing facility where they go through transduction.2 Transduction allows the expression of receptors on the T cell, which in turn target antigens on malignant cells. The cells are then rigorously checked for quality and purity. The engineering process for autologous CAR T cells can take from 1 to 3 weeks before they are ready to be shipped back to the treatment facility for infusion. The biggest challenge with autologous therapy is time, Baer said. Our patients are quite sick and may not have the time needed to prepare the treatment cells.

Allogeneic CAR T cells undergo an engineering process like that of autologous therapy. However, because donor cells are used rather than the patients cells, allogeneic treatments can be prepared ahead of time and quickly made available. Of primary concern to nurses administering donor cell therapy is monitoring patients for graft-vs-host disease, which is not an issue with autologous therapy.

Although these off-the-shelf donor CAR T cells are ready for quick shipment, which is an advantage, patients receiving allogeneic therapy may have significant travel times if they live outside major metropolitan areas where clinical trials are offered. Baer is anxiously awaiting FDA approval for allogeneic CAR T-cell therapy as clinical trials move into phase 2. Approval would provide greater accessibility and benefit many more patients, she stated. Travel concerns and limited access also add to health disparity, which is always concerning.

Price is another discrepancy between autologous and allogeneic CAR T cells. Autologous treatment is very expensive, whereas the pharmaceutical company covers the cost of allogeneic cells used in clinical trials, Baer noted.

Treatment efficacy for both autologous and allogeneic therapy has been described as dramatic, with high rates of complete remission. Baer and Garvin concur, each having witnessed similar results in their respective clinical settings. Both are hopeful CAR T-cell therapies will expand to include solid tumors and other cancers.

Baer and Garvin would like to see these therapies move into a frontline treatment option. It would be great if we could also predict which patients will get cytokine release syndrome and other toxicities and intervene quicker, Garvin added.

CAR T-cell therapy has opened an exciting new door in how we treat cancer, the experts concluded. It continues to signify a big step forward in the fight against this disease.

REFERENCES

1. Muthineni S, Zink K, Kambhampati S. A primer on chimera associated receptor T-cells. Mo Med. 2021;118(5):460-465.

2. Baer B. CAR T-cell therapy: updates in nursing management. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2021;25(3):255-258. doi:10.1188/21.CJON.255-258

Visit link:
The Future of CAR T-Cell Therapy: Will Off-the-Shelf Options Soon Enter the Playing Field? - http://www.oncnursingnews.com/

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on The Future of CAR T-Cell Therapy: Will Off-the-Shelf Options Soon Enter the Playing Field? – www.oncnursingnews.com/

NKGen Biotech to Participate in Truist Securities Cell Therapy Symposium – Yahoo Finance

Posted: June 22, 2022 at 1:55 am

NKGen Biotech, Inc.

SANTA ANA, Calif., June 21, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- NKGen Biotech, a biotechnology company harnessing the power of the bodys immune system through the development of Natural Killer (NK) cell therapies, today announced that senior management will be hosting one-on-one meetings at the Truist Securities Cell Therapy Symposium - symposia-cel being held in person in New York City on Tuesday, June 28, 2022. Details on the symposium can be found below.

Truist Securities Cell Therapy Symposium - symposia-cel (in person)Format: Symposium and 1 x 1 meetingsDate: Tuesday, June 28, 2022Meeting Times: 12:30 pm 5:00 pm EDTLocation: New York, NYRegistration: Event website

If you are interested in arranging a 1 x1 meeting with NKGen Biotech, please contact your Truist representative.

About NKGen Biotech

NKGen Biotech, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative autologous, allogeneic, and CAR-NK Natural Killer (NK) cell therapeutics. Leveraging our proprietary cell expansion and activation technology and cutting-edge cell manufacturing expertise, we have the ability to infinitely expand natural killer cells while significantly enhancing cytotoxicity across our peripheral blood-derived products. NKGen Biotechs lead product candidate, SNK01, is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of advanced refractory solid tumors both as a monotherapy and in combination with other agents, including checkpoint inhibitors and cell engagers. NKGen Biotech is committed to the vision of executing on our clinical strategies with the goal of commercializing our NK cell therapies to help save and sustain patients lives worldwide. The company and its commercially licensed cGMP facility are headquartered in Santa Ana, California, USA. For more information, please visit http://www.nkgenbiotech.com.

Contact:Denise Chua, MBA, CLS, MT (ASCP)Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications949-396-6830dchua@nkgenbiotech.com

Read more:
NKGen Biotech to Participate in Truist Securities Cell Therapy Symposium - Yahoo Finance

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on NKGen Biotech to Participate in Truist Securities Cell Therapy Symposium – Yahoo Finance

A Phase I Study of HER2-Directed CAR T-Cell Therapy for People with Recurrent or Persistent Ependymoma – On Cancer – Memorial Sloan Kettering

Posted: June 22, 2022 at 1:55 am

Full TitlePhase 1 Trial of Autologous HER2-specific CAR T cells in Pediatric Patients with Refractory or Recurrent Ependymoma (PBTC-059) (CIRB)Purpose

CAR T-cell therapy is a type of immunotherapy. With CAR T-cell therapy, white blood cells called T cells are removed from the patient, altered in the laboratory to recognize a protein on the patients cancer cells, multiplied to larger numbers, and returned to the patient to find and destroy cancer cells. The treatment is made from the modified T cells.

In this study, researchers are evaluating a CAR T-cell therapy directed toward a protein on cancer cells called HER2. They are assessing this treatment in children, adolescents, and young adults with a brain tumor called an ependymoma that has come back or continued to grow despite prior treatment.

Before patients receive the CAR T cells, they will have conditioning chemotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy to suppress the immune system and help prepare the body for receiving the CAR T cells. The treatments in this study are given intravenously (by vein).

To be eligible for this study, patients must meet several requirements, including:

For more information about this study and to inquire about eligibility, please contact 1-833-MSK-KIDS.

See the original post:
A Phase I Study of HER2-Directed CAR T-Cell Therapy for People with Recurrent or Persistent Ependymoma - On Cancer - Memorial Sloan Kettering

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on A Phase I Study of HER2-Directed CAR T-Cell Therapy for People with Recurrent or Persistent Ependymoma – On Cancer – Memorial Sloan Kettering

Cell therapies: An introduction – Lexology

Posted: June 22, 2022 at 1:55 am

Major advances in cell therapies have been achieved since the first successful cell therapy was conducted in 1956 in the treatment of leukaemia, and they are now a regular, although highly specialised, treatment for a select few conditions. With the emergence of new cell therapy techniques in recent years, increasingly researchers have focused on the identification of new therapeutic targets to broaden the possible use of cell therapies.

First published in our Biotech Review of the year issue 9.

What are cell therapies?

In the simplest of terms, one can think of cell therapies as living medicines. Traditional medicines work by directing and inducing a patients own cells, whereas cell therapy uses live cells that are injected or grafted into a patient where the cells work locally or systemically to restore the function of tissues or organs. Cell therapies can be used where a patients cells are compromised, or insufficient in numbers, and may bring significant improvement to a patients life or even be curative, depending on the condition being treated. Cell therapies can therefore be life-changing, but as a specialised treatment, every step of their development and use is expensive. However, because cell therapies are often used as a last resort in select patient populations after all other treatments have failed or where none are available to begin with, the cost-benefit ratio may be favourable.

How do cell therapies work?

The basic concept of cell therapies is to take healthy cells and implant them into a patient to cure or alleviate symptoms of a disease. In principle this is simple, however, getting to a stage of having suitable cells in sufficient amounts and of sufficient quality is extremely challenging. It may help to think about what the point of the therapy is: to make the transplanted cells do something that cures (or treats) an illness or condition. Cell therapies are powerful tools, but there are also significant risks. Cells used in cell therapies have the potential to transform into malignant cells, migrate to sites outside of the target area or tissue and can generate unwanted immunogenicity. Unsurprisingly, the mitigation of such risks is a core element in the applicable regulatory environment.

Sources of cells for cell therapies

There are two sources of cells for cell therapy; autologous and allogeneic cells. Autologous cells are harvested from a patient, stored, and treated before being re-implanted into the same patient, whereas allogeneic cells are harvested from a healthy donor before processing and implantation into a patient. A third form of cell therapy, xenogeneic, is possible where the cells to be grafted come from a different animal species. Currently, xenografts are limited to research settings in which human cells are transplanted into other species, but with the hope that, if problems such as rejection and endogenous retroviruses can be overcome, this methodology can be reversed and animal cells be used safely and effectively in the treatment of humans.

One of the benefits of autologous cell therapies is that the immunogenic response is minimal as the patient is being administered their own cells. This form of therapy is therefore particularly suitable for immunocompromised patients. However, unless the cells can be procured and re-implanted within the same surgical procedure, autologous therapy is by no means straightforward, because the therapy must be customised for each patient. The cells must be collected, processed to achieve the desired population, and then re-implanted. Following harvest, the cells may require weeks of isolation in culture and expansion before there are enough that are suitable for treatment, with each step between procurement and implantation conducted under strict quality and safety conditions.

This is time-consuming and there is no guarantee that a sufficient amount of cell product will be produced, nor that it will be available in time to treat a patient with an aggressive form of disease. Another drawback of autologous cell therapies arises from the fact that they are personalised for each patient so that the time and cost cannot be shared between patients by scaling the operation. Traditional quality and effectiveness testing is always applicable, but the relevant question is whether they make sense for all personalised cell therapy medicinal products. Despite this, there have been major advances in autologous therapies in the last few years, most excitingly CAR-T therapy, the first approved genetically modified cell therapy.

In contrast to autologous therapies, allogeneic cell therapies use cells harvested from a healthy donor, after which the cells are cultured and scaled to produce large amounts of cells over time. This can result in an off-the-shelf product that can be used for multiple patients. The drawback of using cells that are not the patients own is that a patient who receives allogeneic cells will need to undergo immunosuppressive therapy to prevent serious immunological complications such as graft versus host disease. Some of the benefits associated with the use of allogeneic cell therapies are the immediate availability of cultured cells and the availability of having multiple donors on file to match patients as well as possible. If allogeneic cell therapies can be sufficiently refined to be effective, and their manufacturing scaled appropriately, there might be a shift from using autologous to allogeneic cells in therapies. Although scaling may be done in theory and large batches of cells cultured, new issues arise such as the functional heterogeneity inherent in cells which introduces variability between batches of cells, and which will likely affect functional responses in patients.

Manufacturing

The manufacturing process for cell therapies is complex and highly specialised. Cell cultures are temperamental and can currently only be produced manually and in small batches, although there are attempts to automate the production. There is also a major manufacturing bottleneck around talent: a shortage of people qualified in cell therapies at all levels, from technical staff manufacturing the cells to scientists and clinicians. Another issue is around the facilities for the production of cells which are highly regulated environments to ensure microbiological purity of the cell-drug product.

This brings logistical issues. As an example, for patients in the EU who are to receive Novartiss therapy Kymriah, the process involves harvesting autologous cells from patients in the EU, flying them to the USA for transformation into treatment cell therapy product, and then flying them back to be re-infused to patients as treatment. Due to the specialised facilities required, manufacture of cells is only done in a select few places. Manufacturers have been trying to address some of the bottlenecks. As an example, Novartis recently invested $90 million in a cell and gene therapy factory in Switzerland to establish an EU facility.

As with most areas of life, COVID-19 also touched upon cell therapies. The viral vectors used in their production are also used in vaccine production, as is explored elsewhere in this years Biotech Review. Viral vector manufacturing is already at capacity, and demand is unlikely to decrease in the next few years. There is therefore an urgent need to implement scaling of viral vector production to increase their yield as soon as possible to enable increased cell culture manufacturing capacity.

The regulatory environment of cell therapies

The regulatory landscape for cell therapies varies from country to country, which in and of itself is problematic for the development of therapies, standards, and clinical trialsIn the EU, cell therapies the manufacture of which involve substantial manipulation are regulated as Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) for purposes of medicines law. There are three types of ATMPs: gene therapy medicinal products, somatic cell therapy medicinal products and tissue-engineered products. In addition to needing to meet the donation, procurement and testing requirements of the EUs blood cell and tissue regulations,they are also regulated by the ATMP Regulation. Before being brought to market, all medicines (including cell therapies) must be authorised by the relevant regulator: getting a marketing authorisation is demanding, especially when it comes to ATMPs. In the UK the licensing authority is the MHRA; in the EU, applications are addressed centrally, to the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Are cell therapies correctly classified as ATMPs?

The problem is that although the ATMP Regulation accommodates cellular and genetic medicinal products within the European medicines regime, they do not quite fit a framework designed around mass-market pharmaceutical products. For example, when the Regulation was proposed in the early 2000s, embryo-derived cell products and other allogeneic products were expected to dominate. Things have, however, turned out quite differently. Most therapies are not derived from embryonic cells, and the vast majority of them are based on the patients own cells.

The awkwardness of the ATMP Regulation becomes apparent as soon as one thinks of autologous cell therapies: products designed and manufactured solely for one person. As the ATMP Regulation is intended to govern products placed on the market, can it truly be said that a product like cell therapy intended for one person is truly placed on a market? Despite this, autologous therapies do get authorised, but is the process fit for purpose? With the development of more accessible cell therapies, there seems to be a gradual acceptance that the current framework needs to be reconsidered. After MEPs approved, in November 2021, a new EU medicines strategy which expressly refers to the position of new and innovative medicines, we anticipate that the European Commission will publish proposals in due course. Whether these address such issues remains to be seen. There are no plans for Great Britain.

The EUs blood cell and tissue regulationsalready address quality and safety frameworks for cells, so is it legitimate to argue that the autologous cell therapy market would be better regulated as a service than based on a framework for mass-market products? Some of the fundamental questions asked during market authorisation preparation for mainstream small molecule medicines are questions such as, what is the mechanism of action? and what is the dose? But questions such as these do not fit products like cell therapies where the mechanism of action is the cells themselves. The European Commission is undertaking a review of the blood cell and tissue regulations, although as above, there are no plans for Great Britain.

Trends in the coming years

With the scientific advances made in recent years, we are likely to see increased use of personalised medicine and cell therapies in the coming years. There are currently over 1,300 active cell therapy clinical trials globally, with the majority of trials being CAR-T cell therapies. Although increased use and development of these therapies will require manufacturers to address the manufacturing bottlenecks to meet growing demand, one can be positive about future developments. In parallel, regulatory authorities will need to address the inappropriate classification of cell therapies to enable their use. As therapies for more conditions become available, the cost of therapies and how health systems cover them (or not) will likely be a heated subject.

More here:
Cell therapies: An introduction - Lexology

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Cell therapies: An introduction – Lexology

New Korus Technology Set to Transform Industry Standards in Elutriation and Cell Wash – PR Newswire UK

Posted: June 22, 2022 at 1:55 am

Innovation in cell processing is much needed to improve process development and GMP manufacturing performance and ensure a high enough yield for a viable therapy. Developers can now speed up clinical development, efficiently scale-out and be poised to be first to market with Invetech's new Korus system.

"To fast-track the commercialization of cell and gene therapies, our industry needs efficient and scalable manufacturing technologies that can deliver high quality therapies cost-effectively," says Andreas Knaack, Invetech's President. "Invetech's new technology offering, as demonstrated by our new Korus system, represents our continued commitment to helping make life-saving therapies accessible to more patients."

Invetech's Korus system uses a gentle elutriation process to provide a cleaner cell population for cell therapy production. Study results show a transformative change to processing starting materials compared to current industry standards that will set manufacturers up for downstream success.

Compared to standard washing protocols, the Korus can resulti in:

- 31% purer lymphocyte population- 49% improvement in T cell recovery after selection- 70% more T cells during expansion- 2.5X improvement in manufacturing yield

Integrating Korus technology into a cell therapy manufacturing process can lead to better downstream performance including significantly higher target cell recovery during selection and significantly higher cell growth during expansion. The 2.5X improvement in manufacturing yield means that cell therapy developers can expect to more consistently grow enough cells for a viable final cell therapy product.

During testing in the above internal study, similar lymphocyte recovery performance was seen in both Korus and CS5+ (wash) control armsdespite the increase in purity in the Korus arm due to elutriation. Relative Korus T cell selection recovery and fold expansion were considerably higher leading to over 70% more cells cultured in the Korus arm.

Jon Ellis, who leads Invetech's Cell Therapy Science & Application team explains the results of Korus's testing program. "Manufacturing efficiency of cell therapies needs improvement and innovation if the cell therapy industry is going to reach its commercialization goals. Our data shows that whilst achieving similar apheresis lymphocyte cell recovery to the control wash process, Korus eluted lymphocytes to high purity which resulted in improvements in downstream performance including greater Dynabead cell selection recovery and fold expansion."

"Overall, this innovation in cell processing will reduce the impact of starting material variability, contribute to higher manufacturing yield and reduced risk of batch failure; and potentially reduce the cost of goods for future therapies."

The Korus system is for research, laboratory or further manufacturing use only. It is not intended as a medical device in therapeutic or diagnostic procedures. Customers are responsible for validating the use of Korus within their process or therapy.

About Invetech

Invetechhelps cell and gene therapy developers to visualize, strategize and manage the future. Throughready-to-run systems, custom solutions and full-spectrum services, we swiftly accelerate vital, emerging therapies from the clinic to commercial-scale manufacturing. Together with our partners, we expand the reach of next-generation medical advances that are revolutionizing healthcare.

Further Press Information

Paul Dal PozzoSenior Product ManagerInvetechPaul.DalPozzo@invetechgroup.com+ 1 720 822 3709

Eeva RoutioMarketing Manager, Brand and Thought LeadershipInvetecheeva.routio@invetechgroup.com+ 1 858 688 7136

Related Links: invetechgroup.com/korus

i The full comparison study can be accessed here.

Photo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1844038/Korus_Invetech_Counterflow_Centrifugation_System.jpg

Logo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1844039/Korus_Invetech_Logo.jpg

SOURCE Invetech

Read this article:
New Korus Technology Set to Transform Industry Standards in Elutriation and Cell Wash - PR Newswire UK

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on New Korus Technology Set to Transform Industry Standards in Elutriation and Cell Wash – PR Newswire UK

EMA validates application for CAR-T cell therapy Breyanzi from BMS – The Pharma Letter

Posted: June 22, 2022 at 1:55 am

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has validated the type II variation application for extension of the indication for Breyanzi (lisocabtagene maraleucel) to treat adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), high grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and follicular lymphoma grade 3B (FL3B), who are refractory or have relapsed within 12 months of initial therapy and are candidates for hematopoietic

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user pleaselogin. If your trial has come to an end, you cansubscribe here.

Try before you buy

All the news that moves the needle in pharma and biotech. Exclusive features, podcasts, interviews, data analyses and commentary from our global network of life sciences reporters. Receive The Pharma Letter daily news bulletin, free forever.

Become a subscriber

Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech. Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results. Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech. Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news. Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription.

Excerpt from:
EMA validates application for CAR-T cell therapy Breyanzi from BMS - The Pharma Letter

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on EMA validates application for CAR-T cell therapy Breyanzi from BMS – The Pharma Letter

Page 383«..1020..382383384385..390400..»