Page 422«..1020..421422423424..430440..»

Google Reverses Ban on Ads for All Stem Cell Therapies, Will Allow FDA-Approved Ones – Gizmodo Australia

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 2:54 am

Google announced Monday it will allow ads for stem cell treatments approved by the Food and Drug Administration to appear in search results starting in July. The tech giant previously banned any ads for stem cell therapies, FDA-approved or otherwise.

In an update to its policies page first spotted by Gizmodo, the company said that, starting July 11, it will permit search engine ads for stem cell therapies given the thumbs up from the FDA, a very small list of just 23 companies that treat some blood disorders and cancers, according to the FDAs website.

At the same time, Google is clarifying its policy language on stem cell therapy ads, which would allow a global cell or gene therapy company to advertise if the ads are are exclusively educational or informational in nature, regardless of regulatory approval status. Google did not clarify what would constitute educational or informational, nor did the company respond to a request for comment how it will restrict less-than-reputable products from being advertised with its technology going forward. We will update the story if we hear more.

The search engine said it banned all advertising for stem cell treatments back in 2019, proclaiming at the time it was restricting ads that have no established biomedical or scientific basis. In 2021, the company clarified that it was restricting ads for experimental treatments meant for so-called biohacking or other DIY genetic engineering, as well as any cell or gene therapies like stem cell therapy.

Despite the pledge to ban such ads or Mondays announced change, a simple Google search reveals just how easily bad actors can get around the restrictions. Searching for stem cells for neuropathy reveals several misleading ad results for stem cell treatments that are not FDA approved, though at least one maker claims it is FDA registered and another says its treatment is supported by FDA master files.

Paul Knoepfler, a professor at the University of California Davis School of Medicine who researches stem cells and cancer, has written before about Googles problematic search engine ad policies that allow stem cell companies to easily advertise their products in spite of the tech giants rules. In an email, he told Gizmodo he is concerned How effectively the new rule for strictly educational ads would be maintained, particularly given the context of Google Search now so often highly ranking promotional clinic websites arguably presented as educational material.

Stem cells as an industry have grown rapidly in recent years and are expected to continue doing so, with MarketWatch reporting in February the $US2.75 ($4) billion industry is expected to more than double to $US5.72 ($8) billion by 2028.

Stem cell treatments are approved by the FDAs Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee. Though some companies claim in advertising they have FDA approval, being listed on clinicaltrials.gov database or being registered with the FDA isnt full-on approval, according to the agencys guidelines. The fact that companies regularly run around Googles existing policies leaves even more questions on the table. Knoepfler asked whether clinical trial recruitment be allowed, when hes often seen such trials already claiming their treatment already works.

Perhaps good citizens in the regenerative medicine world want the opportunity to run such ads related to clinical trial recruitment, but even exclusively educational ads of that type with good intentions could run into ethical issues, Knoepfler added.

Shoshana Wodinsky contributed reporting.

Here is the original post:
Google Reverses Ban on Ads for All Stem Cell Therapies, Will Allow FDA-Approved Ones - Gizmodo Australia

Posted in California Stem Cells | Comments Off on Google Reverses Ban on Ads for All Stem Cell Therapies, Will Allow FDA-Approved Ones – Gizmodo Australia

Head-To-Head Survey: Jasper Therapeutics (NASDAQ:JSPR) & CytRx (OTCMKTS:CYTR) – Defense World

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 2:54 am

Jasper Therapeutics (NASDAQ:JSPR Get Rating) and CytRx (OTCMKTS:CYTR Get Rating) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Jasper Therapeutics and CytRxs top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

63.0% of Jasper Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of CytRx shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.8% of CytRx shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Jasper Therapeutics and CytRxs net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Jasper Therapeutics has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CytRx has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its share price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Jasper Therapeutics and CytRx, as reported by MarketBeat.

Jasper Therapeutics currently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 415.46%. Given Jasper Therapeutics higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Jasper Therapeutics is more favorable than CytRx.

About Jasper Therapeutics (Get Rating)

Jasper Therapeutics, Inc., a clinical-stage biotechnology company, develops therapeutic agents for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and gene therapies. It focuses on the development and commercialization of conditioning agents and stem cell engineering to allow expanded use of stem cell transplantation and ex vivo gene therapy, a technique in which genetic manipulation of cells is performed outside the body prior to transplantation. The company's lead product candidate is JSP191, which is in clinical development as a conditioning antibody that clears hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow in patients prior to undergoing allogeneic stem cell therapy or stem cell gene therapy. It is also developing engineered hematopoietic stem cells product candidates to overcome key limitations of allogeneic and autologous gene-edited stem cell grafts. The company is based in Redwood City, California.

About CytRx (Get Rating)

CytRx Corporation, a biopharmaceutical research and development company, focuses on oncology and rare diseases. It engages in the discovery, research, and clinical development of novel anti-cancer drug candidates that employ novel linker technologies to enhance the accumulation and release of cytotoxic anti-cancer agents at the tumor. The company's lead candidates include linker activated drug release (LADR) -7, LADR-8, LADR-9, and LADR-10; and Aldoxorubicin, a conjugate of prescribed cytotoxin agent doxorubicin that binds to circulating albumin in the bloodstream and to concentrate the drug at the site of the tumor. It also provides ACDx, an albumin companion diagnostic product to identify patients with cancer who are most likely to benefit from treatment with these drug candidates. CytRx Corporation was incorporated in 1985 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.

Receive News & Ratings for Jasper Therapeutics Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Jasper Therapeutics and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Read this article:
Head-To-Head Survey: Jasper Therapeutics (NASDAQ:JSPR) & CytRx (OTCMKTS:CYTR) - Defense World

Posted in California Stem Cells | Comments Off on Head-To-Head Survey: Jasper Therapeutics (NASDAQ:JSPR) & CytRx (OTCMKTS:CYTR) – Defense World

Primary Cell Culture Market Mechanical Separation Segment Is Expected To Witness A Lucrative CAGR Of 11.7% Till 2028, Owing To Advancements In…

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 2:54 am

According to a new report published by Grand View Research, the market growth can be primarily attributed to the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions, such as cancer, infections, autoimmune diseases, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and nephrological diseases. This has led to an increase in research, facilitating the high adoption of primary cell cultures.

Primary Cell Culture Industry Overview

The global primary cell culture market size was valued at USD 3.4 billion in 2020 and is expected to reach USD 8.0 billion by 2028, projecting to expand at a CAGR of 11.6% during forecast period.

The market growth can be primarily attributed to the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions, such as cancer, infections, autoimmune diseases, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and nephrological diseases. This has led to an increase in research, facilitating the high adoption of primary cell cultures.

Gather more insights about the market drivers, restrains and growth of the Global Primary Cell Culture Market

According to the American Cancer Society, there are an estimated 16.9 million cancer patients/survivors in 2020. According to the WHO (2020), 71.0 million people worldwide are suffering from chronic hepatitis C infection. Hence, the rising number of chronic disorders being diagnosed is driving the demand for research on advanced therapies, which is expected to boost the market growth in the coming years.

In addition, the rising usage of primary cell cultures for in-vitro testing and drug screening can be further attributed to the growth of the market for primary cell culture. These are derived from tissues, which facilitates researchers to study cellular structure in the in vivo state, showcasing their normal functioning. As a result, they are used as model systems to study cell biochemistry and physiology, aging processes, signaling studies, and metabolic processes, as well as the effect of toxic compounds and drugs.

COVID-19 pandemic is acting as a positive catalyst for the growth of the market for primary cell culture. Researchers are increasingly using primary cell culture for understanding the infection. Standardized and characterized epithelium cell culture models are facilitating the understanding of the physical barrier destroyed by the coronavirus. These models can help mimic the functions and properties of the respiratory tract, leading to a breakthrough for a research outcome turning into a medical application.

Moreover, the primary immune cell culture has been proven to be very beneficial in the study of immune repertoire to produce antibodies and antigens for the COVID-19 virus. As per the findings by the scientists from the German Primate Center in Gottingen, the COVID-19 virus could block the infection in lung cells with TMPRSS2, an inhibitor for serine protease. The results have been validated with the experiment using primary cell culture.

Primary Cell Culture Market Segmentation

Based On the Product Insights, the market is segmented into primary cells, reagents and supplements and media

Based On the Separation Methods Insights, the market is segmented into explant method, enzymatic degradation, mechanical separation and others

Based On the Cell Type Insights, the market is segmented into animal and human.

Based on the Application Insights, the market is segmented into tissue culture & tissue engineering, vaccine production, gene therapy and regenerative medicine, toxicity testing and drug screening, cancer research, model system, virology, prenatal diagnosis, stem cell therapy and others.

Based on the Regional Insights, the market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa

Browse through Grand View ResearchsBiotechnology IndustryResearch Reports.

Market Share Insights:

Key Companies Profile:

The companies are launching new and advanced products for primary cell culture. The new Gibco CTS OpTmizer Pro SFM helps in enhancing donor T (lymphocyte) cell proliferation. It is a new media solution for targeting the metabolism of healthy donors, for the efficient production of cost-effective cell therapies.

Some of the prominent players in the primary cell culture market include:

Order a free sample PDF of the Primary Cell Culture Market Intelligence Study, published by Grand View Research.

About Grand View Research

Grand View Research is a full-time market research and consulting company registered in San Francisco, California. The company fully offers market reports, both customized and syndicates, based on intense data analysis. It also offers consulting services to business communities and academic institutions and helps them understand the global and business scenario to a significant extent. The company operates across multitude of domains such as Chemicals, Materials, Food and Beverages, Consumer Goods, Healthcare, and Information Technology to offer consulting services.

Web: https://www.grandviewresearch.com

Media ContactCompany Name: Grand View Research, Inc.Contact Person: Sherry James, Corporate Sales Specialist U.S.A.Email: Send EmailPhone: 1888202951Address:Grand View Research, Inc. 201 Spear Street 1100 San Francisco, CA 94105, United StatesCity: San FranciscoState: CaliforniaCountry: United StatesWebsite: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/primary-cell-culture-market

Read the original post:
Primary Cell Culture Market Mechanical Separation Segment Is Expected To Witness A Lucrative CAGR Of 11.7% Till 2028, Owing To Advancements In...

Posted in California Stem Cells | Comments Off on Primary Cell Culture Market Mechanical Separation Segment Is Expected To Witness A Lucrative CAGR Of 11.7% Till 2028, Owing To Advancements In…

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Market to Witness Growth Acceleration | Celprogen Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Queen Anne and Mangolia News – Queen…

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 2:50 am

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Market research report is the new statistical data source added by Research Cognizance.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Market is growing at a High CAGR during the forecast period 2022-2029. The increasing interest of the individuals in this industry is that the major reason for the expansion of this market.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Market research is an intelligence report with meticulous efforts undertaken to study the right and valuable information. The data which has been looked upon is done considering both, the existing top players and the upcoming competitors. Business strategies of the key players and the new entering market industries are studied in detail. Well explained SWOT analysis, revenue share, and contact information are shared in this report analysis.

Get the PDF Sample Copy (Including FULL TOC, Graphs, and Tables) of this report @:

https://researchcognizance.com/sample-report

Top Key Players Profiled in this report are:

Celprogen Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Lonza AG, Cell Applications, Inc., Smith+Nephew, Axol Biosciences Ltd., Cyagen Biosciences Inc., Merck KGaA, Cytori Therapeutics Inc, STEMCELL Technologies Inc

The key questions answered in this report:

Various factors are responsible for the markets growth trajectory, which are studied at length in the report. In addition, the report lists down the restraints that are posing threat to the global Mesenchymal Stem Cells market. It also gauges the bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, threat from new entrants and product substitute, and the degree of competition prevailing in the market. The influence of the latest government guidelines is also analyzed in detail in the report. It studies the Mesenchymal Stem Cells markets trajectory between forecast periods.

Get up to 30% Discount on this Premium Report @:

https://researchcognizance.com/discount

Regions Covered in the Global Mesenchymal Stem Cells Market Report 2022: The Middle East and Africa (GCC Countries and Egypt) North America (the United States, Mexico, and Canada) South America (Brazil etc.) Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.) Asia-Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia)

The cost analysis of the Global Mesenchymal Stem Cells Market has been performed while keeping in view manufacturing expenses, labor cost, and raw materials and their market concentration rate, suppliers, and price trend. Other factors such as Supply chain, downstream buyers, and sourcing strategy have been assessed to provide a complete and in-depth view of the market. Buyers of the report will also be exposed to a study on market positioning with factors such as target client, brand strategy, and price strategy taken into consideration.

The report provides insights on the following pointers:

Market Penetration: Comprehensive information on the product portfolios of the top players in the Mesenchymal Stem Cells market.

Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on the upcoming technologies, R&D activities, and product launches in the market.

Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of the market strategies, geographic and business segments of the leading players in the market.

Market Development: Comprehensive information about emerging markets. This report analyzes the market for various segments across geographies.

Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the Mesenchymal Stem Cells market.

Buy Exclusive Report @:

https://researchcognizance.com/checkout

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

About Us:

Research Cognizance is an India-based market research Company, registered in Pune. Research Cognizance aims to provide meticulously researched insights into the market. We offer high-quality consulting services to our clients and help them understand prevailing market opportunities. Our database presents ample statistics and thoroughly analyzed explanations at an affordable price.

Contact Us:

Neil Thomas

116 West 23rd Street 4th Floor New York City, New York 10011

sales@researchcognizance.com

+1 7187154714

Read more here:
Mesenchymal Stem Cells Market to Witness Growth Acceleration | Celprogen Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Queen Anne and Mangolia News - Queen...

Posted in New York Stem Cells | Comments Off on Mesenchymal Stem Cells Market to Witness Growth Acceleration | Celprogen Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Queen Anne and Mangolia News – Queen…

A Medical History of Transplant Surgery Thats Not for the Squeamish – The New York Times

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 2:50 am

SPARE PARTSThe Story of Medicine Through the History of Transplant SurgeryBy Paul Craddock

Paul Craddocks Spare Parts: The Story of Medicine Through the History of Transplant Surgery opens midoperation, as a donor organ (this lifeless gray mass, as Craddock describes it) is sewn into place. Clamps released, the new kidney comes alive, or appears to. Before my eyes, the surgeon removed these devices and in a matter of seconds the kidney turned from gray to pink, then almost red, Craddock writes. It seemed as if life itself had cascaded from one mans body into anothers. The operation is described as state of the art, yet Craddock, a senior research associate in the division of surgery and interventional sciences at the University College of Londons medical school, sets out to show the ancient roots of transplantation. Transplant surgery is far from an exclusively modern phenomenon, he writes, with a surprisingly long and rich history that stretches back as far as the pyramids.

And so we are off, on a thrilling and often terrifying ride through transplantation and the theories and techniques that made it possible. It begins in Renaissance Italy, where the push for rhinoplasty came not from kings but from the general populace, who had perfected skin grafts long before the European medical profession such as it was. (The Sushruta Samhita, a 500 B.C. Sanskrit text that Craddock cites, described skin grafts, among hundreds of other surgeries.) Craddocks tantalizing opening assertion is that late-16th-century specialists were merely catching up with farmers, who had long ago learned a way to graft skin from an arm to a nose, masking nasal bridge collapses caused by syphilis or mutilation from duels, both common. In Italy, skin grafting had evolved as a peasants operation, linked culturally and technically to the farmers procedure of plant grafting.

The book is arranged chronologically by procedure: from that 16th-century skin grafting to 17th-century blood transfusions to 18th-century tooth transplants. It skips lightly over the 1800s (and the development of germ theory, anesthesia and nursing) and winds up with 20th-century kidney and heart transplants. Craddock explains the scientific theories underlying each new technique and then he highlights a star, or several. In addition to nose repair, Leonardo Fioravanti claimed to have cured leprosy and discovered the antiseptic attributes of aquavit and urine; in 16th-century Bologna, he urinated on patients (literally) while metaphorically urinating on a medical establishment he saw as devoted to moribund classical texts. As Craddock puts it, Fioravanti preferred to base his own medical system on the collective, intuitive wisdom of centuries a live tradition with no written component as opposed to a raft of dead, book-learned knowledge.

The reigning such text was by Galen of Pergamon, the first-century Greek philosopher, who was silent on skin grafts (Aristotle related the bodys largest organ to the crust on a polenta) but famously described health in terms of the four humors blood, yellow bile, phlegm and black bile, the flow of which was thought to be affected by mood, personality and the stars. Medicine was a matter of humoral balance, often regulated by bleeding. Galens anatomical descriptions, though still gospel in the 16th century, were hampered by a Roman rule against dissection of humans. When Andreas Vesalius, a Flemish anatomist, published On the Fabric of the Human Body in 1543, based on his own dissection of corpses, it helped to highlight the importance of scientific observation and to reconceive the heart as pumplike. It also stressed the idea that blood was better inside the body than out inspiring a slew of experiments that made life in Paris and London horrible for dogs. The heart was now perceived as a ruler or king, the seat and organ of all passions, prompting questions about dogs (whether a fierce Dog by being often new stocked with the blood of a cowardly Dog, may not be more tame) and then humans. In 1667, French doctors infused a man with calfs blood in part to improve his character. Sheep, docile in the Bible, were a go-to for human transfusion, though a butcher, infused by members of an English scientific society, irritated doctors when he slaughtered and then ate his donor. By 1700, a faint professional decorum, fortified by public ridicule, shut the experiments down.

The generally unsuccessful attempts to transplant teeth, Craddock argues, coincided with a view of the body as a machine, complete with transferable parts complicating the work of philosophers, and enriching that of salespeople. Enter the dentist, offering advice (gargle with urine!) and private tooth transplants to fancy customers put off by public tooth-yankers. The new teeth were eventually supplied by young and poor mouths: As Craddock points out, the dystopian reality of body shopping has a dark precedent in teeth. The search for what animated the human machine also led to theories on nerves and the associated disorders observed to particularly affect the more developed upper classes. The soul was body-bound, a material thing that pulsed through it.

Cut to 1901. Immunology is a new discipline, and the previous blood types dog, cat, sheep, human have evolved into our modern iteration, named by the Viennese researcher Karl Landsteiner. In the same year, Alexis Carrel, a young French surgeon whose mother owned textile factories, studied with Marie-Anne Leroudier, one of Lyons finest embroiderers (and one of very few women featured in Spare Parts). Leroudiers dexterity in handling unfathomable intricate decaying fabrics taught the young surgeon how to stitch together blood vessels, making kidney and heart transplants as well as bypass surgery possible, though her contributions were minimized by Carrel and the bulk of Western scientific history. After being drummed out of Europe, Carrel, whose experiments make Dr. Frankenstein look like a genial Marcus Welby, landed in 1930s New York, where his passion for eugenics earned him the friendship of Charles Lindberg. Together, they would invent a perfusion device to keep an organ viable outside the body all in the pursuit of weeding the weak from society. Carrels book, Man, the Unknown, was a U.S. best seller in 1936; the German edition praised the Nazis eugenics work.

The first heart transplant surgeons were less health- than prize-oriented. As one doctor put it: Virtually all the patients subject to the procedure died, having satisfied the macho aspirations of their surgeons. Meanwhile, any technical successes had more to do with medicines deeper communal understanding of immunology how to address organ rejection than with surgical breakthroughs.

Craddocks conclusion is meant to feel hopeful: According to colleagues at U.C.L. in London, printing an entire replacement body part might only be a decade away. But it doesnt reassure so much as concern a reader, especially given the case of Paolo Macchiarini, the U.C.L.-affiliated celebrity surgeon (unmentioned by Craddock) widely lauded for performing the worlds first synthetic trachea transplants using stem cells but currently on trial in Sweden for aggravated assault against his patients. In fact, what inspires most hope is what ends up seeming like the accidental subtext of Spare Parts. It relates to the way Renaissance Italian farmers saw themselves in trees: distinctly individual trees that, as Craddock notes, science has only recently become aware are in communication with one another, not to mention us. If we look more carefully at the forest, the past indicates, we just might repair ourselves through the trees.

Read the original post:
A Medical History of Transplant Surgery Thats Not for the Squeamish - The New York Times

Posted in New York Stem Cells | Comments Off on A Medical History of Transplant Surgery Thats Not for the Squeamish – The New York Times

CORRECTING and REPLACING Paracrine Announces Appointment of Biotech Veteran David H. Crean, Ph.D. to the Board of Directors – Business Wire

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 2:50 am

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Please replace the release with the following corrected version due to multiple revisions.

The updated release reads:

PARACRINE ANNOUNCES APPOINTMENT OF BIOTECH VETERAN DAVID H. CREAN, PH.D. TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Paracrine, Inc., a privately-held company developing its novel cell therapy platform in late-stage clinical trials in advanced wound care, announced today the appointment of David H. Crean, Ph.D. as an independent Director of the company.

We are delighted to welcome Dr. Crean to the Paracrine Board, said Christopher J. Calhoun, Chairman and CEO of Paracrine. Davids board and advisory experiences in the healthcare and biotechnology fields will provide immense value to Paracrine as we continue to execute our strategy of developing safe, cost-effective cell therapies in the $21 billion wound care market.

I am happy to join Paracrines Board of Directors at this exciting time in the companys development, added David H. Crean, Ph.D. Together with the team, I am looking forward to contributing to Paracrines clinical and commercialization strategy, achieving the companys financing goals and successfully implementing our vision of providing urgently needed innovative therapeutic options in chronic wound care. I am particularly excited with our lead program in treating diabetic foot ulcers, where prior studies have demonstrated Paracrines cell therapy resulted in twice the wound closure rate of non-healing ulcers in half the time.

David is Founder and Managing Partner of Cardiff Advisory LLC, an investment banking firm focused on providing strategic and financial advisory for M&A, partnering and capital financing transactions within the life sciences and healthcare sectors. David is also a Co-Founder and Managing General Partner of Equitos Venture Partners, a life sciences-focused investment firm with a goal to start deploying capital in 2022. In addition, David is an investment partner with Suncoast Venture Partners and Mesa Verde Venture Partners, two micro life science seed stage & incubator venture funds.

Dr. Crean currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors for Phoenix Molecular Designs, Lead Independent Director of Histogen, Inc. (Nasdaq: HSTO) and serves on the Board of Directors of California Life Sciences (Executive Committee), and BIOCOM (Chairman of Capital Development).

David is a contributing writer for PharmaBoardroom.com and Forbes.com. As a result of his trusted and outstanding advisory work, he has been awarded numerous recognitions including San Diegos 500 Most Influential people in 2019 - 2021, 2020 Top Thought Leaders by Axial, M&A Advisor of the Year in 2019, and the 2018 Healthcare Hero Award.

David holds FINRA Series 79 and Series 63 licenses and is a Registered Investment Banking Representative of BA Securities LLC, Member FINRA SIPC. He holds a Doctorate of Philosophy (Ph.D.) Degree in Biophysics and a Masters of Science (MS) Degree in Oncology from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He earned a Bachelor of Science (BS) Degree in Biology/ Pre-Med from Canisius College. Additionally, he holds a Masters of Business Administration (MBA) Degree with a finance concentration from Pepperdine University Graziadio School of Management.

About Paracrine

Paracrine, Inc. is a biotechnology company committed to unlocking the potential of autologous stem cells for patients suffering from serious chronic illnesses by discovering, developing, and delivering innovative and effective human therapeutics. The company is advancing multiple late-stage clinical trials, initially targeting the $21 billion advanced wound care market segment. Paracrines device-enabled cell therapy platform bears the promise of cost-effectively addressing common underlying pathology of debilitating chronic diseases due to its multi-modal mechanisms of action.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This press release includes forward-looking statements regarding events, trends and business prospects, which may affect our future operating results and financial position. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results and financial position to differ materially. Paracrine assumes no responsibility to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this press release to reflect events, trends or circumstances after the date of this press release.

Excerpt from:
CORRECTING and REPLACING Paracrine Announces Appointment of Biotech Veteran David H. Crean, Ph.D. to the Board of Directors - Business Wire

Posted in New York Stem Cells | Comments Off on CORRECTING and REPLACING Paracrine Announces Appointment of Biotech Veteran David H. Crean, Ph.D. to the Board of Directors – Business Wire

William Blair Begins Coverage on Century Therapeutics (NASDAQ:IPSC) – Defense World

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 2:50 am

Equities researchers at William Blair started coverage on shares of Century Therapeutics (NASDAQ:IPSC Get Rating) in a report issued on Thursday, The Fly reports. The brokerage set a market perform rating on the stock.

A number of other research firms have also recently issued reports on IPSC. SVB Leerink reissued a buy rating and issued a $32.00 target price on shares of Century Therapeutics in a research note on Friday, March 18th. Zacks Investment Research raised Century Therapeutics from a sell rating to a hold rating in a research report on Tuesday, May 3rd. Two analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and four have assigned a buy rating to the companys stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the company has a consensus rating of Buy and a consensus target price of $36.00.

NASDAQ:IPSC traded up $0.02 on Thursday, reaching $8.10. The companys stock had a trading volume of 211 shares, compared to its average volume of 110,036. Century Therapeutics has a 1-year low of $7.32 and a 1-year high of $32.90. The company has a quick ratio of 14.57, a current ratio of 14.57 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.03. The businesss 50-day moving average price is $12.10 and its two-hundred day moving average price is $14.49.

A number of large investors have recently modified their holdings of IPSC. Citigroup Inc. acquired a new stake in Century Therapeutics during the third quarter worth approximately $34,000. Royal Bank of Canada acquired a new stake in shares of Century Therapeutics in the 3rd quarter valued at $35,000. New York State Common Retirement Fund acquired a new stake in shares of Century Therapeutics in the 3rd quarter valued at $53,000. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co NY acquired a new stake in shares of Century Therapeutics in the 3rd quarter valued at $94,000. Finally, SG Americas Securities LLC acquired a new stake in shares of Century Therapeutics in the 3rd quarter valued at $134,000. 57.50% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.

About Century Therapeutics (Get Rating)

Century Therapeutics, Inc, a biotechnology company, develops transformative allogeneic cell therapies for the treatment of solid tumor and hematological malignancies. The company's lead product candidate is CNTY-101, an allogeneic, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)-derived chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)-iNK cell therapy targeting CD19 for relapsed, refractory B-cell lymphoma.

Featured Articles

Receive News & Ratings for Century Therapeutics Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Century Therapeutics and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

View original post here:
William Blair Begins Coverage on Century Therapeutics (NASDAQ:IPSC) - Defense World

Posted in New York Stem Cells | Comments Off on William Blair Begins Coverage on Century Therapeutics (NASDAQ:IPSC) – Defense World

JASPER THERAPEUTICS, INC. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (form 10-Q) – Marketscreener.com

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 2:50 am

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial conditionand results of operations together with the condensed consolidated financialstatements and related notes included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q (this "Quarterly Report") and with the audited financial statementsand the related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2021 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon March 18, 2022. Certain of the information contained in this discussion andanalysis or set forth elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, including informationwith respect to plans and strategy for our business, includesforward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result ofmany factors, including those factors set forth in the section entitled "RiskFactors", in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report, our actual results coulddiffer materially from the results described in or implied by theforward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.You should carefully read the section entitled "Risk Factors" to gain anunderstanding of the important factors that could cause actual results to differmaterially from our forward-looking statements. Please also see the section ofthis Quarterly Report entitled "Cautionary Note RegardingForward-Looking Statements." The events and circumstances reflected in ourforward-looking statements may not be achieved or may not occur, and actualresults could differ materially from those described in or implied by theforward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.As a result of these risks, you should not place undue reliance on theseforward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to revise or update anyforward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.OverviewWe are a clinical-stage biotechnology company dedicated to enabling curesthrough hematopoietic stem cell therapy. We are focused on the development andcommercialization of safer and more effective conditioning agents and mRNA-basedstem cell engineering to allow for expanded use of stem cell transplantation andex vivo gene therapy, a technique in which genetic manipulation of cells isperformed outside of the body prior to transplantation. We are also developingnovel therapeutics directed at diseased hematopoietic stem cells.Our drug development pipeline includes multiple product candidates designed toimprove hematopoietic stem cell therapy. Our lead product candidate, JSP191, isin clinical development as a novel conditioning antibody that clearshematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow in patients prior to undergoingallogeneic stem cell therapy or stem cell gene therapy. We plan to initiate aregistrational clinical study in acute myeloid leukemia ("AML") patientsundergoing stem cell transplantation by the end of the first quarter of 2023.Based on the single agent depletion observed in our Phase 1 study ofmyelodysplastic syndrome ("MDS") patients undergoing stem cell transplant, weare also initiating a pilot study of JSP191 as a therapeutic in lower-risk MDS,which we expect to commence in the second half of this year. Beyond JSP191, weare developing stem cell grafts transiently reprogrammed using mRNA that have acompetitive advantage over endogenous hematopoietic stem cells ("HSCs"),enabling higher levels of engraftment designed to remove the need for highlytoxic conditioning of the patient and lower the risk of other seriouscomplications that limit current stem cell transplants. We plan to continue toexpand our pipeline to include other novel stem cell therapies based on immunemodulation, graft engineering and cell or gene therapies. Our goal is to expandthe use of curative stem cell transplant and gene therapies for all patients,including children and the elderly.Stem cell transplantation is among the most widely practiced forms of cellulartherapy and has the potential to cure a wide variety of diseases, includingcancers, genetic disorders, and autoimmune diseases. Yet currently, patientsmust receive highly toxic and potentially life-threatening conditioning agentsto prepare their bone marrow for transplantation with either donor stem cells ortheir own gene-edited stem cells. Younger, fitter patients capable of survivingthese toxic side effects are typically given myeloablative, or high-intensity,conditioning whereas older or less fit patients are typically given reducedintensity, but still toxic, conditioning which leads to less effectivetransplants. These toxicities include a range of acute and chronic effects tothe gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, liver, lung, endocrine, and neurologictissues. Depending upon the conditioning regimen, fitness of the patient, andcompatibility between the donor and recipient, the risk of transplant-relatedmortality ranges from 10% to more than 50% in older patients. Less toxic ways tocondition patients have been developed to enable transplant for older patientsor those with major comorbidities, but these regimens risk less potent diseaseelimination and higher rates of disease relapse. Even though stem cell therapycan be one of the most powerful forms of disease cure, these limitations ofnon-targeted conditioning regimens have seen little innovation over the pastdecade. 20Our lead product candidate, JSP191, is a monoclonal antibody designed to blockthe specific signal on stem cells required for survival. It is currently indevelopment as a highly targeted conditioning agent prior to stem cell therapyas well as a therapeutics in lower-risk MDS patients, which we expect tocommence in the second half of 2022. We are also sponsoring two clinical studiesof JSP191 as a conditioning agent prior to stem cell transplant. The firstclinical study is an open label Phase 1/2 trial in two cohorts of severecombined immunodeficiency ("SCID") patients: patients with a history of a priorallogeneic transplant for SCID but with poor graft outcomes and newly diagnosedSCID patients. The primary endpoint in this study is to evaluate the safety andtolerability of JSP191. The secondary goal of this study is to evaluate theefficacy of JSP191 as a conditioning agent in conjunction with a stem celltransplant. Based on preliminary results from our ongoing Phase 1/2 clinicaltrial, we believe JSP191 has demonstrated the ability as a single agent toenable engraftment of donor HSCs as determined by donor chimerism, or thepercentage of bone marrow cells in the patient that are of donor origin aftertransplant. Engraftment was observed in seven out of ten T-B-NK+ SCID patientswith prior allogeneic transplant, as evidenced by CD15+ donor chimerism of morethan 5% averaged from 12-24 weeks post-transplant. Increased nave donor T cellproduction was observed in the majority of T-B-NK+ subjects, as well as clinicalimprovement. No JSP191 treatment-related serious adverse events ("SAEs") havebeen reported to date and pharmacokinetics have been consistent with earlierstudies in healthy volunteers. We expect to complete enrollment in this Phase1/2 clinical trial by mid-2023.

The FDA has granted rare pediatric disease designation to JSP191 as aconditioning treatment for patients with SCID. In addition, the FDA grantedorphan drug designation to JSP191 for conditioning treatment prior tohematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

We expect our expenses will increase substantially in connection with ourongoing and planned activities, as we:

? advance product candidates through preclinical studies and clinical trials;

? procure the manufacture of supplies for our preclinical studies and clinical

? attract, hire and retain additional personnel;

? operate as a public company;

? implement operational, financial and management systems;

? pursue regulatory approval for any product candidates that successfully

? establish a sales, marketing, and distribution infrastructure to commercialize

any product candidate for which we may obtain marketing approval and related

commercial manufacturing build-out; and

? obtain, maintain, expand, and protect our portfolio of intellectual property

Business Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Stanford License Agreement

Other collaboration and clinical trial agreements

Collaboration with Stanford University

Components of Results of Operations

External research and development costs include:

? costs incurred under agreements with third-party CROs, CMOs and other third

parties that conduct preclinical and clinical activities on our behalf and

manufacture our product candidates;

? costs associated with acquiring technology and intellectual property licenses

that have no alternative future uses;

? consulting fees associated with our research and development activities; and

? other costs associated with our research and development programs, including

Internal research and development costs include:

? employee-related costs, including salaries, benefits and

stock-based compensation expense for our research and development personnel;

? other expenses and allocated overheads incurred in connection with our research

Our future research and development costs may vary significantly based onfactors, such as:

? the scope, rate of progress, expense and results of our discovery and

preclinical development activities;

? the costs and timing of our chemistry, manufacturing and controls activities,

including fulfilling cGMP-related standards and compliance, and identifying and

? per patient clinical trial costs;

? the number of trials required for approval;

? the number of sites included in our clinical trials;

? the countries in which the trials are conducted;

? delays in adding a sufficient number of trial sites and recruiting suitable

patients to participate in our clinical trials;

? the number of patients that participate in the trials;

? the number of doses that patients receive;

? patient drop-out or discontinuation rates;

? the duration of patient participation in the trials and follow up;

? the cost and timing of manufacturing our product candidates;

? the phase of development of our product candidates;

? the efficacy and safety profile of our product candidates;

? the timing, receipt, and terms of any approvals from applicable regulatory

authorities, including the FDA and non-U.S. regulators;

? maintaining a continued acceptable safety profile of our product candidates

following approval, if any, of our product candidates;

? changes in the standard of care on which a clinical development plan was based,

which may require new or additional trials;

? the extent to which we establish additional strategic collaborations or other

? the impact of any business interruptions to our operations or to those of the

Other Income (Expense), Net

Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 and 2021

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three monthsended March 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):

Research and Development Expenses

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for thethree months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):

Our external costs by program for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021were as follows (in thousands):

General and Administrative Expenses

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Future Funding Requirements - Going Concern

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

We have contractual obligations and commitments as described in Note 9,Commitments and Contingencies, within our condensed consolidated financialstatements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.

Our future financing requirements will depend on many factors, including:

? the timing, scope, progress, results and costs of research and development,

preclinical and non-clinical studies and clinical trials for our current and

? the number, scope and duration of clinical trials required for regulatory

approval of our current and future product candidates;

? the outcome, timing and costs of seeking and obtaining regulatory approvals

from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for our product

candidates, including any requirement to conduct additional studies or generate

additional data beyond that which we currently expect would be required to

support a marketing application;

? the costs of manufacturing clinical and commercial supplies of our current and

future product candidates;

? the costs and timing of future commercialization activities, including product

manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution, for any of our product

candidates for which we receive marketing approval;

? any product liability or other lawsuits related to our product candidates;

? the revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of any product candidates

for which we may receive marketing approval;

? our ability to establish a commercially viable pricing structure and obtain

approval for coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party and

? the costs to establish, maintain, expand, enforce and defend the scope of our

intellectual property portfolio, including the amount and timing of any

payments we may be required to make, or that we may receive, in connection with

licensing, preparing, filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing our patents

or other intellectual property rights;

? expenses incurred to attract, hire and retain skilled personnel;

? the costs of operating as a public company; and

? the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which may exacerbate the magnitude of the

10,752

Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $14.2 million and $6.2 million for thethree months ended March 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

See more here:
JASPER THERAPEUTICS, INC. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (form 10-Q) - Marketscreener.com

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on JASPER THERAPEUTICS, INC. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (form 10-Q) – Marketscreener.com

Cell Culture Market to Gain US$ 27.6 Bn by 2031, Burgeoning Demand for Biosimilars and Biologic Therapeutics Fueling Market Growth – BioSpace

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 2:50 am

Albany NY, United States: According to the report, the global cell culture market was valued at US$ 10.5 Bn in 2020 and is projected to expand at a CAGR of 9% from 2021 to 2031. The global cell culture market is driven by development of new products, technological advancements, and increase in use of single-use bioprocessing systems during the forecast period. The cell culture market in Asia Pacific is anticipated to expand at the fastest CAGR during the forecast period due to high unmet clinical needs, improvements in the healthcare infrastructure, and increase in focus on research & development activities.

Rise in Demand and Approvals for Biosimilar Products & Other Biologic Therapeutics to Drive Market

Cell culture is one of the most important steps for the production of biosimilar antibodies, as cell culture helps increase efficiency & productivity and reduce the cost of manufacture. The increase in demand & approvals for biosimilars products and other biologic therapeutics for the treatment of chronic diseases in developed as well as developing countries has led to the demand for efficient and cost-effective products. This is expected to drive the global cell culture market during the forecast period.

Request Brochure of Report https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=405

Moreover, rise in demand for cost-effective and highly efficient cell culture products such as bioreactors, media, reagents, and sera for the production of high-yield cell lines has led to a surge in the number of new product launches. This is likely to provide lucrative opportunities in the global cell culture market during the forecast period. Major manufactures strive to expand their product portfolio by launching new and advanced systems for large-scale production, which is cost-effective and has low risk of contamination.

For instance, in 2018, Merck launched capsule filters that are designed to decrease the risk of contamination in a bioreactor. These filters are used for the separation of mycoplasma and bacteria from cell culture media. However, ethical issues associated with the use of fetal bovine serum, stringent regulations, and high cost of infrastructure for cell culture are projected to hamper the growth of global cell culture market during the forecast period.

Request Sample of Report https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=S&rep_id=405

Technological Advancements in Cell Culture Production Media & Instruments to Drive Demand for Protein-based Therapeutics

In terms of product, the global cell culture market has been classified into instruments, media, sera, and reagents. The instruments segment has been categorized into cell culture vessels (bioreactors), carbon dioxide incubators, biosafety cabinets, cryogenic tanks, and others. Technological advancements for improving the efficiency and reducing the risk of cross contamination are anticipated to propel the instruments segment during the forecast period.

The media segment has been split into chemically defined, classical media, protein free media, Lysogeny media, serum free media, and specialty media. The efficiency of different media used for cell culture production is expected to drive the media segment over the next few years.

The sera segment has been bifurcated into fetal bovine serum and others. Sera are used as cell culture supplements consisting of growth factors, nutrients, and other important trace elements. The reagents segment has been segregated into albumin, amino acid, attachment factors, growth factors & cytokines, protease inhibitor, thrombin, and others. Applications such as stem cell research have vast potential in future. Stem cell culture assists in standardization of drug production and enables production of a number of cell lines & related products.

Request Brochure of Report https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=405

Traditional pharmaceutical therapeutics help in treating only disease symptoms, whereas stem cell therapies assist in treating the cause of the disease. Hence, further research in the field of stem cell culture for development of drugs presents significant opportunities in the market in the near future.

Increase in Usage of Cell Culture Products in Drug Development & Manufacturing to Propel Pharmaceutical Companies Segment

Based on end-user, the global cell culture market has been divided into biotechnology companies, pharmaceutical companies, academic institutes, and research institutes. The pharmaceutical companies segment dominated the global market in 2020, and the trend is anticipated to continue during the forecast period due to increase in usage of cell culture products in drug development and manufacturing. The biotechnology companies segment is expected to account for a significant market share by 2031. The growth of the segment can be attributed to increase in the number of biotechnology companies and rise in strategic collaborations among market players to expand global presence.

Request for Analysis of COVID19 Impact on Cell Culture Market https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=405

Asia Pacific to Dominate Global Market

In terms of region, the global cell culture market has been segmented into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa. North America is anticipated to account for a major share of the global market during the forecast period, owing to the presence of key players, increase in research & development activities, and new drug approvals.

Shift in trend toward continuous processing is expected to drive the cell culture market in North America. The cell culture market in Asia Pacific is at a pivotal point. Increase in focus of key players on expansion in the region, large untapped population, and rise in awareness about healthcare augment the cell culture market in Asia Pacific. For instance, Thermo Fisher expanded its Fisher BioServices and cryogenic service capabilities in Japan.

Make an Enquiry before Buying https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=EB&rep_id=405

Thermo Fisher Scientific and Merck KGaA to Lead Global Market

Key players covered in this report are Sartorius AG, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Eppendorf AG, GE Healthcare, Corning Incorporated, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Merck KGaA, Lonza, VWR International, LLC, and PromoCell GmbH. Companies operating in the global cell culture market focus on strategic collaborations for developing new products in the emerging markets such as Asia Pacific and Latin America.

For instance, in May 2017, Merck announced the launch of EX-CELL Advanced HD perfusion medium, which helps increase the production yield and streamline the regulatory compliances.

Browse more Reports by Transparency Market Research:

CAR T-cell Therapy Market: The global CAR T-cell therapy market is driven by increase in incidence of cancer and strong product pipeline. North America dominated the global CAR T-cell therapy market in 2020 and the trend is anticipated to continue during the forecast period.

Psoriatic Arthritis Therapeutics Market: The global psoriatic arthritis therapeutics market is expanding at a rapid pace due to high prevalence and increase in incidence rate of psoriatic arthritis and new product development and commercialization across the globe.

About Us

Transparency Market Research is a next-generation market intelligence provider, offering fact-based solutions to business leaders, consultants, and strategy professionals.

Our reports are single-point solutions for businesses to grow, evolve, and mature. Our real-time data collection methods along with ability to track more than one million high growth niche products are aligned with your aims. The detailed and proprietary statistical models used by our analysts offer insights for making right decision in the shortest span of time. For organizations that require specific but comprehensive information we offer customized solutions through ad hoc reports. These requests are delivered with the perfect combination of right sense of fact-oriented problem solving methodologies and leveraging existing data repositories.

TMR believes that unison of solutions for clients-specific problems with right methodology of research is the key to help enterprises reach right decision.

Contact

Rohit BhiseyTransparency Market Research

State Tower,

90 State Street,

Suite 700,

Albany NY - 12207

United States

USA - Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453

Email: sales@transparencymarketresearch.com

Website: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/

See original here:
Cell Culture Market to Gain US$ 27.6 Bn by 2031, Burgeoning Demand for Biosimilars and Biologic Therapeutics Fueling Market Growth - BioSpace

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Cell Culture Market to Gain US$ 27.6 Bn by 2031, Burgeoning Demand for Biosimilars and Biologic Therapeutics Fueling Market Growth – BioSpace

Pilot Study Shows Promising Results With CPX-351 in Relapsed/Refractory ALL – OncLive

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 2:50 am

Bijal Shah, MD, MS, discusses the results of a phase 2 pilot study investigating CPX-351 in adults with high-risk relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia, as well as next steps for research in this patient population.

CPX-351 (Vyxeos), a liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin provided encouraging activity and overall response rates in adults with high-risk relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or mixed phenotype leukemia, according to data from a phase 2 trial (NCT03575325).1

The small open-label, single-arm pilot study featured 6 patients with B-cell ALL, including 1 with B-myeloid disease. Additionally, 5 patients had T-cell ALL, including 4 with an early T-cell phenotype. Moreover, a TP53 mutation was noted in 5 patients. Of the 10 evaluable patients, 3 had a complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), and further research with this agent is warranted, according to Bijal Shah, MD, MS.

We were happy with how CPX-351 performed in this pilot cohort, Shah said. This sets up a benchmark for expectations with single-agent CPX-351. It also tells us about who were going to be enrolling into relapsed and refractory trials as we go forward with the approvals of these novel agents in B-cell ALL.

In an interview with OncLive, Shah, associate member in the Department of Malignant Hematology at Moffitt Cancer Center, discussed the results of the phase 2 pilot study, as well as next steps in the patient population.

Shah: When we talk about how T cells kill, theres the assumption that its largely a perforin/granzyme mediated cell-killing event. What was shared was that there may be other mechanisms involved here, including the induction of apoptosis in lymphoblasts, and what the investigators saw on a [CRISPR/Cas9] screen was that when you lose some of the proteins that help mediate apoptosis, you lose your CAR T-cell killing efficiency. There are 2 pieces to that.

One is that it seems like those cells can grow more rapidly. More proliferative leukemias are harder to kill. The other part of the equation is the T cells are less effective in eliminating those cells, despite perforin and granzyme production, and, classically, what we think of as T-cell mediated killing. Some of that may relate to the fact that the T cells are becoming exhausted as they proceed down this path and keep trying to kill this blast population that doesnt want to accept defeat.

When we do genetic testing of leukemia, were not often looking at mutations or other changes along the apoptosis pathway. But it does suggest that we need to think more carefully, particularly in the more proliferative leukemias, to see whether there is an enrichment for those mutations that come with that enhanced resistance to CAR [T-cell therapy]. This fits into a whole category that were seeing as they relate to intrinsic CAR T-cell resistance.

We have talked about CD19 antigen downregulation, as well as CD58 and how that may affect CAR T-cell therapy and cancer interactions. Were starting to now get a flavor for all these things, touching specifically on intrinsic features in lymphoma. I hope were also going to start to better understand tumor microenvironment features.

Dr Ruella talked about his studies looking at the microbiome and how that may affect T-cell biology. We know that antigen-presenting cells, or along that same spectrum, myeloid dendritic suppressor cell populations, can affect both the expansion and the contraction of T cells over time. There are a lot of moving parts here [in figuring out how we can] improve the activity of CAR T-cell therapies and the durability of cell killing.

[Regarding] toxicity, it seems like that may be more reaction to the T-cell growth rather than the T cells directly driving this phenotype. Targeting some of these pieces of the tumor microenvironment also improves toxicity, which, interestingly, may also improve T-cell activity and the durability of that activity.

Its a rapidly evolving field, and its great to see. Hopefully well get to a point where we can talk about CAR T-cell therapy as a replacement for chemotherapy. Thats the ultimate goal.

Although Im excited about [CAR T-cell therapy as a replacement for chemotherapy], it is true that there are other things that are happening, including a trial that we did examining [CPX-351].

This is the liposomal formulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine. We want to get rid of chemotherapy, but as it turns out, not everyone is an immunotherapy candidate. Weve seen this in clinical practice. There are [patients] who are still on immunosuppressive therapy following an allogeneic stem cell transplant, and there are [patients] who dont have B-cell ALL. T-cell ALL remains an area that were struggling to target from an immunotherapeutic standpoint. We wanted to try to understand what we could accomplish [with this agent].

This was a pilot study with 11 patients. The observations were interesting, and 1 of the key observations was who we enrolled. We have novel trials for ALL, including with CAR T-cell immunotherapy. Six [patients] who came onto [the study] had B-cell ALL, including 1 B-myeloid overlap.

Of the remaining 5 patients with T-cell ALL, 4 had an early T-cell phenotype. That tells us where some of our gaps are. When we look to the biology, 5 of the 10 evaluable patients had a TP53 mutation. [Additionally], 2 had [Philadelphia chromosomelike] changes, speaking to the high-risk nature of the patients who were enrolled to the study. They had a median of 3 prior lines of therapy, with a range of 1 to 7. Seven had primary refractory disease. When we talk about prior therapies for the B-cell ALL cohort, that included blinatumomab [Blincyto; n = 5], inotuzumab ozogamicin [Besponsa; n = 2], and CAR T-cell therapy [n = 1]. [Moreover], 3 patients had prior [allogeneic stem cell transplant]. This was a very heavily pretreated population, with [a] high [prevalence of] TP53 mutations and high rates of early T-cell precursor and B-myeloid phenotypes. [These were] the groups that you would expect since we dont have great therapies for this group of patients.

We did see pancytopenia during induction as you would expect with cytarabine and daunorubicin. We did see febrile neutropenia in 9 [patients]. In terms of severe infections, it wasnt what I would have predicted, particularly having been involved in the studies of CPX-351 in acute myeloid leukemia. We had 1 patient who [died] from pneumonia. This was a patient who had B-cell ALL, and she failed to collect for CAR T-cell therapy [since] she had low lymphocyte counts. We had hoped to intubate her and support her through the process, but she and her family decided to move to comfort measures in lieu of intubation.

A second patient developed grade 3 sepsis, which resolved without any significant issues. All other infections in the remaining patients were grade 1 to 2. The only atypical thing that we saw [in terms of] severe, unexpected adverse [effects] was 1 gastrointestinal bleed. This was in a patient who had prior allogeneic transplant, and there was a concern that this may have reflected some component of graft-versus-host disease, [GVHD], although we couldnt confirm that. We had 3 grade 1 spontaneous subdural bleeds. [Those patients] all had low platelets, but we do see low platelets commonly in ALL without bleeding. This was a novel observation.

We had 1 patient develop veno-occlusive disease, but this is a patient who had prior inotuzumab [ozogamicin] and allogeneic transplant, so it was difficult to connect that with the CPX-351 therapy.

The infections that we saw were largely mild, meaning grade 1 to 2. Although we did see some unexpected cases of bleeding, [they] were incidentally appreciated in most cases and resolved.

The safety of this therapy was impressive in our patients with advanced ALL. The median time to neutrophil recovery was around 33 days. There were 2 patients who had refractory disease who didnt recover their platelets, but among the remaining patients, [recovery] was around 30 days. We did allow consolidation, so just as in the ALL trial, patients received an induction dose and then subsequent consolidation doses where the CPX-351 was given at a lower dose.

We saw 1 episode of foot cellulitis. This was a patient who had recurrent foot cellulitis prior to enrolling on the study. [We also observed] 1 episode of myocarditis. That ultimately was not attributed to the study drug.

In terms of responses, 3 patients achieved a CR or CRi including 2 in the early T-cell precursor group and 1 who had B-cell ALL.

We did see responses in the TP53 cohort, so that was very encouraging. [Of those 4 patients], 1 had a CR/CRi, and 1 showed a reduction of blasts but not enough to meet the criteria for CR. One went on to receive consolidation, and one was bridged to a donor leukocyte infusion.

It seemed like we were succeeding in terms of supporting these patients. The median time to next therapy was about 2.5 months, so 76 days. The median overall survival for the patients was 218 days, so it seemed to come with some clinical benefit.

With regard to what happened when patients progressed, after CPX-351, we only saw responses to any subsequent therapy in 2 patients. The other 8 patients were refractory to every subsequent therapy that was administered, ranging from chemotherapy to targeted therapy. This speaks to the nature of the patients that were enrolled.

Next steps are to figure out what we can do with CPX-351. That may be combining it with novel agents like venetoclax [Venclexta] or even asparaginase [crisantaspase, erwinase]. It may also mean continuing to treat more intensively since we really didnt see any significant toxicity in the consolidation phases.

Once patients moved to the lower intensity CPX-351, they were more likely to progress, if they didnt go on to transplant. We would probably want to think about continuing the induction dosing for at least 1 additional cycle to help deepen responses for some of these patients.

Originally posted here:
Pilot Study Shows Promising Results With CPX-351 in Relapsed/Refractory ALL - OncLive

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Pilot Study Shows Promising Results With CPX-351 in Relapsed/Refractory ALL – OncLive

Page 422«..1020..421422423424..430440..»