Page 491«..1020..490491492493..500510..»

OpGen Announces Interim Analysis Results from Clinical Trial for Unyvero Urinary Tract Infection Panel – GlobeNewswire

Posted: April 6, 2022 at 2:34 am

ROCKVILLE, Md., April 05, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- OpGen, Inc. (Nasdaq: OPGN, OpGen or the Company), a precision medicine company harnessing the power of molecular diagnostics and bioinformatics to help combat infectious disease, reported today that, following the successful completion of a reproducibility study earlier this year, it has now unblinded and analyzed a limited data set comprising of the first 150 prospectively enrolled U.S. patient samples. Clinical trial enrollment continues at all sites.

OpGens Unyvero Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Panel tests for a broad range of pathogens as well as antimicrobial resistance markers directly from native urine specimens. The clinical performance evaluation, which aims at a subsequent FDA submission, includes a prospective multicenter trial at three U.S. sites.

The objective of the interim analysis was to confirm the absence of significant performance variations in results between the testing sites, and to furthermore confirm that blinded data collection across all data sources and study participants is executed as planned.

Were pleased to see that the clinical trial protocol has been implemented as planned across the different participating trial sites, said Johannes Bacher, COO of OpGen, Inc. and Managing Director of German based Curetis GmbH. Based on our preliminary analysis of the different data sources generated for this limited sample set, we have decided to continue enrollment towards our study goal of 1,500 prospective samples without any changes. We will furthermore include archived urine samples in order to complement the study data with additional data points for rare pathogens and antibiotic resistance markers.

DisclaimerCaution - Investigational Device, Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. The information contained in this communication does not constitute or imply an offer to sell or transfer any product. Performance characteristics for this device have not yet been established and the U.S. FDA has not yet cleared the panel.

About OpGen, Inc.

OpGen, Inc. (Rockville, MD, USA) is a precision medicine company harnessing the power of molecular diagnostics and bioinformatics to help combat infectious disease. Along with our subsidiaries, Curetis GmbH and Ares Genetics GmbH, we are developing and commercializing molecular microbiology solutions helping to guide clinicians with more rapid and actionable information about life threatening infections to improve patient outcomes and decrease the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms, or MDROs. OpGens product portfolio includes Unyvero, Acuitas AMR Gene Panel and Acuitas Lighthouse, and the ARES Technology Platform including ARESdb, using NGS technology and AI-powered bioinformatics solutions for antibiotic response prediction.

For more information, please visit http://www.opgen.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release includes statements regarding the interim analysis results of OpGens clinical trial for its Unyvero Urinary Tract Infection. These statements and other statements regarding OpGens future plans and goals constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that are often difficult to predict, are beyond our control, and which may cause results to differ materially from expectations. Factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those described include, but are not limited to, the success of our commercialization efforts, our ability to successfully, timely and cost-effectively develop, seek and obtain regulatory clearance for and commercialize our product and services offerings, the rate of adoption of our products and services by hospitals and other healthcare providers, the fact that we may not effectively use proceeds from recent financings, the continued realization of expected benefits of our business combination transaction with Curetis GmbH, the continued impact of COVID-19 on the Companys operations, financial results, and commercialization efforts as well as on capital markets and general economic conditions, the effect of the military action in Russia and Ukraine on our distributors, collaborators, and service providers, our liquidity and working capital requirements, the effect on our business of existing and new regulatory requirements, and other economic and competitive factors. For a discussion of the most significant risks and uncertainties associated with OpGens business, please review our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on our expectations as of the date of this press release and speak only as of the date of this press release. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

OpGen:Oliver SchachtPresident and CEOInvestorRelations@opgen.com

OpGen Press Contact:Matthew BretziusFischTank Marketing and PR matt@fischtankpr.com

OpGen Investor Contact:Alyssa FactorEdison Groupafactor@edisongroup.com

Read more here:
OpGen Announces Interim Analysis Results from Clinical Trial for Unyvero Urinary Tract Infection Panel - GlobeNewswire

Posted in Molecular Medicine | Comments Off on OpGen Announces Interim Analysis Results from Clinical Trial for Unyvero Urinary Tract Infection Panel – GlobeNewswire

Plantation drive themed Donate, Plant & Own a Tree held at IUST – Rising Kashmir

Posted: April 6, 2022 at 2:34 am

Awantipora, April 03: As part of the Green India Mission, the Islamic University of Science and Technology (IUST) Awantipora conducted a plantation drive this week, to continue its ongoing initiatives for enhancing campus green cover and valuing the environmental protection, conservation and sustainable management of biodiversity.

The plantation drive, themed as Donate, Plant & Own a Tree (DPOT) was organized by IUST's Landscaping Section and Biodiversity Park Project in association with the Department of Sericulture, Jammu & Kashmir.

During the drive saplings of Mulberry species supplied by the Department of Sericulture were planted in the campus. The event was carried out under the overall supervision of Registrar IUST Prof. Naseer Iqbal, who shared a brief overview about the objectives behind organizing such drives and said, "IUST is establishing Biodiversity Park in the campus so as to enhance the environment management and increase the ecosystem services in the area." He also congratulated the staff associated with Landscaping Section and Biodiversity Park in organising the event and also thanked the Department of Sericulture for their support in making the event a success.

Various officers, Faculty members, Staff and students from various Schools/departments of IUST participated in the drive and planted trees. Those present included Prof. Manzoor Ahmad Malik, Dean Academic Affairs, Prof. Shabir Ahmad Bhat, Dean Outreach, Prof. Hamidullah Marazi, I/C Director, International Centre for Spiritual Studies, Prof. Lily Want, I/C Director, Averroes Centre for Philosophical Studies, Prof. Ab. Rashid Malik I/C Director Habba Khatoon Centre for Kashmiri Language and Literature, Sameer Wazir, Finance Officer, Dr. S. Iqbal Quraishi, Deputy Registrar, Estates, Sheikh Asif, Deputy Registrar, Establishment, Dr. Afroz Bisati, I/C Librarian, Dr. Anisa Jan Dean of Students, Dr. Asif Fazili, Head, Department of Management Studies, Mudasir A. Mir, Assistant Registrar Finance, Mubashir Nazir, Assistant Registrar Procurement & Stores, Dr. Muzafar A Macha, I/C Watson-Crick Centre for Molecular Medicine, Dr. Rais A. Ganie, I/C Centre for Vocational Studies, Dr. Asheed A Ganie, Ramalingaswami Fellow, Watson-Crick Centre for Molecular Medicine. The Department of Sericulture was represented by Feroz Ahmad Mattoo, District Sericulture Officer, Pulwama, Gh Mohammad Hafiz Sericulture Assistant Tral Zone, Dr. Adil Abdullah Wani, Field Assistant Tral Zone, Mohd Amin Bhat, Nursery Man Tral and Ashiq Hussain Malik. The event was coordinated by Incharge Landscaping and Nodal Officer Biodiversity Park IUST, Dr. Aijaz A. Qureshi.

Follow this link:
Plantation drive themed Donate, Plant & Own a Tree held at IUST - Rising Kashmir

Posted in Molecular Medicine | Comments Off on Plantation drive themed Donate, Plant & Own a Tree held at IUST – Rising Kashmir

Living with COVID in the Season of Cherry Blossoms – JAPAN Forward

Posted: April 6, 2022 at 2:34 am

Universal masking, high vaccination rate, early focus on ventilation: Japan seems to have gotten some things right in fighting the pandemic. Looking deeper, Japans success is not easy to explain. Particularly striking is the difference from South Korea, which is suffering its worst outbreak.

Tokyo is in awe of the cherry blossoms in this season. In Yoyogi park people were again sitting under the blooming trees, as if the pandemic had never happened. Meanwhile, security politely warned people not to linger. Japan has lifted all its quasi emergency antivirus measures. Still, residents have been advised against throwing hanami picnic parties.

RELATED: Sakura: Softly Blossoming Cherries Herald the Hope and Pleasures of Spring

With so much sunshine and pink petal magic, can Japan let its guard down?

On Thursday March 31, Japan reported 51,913 new cases and 101 deaths. Numbers had been going up for the past few days, after a steady decline since the Omicron peak in early February when more than 100,000 daily new infections were reported. It is unclear if this is the start of a new wave of infections this time, maybe driven by the Omicron sub type BA.2.

Japans path, however, stands in sharp contrast to its neighbor South Korea. The country is reporting around 344,000 new cases per day at the moment, and more than 300 deaths daily.

In gruesome news, last week health officials in South Korea instructed crematories to burn more dead bodies per day and funeral homes to add more refrigerators to store the dead. South Korea is still reeling under the omicron wave its biggest wave so far. But might have begun a turnaround.

South Korea and Japan share many similarities. They have similar demographics, a culture of mask wearing, and strong public health systems.

This latest development is therefore surprising, given that South Korea has been a success story in the first two years of the pandemic. With its unique test, track, tracing, and quarantine strategy, mask wearing and mass testing, the country had been able to fight virus surges until the highly contagious Omicron variant came along.

In part, South Koreas high numbers compared to Japan are due to its aggressive testing. It is using rapid antigen tests conducted by medical personnel at clinics, as well as PCR tests done at screening centers. And all positive test results are entered into the national case count.

This is unlike Japan, which does not use rapid tests at all for screening purposes. Counts of positive test results come only from PCR tests that have been initiated by a doctor for a patient who experiences symptoms.

Less easy to explain is the difference between Japan and South Korea in virus fatalities. While Japan has also seen a surge in infections due to Omicron, this did not translate into so many deaths.

As Eric Topol, professor of Molecular Medicine at The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California, recently pointed out on twitter: Despite a 2 fold higher booster vaccination percentage, a noteworthy difference in fatality rate and divergence of curves.

Japan and South Korea have similar vaccination rates. Tokyo has administered two shots for 80 percent of its population. Seoul reports an even higher rate at 86 percent.

Seoul has also done better at bringing the third shot or booster to its citizens. The booster vaccination rate is around 60 percent twice as high as that of Japan. Despite this South Korea has seen many more cases and fatalities.

There is no easy explanation here. Does the type of vaccine make a difference? Japan only uses mRNA shots by Pfizer and Moderna, while Seoul uses a substantial amount of AstraZeneca along with Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen.

Was Japan lucky, because it started the booster campaign late and thus vaccinated into the Omicron wave, while South Korea started earlier and did not get the same effect due to the waning for vaccines?

Is it down to genes or to diet? Are Japanese elders healthier than their South Korean counterparts? Do Japanese people have greater trust in their government or in their neighbors?

Or do South Koreans care simply less about getting infected?

A survey released on March 15 by Seoul National Universitys graduate school of public health, showed the number of South Koreans who worry about a serious health impact from COVID-19 had dropped to about 48 percent, the lowest since the surveys began in January 2020. In any case, Omicron has forced Seoul to abandon its stringent COVID-19 response of mass testing, aggressive contact tracing and quarantines. Instead, it has to focus its limited medical resources on the groups most at risk, like people 60 and older and those with chronic diseases.

We see what omicron can truly do when it enters a country where very very few have had COVID before, writes Vincent Rajkumar, professor of medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota on twitter. But all is not failure and despair. This is only the first wave in South Korea. The wave in terms of deaths is much less than 4 of the waves in the US.

While the absolute death figures of South Korea may seem dramatic, the countrys fatality rate remains low relative to other countries. Cumulative confirmed COVID-19 deaths per 1 million people are 316.34 for South Korea and 222.28 for Japan a lot less than the United States with 2933.79, or Germany with 1543.72.

While confirmed COVID deaths figures are still biased by testing levels in places such as Belarus or Djibouti where testing is next to non-existent, a much lower percentage of COVID deaths have been identified excess mortality is often used to measure the brutality of the pandemic. It refers to the number of deaths from all causes during the crisis above what would be expected to be observed under normal, non-pandemic conditions.

For the first two years of the pandemic, South Koreas excess deaths are about 1 percent above average, while the excess deaths for Germany are 4 percent, and 16 percent for the United States. Japan seems to report no increase, but data is simply lacking.

Japan seems an outlier compared to other countries. Its COVID death rate is on par with countries that followed a zero COVID tolerance policy like Taiwan, China and New Zealand. Yet, it did not introduce any of their zero-COVID measures, such as lockdowns or mass testing.

Despite the latest Omicron surge, Japan still has fewer COVID deaths than other countries.

Very early on in the pandemic Japan focused on airborne transmission. Some experts think that its multilayered approach with mitigation of airborne transmission, a focus on ventilation, mask wearing and restriction of mass gatherings has been key to its success.

We might never know for sure why Japan has done a better job of protecting lives. One thing, however, is certain, however. No country is an island to a highly transmissible virus even those that are islands like Japan.

Agnes Tandler (Tokyo)

Since the start of the pandemic in 2020, Agnes Tandler has been based in Japan, where her reporting covers COVID-19 for a daily healthcare newsletter in Germany. Find other essays and reports for JAPAN Forward here.

Read the rest here:
Living with COVID in the Season of Cherry Blossoms - JAPAN Forward

Posted in Molecular Medicine | Comments Off on Living with COVID in the Season of Cherry Blossoms – JAPAN Forward

Marshall Highlights the Importance of Distinct Approaches to GI Cancers – OncLive

Posted: April 6, 2022 at 2:34 am

Distinctions in histology, molecular profiles, and tumor location have set diverging course of care for the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal cancers.

Distinctions in histology, molecular profiles, and tumor location have set diverging course of care for the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, according to John L. Marshall, MD. To address these varying pathways to care, cross-functional approaches to education and care have become paramount for clinicians.

Marshall was the coleader of the 7th Annual School of Gastrointestinal Oncology (SOGO), hosted by Physicians Education Resource, LLC (PER), a 1-day multidisciplinary educational conference on the emerging therapies and evolving standards of care in the management of patients with GI cancers. The hybrid symposium featured presentations on locoregional treatment of GI cancers, as well as case-based discussions on multidisciplinary, real-world management of GI cancers.

The main takeaway from this meeting is that there is a lot to learn, Marshall, chief of the Division of Hematology/Oncology at Medstar Georgetown University Hospital and director of The Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers in Washington, DC, said in an interview with OncLive. We learned a lot, we have moved the bar, but we have a long way to go. We know there are common malignancies, we know there are highly fatal malignancies as a group, and we know a lot of [clinicians] are familiar with them. It used to be an easy disease or group of diseases to take care of, [but] there is a lot going on in GI cancers.

Marshall provided an overview of the main highlights from the meeting, including progress made, anticipated trends in research, and optimal treatment benefits for GI cancer.

Marshall: When I first started in GI cancers, there was not much called bile duct cancer. We used to call that unknown primaries in the liver because you were not supposed to get adenocarcinomas in the liver. It has only been in the past 10 plus years that we have recognized that these adenocarcinomas in the liver cleanse [the body] of carcinomas and bile duct cancers.

We have to divide them into 3 categories [and] here I like to use a tree [analogy]: there is the trunk of the tree, and that is the common bile duct; there are the branches, the wood parts up in the tree, and those are intrahepatic bile ducts; and then there is that kind of knot off the side of the tree that is the gallbladder. And as we think about those 3 parts of the treethe 3 parts of the bile systemwe are increasingly recognizing that they are different. Yes, they are all adenocarcinomas [and] they are mostly included in all the clinical trials. But when we look at molecular profiling or precision medicine, we are seeing that they have different characteristics.

So, just like we did in upper GI cancers, where we separated esophageal GI junction and stomach, we are now increasingly separating common bile duct intrahepatic and gallbladder from each other.

I was charged with the job of reviewing what has been going on in bile duct cancers and the answer is: a lot. My title was from obscurity to the star of the show.

That is increasingly true because with precision medicine, we are learning that there are important molecular subtypesFGFR fusions or alterations, IDH1 alterations or mutations, and immunotherapy biomarkersall of which are present in a high-enough percentage that they are worth looking for. And there are therapies that have significant improvements in outcome when they are applied. So just as you would measure molecular tests for almost all your cancers, the same now is true for cholangiocarcinoma and bile duct cancers.

Now, one of the other places it has become the star of the show and it is one more of our GI cancers where immunotherapy has worked, is in the TOPAZ-1 clinical trial [NCT03875235], a randomized study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin plus immunotherapy. What we saw was an improvement in overall survival in that patient population and we are expecting an FDA approval in that space. So immunotherapy [is making] its way to bile duct cancers as well.

[Bile duct cancer] is absolutely not that rare of a cancer if you know what you are looking for. Precision medicine is key, and immunotherapy is an important part of that.

When we look at next steps with cholangiocarcinoma and bowel cancers, first we are applying the precision medicine and so now we have subcategories of this based on not only anatomy, but now also molecular profile. With each of those areas, we are seeing further activity of combinations and different lines of therapy.

We are also increasingly seeing liver-directed therapy approaches [and we are doing] this with our interventional surgical and radiation [colleagues] who are helping us to manage this. We have a lot of patients with liver-dominant problems. That sort of multidimensional approach is required in optimal management.

And then, how do we make the toehold we have with immunotherapy get bigger through combinations and other molecular characterizations to better understand who should get in therapy and who should not? So, [there is] a lot of ongoing work in the biotech cancer space.

Each year we hold a crossfire session, and these are not intended to be slide-heavy, but [to rather to address] some critical questions that we all have about a key topic in GI cancers. This year, we picked immunotherapy; there is so much going on. It is really the Wild West. We were looking at immunotherapy being applied to GI cancers and so we walked through the GI tract [and asked] does PD-L1 expression matter in upper GI cancers? And we decided yes, it does. Immunotherapy has a place through lines of therapy even in the adjuvant setting in certain cancers. PD-L1 expression probably is a good marker for who benefits and who does not.

We [also] looked at hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], [a space that is] dominated by immunotherapy approaches, in the frontline and also other lines of therapy. Durvalumab [Imfinzi] showed positive results even as a single agent in HCC. The data with durvalumab in cholangiocarcinoma and bile duct cancers was there.

In pancreas cancer, [immunotherapy] is still dormant, we have not figured out how to crack that nut. But then if you go on further south to colorectal cancer, particularly rectal cancer, we talked about MSI-H [microsatellite instabilityhigh] in the neoadjuvant setting [and asked] do we use immuno-oncology [IO] therapy in the neoadjuvant setting and in rectal cancer?

There are some highly provocative small phase 2 experience data showing 11 out of 11 [patients] having a complete clinical and radiographic response with just IO therapy and MSI-H rectal cancer. That would be transformative.

One of the main themes of the meeting was that molecular profiling is critical and in order to identify those patients who are candidates for immunotherapy and candidates for precision medicine target therapy. You need adequate tissue, you need to understand what the tests measure, and then you need to apply those in a multidisciplinary fashion to optimize treatment for our patients.

We are increasingly emphasizing organ preservation. And so, we are trying to not only care for our patients but allow them to maintain their quality of life. What we are seeing is what we were hoping, that these precision medicine tools are giving us those opportunities to both improve outcomes and maintain quality of life.

See the original post:
Marshall Highlights the Importance of Distinct Approaches to GI Cancers - OncLive

Posted in Molecular Medicine | Comments Off on Marshall Highlights the Importance of Distinct Approaches to GI Cancers – OncLive

‘Monumental’ Treatment Advancements Have Been ‘Life-Changing’ For Many Patients With Thyroid Cancer – Curetoday.com

Posted: April 6, 2022 at 2:34 am

Over the past 20 years, there have been several advancements in the treatment of patients with thyroid cancer which have improved survival and quality of life, according to an expert.

However, the same expert said that more work is needed to find a curative approach for this patient population.

Dr. Jessica Geiger, a medical oncologist specializing in head/neck and thyroid cancers at Cleveland Clinics Taussig Cancer Institute in Ohio, said that the biggest advancement made over the years in treating thyroid cancer has been the development of targeted therapies.

In particular, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), she said, have been shown to better improve survival and quality of life compared with the old standard of care.

I would say over the last decade, rather than 20 years there have been great monumental advancements in (the treatment of thyroid cancer), she said in an interview with CURE.

The earlier TKIs gave us options for patients whereas before we didn't have any, Geiger continued The newer drugs that have been developed and are now in use are a prime example of how personalized medicine can be groundbreaking and life-changing. Because now, instead of just getting an agent that has many different targets, and so many patients could just go on the same drug, it doesn't work very well. But if you have one particular specific type of mutation, or one specific gene fusion protein that'scausing this cancer to grow and spread and we have a targeted agent that targets that molecular aberration directly, you can have fantastic results that last for quite a long time.

Improved Survival and Quality of Life

These advancements, according to Geiger, give patients with thyroid cancer options that they didnt previously have. Prior to 2013, the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved systemic therapy for these patients was chemotherapy that was known to be ineffective and often led to many side effects, Geiger said.

Twenty years ago, a patient would first undergo surgery with radioactive iodine, depending on the subtype, and then the only other available treatment option was cytotoxic chemotherapy. There were no treatment options available at that time that could circulate through the bloodstream to attack cancerous cells in multiple locations with a patients body.

You would just try to attend to the problem areas where the disease popped up, but you could never do anything that treated all of the lesions at the same time with one form of treatment, Geiger said. No doubt, patients were suffering. (And) patients were dying sooner than what they are now.

Today, Geiger noted, patient survival has improved dramatically because the newer drugs can better target the disease and the genomic mutations.

Not only has survival improved over the past two decades, but so has quality of life. The initial TKIs that were previously used in these patients heavily affected their quality of life. Side effects such as fatigue, loss of appetite, changes in taste and the onset of nausea, can all lead to weight loss. The use of these TKIs was also associated with heart abnormalities, poor kidney function, high blood pressure, bleeding complications and wound healing complications.

But now, Geiger explained, the recently developed agents are much better tolerated than the previous ones.

Theres an all-around benefit where patients are living longer with their cancer, and theyre living with a better quality of life (with) many fewer side effects than what they normally would, she said.

Prior to the development of these agents, a patient may have had to undergo a total laryngectomy, which is the surgical removal of the larynx, which is better known as the voice box.

This procedure, Geiger said, can often become a huge quality-of-life issue for patients who now have to depend on and manage their tracheostomy (an opening created at the front of the neck so a tube can be inserted into the windpipe, or trachea, to help with breathing).

Patients who receive a tracheostomy often have to be trained in how to change the tubing, work with speech and language pathologists to make sure they are swallowing properly, or if they may be a candidate to be fitted for a voice prosthetic.

We have been more thoughtful of these patients where normally the standard of care is if youre able to have surgery, you have the surgery and avoid systemic therapy. But in a situation like that, some of these newer drugs have allowed us to question that treatment. And weve had patients who, for whatever reason, have said Yeah, Im not ready for such a big surgery, she said.

The recent developments of more effective TKIs luckily mean that a tracheostomy does not have to be a patients only option. In fact, as Geiger noted, some patients may only need to undergo a comprehensive surgery at first and then receive treatment with the more effective TKIs.

Depending on the molecular profile, weve saved patients, or at least delayed patients, from having a total laryngectomy or being (tracheostomy)-dependent, which again I think is a significant improvement, she said.

Watch and Wait

Even though there have been tremendous advancements that improve survival and quality of life, that doesnt mean that every patient should receive immediate treatment, she explained.

For instance, if a patients lesion is small enough, Geiger said she tells patients that shell see them again in six months.

However, all of this is dependent on the presence of genomic mutations. And, as Geiger added, every patient should receive genetic testing to find out which treatment might be best for them.

Its a combination of looking to see what their molecular profile is to see what options we have available, but then looking back at the patient characteristics, clinically how theyre doing and feeling and what is their overall tumor burden because not everybody warrants treatment at that time, she said. Even though we have better options and more options for treatment, that doesnt mean, at least right now, that Im more eager to use them sooner than I would otherwise.

More Room for Improvement

Although these advancements have been significant for patients with thyroid cancer, they only touch the surface, as they pertain to four or five different genetic mutations out of the dozens that exist in thyroid cancer, Geiger said.

Theres a lot of patients that are not getting these highly selective therapies because they dont exist, she explained.

The hope, Geiger said, is there will be more targeted therapies for all the different mutations over the next 20 years.

Another major concern she said is that cancer is very smart. A provider can give patients these therapies, but the cancer may find a way around it.

For instance, a patients cancer could develop a new mutation or a new driver that allows the cancer to unlock another door to progression that was once blocked by that other drug, Geiger explained.

Identifying those escape mechanisms or escape mutations and then developing another drug to (attack that), I think thats going to be important as the years go on, she said.

Another hot topic right now in the thyroid cancer space is immunotherapy, which is a treatment that has been commonly utilized in other cancers such as lung cancer.

While there are a few studies evaluating the use of immunotherapy in thyroid cancer, they havent shown the treatment to be as effective as has been seen in other cancers, she described. Again, Geiger noted that some patients may not need to receive immunotherapy.

Patients with targetable genomic mutations, she said, may respond to those treatments for years possibly eliminating the need for immunotherapy.

I have some patients who have been on these medicines for over two years and still get the same responses, which is amazing. Two years in the grand scheme of things is a long, long time, she added. We know that not everybody responds to immunotherapy. In thyroid cancer, the majority of patients actually will not benefit from immunotherapy; meaning that you could give it to them but theyre not going to respond to it. Its probably a very small subset of thyroid cancer patients where immunotherapy will work.

Of note, there is no FDA-approved immunotherapy available to patients with thyroid cancer, according to Geiger.

Unnecessary Stress and Anxiety

Technological advances over the past 20 years have significantly improved the capabilities of imaging and ultrasound testing. As a result, providers have been able to detect more thyroid cancers. While a good development for some patients, Geiger noted that this may have caused a tremendous amount of stress and anxiety in patients that may not have had to worry.

If you look to see the types of thyroid cancer were better at detecting, its the very small, very slow-growing ones that probably for a majority of those patients would never have come to clinical fruition, she said. The patients would have died with that small thyroid cancer rather than from it.

A Focus on Multidisciplinary Care

Despite the added concern for some patients that may have been considered low-risk, the treatment advancements over the past 20 years have been significant for those with a diagnosis of thyroid cancer, according to Geiger.

In the next 20 years, she continued, a shift to a multidisciplinary approach may lead to more treatment advancements and even better outcomes. Instead of a focus on the medical oncologists, a patients care team should also comprise Interventional radiologists (professionals who can perform minimally invasive surgeries), radiation oncologists and endocrinologists, so that they may all consult on what is the best treatment approach.

Having a multidisciplinary approach for some of these really advanced and aggressive thyroid cancers is key because theres a lot of moving pieces involved. I think molecular testing for whenever the patient is considered recurrent, or highly aggressive late-stage type of cancer, I think that is key because you need that information well before any other treatment is started, Geiger concluded.

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, dont forget to, subscribe toCUREs Newsletters here.

Go here to see the original:
'Monumental' Treatment Advancements Have Been 'Life-Changing' For Many Patients With Thyroid Cancer - Curetoday.com

Posted in Molecular Medicine | Comments Off on ‘Monumental’ Treatment Advancements Have Been ‘Life-Changing’ For Many Patients With Thyroid Cancer – Curetoday.com

Viral Vectors in Gene Therapy – PMC

Posted: April 6, 2022 at 2:30 am

The spectrum of viral vectors is very broad including both delivery vehicles developed for transient short-term and permanent long-term expression. Moreover, the types of vectors are represented by both RNA and DNA viruses with either single-stranded (ss) or double-stranded (ds) genomes. The main groups of viral vectors applied for gene therapy are summarized below and in , followed by examples of both preclinical () and clinical findings (). Finally, the approval of viral vector-based drugs is discussed.

The most applied viral vectors are certainly based on adenoviruses [4]. Naked dsDNA adenoviruses possess a packaging capacity of 7.5 kb of foreign DNA providing short-term episomal expression of the gene of interest in a relatively broad range of host cells. The original adenovirus vectors generated strong immune responses, whereas the so-called gutted second and third generation vectors containing deletions have proven to elicit substantially reduced immunogenicity [5]. Much attention has been paid to engineering packaging cell lines for large scale production of recombinant particles of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-grade to support clinical trials [6]. AAV vectors carry a small ssRNA genome, which allows packaging of only 4 kb inserts [7]. Generally, AAV is considered to generate low pathogenicity and toxicity and provides long-term transgene expression through chromosomal integration [8]. One limitation of using AAV relates to the immune response triggered by repeated administration [9]. This problem has been addressed by applying a different AAV serotype for each re-administration. Another issue relates to the limited packaging capacity of foreign DNA into recombinant AAV particles [10]. This shortcoming has been addressed by engineering dual AAV vectors [11].

Herpes simplex viruses (HSV) are large enveloped dsDNA viruses characteristic of their lytic and latent nature of infection, which result in life-long latent infection of neurons and allows for long-term transgene expression [12]. Deletion of HSV genes has generated expression vectors with low toxicity and an excellent packaging capacity of >30 kb foreign DNA [13]. In contrast to HSV, retroviruses possess a ssRNA genome with an envelope structure [14]. Typically, retroviruses are randomly integrated into the host genome, which has been problematic, as previously described, in the therapy of SCID patients [2,3]. However, this shortcoming has triggered the development of safer vectors showing targeted integration and also improved helper cell lines [15]. Retroviruses can accommodate up to 8 kb of foreign inserts and have represented the gold standard vectors for long-term gene therapy applications. One drawback of retroviruses is their incapability to infect nondividing cells, which has enhanced the interest in application of lentivirus vectors for gene therapy. Although lentiviruses belong to the family of retroviruses, they have the capability of infecting both dividing and nondividing cells providing low cytotoxicity [16,17]. Possessing the same packaging capacity and chromosomal integration as conventional retroviruses, lentiviruses have become attractive for therapeutic applications requiring long-term expression.

Self-amplifying ssRNA viruses comprise of alphaviruses (Semliki Forest virus, Sindbis virus, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, and M1) and flaviviruses (Kunjin virus, West Nile virus, and Dengue virus) possessing a genome of positive polarity [18]. In contrast, rhabdoviruses (rabies and vesicular stomatitis virus) and measles viruses carry negative strand genomes [18]. Most of the self-amplifying RNA viruses possess a packaging capacity of 68 kb, and generate high levels of short-term transient gene expression [19]. Additionally, the ssRNA paramyxovirus Newcastle disease virus (NDV) replicates specifically in tumor cells and has therefore been frequently applied for cancer gene therapy [20]. Moreover, oncolytic cancer cell targeting vectors have been engineered for many of the listed ssRNA viruses above [21]. Another family of nonenveloped ssRNA viruses, namely Coxsackieviruses belonging to Picornaviridae, have been applied as oncolytic vectors [22,23].

Also, poxviruses and especially vaccinia viruses have been applied as delivery vectors [24]. The characteristic feature of poxviruses is their dsDNA genome, which can generously accommodate more than 30 kb of foreign DNA. Tumor-selective replication-competent poxvirus vectors have been engineered causing necrosis in nonhuman primates [25]. Additionally, vaccinia vectors, which replicate in tumor cells without damaging normal cells, were engineered by deletions in the thymidine kinase (TK) and vaccinia growth factor (VGF) genes [26].

Due to the many gene therapy applications of a number of viral vectors evaluated in preclinical animal models, only some examples can be presented here (). In this context, oncolytic adenoviruses have shown great promise in cancer therapy [27]. For instance, an oncolytic adenovirus engineered with a pancreatic cancer-targeting ligand SYENFSA (SYE), specifically infected and replicated in cancer cells, but not normal cells, provided effective oncolysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma PDAC) [28]. The AdSur-SYE vector, regulated by the survivin promoter, also showed high transduction efficiency in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) [29]. Intratumoral administration of AdSur-SYE resulted in complete regression of subcutaneous tumors in a mouse model. In another approach, chimeric Adenovirus type 5 and type 3 vectors, which can selectively replicate in cancer cells, have been engineered [30]. Providing simultaneous expression of the secreted melanoma differentiation associated gene-7 (MDA-7) and interleukin-12 (L-24) from the chimeric Ad5/3 vector generated selective tumor cell death after intratumoral injection in animal models. Moreover, therapeutic activity was also confined to noninfected distant tumors due to the so-called bystander anti-tumor activity. To further enhance the therapeutic efficacy, the chimeric Ad5/3 vector was encapsulated in microbubbles for stealth delivery. Ultrasound treatment released and allowed replication of the vector, which together with secretion of MDA-7/IL-24 enhanced therapeutic activity, including promotion of apoptosis and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Due to the generally limited duration of therapeutic activity of adenovirus-based gene therapy, hybrid adenovirus vectors utilizing the Sleeping Beauty transposase system or clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) associated protein-9 nuclease have been used for chromosomal integration and permanent gene editing, respectively [31]. Oncolytic adenovirus vectors have also been used in combination with the expression of immunomodulatory proteins [32]. This approach can change the tumor microenvironment from immune-suppressive to immune-vulnerable due to activation of cytotoxic T cells. In another approach, the oncolytic adenovirus Enadenotucirev, an Ad11p and Ad3 chimeric vector, has demonstrated selective propagation and killing of tumor cells [33]. Due to the inability of replication in animal cells, Enadenotucirev was evaluated in a panel of primary human cells, which demonstrated >100-fold higher viral genome levels in tumor cells than in normal cells [33]. Furthermore, intravenous tolerability was assessed in mice. The resistance to inactivation by human blood components will potentially enable intravenous vector administration.

The X chromosome-linked neurodevelopmental disorder named Rett Syndrome (RTT) has been targeted by AAV vectors in a mouse model for RTT [34]. AAV vectors expressing the transcription regulator methyl CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) delivered directly to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), showed dose-dependent side effects, but also extended survival of RTT mice. Moreover, the fatal neurodegenerative Huntingtons disease (HD) has been evaluated for AAV-based therapy in a HD mouse model [35]. Transgenic HD sheep expressing the full-length human huntingtin (HTT) gene were injected with AAV9 miRNA targeting exon 48 of the human HTT mRNA. The outcome was reduced human HTT mRNA and 5080% HTT protein in the striatum, indicating safe and effective gene silencing. Cystic fibrosis has been targeted by AAV-based expression of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) in a number of animal models showing a good safety profile, although no clear clinical benefits [36]. Recently, the AAV1 and AAV5 serotypes were tested using a dual-luciferase reporter system based on firefly and Renilla luciferases, respectively [36]. Both AAV1 and AAV5 were delivered into lungs of Rhesus macaques by microspraying, which resulted in a 10-fold higher vector genome number of AAV1 than AAV5. However, the AAV1-based luciferase activity was not statistically higher in comparison to AAV5. Moreover, serum neutralizing antibodies showed a dramatic increase for both AAV serotypes. There were no adverse events, indicating safe administration of AAV, which supports additional clinical trials, especially with the more lung-tropic AAV1 serotype. In another approach, AAV vectors have been applied for the treatment of Duchenne and limb girdle muscular dystrophies [37]. Furthermore, dual AAV technology allowed the expression of a 7 kb canine H2-R15 mini-dystrophin gene using a pair of dual AAV vectors [38]. The AAV9 was administered to the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle in a canine model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The outcome was widespread mini-dystrophin expression, restoration of dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex, reduced muscle degeneration, and improved myofiber size distribution. In the context of hemophilia A, liver-specific promoter and enhancer elements with a codon-optimized human coagulation factor VIII (hFVIII) gene have been engineered [39]. One promoter-enhancer construct with high hFVIII immunogenicity was evaluated in an FVIII knockout mouse model applying AAV8, AAV9, AAVhu37, and AAVrh64R1 vectors. Based on the generation of anti-hFVIII antibodies, the vectors were divided into one group, where less than 20% of mice (AAV8 and AAV9) and the other with more than 20% of mice (AAVrh10, AAVhu37 and AAVrh64R1) generated anti-hFVIII antibodies.

Due to the long-term effect, HSV vectors have found many applications in various disease areas. For instance, HSV-based expression of proinflammatory cytokines has proven useful in treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy [40]. In this context, continuous delivery of HSV-IL-10 into the nerve fibers of mice with type I diabetes blocked nociceptive and stress responses in transduction of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) [40]. It was suggested that macrophage activation in the peripheral nervous system is involved in the pathogenesis of pain and that HSV-based cytokine expression inhibited the development of painful neuropathy. In another approach, administration of nonreplicating HSV vectors expressing growth factors in the skin of mice resulted in the transduction of DRGs and prevented the progression of sensory neuropathy without causing any side effects [41]. Related to cancer, oncolytic HSV vectors have been applied in several preclinical studies [42]. The genome of the HSV-1 HF10 vector includes nonengineered deletions and mutations and frame-shift mutations lacking the expression of UL43, UL48.5, UL55, UL56, and latency-associated transcripts, while demonstrating overexpression of UL53 and UL54. HSV-1 HF10 replicates efficiently in tumor cells causing extensive cytotoxic damage. Moreover, activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and natural tumor killer cells were induced in tumors resulting in significant tumor growth reduction and prolonged survival. Oncolytic HSV-2 vectors have also been evaluated in animal studies on colon cancer cells and cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) and are known to be tumorigenic and responsible for cancer recurrence and metastasis [43]. Significant inhibition of tumor growth was observed after administration of oncolytic HSV-2 vectors.

Retroviruses present the classic approach for long-term gene therapy applications and the first human gene therapy trial involved implantation of autologous bone marrow cells transduced ex vivo with gamma retrovirus vectors [44]. More recently, attention has been paid to target dendritic cells (DCs) by engineering of vectors with DC-specific promoters or by retargeting vector tropism [45]. Also, transduction of hematopoietic stem cells has supported antigen-specific immune tolerance. In another immunotherapy approach, the low gene transduction efficiency of 50% of chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T (CAR-T) cells was improved to more than 90% by optimization of precultivation conditions and antibody stimulation [46]. The transduced CAR-T cells showed antigen-specific cytotoxic activity and secreted cytokines by antigen stimulation. Related to cancer therapy, the nonlytic amphotropid retroviral replicating vector (RRV) Toca 511 encoding yeast cytosine deaminase (CD) was delivered to tumors in orthotopic glioma models [47]. When combined with 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC), CD in infected tumor cells converts 5-FC to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) leading to cell death. Intravenous or intracranial administration of Toca 511 provided long-term survival in immune-competent mice after combination treatment with 5-FC. Prolonged survival was also observed in animals with pre-existing immune response to the vector, which supports the potential of readministration. The self-inactivating gammaretroviral vector (SINfes.gp91s), containing the codon-optimized transgene (gp91(phax)) and the promoter for the X-linked form of the immunodeficiency named chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), was demonstrated to protect X-CGD mice from challenges with Aspergillus fumigatus [48].

In the case of lentivirus-based gene therapy, a lentiviral vector carrying the human pyruvate kinase deficiency (hPKD) promoter and the PKLR gene was employed for addressing the monogenic metabolic disease PKD caused by mutations in the pyruvate kinase isoenzymes L/R (PKLR) gene [49]. When mouse hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) transduced with lentivirus were transplanted into myeoblated PKD mice, the erythroid compartment was normalized providing a corrected hematological phenotype and reversion of organ pathology. Furthermore, analysis of the genomic insertion sites for the lentivirus vector in transplanted hematopoietic cells indicated no presence of genotoxicity. Lentivirus vectors have also been subjected to gene therapy applications of RNA silencing in the CNS [50]. Related to Parkinsons disease (PD), the misregulation and overexpression of -synuclein leading to its accumulation in neurons was counteracted by lentivirus-based RNA interference (RNAi) in the human dopaminergic cell line SH-SY5Y and in neurons in rat striatum [51]. Moreover, in another approach, the PD-related transcriptional upregulation of the GABA-producing enzyme glutamate decaorboxylase 1 (GAD1) or GAD67 was successfully knocked down by lentivirus-mediated shRNA-miR expression in a rat model for PD, demonstrating normalized neuronal activity [52]. In the context of Alzheimers disease, lentivirus vectors have been applied for RNA silencing to knock down BACE1 attenuated amyloid precursor protein (APP) cleavage and -amyloid production, resulting in reduced neurodegeneration and behavioral deficits in an Alzheimers disease mouse model [53]. In another approach, lentivirus-based siRNA expression showed reduced tau phosphorylation and number of neurofibrillary tangles in an Alzheimers disease mouse model [54]. Furthermore, lentivirus vector-based delivery of shRNAs targeting the HIV-1 coreceptor CCR5 and the R-region of the HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR) has been evaluated in humanized bone marrow/thymus (hu-BLT) mice [55]. The outcome was efficient inhibition of HIV infection and might provide a potential therapy against HIV. In another approach, the Cal-1 anti-HIV lentiviral vector was evaluated in pigtailed macaques [56]. Cal-1 lentivirus demonstrated safe integration and preclinical safety.

Alphaviruses have been mainly applied in preclinical gene therapy studies for cancer treatment [57]. The particular feature is that alphavirus vectors can be delivered in the form of naked RNA, layered plasmid DNA vectors and recombinant replication-deficient or -proficient particles. In this context, local administration of a replication-proficient Semliki Forest virus (SFV) vector expressing EGFP, generated prolonged survival in mice with implanted A549 lung carcinoma xenografts [58]. In another study, SFV-IL-12-based therapy was evaluated in a syngeneic RG2 rat glioma model, which resulted in 87% reduction in tumor volume and significant extension of survival [59]. In attempts to target tumor cell replication, six micro-RNAs (miRNAs) were introduced into the SFV genome. Intraperitoneal administration of engineered SFV4-miRT124 particles in BALB/c mice resulted in glioma targeting, limited spread in the CNS and significantly prolonged survival rates [60]. Moreover, the naturally occurring oncolytic alphavirus M1 was demonstrated to selectively kill zinc-finger antiviral protein (ZAP)-deficient cancer cells and also showed high tumor tropism and potent oncolytic activity in a liver tumor model [61].

In the context of flaviviruses, the granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) expressed from a Kunjin virus vector was subjected to intratumoral administration in mice with subcutaneous CT26 colon carcinoma [62]. The treatment resulted in a cure of more than 50% of injected mice; tumors were undetectable 18 days after Kunjin-GM-CSF administration. Likewise, treatment of B16-OVA melanoma tumors led to significant tumor regression after 5 days and the cure rate in mice reached 67% [62]. Moreover, subcutaneous injection of Kunjin-GM-CSF resulted in regression of CT26 lung metastasis in BALB/c mice.

Among rhabdoviruses, recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) has been applied for preclinical gene therapy studies. The low seroprevalence in humans and robust heterologous expression profile have supported a number of vaccine approaches against human pathogens [63]. For instance, VSV vectors expressing HIV-1 Gag and Env elicited robust HIV-1 specific cellular and humoral immune responses in nonhuman primates [63]. Furthermore, vaccinated animals were protected against challenges with a pathogenic SIV/HIV recombinant. However, the neurovirulence of VSV vectors has remained an issue of concern leading to strategies of developing attenuated vectors [60]. In another approach, a chimeric VSV vector, where the VSV G envelope was replaced by a lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein (LCMV-GP), the chimeric vector presented no harm to normal brain cells, but efficiently eliminated brain tumor cells in several tumor models in vivo [64]. Moreover, safe systemic administration was confirmed in mice and no humoral activity against VSV was detected, which provided the basis for repeated systemic injections. In preparation for future clinical trials, the oncolytic VSV-IFN-NIS vector expressing interferon- (IFN) and sodium iodide transporter (NIS) was evaluated in preclinical rodent models [65]. For instance, dose-dependent tumor regression was demonstrated in C57BL1/KaLwRij mice implanted with syngeneic 5TGM1 plasmacytoma tumors. However, KAS6/1 xenografts regressed at all VSV doses tested in SCID mice. Moreover, purpose-bred dogs with naturally occurring tumors were subjected to a dose-escalation study with VSV-IFN-NIS [66]. The intravenous maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to 1010 TCID50 with mild to moderate adverse events. The VSV genome disappeared rapidly and anti-VSV antibodies were detected 5 days after administration in the blood. However, no infectious virus was detected in the plasma, urine or buccal swabs. In another study, VSV-based expression of human mucin 1 (MUC1) provided significant reduction of tumor growth in mice with established pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma xenografts [67]. Furthermore, combination of VSV-MUC1 and gemcitabine resulted in superior therapeutic efficacy.

Measles viruses have found a number of gene therapy applications, which have been evaluated in preclinical animal models. In this context, the oncolytic MV-Edm was engineered to express NIS, which is depleted in aggressive and radioiodine resistant anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) [68]. Treatment with MV-NIS confirmed NIS expression and enhanced tumor killing. In another approach, measles virus was engineered to express a yeast-based bifunctional suicide gene encoding cytosine deaminase and uracil phosphoribosyltransfrerase named super-cytosine deaminase (SCD) [69]. The chimeric protein is capable of converting the nontoxic prodrug 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) into highly cytotoxic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Furthermore, 5-FU is directly converted into 5-fluorouridine monophosphate (5-FUMP), which addresses the issue of chemoresistance to 5-FU in cancer treatment. Transduction with MV-SCD showed replication and efficient lysis of human ovarian cancer cell lines and primary tumor cells. Moreover, precision-cut tumor slices from human ovarian cancer patients demonstrated efficient infection by MV-SCD. The MV-SCD also showed strong oncolytic activity in a mouse xenograft model of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [70]. Furthermore, MV-SCD generated long-term virus replication in tumor tissue and induced apoptosis-like cell death independent of intact apoptosis pathways. In another study, MV-SCD was administered intratumorally in combination with systemic 5-FU in a TFK-1 xenograft mouse model, which resulted in significant tumor reduction [71]. Moreover, tumor reduction and significant survival benefits were observed in a HuCCT1 xenograft model [71].

Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vectors have been frequently used in preclinical cancer therapy studies due to their oncolytic activity [72]. Although NDV vectors expressing IL-2 showed promise, comparative studies with the less toxic IL-15 have been conducted. Intratumoral injection of NDV-IL15 and NDV-IL2 in melanoma-bearing mice showed efficient suppression of tumor growth [72]. However, the 120 day survival rate was 12.5% higher after NDV-IL15 treatment than that of NDV-IL2. Likewise, the survival rate was 26.6% higher for NDV-IL15 treatment in a tumor rechallenge experiment. In another study, reverse genetics were employed on the oncolytic NDV D90 strain to generate recombinant NDVs carrying the GFP gene [73]. The rescued virus showed tumor-selective replication and induced apoptosis in tumor cells in athymic mice with implanted lung tumors. It has also been demonstrated that expression of IL-2 and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) enhanced inherent antineoplasticity by inducing apoptosis [74]. The NDV-TRAIL and the bifunctional NDV-IL2-TRAIL showed superior apoptotic function in comparison to NDV-IL2. Moreover, CD4+ and CD8+ proliferation was induced and expression of TFN- and IFN- antitumor cytokine expression was elicited. The NDV-IL2-TRAIL also exhibited prolonged survival in mice implanted with HCC and melanoma xenografts. In another study, the NDV Anhinga strain was applied for the expression of soluble TRAIL (NDV/Anh-TRAIL), which resulted in efficient suppression of HCC without significant cytotoxicity [75].

Coxsackieviruses have been used for several gene therapy applications [23]. For instance, the coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) expressing the human fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) was injected into ischemic hindlimbs of mice showing protection from ischemic necrosis [76]. The treatment improved the blood flow in ischemic limbs for more than 3 weeks. Moreover, the recombinant CVB3 showed a drastic decrease in virulence compared to wild type CVB3. Related to cancer, Coxsackievirus A21 (CAV21) expressing intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and decay-accelerating factor (DAF) reduced tumor burden in nonobese SCID mice implanted with melanoma xenografts [77]. A single administration of CAV21 was sufficient to provide efficient oncolysis and the systemic spread of CAV21 showed efficient regression in tumors distantly located from the site of viral injection. Furthermore, the same CAV21 vector was evaluated in SCID mice implanted with T47D and MDA-MB-231-luc breast tumor xenografts [78]. A single intravenous injection generated significant regression of pre-established tumors and also targeting and elimination of metastases. Furthermore, intravenous injection of CVA21 expressing ICAM-1 and DAF in combination with intraperitoneal injection of doxorubicin hydrochloride provided significantly enhanced tumor regression in comparison to either virus or drug alone in mice with implanted MDA-MB-231 tumors [79]. Related to prostate cancer, the low pathogenic enteroviruses, CVA21, CVA21-DAFv, and Echovirus 1 (EV1), were tested in SCID mice [80]. Systemic delivery induced regression of tumor xenografts and a therapeutic dose-response was obtained for escalating doses of EV1 in the LNCaP mouse model.

Finally, poxviruses have found several applications as gene therapy vectors. For instance, vaccinia virus vectors have demonstrated potential for treatment of pancreatic cancer [81]. In this context, the PANVAC system comprising of recombinant vaccinia and fowlpox viruses, carrying the tumor-associated antigens epithelial MUC-1 and carcinomebryonic antigen (CEA) as well as T cell stimulatory molecules, have been applied [82]. Sequential subcutaneous administration of the vectors has provided induced CEA and MUC-1 CTL responses in preclinical animal models. In the case of HCC, the light-emitting recombinant GLV-2b372 vaccinia virus was injected into HCC xenografts in the flank of athymic nude mice for assessment of tumor growth and inhibition of viral biodistribution [83]. It was demonstrated that flank tumor volumes decreased by 50% 25 days after injection, while tumor volumes increased by 400% in control mice. Related to prostate cancer, NIS expression from the GLV-1h153 vaccinia virus in combination with radiotherapy was evaluated in CD1 nude mice implanted with PC3 xenografts [84]. Combination therapy was superior to individual treatments both in xenograft and immunocompetent transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) mouse models, demonstrating restricted tumor growth and improved survival rates. A vaccinia virus was engineered by mutating the F4L gene, the viral homologue of the cell-cycle-regulated small subunit of ribonucleotide reductase 2 (RRM2), which provided tumor-selective replication and cell killing [85]. It was confirmed that the F4L-mutated vector selectively replicated in immune-competent rat AY-27 and xenografted human RT122-luc orthotopic bladder cancer models, resulting in substantial tumor regression or complete ablation without causing any cytotoxicity. Moreover, antitumor immunity was established in rats cured of AY-27 tumors. Recently, a novel cowpox virus (CPXV) vector was engineered with a deletion of the thymidine kinase (TK) gene and insertion of the suicide gene FCU1, which is responsible for conversion of 5-FC into 5-FU and 5-FUMP [86]. Systemic administration of the modified CPXV vector showed accumulation in tumor cells and low infection and toxicity of normal cells. Moreover, intratumoral administration in U-87-MG glioblastoma and LoVo colon cancer models, induced relevant tumor growth inhibition.

A substantial number of clinical trials have been conducted or are currently in progress applying viral vectors (). For instance, the tumor-selective chimeric Enadenotucirev adenovirus vector was subjected to intravenous delivery in 17 patients with resectable colorectal cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, urothelial cancer and renal cancer [87]. Tumor-specific delivery was observed in most tumor samples with no treatment-related serious adverse events.

Related to hemophilia, gene therapy has been employed already for three decades, mainly focusing on AAV-based vectors [88]. In addition to discovery of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies in animal models, clinical trials have revealed that liver transaminase levels are elevated and immune-related loss of transgene expression. The mechanism of the decrease in expression levels is not fully understood, but the use of different serotypes for consecutive administration of AAV has provided improved transgene expression [9], which has resulted in long-term expression of factors VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX) and furthermore allows a cure of severe bleedings and joint damage associated with hemophilia. In this context, 11 hemophilia gene therapy clinical trials have been conducted and six ongoing phase I/II clinical trials have applied liver-directed AAV expressing either FVIII or FIX with some success [89]. Furthermore, stem cell-based lentiviral vector delivery has proven successful in establishing sustained high level FIX expression after differentiation of adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteoblastic cells [90], which potentially can be applied for treatment of hemophilia B. Likewise, stem cell-based lentiviral gene therapy can provide life-long production of FVIII and the potential cure of hemophilia A [89].

The oncolytic HSV HF10 vector has been subjected to clinical trials in recurrent breast cancer, head and neck cancer, unresectable pancreatic cancer, refractory superficial cancer, and melanoma [42]. The studies demonstrated high safety and a low frequency of adverse effects in treated patients. Moreover, HF10 antigens were detected 300 days after immunization in pancreatic cancer patients. Combination therapy with HF10 and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) showed a good safety profile and good antitumor efficacy in a phase II trial [42]. Related to retroviruses, a clinical trial in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) is currently in progress with the Toca 511 retrovirus [47]. Moreover, Toca 511 was subjected to an open-label, ascending dose, multicenter phase I trial in patients with recurrent or progressive HGG [91]. The overall survival was 13.6 months and statistically better, relative to an external control group. Moreover, tumor samples from patients surviving more than a year demonstrated survival-related RNA expression in correlation with treatment-related survival. Currently, a phase II/III trial with Toca 511 is in progress [92]. In another approach, a gammaretroviral vector was employed for the treatment of chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), which relates to primary immunodeficiency, resulting in an impaired antimicrobial activity in phagocytic cells [48]. The phase I/II trial revealed that although bacterial and fungal infections were transiently resolved, clonal dominance and malignant transformations compromised the therapeutic effect, suggesting that alternative vectors should be considered for delivery [48]. In another cancer-related approach MV-NIS has been approved by the FDA for human clinical trials in myeloma patients, which could provide a potential strategy for targeting iodine-resistant ATC [66]. Oncolytic vaccinia viruses have also been subjected in a phase I clinical trial in 11 patients with refractory advanced colorectal or other solid cancers [93]. The study showed neither dose-related toxicity nor any treatment-related severe adverse events. However, a strong induction of inflammatory and Th1 cytokines indicated a potent mediation of potential immunity against cancer, which supports further trials with intravenously administered vaccinia virus in combination with expression of therapeutic genes, immune checkpoint blockade, or complement inhibitors. In another study applying poxviruses, the PANVAC-VF vaccine regimen composed of a priming dose of recombinant vaccinia virus and booster doses of recombinant fowlpox virus expressing CEA, MUC-1, and a triad of costimulatory molecules (TRICOM) was subjected to subcutaneous administration in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer [94]. The safety and ability of PANVAC-VF to induce antigen-specific T cells was demonstrated [80]. However, a phase III trial targeting patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer failed to meet the therapeutic targets and was terminated [95]. In another approach, a phase I trial for direct intratumoral injection of PANVAC-VF has generated some encouraging results [96].

In the context of HSV-based clinical trials, the oncolytic HSV M032 vector expressing IL-12 has been subjected to a phase I dose-escalating study in patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma [97]. Moreover, the HSV strain G207 lacking genes essential for replication in normal cells were evaluated in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme [98]. After two doses of HSV G207 (totaling 1.15 109 pfu) no patients developed HSV encephalitis, but significant antitumor activity was observed. Furthermore, the study demonstrated safe multiple dose delivery including direct injections into the brain. In a phase I study in patients with recurrent/progressive HGG six of nine patients had stable disease of partial response and the median survival time was 7.5 months after a single-dose oncolytic HSV injection, indicating the potential for clinical response [99]. Furthermore, preclinical studies with HSV G207 have generated highly sensitive tumor killing, which support the initiation of the first-in-children study of intratumoral administration in children with recurrent or progressive supratentorial malignant tumors [100]. Alphaviruses have so far been subjected to only a limited amount of clinical trials. In this context, recombinant VEE replicon particles expressing the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) were administered to patients with castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer in a phase I dose-escalation study [101]. The immunization showed no toxicity, but no PSMA-specific cellular immune response was detected with only weak signals detected by ELISA with a dose of 9 106 IU.

Similar results occurred when immunizations were performed with 3.6 107 IU. Despite the lack of clinical benefit and robust immune responses, immunizations elicited neutralizing antibodies, which encourages further dose optimization studies. In another approach, liposome-enveloped SFV vectors expressing IL-12 were subjected to systemic administration in a phase I study in melanoma and kidney carcinoma patients [102]. Intravenous injections provided a transient 5-fold increase of IL-12 in the plasma. Due to the encapsulation procedure, tumor targeting and protection against recognition by the host immune system was obtained, which also allowed repeated vector administration.

NDV has been used in a number of clinical trials [103]. For instance, NDV expressing multiple tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) has been demonstrated to provide long-term survival in phase II trials in patients with ovarian, stomach, and pancreatic cancer [104]. Furthermore, melanoma patients were immunized with NDV in a randomized double-blind phase II/III trial [105]. However, the study results suggested that there were no remarkable differences between the vaccinated individuals and those in the placebo group. In a phase II study 79 patients with solid tumors were subjected to intravenous administration of the NDV PV101 strain [106]. A lower dose of 12 109 pfu/m2 and an MTD of 12 1010 pfu/mL were applied, which resulted in objective response to the higher dose and progression-free survival ranging from 4 to 31 months. In another phase III trial, 335 patients with colorectal cancer were subjected to NDV immunotherapy [107]. It was demonstrated that vaccination with NDV provided prolonged survival and short-term improved quality of life.

Approaches on HIV gene therapy lentivirus vectors have been employed for targeting CCR5 by shRNA delivery [108]. The shRNAs were demonstrated to effectively inhibit CCR5 expression providing protection against HIV-1 infection in cell cultures [109]. Moreover, a self-activating lentiviral vector has been engineered to express a combination of the sh5 anti-HIV gene and the C46 antiviral fusion inhibitor peptide, which provided a synergistic effect on HIV-1 inhibition [108]. The promising results of preclinical studies triggered the first phase I clinical trial applying RNA interference to down-regulate CCR5 expression in HIV therapy [110].

Related to Coxsackieviruses, a phase I/II trial in melanoma patients with the CVA21 showed good tolerance, viral replication in tumors and increased antitumor activity [111]. The latter could be further enhanced by combination therapy with immune checkpoint blockade. In another phase II trial, CVA21 demonstrated induced immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment of patients with melanoma [112]. Moreover, combination therapy of CVA21 and systemic pembrolizumab in a phase 1b study in melanoma patients showed a best overall response rate of 60% and stable disease in 27% of the patients [113]. Neither dose-limiting toxicity nor grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were observed.

In the context of cystic fibrosis, a pseudotyped lentivirus vector with a fusion protein (F)/hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) was optimized for promoter/enhancer sequences and evaluated in mice, and human airliquid interface (ALI) cultures in preparation for a first-in-man CF clinical trial [114]. The lentivirus vector carrying a hybrid cytosine guanine dinucleotide (CpG)-free CMV enhancer/elongation factor 1 alpha promoter (hCEF) expressed functional CFTR, retained 90100% transduction efficiency in clinically relevant delivery devices and showed acceptable toxicity and integration site profiles to support the initiation of a clinical trial in CF patients.

The first viral-based gene therapy drugs were approved some time ago in China [115]. In this context, oncolytic adenoviruses expressing the p53 gene (GendicineTM) [115] and AdH101 containing the E1b-55K deletion [116] are used for treatment of cancers with mutated p53 and head and neck cancer, respectively. GendicineTM has been used for 12 years in more than 30,000 patients with an exemplary safety record and has provided significantly better responses compared to standard therapies when combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy [117]. Moreover, the progression-free survival times were significantly extended.

Furthermore, a second-generation oncolytic HSV vector expressing GM-CSF has been approved in the US and Europe for melanoma treatment [118,119]. Unfortunately, although the AAV-based Glybera drug was approved for treatment of the rare inherited disorder lipoprotein lipase deficiency, the high costs and limited demand forced the withdrawal from the market [120].

Additionally, several other viral-based drugs will most likely be on the market in the near future. For instance, oncolytic VV JX-594 (pexastimogene devacirepvec) for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment [121], Ad CG0070 expressing GM-CSF for bladder cancer [122], and the wild type retrovirus-based pelareorep (Reolysin) [123] for head and neck cancer are at late-stage development. Moreover, the third generation oncolytic HSV-1 G47, which was subjected to a phase II glioblastoma study [124], has been further designated as a Sakigake breakthrough therapy, which will provide priority reviewing and fast-track approval [118].

Follow this link:
Viral Vectors in Gene Therapy - PMC

Posted in Gene therapy | Comments Off on Viral Vectors in Gene Therapy – PMC

Yet another gene therapy developer turns to layoffs – BioPharma Dive

Posted: April 6, 2022 at 2:30 am

Dive Brief:

Gene therapy holds great promise, with the potential to effectively cure an array of diseases. Already, the Food and Drug Administration has approved two of these medicines, Roche's Luxturna and Novartis' Zolgensma, the latter of which was developed at AveXis. Yet, as with most cutting-edge technologies, there have been challenges, among them that gene therapies can be costly to develop and are difficult to manufacture.

For young companies like Taysha, these challenges were eased by easy access to money. The last few years had seen the biotechnology sector flushed with record amounts of capital from venture firms and the public markets. Taysha, notably, priced shares at the top end of the company's estimated range when it went public in September 2020, raising $157 million in the process.

But investor sentiment toward biotechnology companies, which reached new heights in the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic, has worsened substantially in recent months. While the downtown has affected drugmakers in all areas of research, it's been hard on those developing gene therapies. In addition to Taysha, at least ten other gene therapy developers have announced layoffs, cost cuts or restructured programs since December.

Taysha's current priorities are to advance one program targeting Rett syndrome, which is in preclinical testing, and another focused on giant axonal neuropathy, which is currently in an early-stage study that should produce results later this year. The company noted, too, that it expects to hit milestones this year in programs for two types of Batten disease and a rare form of infantile epilepsy.

But elsewhere, Taysha is cutting back. A small trial testing one of its therapies against Tay-Sachs disease will stop enrollment, for example, though patients who were previously dosed will continue to be followed.

"To increase operational efficiency, activities for other ongoing clinical programs will be minimized and all additional research and development will be paused," Session said in a statement Thursday.

Taysha announced the layoffs and strategic changes alongside fourth quarter and full-year earnings. The company spent $132 million on research and development last year, and ultimately tallied a $173 million loss from operations. Session said that, with existing cash, debt financing and the newly implemented strategy, Taysha should have enough money to operate into the fourth quarter of 2023.

Taysha shares were up as much as about 3% Friday morning, before dipping down to near $6.50 apiece.

More here:
Yet another gene therapy developer turns to layoffs - BioPharma Dive

Posted in Gene therapy | Comments Off on Yet another gene therapy developer turns to layoffs – BioPharma Dive

Orchard turns to layoffs in cutting gene therapy research – BioPharma Dive

Posted: April 6, 2022 at 2:30 am

Dive Brief:

Orchard recently secured an important agreement on reimbursement in the U.K. for Libmeldy, a gene therapy approved in Europe in December 2020 for children with early-onset metachromatic leukodystrophy. The company is working to expand newborn screening for the ultra-rare disease in other European countries, where two patients were recently treated under early access schemes.

The restructuring announced Wednesday puts Orchard's focus on Libmeldy, which the company hopes to submit for approval in the U.S. later this year or early next, as well as on two earlier gene therapies also for inherited neurometabolic diseases.

"In light of our experiences and knowledge gained in this current and rapidly evolving market environment for gene therapy, our plan is to concentrate resources on programs that have the potential to make a remarkable difference to patients while also providing sustainable value to the business to enable the achievement our long-term vision," said Bobby Gaspar, Orchard's CEO, in a statement.

While Orchard will keep active other research programs for future partnerships, the company will discontinue investment in gene therapies it was developing for rare primary immune deficiencies, including two currently in clinical testing. The path to an approval application in the U.S. for one of those gene therapies is now longer, Orchard said, citing feedback the company recently received from the Food and Drug Administration.

Orchard will also discontinue investment in Strimvelis, a gene therapy originally developed by GlaxoSmithKline that was approved in Europe six years ago. Since then, only 16 patients have received the therapy, which treats a rare immune condition known as ADA-SCID.

The cutbacks aren't the first time Orchard has laid off staff and discontinued research. The company announced layoffs soon after the COVID-19 pandemic began and, in June of last year, stopped developinganother treatment for ADA-SCID.

This time, Orchard has company. At least nine other cell and gene therapy developers have announced layoffs, cost cuts or altered their research plans since December. Bluebird bio, long a leading company in the field, warned investors earlier this month that there was "substantial doubt" about its ability to remain solvent over the next year.

With the expected cost savings, Orchard now anticipates being able to fund operations into 2024 and said it will seek "strategic alternatives" for its discontinued programs.

Read the original here:
Orchard turns to layoffs in cutting gene therapy research - BioPharma Dive

Posted in Gene therapy | Comments Off on Orchard turns to layoffs in cutting gene therapy research – BioPharma Dive

Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Global Market Opportunities and Strategies to 2030 – ResearchAndMarkets.com – Yahoo Finance

Posted: April 6, 2022 at 2:30 am

DUBLIN, April 04, 2022--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The "Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Global Market Opportunities And Strategies To 2030, By Nucleic Acid Technology, Application, End User" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global nucleic acid-based gene therapy market grew from $1,391.9 million in 2015 to $4,726.8 million in 2020 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.7%. The market is expected to grow from $4,726.8 million in 2020 to $7,282.9 million in 2025 at a rate of 9.0%. The market is then expected to grow at a CAGR of 15.4% from 2025 and reach $14,909.6 million in 2030.

Growth in the historic period in the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market resulted from technological advances in synthetic biology, advances in combinatorial chemistry and bioinformatics, increased healthcare expenditure, rising pharmaceutical R&D expenditure, and rise in public-private partnerships.

The market was restrained by off-target specificity, challenges in nucleotide delivery to cells, instability of the nucleotides, inadequate reimbursements, challenges due to regulatory changes, low healthcare access, and limited number of treatment centers.

Going forward, a rise in healthcare expenditure, increasing prevalence of cancer and chronic diseases, rising geriatric population, rising geriatric population, increasing research and development spending and rising focus on gene therapy will drive the growth in the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market. Factors that could hinder the growth of the market in the future include high costs of therapy, stringent regulations, reimbursement challenges, and coronavirus pandemic.

The nucleic acid-based gene therapy market is segmented by technology into anti-sense and anti-gene oligonucleotides, SiRNA and RNA Interference, gene transfer therapy, ribozymes, aptamers, and others. The anti-sense and anti-gene oligonucleotides market was the largest segment of the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market segmented by technology, accounting for 92.90% of the total in 2020. Going forward, the others segment is expected to be the fastest growing segment in the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market segmented by technology, at a CAGR of 59.9% during 2020-2025.

Story continues

The nucleic acid-based gene therapy market is also segmented by application into oncology, muscular dystrophy/muscular disorders, rare diseases and others. The muscular dystrophy/muscular disorders market was the largest segment of the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market segmented by application, accounting for 61.4% of the total in 2020. Going forward, the oncology segment is expected to be the fastest growing segment in the nucleic-acid based gene therapy market segmented by application, at a CAGR of 18.1% during 2020-2025.

The nucleic acid-based gene therapy market is also segmented by end-user into hospitals and clinics, academic and research institutes. The hospitals and clinics market was the largest segment of the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market segmented by end-user, accounting for 85.0% of the total in 2020. Going forward, the academic and research institutes segment is expected to be the fastest growing segment in the nucleic-acid based gene therapy market segmented by end-user, at a CAGR of 9.8% during 2020-2025.

North America was the largest region in the global nucleic acid-based gene therapy market, accounting for 46.2% of the total in 2020. It was followed by the Western Europe, Asia Pacific and then the other regions. Going forward, the fastest-growing regions in the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market will be the Middle East and Eastern Europe where growth will be at CAGRs of 33.7% and 26.0% respectively. These will be followed by South America and Asia Pacific, where the markets are expected to register CAGRs of 21.0% and 20.4% respectively.

The global nucleic acid-based gene therapy market is fairly fragmented, with a large number of small players. The top ten competitors in the market made up to 16.40% of the total market in 2020. Major players in the market include Copernicus Therapeutics, Moderna Inc., Wave Life Sciences, Protagonist Therapeutics and Transgene.

The top opportunities in the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market segmented by technology will arise in the anti-sense and anti-gene oligonucleotides segment, which will gain $1,290.7 million of global annual sales by 2025. The top opportunities in the nucleic-acid based gene therapy market segmented by application will arise in the muscular dystrophy/muscular disorders segment, which will gain $1,000.2 million of global annual sales by 2025.

The top opportunities in the nucleic-acid based gene therapy market segmented by application will arise in the hospitals and clinics segment, which will gain $2,133.7 million of global annual sales by 2025. The nucleic acid-based gene therapy market size will gain the most in the USA at $915.0 million.

Key Topics Covered:

1. Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market Executive Summary

2. Table of Contents

3. List of Figures

4. List of Tables

5. Report Structure

6. Introduction

6.1. Segmentation By Geography

6.2. Segmentation By Technology

6.3. Segmentation By Application

6.4. Segmentation By End-User

7. Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market Characteristics

7.1. Market Definition

7.2. Segmentation By Nucleic Acid Technology

7.2.1. Anti-Sense and Anti-Gene Oligonucleotides

7.2.2. siRNA and RNA Interference

7.2.3. Gene Transfer Therapy

7.2.4. Ribozymes

7.2.5. Aptamers

7.2.6. Others

7.3. Segmentation By Application

7.3.1. Oncology

7.3.2. Muscular Dystrophy/ Muscular Disorders

7.3.3. Rare Diseases

7.3.4. Others

7.4. Segmentation By End-User

7.4.1. Hospitals And Clinics

7.4.2. Academic And Research Institutes

8. Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market Trends And Strategies

8.1. Global Research Initiatives And Funding

8.2. Integration Of Advanced Technologies In Gene Therapy

8.3. Increasing Partnerships And Acquisitions For Promoting Gene Therapy

8.4. Increasing Number Of Pipeline Studies And Drug Development

8.5. Growing Investments and Manufacturing Facility Expansion

8.6. Rising Focus On Gene Editing

9. Impact Of COVID-19 On The Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market

9.1. Introduction

9.2. Supply Chain Disruptions

9.3. Impact On Clinical Trials

9.4. Impact on Manufacturers and Activities

9.5. Conclusion

10. Global Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market Size And Growth

10.1. Market Size

10.2. Historic Market Growth, 2015 - 2020, Value ($ Million)

10.3. Forecast Market Growth, 2020 - 2025, 2030F, Value ($ Million)

11. Global Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market Segmentation

11.1. Global Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market, Segmentation By Technology, Historic And Forecast, 2015 - 2020, 2025F, 2030F, Value ($ Million)

11.2. Global Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market, Segmentation By Application, Historic And Forecast, 2015 - 2020, 2025F, 2030F, Value ($ Million)

11.3. Global Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market, Segmentation By End User, Historic And Forecast, 2015 - 2020, 2025F, 2030F, Value ($ Million)

Companies Mentioned

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/fisci7

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220404005624/en/

Contacts

ResearchAndMarkets.comLaura Wood, Senior Press Managerpress@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

The rest is here:
Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Global Market Opportunities and Strategies to 2030 - ResearchAndMarkets.com - Yahoo Finance

Posted in Gene therapy | Comments Off on Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Global Market Opportunities and Strategies to 2030 – ResearchAndMarkets.com – Yahoo Finance

Tevogen Bio Expands Executive Leadership Team to Accelerate Operational Growth and Commercial Readiness – Business Wire

Posted: April 6, 2022 at 2:30 am

WARREN, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Tevogen Bio, a clinical stage biotechnology company specializing in the development of cell and gene therapies in oncology, neurology, and virology, today announced the strategic expansion of its leadership team with two new executives to support the biotechs rapid operational growth, manufacturing readiness, and the continued development and utilization of its next generation precision T cell platform technology.

New hires include:

-Stephen Chen, Chief Technical Officer

Stephen Chen, MBA, has more than 18 years of biotech industry experience. He was most recently Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technical Officer at NKGen Biotech where he led technical operations and the build out of the companys clinical GMP manufacturing facility. Previously, he was Senior Vice President of Quality and Technical Operations at NKGen Biotech. Before joining NKGen Biotech, he was Senior Director of Quality Assurance and Quality Control at ARMO Biosciences. Previously, he was Director of Quality Assurance at Kite Pharma. Chen started his career with over a decade of increasing responsibility in technical operations at Baxter BioScience. He earned an MBA from the University of Southern Californias Marshall School of Business and a Bachelor of Science in biochemistry/cell biology from the University of California, San Diego.

-Sadiq Khan, Global Commercial Lead

Sadiq Khan, MBA, brings over 30 years of commercial leadership, operations, and alliance management experience. Most recently, Sadiq served as Executive Director of Operations & Business Planning at BioCentriq where he played a key role in the creation of the CDMO specializing in cell and gene therapy manufacturing. Over the course of his career at Sanofi-Aventis and its predecessor companies, Sadiq successfully launched and managed multiple products in individual markets, regions, and globally. His experience covers over 12 therapeutic areas from specialty brands to blockbuster franchise with annual sales exceeding $1.4 billion. In addition to several country and regional commercial leadership roles in the Asia-Pacific region, he has held U.S. and global franchise leadership positions. Sadiq holds an undergraduate degree in mathematics and physics, and an MBA cum laude from University of Illinois at Chicago. He has been a regular guest speaker on topics related to biopharmaceutical commercialization, marketing, and alliance management at the Martin Tuchman School of Management at NJIT and the School of Engineering at Columbia University.

I have witnessed Tevogen Bios rapid growth and disruptive technological advances in the cell and gene therapy space and am excited to join a team who values scientific innovation and embraces a new brand of operational efficiency, Chen said.

Tevogens proprietary cell and gene therapy platforms with potential cures for hard-to-treat viral infections, neurological diseases, and cancers give me hope to finally offer accessible treatment options to the community. I am very excited to join this team of professionals where innovative ideas dont have to wait too long to become a reality, said Khan.

About Tevogens Next Generation Precision T Cell Platform

Tevogens next generation precision T cell platform is designed to provide increased specificity to eliminate malignant and viral infected cells, while allowing healthy cells to remain intact. Multiple targets are selected in advance with the goal of overcoming mutational capacity of cancer cells and viruses.

Tevogen believes its technology has the potential to overcome the primary barriers to the broad application of personalized T cell therapies: potency, purity, production-at-scale, and patient-pairing, without the limitations of current approaches. Tevogens goal is to open the vast and unprecedented potential of developing personalized immunotherapies for large patient populations impacted by common cancers and viral infections.

The companys lead product, TVGN-489, is currently in clinical trials for high-risk COVID-19 patients at Jefferson University Hospitals in Philadelphia. TVGN-489 is a highly purified, SARS-CoV-2-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocyte (CTL) product, which is designed to detect targets spread across the entire viral genome.

Tevogen recently announced it has completed dosing of the second cohort of patients in the proof of concept clinical trial of TVGN-489, marking the midway point of the trials planned four dosing levels. Trial details and recruitment information are available at Clinical Trials - Tevogen.

About Tevogen Bio

Tevogen Bio is driven by a team of distinguished scientists and highly experienced biopharmaceutical leaders who have successfully developed and commercialized multiple franchises. Tevogens leadership believes that accessible personalized immunotherapies are the next frontier of medicine, and that disruptive business models are required to sustain medical innovation in the post-pandemic world.

Forward Looking Statements

This press release contains certain forward-looking statements relating to Tevogen Bio Inc (the Company) and its business. These statements are based on managements current expectations and beliefs as of the date of this release and are subject to a number of factors which involve known and unknown risks, delays, uncertainties and other factors not under the Companys control that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or other expectations implied by these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can sometimes be identified by terminology such as may, will, should, intend, expect, believe, potential, possible, or their negatives or comparable terminology, as well as other words and expressions referencing future events, conditions, or circumstances. In any forward-looking statement in which the Company expresses an expectation or belief as to future results, there can be no assurance that the statement or expectation or belief will be achieved. Various factors may cause differences between the Companys expectations and actual results, including, among others: the Companys limited operating history; uncertainties inherent in the execution, cost and completion of preclinical studies and clinical trials; risks related to regulatory review and approval and commercial development; risks associated with intellectual property protection; and risks related to matters that could affect the Companys future financial results, including the commercial potential, sales, and pricing of the Companys products. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or any of the information in this release, or provide additional information, and expressly disclaims any and all liability and makes no representations or warranties in connection herewith or with respect to any omissions herefrom.

See the original post:
Tevogen Bio Expands Executive Leadership Team to Accelerate Operational Growth and Commercial Readiness - Business Wire

Posted in Gene therapy | Comments Off on Tevogen Bio Expands Executive Leadership Team to Accelerate Operational Growth and Commercial Readiness – Business Wire

Page 491«..1020..490491492493..500510..»