Page 846«..1020..845846847848..860870..»

Hormone replacement therapy and menopause | | tctimes.com – Fenton Tri County Times

Posted: October 31, 2020 at 2:51 am

Menopause is a natural occurrence that takes place in a womans life around the age of 50. Menopause is marked by bodily changes that represent the end of a womans ability to bear children.

Like puberty, menstrual periods and pregnancy, menopause involves fluctuations in hormones, notably estrogen and progesterone. These fluctuations can cause symptoms that may make women uncomfortable, such as hot flashes, vaginal dryness, mood swings, and difficulty sleeping. As a result, many women discuss options that can make them feel more comfortable. Hormone replacement therapy may be a consideration.

What is hormone replacement therapy?

Estrogen levels fall during menopause. The online medical resource WebMD says that hormone replacement therapy, or HRT, involves taking small doses of estrogen alone or estrogen combined with progestin, the synthetic form of progesterone. Women who have undergone a hysterectomy or the surgical removal of their ovaries may only take estrogen, while a woman who still has her uterus typically takes the combination HRT. Many women find that HRT can relieve most of the troubling symptoms of menopause and help them feel more comfortable.

In addition, HRT has been proven to prevent bone loss and reduce fracture in postmenopausal women, according to the Mayo Clinic.

There are different types of HRT. HRT may involve taking a pill or applying a patch, gel or vaginal cream. HRT also may include a slow-releasing suppository or a vaginal ring. The delivery method will depend on the symptoms to minimize the amount of medication taken.

Risks of HRT

While there are many benefits to HRT, there are some risks associated with the therapy. These risks depend on the dose, the length of time taking HRT and individual health risks.

The Mayo Clinic says that, in the largest clinical trial to date, HRT that consisted of an estrogen-progestin pill increased the risk of certain serious conditions, such as heart disease, stroke, blood clots, and breast cancer. Women who begin at age 60 or older or more than 10 years from the onset of menopause are at greater risk of the these conditions. If HRT is started before the age of 60 or within 10 years of menopause, the benefits appear to outweigh the risks.

In addition, unless the uterus has been removed, doctors typically prescribe estrogen taken with progesterone because estrogen alone can stimulate the growth of the lining of the uterus, increasing the risk of endometrial cancer.

The American Cancer Society says that estrogen-progestin therapy also is linked to a higher risk of breast cancer the longer the therapy is used.

Minimizing risk

Doctors can work with their patients to minimize the risk of developing adverse affects from HRT. Tactics include finding the best product and delivery method, seeking regular follow-up care, making healthy lifestyle choices to reduce other health conditions, and taking the lowest effective dose for the shortest amount of time needed.

Hormone replacement therapy may be an option to help manage the symptoms of menopause. Women can discuss the pros and cons of HRT with their doctors.

Read more from the original source:
Hormone replacement therapy and menopause | | tctimes.com - Fenton Tri County Times

Posted in Hormone Replacement Therapy | Comments Off on Hormone replacement therapy and menopause | | tctimes.com – Fenton Tri County Times

Exelixis Announces Takeda and Ono Submit Supplemental Application for CABOMETYX (cabozantinib) in Combination with OPDIVO (nivolumab) for the…

Posted: October 31, 2020 at 2:51 am

Oct. 27, 2020 05:02 UTC

ALAMEDA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Exelixis, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXEL) today announced that Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (Takeda), its partner responsible for the clinical development and commercialization of CABOMETYX (cabozantinib) in Japan, and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Ono), have submitted a supplemental application to the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) for Manufacturing and Marketing approval of CABOMETYX in combination with OPDIVO (nivolumab) for the treatment of patients with unresectable, advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Takeda and Onos application is based on the results of CheckMate -9ER, a phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating CABOMETYX in combination with OPDIVO in previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic RCC compared with sunitinib. In CheckMate -9ER, CABOMETYX in combination with OPDIVO demonstrated superior overall survival, doubled median progression-free survival and objective response rate, and demonstrated a favorable safety profile versus sunitinib. These results were presented as a Proffered Paper during a Presidential Symposium at the European Society for Medical Oncology Virtual Congress 2020.

Following our recent announcement that the U.S. FDA accepted and granted Priority Review to our supplemental new drug application for CABOMETYX in combination with OPDIVO for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, were excited that our partner Takeda along with Ono have also advanced this combination regimen toward potential regulatory approval in Japan, said Gisela Schwab, M.D., President, Product Development and Medical Affairs and Chief Medical Officer, Exelixis. The results of the CheckMate -9ER trial suggest CABOMETYX in combination with OPDIVO may become an important new treatment option for patients with advanced kidney cancer in need of new therapies.

Per the terms of Exelixis and Takedas collaboration and license agreement, Exelixis is eligible to receive a $10 million milestone payment from Takeda as a result of this latest submission for RCC. Following the milestone associated with this regulatory filing, Exelixis will be eligible to receive a first-sale milestone payment of $20 million from Takeda related to the combination of CABOMETYX and OPDIVO for the treatment of RCC. Exelixis continues to be eligible to receive additional development, regulatory and first-sale milestones for potential future cabozantinib indications, and is also eligible for sales revenue milestones and royalties on net sales of cabozantinib in Japan. Takeda fully funds cabozantinib development activities that are exclusively for the benefit of Japan and has the opportunity to share the costs associated with global cabozantinib clinical trials, providing the company opts into those trials.

Takeda received approval in March 2020 from the Japanese MHLW to manufacture and market CABOMETYX as a treatment for patients with curatively unresectable or metastatic RCC.

About CheckMate -9ER

CheckMate -9ER is an open-label, randomized, multi-national phase 3 trial evaluating patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic RCC. A total of 651 patients (23% favorable risk, 58% intermediate risk, 20% poor risk; 25% PD-L11%) were randomized to receive OPDIVO plus CABOMETYX (n=323) vs. sunitinib (n=328). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival and objective response rate. The primary efficacy analysis is comparing the doublet combination vs. sunitinib in all randomized patients. The trial is sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical Co. and co-funded by Exelixis, Ipsen and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

About RCC

The American Cancer Societys 2020 statistics cite kidney cancer as among the top ten most commonly diagnosed forms of cancer among both men and women in the U.S.1 Clear cell RCC is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults.2 If detected in its early stages, the five-year survival rate for RCC is high; for patients with advanced or late-stage metastatic RCC, however, the five-year survival rate is only 12%.2 Approximately 32,000 patients in the U.S. and 71,000 worldwide will require systemic treatment for advanced kidney cancer in 2020.3

About 70% of RCC cases are known as clear cell carcinomas, based on histology.4 The majority of clear cell RCC tumors have below-normal levels of a protein called von Hippel-Lindau, which leads to higher levels of MET, AXL and VEGF.5,6 These proteins promote tumor angiogenesis (blood vessel growth), growth, invasiveness and metastasis.7,8,9,10 MET and AXL may provide escape pathways that drive resistance to VEGF receptor inhibitors.6,7

About CABOMETYX (cabozantinib)

In the U.S., CABOMETYX tablets are approved for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC and for the treatment of patients with HCC who have been previously treated with sorafenib. CABOMETYX tablets have also received regulatory approvals in the European Union and additional countries and regions worldwide. In 2016, Exelixis granted Ipsen exclusive rights for the commercialization and further clinical development of cabozantinib outside of the United States and Japan. In 2017, Exelixis granted exclusive rights to Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited for the commercialization and further clinical development of cabozantinib for all future indications in Japan. Exelixis holds the exclusive rights to develop and commercialize cabozantinib in the United States.

CABOMETYX in combination with OPDIVO is not indicated for advanced RCC.

CABOMETYX Important Safety Information

Warnings and Precautions

Hemorrhage: Severe and fatal hemorrhages occurred with CABOMETYX. The incidence of Grade 3 to 5 hemorrhagic events was 5% in CABOMETYX patients in RCC and HCC studies. Discontinue CABOMETYX for Grade 3 or 4 hemorrhage. Do not administer CABOMETYX to patients who have a recent history of hemorrhage, including hemoptysis, hematemesis, or melena.

Perforations and Fistulas: Gastrointestinal (GI) perforations, including fatal cases, occurred in 1% of CABOMETYX patients. Fistulas, including fatal cases, occurred in 1% of CABOMETYX patients. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of perforations and fistulas, including abscess and sepsis. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who experience a Grade 4 fistula or a GI perforation.

Thrombotic Events: CABOMETYX increased the risk of thrombotic events. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 7% (including 4% pulmonary embolism) and arterial thromboembolism in 2% of CABOMETYX patients. Fatal thrombotic events occurred in CABOMETYX patients. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who develop an acute myocardial infarction or serious arterial or venous thromboembolic event requiring medical intervention.

Hypertension and Hypertensive Crisis: CABOMETYX can cause hypertension, including hypertensive crisis. Hypertension occurred in 36% (17% Grade 3 and <1% Grade 4) of CABOMETYX patients. Do not initiate CABOMETYX in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Monitor blood pressure regularly during CABOMETYX treatment. Withhold CABOMETYX for hypertension that is not adequately controlled with medical management; when controlled, resume at a reduced dose. Discontinue CABOMETYX for severe hypertension that cannot be controlled with anti-hypertensive therapy or for hypertensive crisis.

Diarrhea: Diarrhea occurred in 63% of CABOMETYX patients. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 11% of CABOMETYX patients. Withhold CABOMETYX until improvement to Grade 1 and resume at a reduced dose for intolerable Grade 2 diarrhea, Grade 3 diarrhea that cannot be managed with standard antidiarrheal treatments, or Grade 4 diarrhea.

Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE): PPE occurred in 44% of CABOMETYX patients. Grade 3 PPE occurred in 13% of CABOMETYX patients. Withhold CABOMETYX until improvement to Grade 1 and resume at a reduced dose for intolerable Grade 2 PPE or Grade 3 PPE.

Proteinuria: Proteinuria occurred in 7% of CABOMETYX patients. Monitor urine protein regularly during CABOMETYX treatment. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who develop nephrotic syndrome.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ): ONJ occurred in <1% of CABOMETYX patients. ONJ can manifest as jaw pain, osteomyelitis, osteitis, bone erosion, tooth or periodontal infection, toothache, gingival ulceration or erosion, persistent jaw pain, or slow healing of the mouth or jaw after dental surgery. Perform an oral examination prior to CABOMETYX initiation and periodically during treatment. Advise patients regarding good oral hygiene practices. Withhold CABOMETYX for at least 3 weeks prior to scheduled dental surgery or invasive dental procedures, if possible. Withhold CABOMETYX for development of ONJ until complete resolution.

Impaired Wound Healing: Wound complications occurred with CABOMETYX. Withhold CABOMETYX for at least 3 weeks prior to elective surgery. Do not administer CABOMETYX for at least 2 weeks after major surgery and until adequate wound healing is observed. The safety of resumption of CABOMETYX after resolution of wound healing complications has not been established.

Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome (RPLS): RPLS, a syndrome of subcortical vasogenic edema diagnosed by characteristic findings on MRI, can occur with CABOMETYX. Evaluate for RPLS in patients presenting with seizures, headache, visual disturbances, confusion, or altered mental function. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who develop RPLS.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: CABOMETYX can cause fetal harm. Advise pregnant women and females of reproductive potential of the potential risk to a fetus. Verify the pregnancy status of females of reproductive potential prior to initiating CABOMETYX and advise them to use effective contraception during treatment and for 4 months after the last dose.

Adverse Reactions

The most commonly reported (25%) adverse reactions are: diarrhea, fatigue, decreased appetite, PPE, nausea, hypertension, and vomiting.

Drug Interactions

Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors: If coadministration with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors cannot be avoided, reduce the CABOMETYX dosage. Avoid grapefruit or grapefruit juice.

Strong CYP3A4 Inducers: If coadministration with strong CYP3A4 inducers cannot be avoided, increase the CABOMETYX dosage. Avoid St. Johns wort.

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Lactation: Advise women not to breastfeed during CABOMETYX treatment and for 4 months after the final dose.

Hepatic Impairment: In patients with moderate hepatic impairment, reduce the CABOMETYX dosage. CABOMETYX is not recommended for use in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Please see accompanying full Prescribing Information https://cabometyx.com/downloads/CABOMETYXUSPI.pdf.

OPDIVO INDICATIONS

OPDIVO (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (1%) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab) and 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving OPDIVO.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and at least one other line of therapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with intermediate or poor risk, previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) that has relapsed or progressed after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and brentuximab vedotin or after 3 or more lines of systemic therapy that includes autologous HSCT. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) with disease progression on or after platinum-based therapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy or have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric (12 years and older) patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of adults and pediatric patients 12 years and older with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma with involvement of lymph nodes or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after prior fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy.

OPDIVO IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Severe and Fatal Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Immune-mediated adverse reactions listed herein may not be inclusive of all possible severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions.

Immune-mediated adverse reactions, which may be severe or fatal, can occur in any organ system or tissue. While immune-mediated adverse reactions usually manifest during treatment, they can also occur at any time after starting or discontinuing YERVOY. Early identification and management are essential to ensure safe use of YERVOY. Monitor for signs and symptoms that may be clinical manifestations of underlying immune-mediated adverse reactions. Evaluate clinical chemistries including liver enzymes, creatinine, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level, and thyroid function at baseline and before each dose. Institute medical management promptly, including specialty consultation as appropriate.

Withhold or permanently discontinue YERVOY depending on severity. In general, if YERVOY requires interruption or discontinuation, administer systemic corticosteroid therapy (1 to 2 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent) until improvement to Grade 1 or less followed by corticosteroid taper for at least 1 month. Consider administration of other systemic immunosuppressants in patients whose immune-mediated adverse reaction is not controlled with corticosteroid therapy. Institute hormone replacement therapy for endocrinopathies as warranted.

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis. Fatal cases have been reported. Monitor patients for signs with radiographic imaging and for symptoms of pneumonitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or more severe pneumonitis. Permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 and withhold until resolution for Grade 2. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, fatal cases of immune-mediated pneumonitis have occurred. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.1% (61/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 6% (25/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 10% (5/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 4.4% (24/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 1.7% (2/119) of patients. In NSCLC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 9% (50/576) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.5%), Grade 3 (3.5%), and Grade 2 (4.0%) immune-mediated pneumonitis. Four patients (0.7%) died due to pneumonitis. The incidence and severity of immune-mediated pneumonitis in patients with NSCLC treated with OPDIVO 360 mg every 3 weeks in combination with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks and 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy were comparable to treatment with OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY only. The incidence and severity of immune-mediated pneumonitis in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma treated with OPDIVO 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks were similar to those occurring in NSCLC.

In Checkmate 205 and 039, pneumonitis, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in 6.0% (16/266) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 4.9% (13/266) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1) and Grade 2 (n=12).

Immune-Mediated Colitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated colitis. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 (of more than 5 days duration), 3, or 4 colitis. Withhold OPDIVO monotherapy for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 or recurrent colitis upon re-initiation of OPDIVO. When administered with YERVOY, withhold OPDIVO and YERVOY for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent colitis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 2.9% (58/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 26% (107/407) of patients including three fatal cases. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 10% (5/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 10% (52/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 7% (8/119) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 trial of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated diarrhea/colitis occurred in 12% (62/511) of patients, including Grade 3-5 (7%).

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/reactivation has been reported in patients with corticosteroid-refractory immune-mediated colitis. In cases of corticosteroid-refractory colitis, consider repeating infectious workup to exclude alternative etiologies. Addition of an alternative immunosuppressive agent to the corticosteroid therapy, or replacement of the corticosteroid therapy, should be considered in corticosteroid-refractory immune-mediated colitis if other causes are excluded.

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated hepatitis. Monitor patients for abnormal liver tests prior to and periodically during treatment. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater transaminase elevations. For patients without HCC, withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue OPDIVO for Grade 3 or 4. For patients with HCC, withhold OPDIVO and administer corticosteroids if AST/ALT is within normal limits at baseline and increases to >3 and up to 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), if AST/ALT is >1 and up to 3 times ULN at baseline and increases to >5 and up to 10 times the ULN, and if AST/ALT is >3 and up to 5 times ULN at baseline and increases to >8 and up to 10 times the ULN. Permanently discontinue OPDIVO and administer corticosteroids if AST or ALT increases to >10 times the ULN or total bilirubin increases >3 times the ULN. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 1.8% (35/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 13% (51/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 20% (10/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 7% (38/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 8% (10/119) of patients.

In Checkmate 040, immune-mediated hepatitis requiring systemic corticosteroids occurred in 5% (8/154) of patients receiving OPDIVO.

In a separate Phase 3 trial of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 4.1% (21/511) of patients, including Grade 3-5 (1.6%).

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated hypophysitis, immune-mediated adrenal insufficiency, autoimmune thyroid disorders, and Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis, signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency, thyroid function prior to and periodically during treatment, and hyperglycemia. Withhold for Grades 2, 3, or 4 endocrinopathies if not clinically stable. Administer hormone replacement as clinically indicated and corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hypophysitis. Withhold for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 hypophysitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or 4 adrenal insufficiency. Withhold for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 adrenal insufficiency. Administer hormone-replacement therapy for hypothyroidism. Initiate medical management for control of hyperthyroidism. Withhold OPDIVO for Grade 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 hyperglycemia.

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypophysitis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, hypophysitis occurred in 9% (36/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, hypophysitis occurred in 4% (2/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, hypophysitis occurred in 4.6% (25/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated hypophysitis occurred in 3.4% (4/119) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 1% (20/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 5% (21/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 18% (9/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 7% (41/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 5.9% (7/119) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 9% (171/1994) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 2.7% (54/1994) of patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 22% (89/407) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 8% (34/407) of patients receiving this dose of OPDIVO with YERVOY. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 22% (11/49) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 10% (5/49) of patients receiving this dose of OPDIVO with YERVOY. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 22% (119/547) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 12% (66/547) of patients receiving this dose of OPDIVO with YERVOY. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 15% (18/119) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 12% (14/119) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, diabetes occurred in 0.9% (17/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, diabetes occurred in 1.5% (6/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, diabetes occurred in 2.7% (15/547) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 trial of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe to life-threatening endocrinopathies occurred in 9 (1.8%) patients. All 9 patients had hypopituitarism, and some had additional concomitant endocrinopathies such as adrenal insufficiency, hypogonadism, and hypothyroidism. Six of the 9 patients were hospitalized for severe endocrinopathies.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis and Renal Dysfunction

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated nephritis. Monitor patients for elevated serum creatinine prior to and periodically during treatment. Administer corticosteroids for Grades 2-4 increased serum creatinine. Withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 increased serum creatinine. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.2% (23/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 2.2% (9/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 4.6% (25/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.7% (2/119) of patients.

Immune-Mediated Skin and Dermatologic Adverse Reactions

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated rash, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), some cases with fatal outcome. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or 4 rash. Withhold for Grade 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 rash. For symptoms or signs of SJS or TEN, withhold OPDIVO and refer the patient for specialized care for assessment and treatment; if confirmed, permanently discontinue. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated rash occurred in 9% (171/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 22.6% (92/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 35% (17/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 16% (90/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 14% (17/119) of patients.

YERVOY can cause immune-mediated rash or dermatitis, including bullous and exfoliative dermatitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Topical emollients and/or topical corticosteroids may be adequate to treat mild to moderate non-bullous exfoliative rashes. Withhold YERVOY until specialist assessment for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 exfoliative or bullous dermatologic conditions.

In a separate Phase 3 trial of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 15% (76/511) of patients, including Grade 3-5 (2.5%).

Immune-Mediated Encephalitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated encephalitis. Fatal cases have been reported. Evaluation of patients with neurologic symptoms may include, but not be limited to, consultation with a neurologist, brain MRI, and lumbar puncture. Withhold OPDIVO in patients with new-onset moderate to severe neurologic signs or symptoms and evaluate to rule out other causes. If other etiologies are ruled out, administer corticosteroids and permanently discontinue OPDIVO for immune-mediated encephalitis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, encephalitis occurred in 0.2% (3/1994) of patients. Fatal limbic encephalitis occurred in one patient after 7.2 months of exposure despite discontinuation of OPDIVO and administration of corticosteroids. Encephalitis occurred in one melanoma patient receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg (0.2%) after 1.7 months of exposure. Encephalitis occurred in one RCC patient receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg (0.2%) after approximately 4 months of exposure. Encephalitis occurred in one MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patient (0.8%) receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg after 15 days of exposure.

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, permanently discontinue or withhold OPDIVO, administer high-dose corticosteroids, and, if appropriate, initiate hormone-replacement therapy. Dose modifications for YERVOY for adverse reactions that require management different from these general guidelines are summarized as follows. Withhold for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue YERVOY for Grade 3 or 4 neurological toxicities. Withhold for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue YERVOY for Grade 3 or 4 myocarditis. Permanently discontinue YERVOY for Grade 2, 3, or 4 ophthalmologic adverse reactions that do not improve to Grade 1 within 2 weeks while receiving topical therapy OR that require systemic therapy. Across clinical trials of OPDIVO monotherapy or in combination with YERVOY , the following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions, some with fatal outcome, occurred in <1.0% of patients receiving OPDIVO: myocarditis, rhabdomyolysis, myositis, uveitis, iritis, pancreatitis, facial and abducens nerve paresis, demyelination, polymyalgia rheumatica, autoimmune neuropathy, Guillain-Barr syndrome, hypopituitarism, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, gastritis, duodenitis, sarcoidosis, histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi lymphadenitis), motor dysfunction, vasculitis, aplastic anemia, pericarditis, myasthenic syndrome, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), and autoimmune hemolytic anemia. In addition to the immune-mediated adverse reactions listed above, across clinical trials of YERVOY monotherapy or in combination with OPDIVO, the following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions, some with fatal outcome, occurred in <1% of patients unless otherwise specified: autoimmune neuropathy (2%), meningitis, encephalitis, myelitis and demyelination, myasthenic syndrome/myasthenia gravis, nerve paresis, angiopathy, temporal arteritis, pancreatitis (1.3%), arthritis, polymyositis, conjunctivitis, cytopenias (2.5%), eosinophilia (2.1%), erythema multiforme, hypersensitivity vasculitis, neurosensory hypoacusis, psoriasis, blepharitis, episcleritis, orbital myositis, scleritis, and solid organ transplant rejection. Some cases of ocular IMARs have been associated with retinal detachment.

If uveitis occurs in combination with other immune-mediated adverse reactions, consider a Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like syndrome, which has been observed in patients receiving OPDIVO and YERVOY and may require treatment with systemic steroids to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss.

Infusion-Related Reactions

OPDIVO can cause severe infusion-related reactions, which have been reported in <1.0% of patients in clinical trials. Discontinue OPDIVO in patients with Grade 3 or 4 infusion-related reactions. Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion in patients with Grade 1 or 2. Severe infusion-related reactions can also occur with YERVOY. Discontinue YERVOY in patients with severe or life-threatening infusion reactions and interrupt or slow the rate of infusion in patients with mild or moderate infusion reactions. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 6.4% (127/1994) of patients. In a separate trial in which patients received OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion or a 30-minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.2% (8/368) and 2.7% (10/369) of patients, respectively. Additionally, 0.5% (2/368) and 1.4% (5/369) of patients, respectively, experienced adverse reactions within 48 hours of infusion that led to dose delay, permanent discontinuation or withholding of OPDIVO. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.5% (10/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, infusion-related reactions occurred in 8% (4/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, infusion-related reactions occurred in 5.1% (28/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, infusion-related reactions occurred in 4.2% (5/119) of patients. In MPM patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks, infusion-related reactions occurred in 12% (37/300) of patients.

In separate Phase 3 trials of YERVOY 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.9% (28/982).

Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Fatal and other serious complications can occur in patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) before or after being treated with a PD-1 receptor blocking antibody or YERVOY. Transplant-related complications include hyperacute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after reduced intensity conditioning, and steroid-requiring febrile syndrome (without an identified infectious cause). These complications may occur despite intervening therapy between PD-1 or CTLA-4 receptor blockade and allogeneic HSCT.

Follow patients closely for evidence of transplant-related complications and intervene promptly. Consider the benefit versus risks of treatment with a PD-1 receptor blocking antibody or YERVOY prior to or after an allogeneic HSCT.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Based on mechanism of action, OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with OPDIVO or YERVOY and for at least 5 months after the last dose.

Increased Mortality in Patients with Multiple Myeloma when OPDIVO is Added to a Thalidomide Analogue and Dexamethasone

In clinical trials in patients with multiple myeloma, the addition of OPDIVO to a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone resulted in increased mortality. Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma with a PD-1 or PD-L1 blocking antibody in combination with a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone is not recommended outside of controlled clinical trials.

Lactation

It is not known whether OPDIVO or YERVOY is present in human milk. Because many drugs, including antibodies, are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from OPDIVO or YERVOY, advise women not to breastfeed during treatment and for at least 5 months after the last dose.

Serious Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 037, serious adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=268). Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 42% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse drug reactions reported in 2% to <5% of patients receiving OPDIVO were abdominal pain, hyponatremia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased lipase. In Checkmate 066, serious adverse reactions occurred in 36% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=206). Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (3.9%) and diarrhea (3.4%). In Checkmate 067, serious adverse reactions (74% and 44%), adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation (47% and 18%) or to dosing delays (58% and 36%), and Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions (72% and 51%) all occurred more frequently in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm (n=313) relative to the OPDIVO arm (n=313). The most frequent (10%) serious adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm and the OPDIVO arm, respectively, were diarrhea (13% and 2.2%), colitis (10% and 1.9%), and pyrexia (10% and 1.0%). In Checkmate 227, serious adverse reactions occurred in 58% of patients (n=576). The most frequent (2%) serious adverse reactions were pneumonia, diarrhea/colitis, pneumonitis, hepatitis, pulmonary embolism, adrenal insufficiency, and hypophysitis. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 1.7% of patients; these included events of pneumonitis (4 patients), myocarditis, acute kidney injury, shock, hyperglycemia, multi-system organ failure, and renal failure. In Checkmate 9LA, serious adverse reactions occurred in 57% of patients (n=358). The most frequent (>2%) serious adverse reactions were pneumonia, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, anemia, acute kidney injury, musculoskeletal pain, dyspnea, pneumonitis, and respiratory failure. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 7 (2%) patients, and included hepatic toxicity, acute renal failure, sepsis, pneumonitis, diarrhea with hypokalemia, and massive hemoptysis in the setting of thrombocytopenia. In Checkmate 017 and 057, serious adverse reactions occurred in 46% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=418). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, dyspnea, pyrexia, pleural effusion, pneumonitis, and respiratory failure. In Checkmate 032, serious adverse reactions occurred in 45% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=245). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were pneumonia, dyspnea, pneumonitis, pleural effusion, and dehydration. In Checkmate 743, serious adverse reactions occurred in 54% of patients receiving OPDIVO plus YERVOY. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients were pneumonia, pyrexia, diarrhea, pneumonitis, pleural effusion, dyspnea, acute kidney injury, infusion-related reaction, musculoskeletal pain, and pulmonary embolism. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 4 (1.3%) patients and included pneumonitis, acute heart failure, sepsis, and encephalitis. In Checkmate 025, serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=406). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients were acute kidney injury, pleural effusion, pneumonia, diarrhea, and hypercalcemia. In Checkmate 214, serious adverse reactions occurred in 59% of patients receiving OPDIVO plus YERVOY. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients were diarrhea, pyrexia, pneumonia, pneumonitis, hypophysitis, acute kidney injury, dyspnea, adrenal insufficiency, and colitis. In Checkmate 205 and 039, adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 7% and dose delays due to adverse reactions occurred in 34% of patients (n=266). Serious adverse reactions occurred in 26% of patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 1% of patients were pneumonia, infusion-related reaction, pyrexia, colitis or diarrhea, pleural effusion, pneumonitis, and rash. Eleven patients died from causes other than disease progression: 3 from adverse reactions within 30 days of the last OPDIVO dose, 2 from infection 8 to 9 months after completing OPDIVO, and 6 from complications of allogeneic HSCT. In Checkmate 141, serious adverse reactions occurred in 49% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=236). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were pneumonia, dyspnea, respiratory failure, respiratory tract infection, and sepsis. In Checkmate 275, serious adverse reactions occurred in 54% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=270). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were urinary tract infection, sepsis, diarrhea, small intestine obstruction, and general physical health deterioration. In Checkmate 142 in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY, serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients were colitis/diarrhea, hepatic events, abdominal pain, acute kidney injury, pyrexia, and dehydration. In Checkmate 040, serious adverse reactions occurred in 49% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=154). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients were pyrexia, ascites, back pain, general physical health deterioration, abdominal pain, pneumonia, and anemia. In Checkmate 040, serious adverse reactions occurred in 59% of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY (n=49). Serious adverse reactions reported in 4% of patients were pyrexia, diarrhea, anemia, increased AST, adrenal insufficiency, ascites, esophageal varices hemorrhage, hyponatremia, increased blood bilirubin, and pneumonitis. In Checkmate 238, Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25% of OPDIVO-treated patients (n=452). The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions reported in 2% of OPDIVO-treated patients were diarrhea and increased lipase and amylase. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 18% of OPDIVO-treated patients. In Attraction-3, serious adverse reactions occurred in 38% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=209). Serious adverse reactions reported in 2% of patients who received OPDIVO were pneumonia, esophageal fistula, interstitial lung disease and pyrexia. The following fatal adverse reactions occurred in patients who received OPDIVO: interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (1.4%), pneumonia (1.0%), septic shock (0.5%), esophageal fistula (0.5%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (0.5%), pulmonary embolism (0.5%), and sudden death (0.5%).

Read more here:
Exelixis Announces Takeda and Ono Submit Supplemental Application for CABOMETYX (cabozantinib) in Combination with OPDIVO (nivolumab) for the...

Posted in Hormone Replacement Therapy | Comments Off on Exelixis Announces Takeda and Ono Submit Supplemental Application for CABOMETYX (cabozantinib) in Combination with OPDIVO (nivolumab) for the…

Why author Val McDermid recommends drinking pale ale to help with menopause symptoms – Press and Journal

Posted: October 31, 2020 at 2:51 am

The crime writer made the revelation in a new collection of stories from women who are experiencing or have been through menopause. Here, we look at the science behind it.

Finding natural solutions to help ease your way through the menopause is a high priority for a lot of women at that time of life.

The symptoms can range from hot flushes, to night sweats, anxiety and mood swings to difficulty sleeping and even memory problems.

And while womens experiences of menopause can vary, few report coming through it without any issues.

Treatments include hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and oestrogen creams, with diet believed to play an important part.

Now, Scottish crime writer Val McDermid, has added to the list of potentially beneficial nutritional therapies by revealing her partners symptoms improved after drinking Indian pale ale (IPA).

The writer made the revelation in a new collection of stories from women who are experiencing or have been through menopause, written by presenter Kaye Adams and her co-author Vicky Allan.

Other contributors to the book, Still Hot!, include the artist Tracey Cox, presenters Carol Smillie and Anthea Turner, Trinny Woodall and Lorraine Kelly.

In an extract published in The Sunday Times, Val McDermid revealed: We had a very interesting experience last year with my partner, who is currently menopausal. We were in New Zealand for two-and-a-half months and after about a month she said: My menopausal symptoms seem to be so much easier here.

She was discussing it with a friend of hers who is a medic and he said: Have you been drinking the beer? Apparently IPA which is the principal beer in New Zealand and especially unpasteurised IPA has a lot of phytoestrogens in it. So there is a strong supposition that it could have a very positive effect on the menopause. So keep drinking the beer! My partner has discovered non-alcoholic IPAs, now a regular feature of our evening meal.

IPAs (Indian Pale Ale) are made using hops which carry plant-based compounds known as phytoestrogens. These compounds have been marketed as a natural alternative to oestrogen replacement therapy. Theyre present in soybeans, which is why soya, too, is suggested as being beneficial for women experiencing menopause.

Several years ago men were warned that drinking IPAs could contribute to man boobs because of their phytoestrogen content. But though that may have been a negative for affected males, it was a positive for women struggling with their hormones.

And while heavy drinking of alcohol has been linked with multiple health risks, moderate drinking of beer could be beneficial. As Val McDermid herself points out, alcohol-free versions are available and are at least just as good for menopause.

The results of a study carried out in Spain and published in 2012 looked at the effects of non-alcoholic hoppy beers. The researchers found that women who drank the beers with dinner had lower levels of anxiety and better sleep quality.

Drinking alcohol has been shown to increase anxiety levels and disrupt sleep quality, suggesting non-alcoholic options could be best for the insomnia that often accompanies menopause.

Menopause is caused by changes in the balance of hormones, with the ovaries producing less oestrogen and progesterone, the two key hormones that control the reproductive system.

According to the NHS website, menopause (when a woman stops having periods completely) usually occurs between 45 and 55 years of age, with the average age for a woman to reach the menopause in the UK being 51.

Symptoms can begin months or years before women stop menstruating and include night sweats, hot flushes, vaginal dryness, difficulty sleeping, low mood, anxiety, and reduced sex drive.

Eating a healthy and balanced diet is thought to play an important role in managing symptoms, and phytoestrogens appear to be particularly beneficial. If youre eating a healthy diet of fruits, vegetables, legumes (such as peas, lentils and beans) and some grains, you will already be eating them.

In addition to IPA drinks and soya-based foods, other notable sources of phytoestrogens include broccoli, carrots, coffee and tea, evening primrose oil and oranges.

Studies suggest phytoestrogens can also help prevent the bone-density loss in ageing women that is linked to menopause, with oestrogen known to help maintain normal bone density.

The web is awash with great recipe ideas for phytoestrogen-rich dishes and snacks, including Liz Earles menopause cake.

Most of the major supermarkets now carry alcohol-free IPA options. There are also several Scottish brewers producing alcohol-free IPAs to try out, including Ellon-based Brewdog, which offers this 0.5% Punk drink (carried by a couple of the major supermarekts), alongside their Nanny-State alcohol-free hoppy ale.

Edinburgh-based Jump Ship Brewing, which is dedicated to producing alcohol-free beers, also has a 0.5% Flying Colours pale ale.

Another Edinburgh-based alcohol-free brewer is Coast Beer which produces a range of IPAs available in mixed and single cases.

Gut doctor on why adding more fibre to your diet could transform your health

Originally posted here:
Why author Val McDermid recommends drinking pale ale to help with menopause symptoms - Press and Journal

Posted in Hormone Replacement Therapy | Comments Off on Why author Val McDermid recommends drinking pale ale to help with menopause symptoms – Press and Journal

Ways to cash in on regenerative medicine – The Australian Financial Review

Posted: October 29, 2020 at 3:00 pm

Despite the ethical questions, the field of stem cell research has not slowed particularly within the field of regenerative medicine where the potential for cellular regeneration to kickstart the body's repair mechanism is huge.

But is it as simple as gathering stem cells, putting them into the human body and seeing how things go?

First lets understand the balance within our bodies. Take for example bones, made up by the balance of two types of cell, osteoblasts (builders) and oesteoclasts (dissolvers).

If the body has excess osteoblasts it can lead to abnormal bone growth such as bunions through to Pagets disease. And too many osteoclast cells can lead to bone degeneration conditions such as osteoporosis. Stem cells as the natural building blocks of the body could be used to tell the existing cells how they should be acting to get the balance back and avoid these issues.

While in principle this sounds good, when it comes to degenerative diseases such as Parkinsons, multiple sclerosis, neurodegeneration and cancer, these are complex conditions where imbalances in cell development and chronic inflammation need a more detailed and complete "message" to resolve these issues.

In short, and in keeping with the theme of the US election, rather than rely on multiple random and chaotic tweets from the President, what is required is a more detailed email explaining what each cell should be doing to ensure a harmonious operating environment.

In the 1990s researchers identified that exosomes that secrete naturally from cells were not nanoparcel debris as first thought. Rather, exosomes are bioactive and have the specialised function of carrying messages to other cells in the body instructing them on how they should act.

So if exosomes could be harvested and then delivered to the specific area of the body that needs them, they could aid the bodys healing process.

Excitingly there is a listed Australian company at the forefront of this field of work. Exopharm is the owner of proprietary manufacturing technology called LEAP, which performs the exosome extraction and purification process.

The technology created by the company's chief executive, Ian Dixon, is designed to complete the purification process and facilitate the mass production of pharmaceutical-grade exosomes.

The company has candidates in testing and development, ranging from wound healing to curing dry age-related macular degeneration. Further, it recently signed exclusive IP agreements for the delivery of engineered extracellular vesicles (EEV) which can be designed to carry specific cargos to target particular cells or tissue to cure illnesses.

From an investment perspective, the exciting thing that Exopharm offers is the potential for numerous products to be commercialised using its manufacturing process. It will seek licensing arrangements and partnerships with other parties to deliver their drugs at scale using Exopharm technology

Dixon is supported by a team with experience from big pharma, including Alison Mew, previously a senior manager at CSL and now director of manufacturing and development at Exopharm.

While all biotech firms at the pre-revenue stages carry risks, specifically regulatory and financial, in the case of the latter this is somewhat mitigated for Exopharm as it seeks a model where there are upfront licensing payments for the early stage work with the potential for milestone payments and royalties in the longer term.

While this field of study may seem like science fiction, it is actively pursued in laboratories and discussed in medical journals all over the world, with large pharma refocusing their stem cell work to accommodate the development of exosomes.

Underpinned by the size of the global regenerative medicine market estimated at $US100 billlion ($141 billion) per annum and growing, the prospects for this innovative world leader look positive.

Disclaimer: Spotee and/or its directors, employees, representatives and associates hold an interest in Exopharm.

See the original post:
Ways to cash in on regenerative medicine - The Australian Financial Review

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Ways to cash in on regenerative medicine – The Australian Financial Review

Regenerative Medicine Market By Key Players, Product And Production Information Analysis And Forecast To 2026 – PRnews Leader

Posted: October 29, 2020 at 3:00 pm

AllTheResearchs latest research report provides an overview of theRegenerative Medicine market with segmentation, regional analysis and discussion of important industry trends, market share estimates and profiles of the leading key players. The identified trends that are very helpful for business decisions. The Regenerative Medicine Industry report is a valuable source of guidance for the new and prominent growths of the enterprise, the competitive evaluation, and nearby assured analysis for the reviewing size.

The global Regenerative Medicine market was valued at US$ 13.56 Mn in 2018 and is expected to reach US$ 55.67 Mn in 2026, growing at a CAGR of 23% during the forecast period.

Request for Sample with Complete TOC and Figures & Graphs @ https://www.alltheresearch.com/sample-request/232

Company Profiles mapped in Regenerative Medicine market with Competitive Intelligence:

Market Segmentation by Type, Application and Region

Based on Product Type:

Based on Application:

The Global Regenerative Medicine market analyses and researches the Regenerative Medicine development status and forecast in the United States, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia, India and Central and South America. The Global Regenerative Medicine Market focuses on global major leading industry players providing information such as company profiles, product picture and specification, capacity, production, price, cost, revenue, and contact information. Upstream raw materials and equipment and downstream demand analysis is also carried out.

The Regenerative Medicine industry development trends and marketing channels are analyzed. Finally, the feasibility of new investment projects is assessed, and overall research conclusions offered. The Regenerative Medicine Market report provides key statistics on the market status of the Regenerative Medicine manufacturers and is a valuable source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the industry.

Any questions, Lets discuss with the analyst @ https://www.alltheresearch.com/speak-to-analyst/232

How Report will help you to make decisions for business:

Browse report along with TOC, Table & figures, research methodology and many more @ https://www.alltheresearch.com/report/232/Regenerative Medicine

About AllTheResearch:

AllTheResearch was formed with the aim of making market research a significant tool for managing breakthroughs in the industry. As a leading market research provider, the firm empowers its global clients with business-critical research solutions. The outcome of our study of numerous companies that rely on market research and consulting data for their decision-making made us realise, that its not just sheer data-points, but the right analysis that creates a difference.While some clients were unhappy with the inconsistencies and inaccuracies of data, others expressed concerns over the experience in dealing with the research-firm. Also same-data-for-all-business roles was making research redundant. We identified these gaps and built AllTheResearch to raise the standards of research support.

FOR ALL YOUR RESEARCH NEEDS, REACH OUT TO US AT:

Contact Name: Rohan S.

Email:[emailprotected]

Phone: +1 (407) 768-2028

See more here:
Regenerative Medicine Market By Key Players, Product And Production Information Analysis And Forecast To 2026 - PRnews Leader

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Regenerative Medicine Market By Key Players, Product And Production Information Analysis And Forecast To 2026 – PRnews Leader

Letters to the Editor: We can afford Prop. 14; Voting for Jordan Cunningham; Poll workers should be tested before, after election – Santa Maria Times

Posted: October 29, 2020 at 3:00 pm

Over the last three months I served on the Patient and Medical Advisory Committee for Prop. 14, which will renew support for the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM).

It has been an honor and privilege to advocate for CIRM, because the research, education, and clinical trials it supports will save lives and reduce suffering. Were a diverse group, including patients, advocates, scientists, and students - brought together by the power of a state agency that has enabled a cure for children born without an immune system - so called bubble babies, and treatments for blindness and cancer.

In addition to a possible cure for diabetes, more than 90 other regenerative treatments and cures are in clinical trials. It is impossible to argue with these accomplishments.

Given that, some will argue against the economics of supporting CIRM through Prop. 14, which will involve the sale of $5.5 billion in bonds over the next 20 years. Contrast that to the $300 billion per year spent in California on healthcare.

Even if the only thing that comes from CIRM support is a cure for diabetes, it will pay for itself many times over, given that diabetes cost California $30 billion per year. But CIRM wont just enable a cure for diabetes - treatments and cures are being developed for dozens of other chronic diseases and conditions.

Can we afford Prop. 14 now, in the middle of the COVID-19 recession? We can. Bond repayments wont start for five years. After that, state revenue stimulated by CIRM will cover bond payments until 2030. At the same time, renewing support of CIRM will create 100,000 jobs. That is exactly the sort of stimulus we need right now.

Read more:
Letters to the Editor: We can afford Prop. 14; Voting for Jordan Cunningham; Poll workers should be tested before, after election - Santa Maria Times

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Letters to the Editor: We can afford Prop. 14; Voting for Jordan Cunningham; Poll workers should be tested before, after election – Santa Maria Times

Government of Canada invests in regenerative medicine, genomics research to support Canadians’ health – Benzinga

Posted: October 29, 2020 at 3:00 pm

Funding will help fight cancer and blood disorders and address environmental and agricultural challenges

OTTAWA, ON, Oct. 26, 2020 /CNW/ - As the Government of Canada focuses on responding to the challenges of COVID-19, the importance of investing in science and research is clearer than ever. These investments allow researchers to produce the breakthroughs that improve our daily lives, from delivering cutting-edge therapeutics for treating diseases and chronic conditions to developing new technologies that will help Canadian farmers better protect their crops and livestock.

Today, William Amos, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry (Science), on behalf of the Honourable Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry, announced an investment of more than $20 million to support advances in stem cell and regenerative medicine and support genomics research.

Today's investments include:

Quotes

"The Government of Canada is proud to support Canada's world-leading stem cell and genomics research community. Today's investment has the potential to save lives and come up with new ways of solving environmental and agricultural challenges. This is Canadian science and innovation in action." William Amos, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry (Science)

"The health and safety of Canadians remains the government's top priority, and the COVID-19 pandemic has illustrated the continued importance of investing in science and research. I would like to extend my congratulations and gratitude to today's recipients, who continue to work so tirelessly to improve the lives of Canadians. The Government of Canada is committed to supporting science and research, which has far-reaching impacts on Canadians' health and day-to-day lives." The Honourable Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science, and Industry

"The projects the Stem Cell Network is funding underscore the depth, breadth and innovation of this highly diverse and collaborative community. Thanks to the continued, long-term funding of the Government of Canada, we will continue to deliver leading-edge and viable stem cellbased therapeutics to treat serious illnesses and chronic diseases, for the benefit of all Canadians." Dr. Michael Rudnicki, O.C., FRS, FRSC, Scientific Director & CEO, Stem Cell Network

"Research will be a key driver of Canada's economic recovery and long-term prosperity. Investments in leading genomics research and technology will support the development of sustainable agriculture, more resilient food systems, healthier communities and a greener resource sector. Genome Canada, in partnership with the Government of Canada, is proud to support collaboration between research institutions and industry that will have transformative impacts on the lives of Canadians."Dr. Rob Annan, President and CEO, Genome Canada

Quick facts

Associated links

For Canadian Science news, follow @CDNScienceon social media: Twitter, Instagram, FacebookFollow Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada on Twitter: @ISED_CAFollow Stem Cell Network on Twitter: @StemCellNetworkFollow Genome Canada on Twitter: @GenomeCanada

SOURCE Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada

View original content: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/October2020/26/c7617.html

Read this article:
Government of Canada invests in regenerative medicine, genomics research to support Canadians' health - Benzinga

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Government of Canada invests in regenerative medicine, genomics research to support Canadians’ health – Benzinga

Regenerative Medicine Market by Type, Application, Element – Global Trends and Forecast to 2026 – News by Decresearch

Posted: October 29, 2020 at 3:00 pm

Market Study Report LLC adds a latest research study on Regenerative Medicine market Statistics for 2020-2026, which is a detailed analysis of this business space inclusive of trends, competitive landscape, and the market size. Encompassing one or more parameters among product analysis, application potential, and the regional growth landscape, Regenerative Medicine market also includes an in-depth study of the industry's competitive scenario.

The latest research report of the Regenerative Medicine market provides a comprehensive assessment of the key factors driving the industry growth. The study lists out the existing challenges and opportunities crucial to business expansion in the upcoming years. It also houses an economy-wide database to enhance business management and boasts of a dedicated section for profiling leading players. In addition, impact assessment of the COVID-19 pandemic is covered as well.

Request a sample Report of Regenerative Medicine Market at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/request-a-sample/2957730?utm_source=decresearch.com&utm_medium=AK

Main pointers from the COVDI-19 impact analysis:

Additional highlights of the Regenerative Medicine market report:

Ask for Discount on Regenerative Medicine Market Report at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/check-for-discount/2957730?utm_source=decresearch.com&utm_medium=AK

An outline of the regional analysis:

Comprehensive assessment of all opportunities and risks in the Regenerative Medicine market.

This exclusive study addresses key questions for stakeholders in the Regenerative Medicine Market:

For More Details On this Report: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-regenerative-medicine-market-report-2020-by-key-players-types-applications-countries-market-size-forecast-to-2026-based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread

Related Reports:

1. Global Albumin Market Report 2020 by Key Players, Types, Applications, Countries, Market Size, Forecast to 2026 (Based on 2020 COVID-19 Worldwide Spread)Read More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-albumin-market-report-2020-by-key-players-types-applications-countries-market-size-forecast-to-2026-based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread

2. Global Dental Supplies Market Report 2020 by Key Players, Types, Applications, Countries, Market Size, Forecast to 2026 (Based on 2020 COVID-19 Worldwide Spread)Read More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-dental-supplies-market-report-2020-by-key-players-types-applications-countries-market-size-forecast-to-2026-based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread

Read More Reports On: https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/automotive-glazing-market-growth-size-share-demand-trends-and-forecasts-to-2027-2020-10-08

Contact Us:Corporate Sales,Market Study Report LLCPhone: 1-302-273-0910Toll Free: 1-866-764-2150 Email: [emailprotected]

Visit link:
Regenerative Medicine Market by Type, Application, Element - Global Trends and Forecast to 2026 - News by Decresearch

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Regenerative Medicine Market by Type, Application, Element – Global Trends and Forecast to 2026 – News by Decresearch

Regenerative Medicine Products Market Shares, Strategies and Forecast Worldwide, 2020 to 2027 – TechnoWeekly

Posted: October 29, 2020 at 3:00 pm

The Global Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 2020 Market Research Report is a professional and in-depth study on the current state of Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Market.

This report studies the Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 market with many aspects of the industry like the market size, market status, market trends and forecast, the report also provides brief information of the competitors and the specific growth opportunities with key market drivers. Find the complete Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 market analysis segmented by companies, region, type and applications in the report.

New vendors in the market are facing tough competition from established international vendors as they struggle with technological innovations, reliability and quality issues. The report will answer questions about the current market developments and the scope of competition, opportunity cost and more.

Request Sample Report @ https://chronicalmarketresearch.com/request-for-sample-report/26169

The report discusses the various types of solutions for Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Market. While the regions considered in the scope of the report include North America, Europe, and various others. The study also emphasizes on how rising digital security threats is changing the market scenario.

Development policies and plans are discussed as well as manufacturing processes and cost structures are also analyzed. This report also states import/export consumption, supply and demand Figures, cost, price, revenue and gross margins.

This report focuses on the global Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players. The study objectives are to present the Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 development in United States, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia, India, and Central & South America.

Key Players:

The Key manufacturers that are operating in the global Regenerative Medicine Products market are:

Acelity

DePuy Synthes

Medtronic

ZimmerBiomet

Stryker

MiMedx Group

Organogenesis

UniQure

Cellular Dynamics International

Osiris Therapeutics

Vcanbio

Gamida Cell

Golden Meditech

Cytori Therapeutics

Celgene

Vericel Corporation

Guanhao Biotech

Mesoblast

Stemcell Technologes

Bellicum Pharmaceuticals

Competitive Landscape

The Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 market is a comprehensive report which offers a meticulous overview of the market share, size, trends, demand, product analysis, application analysis, regional outlook, competitive strategies, forecasts, and strategies impacting the Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Industry. The report includes a detailed analysis of the market competitive landscape, with the help of detailed business profiles, SWOT analysis, project feasibility analysis, and several other details about the key companies operating in the market.

Request Discount About This Report @ https://chronicalmarketresearch.com/discount-request-on-report/26169

The study objectives of this report are:

To study and forecast the market size of Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 in global market.

To analyze the global key players, SWOT analysis, value and global market share for top players.

To define, describe and forecast the market by type, end use and region.

To analyze and compare the market status and forecast among global major regions.

To analyze the global key regions market potential and advantage, opportunity and challenge, restraints and risks.

To identify significant trends and factors driving or inhibiting the market growth.

To analyze the opportunities in the market for stakeholders by identifying the high growth segments.

To strategically analyze each submarket with respect to individual growth trend and their contribution to the market

To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.

To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.

Following are the segments covered by the report are:

Cell Therapy

Tissue Engineering

Biomaterial

Others

By Application:

Dermatology

Cardiovascular

CNS

Orthopedic

Others

The Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 market research report completely covers the vital statistics of the capacity, production, value, cost/profit, supply/demand import/export, further divided by company and country, and by application/type for best possible updated data representation in the figures, tables, pie chart, and graphs. These data representations provide predictive data regarding the future estimations for convincing market growth. The detailed and comprehensive knowledge about our publishers makes us out of the box in case of market analysis.

Key questions answered in this report

What will the market size be in 2026 and what will the growth rate be?

What are the key market trends?

What is driving this market?

What are the challenges to market growth?

Who are the key vendors in this market space?

What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the key vendors?

What are the strengths and weaknesses of the key vendors?

Request For Customization About This Report @ https://chronicalmarketresearch.com/request-for-customization/26169

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Global Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Market Overview

Chapter 2: Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Market Data Analysis

Chapter 3: Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Technical Data Analysis

Chapter 4: Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Government Policy and News

Chapter 5: Global Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Market Manufacturing Process and Cost Structure

Chapter 6: Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Productions Supply Sales Demand Market Status and Forecast

Chapter 7: Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Key Manufacturers

Chapter 8: Up and Down Stream Industry Analysis

Chapter 9: Marketing Strategy -Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Analysis

Chapter 10: Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Development Trend Analysis

Chapter 11: Global Regenerative Medicine Products for Covid-19 Market New Project Investment Feasibility Analysis

Contact Us

Chronical Market Research,

4004 W Lake Sammamish,

Pkway B9 Redmond,

WA 98052 United States.

Tel: +44 115 888 3028

Web: http://www.chronicalmarketresearch.com

About Us

At Chronical Market Research, we understand that the research we provide is only as good as the outcome it inspires. These reports are generated by well-renowned publishers on the basis of the data acquired from an extensive research and credible business statistics. Thats why we are proud to provide the widest range of research products, multilingual 24/7 customer support and dedicated custom research services to deliver the insights you need to achieve your goals. Take a look at few of our aspects that makes Chronical Market Research an asset to your business.

Excerpt from:
Regenerative Medicine Products Market Shares, Strategies and Forecast Worldwide, 2020 to 2027 - TechnoWeekly

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Regenerative Medicine Products Market Shares, Strategies and Forecast Worldwide, 2020 to 2027 – TechnoWeekly

Regenerative Medicine Market Analysis and In-depth Research on Size, Trends, Emerging Growth Factors and Forecasts 2026 – PRnews Leader

Posted: October 29, 2020 at 3:00 pm

The Global Regenerative Medicine Market research report is a comprehensive study of the Regenerative Medicine industry and its prospects. The global Regenerative Medicine Market was valued at US$ 13.56 Mn in 2018 and is expected to reach US$ 55.67 Mn Mn by 2026, expanding at a CAGR of 23% during the forecast period.

The global Regenerative Medicine market has been subjected to several regulatory compliances and crucial coding terminology over the years. Adherence to regulatory standards remains crucial for vendors.

The study considers the present scenario of the Regenerative Medicine market and its market dynamics for the period 20202026. It covers a detailed overview of several market growth enablers, restraints, and trends. The report covers both the demand and supply aspect of the market. This research report on the Regenerative Medicine market covers sizing and forecast, market share, industry trends, growth drivers, and vendor analysis.

Browse Full Research report along with TOC, Tables & Figures: https://www.alltheresearch.com/report/232/Regenerative Medicine

The study profiles and examines leading companies and other prominent companies operating in the Regenerative Medicine industry.

List of key players profiled in the report:

Regenerative Medicine Market segmentation as per below:

Product Types:

Applications:

Request for Sample Copy of Report to get more information about the market @ https://www.alltheresearch.com/sample-request/232

COVID-19 Impact on Regenerative Medicine Industry

The outbreak of COVID-19 has bought along a global recession, which has impacted several industries. Along with this impact COVID Pandemic has also generated few new business opportunities for Regenerative Medicine market. Overall competitive landscape and market dynamics of Regenerative Medicine has been disrupted due to this pandemic. All these disruptions and impacts has been analysed quantifiably in this report, which is backed by market trends, events and revenue shift analysis. COVID impact analysis also covers strategic adjustments for Tier 1, 2 and 3 players of Regenerative Medicine market.

The competitive environment in the Regenerative Medicine market is intensifying. The market currently witnesses the presence of several major as well as other prominent vendors, contributing toward the market growth. However, the market is observing an influx of local vendors entering the market.

Request COVID19 Impact Analysis on Regenerative Medicine Industry Sample Report @ https://www.alltheresearch.com/impactC19-request/232

Vendors can consider targeting key regions such as APAC, North America, and Europe to gather maximum customer attention. Countries in the APAC region such as China, India, and Japan among others are expected to display significant growth prospects in the future due to high economic growth forecasts along with huge population statistics leading to high consumption of goods and products.

Regional Overview & Analysis of Regenerative Medicine Market:

North America(US and Canada)

Europe(UK, Germany, France and Rest of Europe)

Asia Pacific(China, Japan, India and Rest of Asia Pacific)

Latin America(Brazil, Mexico and Rest of Latin America)

Middle East & Africa(GCC and Rest of Middle East & Africa)

The changing regulatory compliance scenario and the growing purchasing power among consumers are likely to promise well for the North America market. New product development and technological advancements remain key for competitors to capitalize upon in the Regenerative Medicine industry across the globe.

Report Snapshot:

Report Coverage

Details

Base Year:

2018

Historical Data for:

2014 to 2018

Forecast Period:

2020 to2026

Market Size in 2018:

USD 13.56 Mn

Forecast Period 2020 to 2026 CAGR:

23%

2026 Value Projection:

USD 55.67 Mn

Ask for more details or request custom reports from our industry experts at @ https://www.alltheresearch.com/customization/232

Key Market Insights:

Read more:
Regenerative Medicine Market Analysis and In-depth Research on Size, Trends, Emerging Growth Factors and Forecasts 2026 - PRnews Leader

Posted in Regenerative Medicine | Comments Off on Regenerative Medicine Market Analysis and In-depth Research on Size, Trends, Emerging Growth Factors and Forecasts 2026 – PRnews Leader

Page 846«..1020..845846847848..860870..»